Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 09:35 25 Apr 2024
- Labour pledges to renationalise most rail services within five years
- Labour pledges to renationalise most rail services
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

No 'On This Day' events reported for 25th Apr

Train RunningShort Run
06:40 Penzance to Cardiff Central
Delayed
06:44 Exeter St Davids to Cardiff Central
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 08:49 Plymouth to Cardiff Central
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 25, 2024, 09:40:44 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[127] Lack of rolling stock due to attacks on shipping in the Red Se...
[109] Labour to nationalise railways within five years of coming to ...
[82] Theft from Severn Valley Railway
[46] Where have I been?
[45] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[38] Death of another bus station?
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: OTD - 6th Feb (1986) - Class 151 enters public service  (Read 1332 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40824



View Profile WWW Email
« on: February 05, 2022, 23:20:07 »

Some of us (see end of article if not you) are familiar with Classes 150, 153, 158 and 159, but what happened to the missing numbers?

Our good friend 150002 was used as a testbed for various feature and was classified as class 154 for the purpose.

42 2 car units of class 155 were built by British Leyland, but 35 of them were later converted to class 153, making 70 of them. The remain 7 still operate in Yorkshire

114 class 156 units were built, and they can be found is Scotland and the North and East of England

21 units of class 157 - called Strathclyde Sprinters - were planned but never got off the drawing board

Class 152 was another planned-but-didn't happen - a conversion plan from class 156 2 car trains to class 152 single carriage multiple units in the same way that 155s became 153s.

So what about the remaining number - class 151 was a class 150 rival. According to something I read, after testing it entered schedule passenger serice on 6th February 1986.

From Wikipedia:

Quote
Development of the Class 151 commenced during 1983 in response to a specification issued by BR (British Rail(ways)) calling for a new generation of DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) with which to equip its fleet. Both Metro Cammell and British Rail Engineering Limited (BREL (British Rail Engineering Ltd)) were selected to produce prototypes of their design submissions. Accordingly, a pair of 3-car units were constructed, which entered trial service with BR during 1985. If it had emerged successful, the Class 151 would have likely become the basis of Sprinter family of DMUs that were produced during the 1980s. However, following a competitive evaluation against the rival Class 150, the type did not secure a production contract, having lost out to its BREL-built rival. Both units were withdrawn during 1989 and, despite multiple vendors planning to restore them for service, they were ultimately scrapped.


Want to see more?  http://www.traintesting.com/Class151.htm

* Other numbers
Class 150 - local diesel units 2 cars used across the country including South West
Class 153 - single carriage trains, no longer in use in South West but were here until quite recently
Class 158 - regional and longer distance units - 2 and 3 car, end doors, corridor throughout, aircon
Class 159 - South West[ern] [trains/railway] 3 car units - minor conversion from class 158.
« Last Edit: February 06, 2022, 06:30:03 by grahame » Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40824



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1 on: February 06, 2022, 07:11:54 »

Perhaps an ordered list would be a good idea - showing (bolded) those which have been operated by GWR (Great Western Railway) or SWR» (South Western Railway - about) during the lifetime of the forum. Italics for those never built, Navy for prototypes  / test sets

"Pacer"s
Class 140 - prototype unit - around from 1981
Class 141 - Used in north of England. Withdrawn by 1997; many exported to Iran
Class 142 - Mainly used in Wales and north of England, some loans to South West
Class 143 - Used by FGW (First Great Western) / GWR until quite recently
Class 144 - Used almost exclusively in the North East

"Sprinter"s
Class 150 - local diesel units 2 cars used across the country including South West
Class 151 - prototype units - around in the late 1980s
Class 152 - never built / converted single carriage trains
Class 153 - single carriage trains, no longer in use in South West but were here until quite recently
Class 154 - prototype unit converted from 150, redesignated back
Class 155 - 2 car units mostly converted to class 153. Some remain in Yorkshire
Class 156 - Common in North and East - not made it to South and West
Class 157 - never built - planned for Strathclyde
Class 158 - regional and longer distance units - 2 and 3 car, end doors, corridor throughout, aircon
Class 159 - South West[ern] [trains/railway] 3 car units - minor conversion from class 158.

"Turbo"s
Class 165 - Outer Suburban trains
Class 166 - Full airconditioned variety of class 165
Class 168 - Turbostar units used by Chiltern Railways
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18921



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: February 06, 2022, 11:48:32 »

To add. Class 153s are single car conversions from 2 car Class 155s.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
Richard Fairhurst
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1209


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: February 06, 2022, 13:25:05 »

The 151s sat around in the sidings south of Crewe in the early 00s - I remember passing them many times. It seemed a shame at the time that (in theory) serviceable units were going for scrap, but 20 years on we've just had all the 365s go the same way...
Logged
eightonedee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1536



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: February 06, 2022, 18:12:08 »

Quote
but 20 years on we've just had all the 365s go the same way...

What - is that right - aren't they those the Networker generation, Turbo look-alikes that use to work the Kings Cross-Cambridge-King's Lynn services with nice comfortable 4 across seating?

Why on earth are these being scrapped when those grottier 317s are being slowly and inefficiently bodged as bi-/tri- modes instead?

No doubt there's some technical (or accountancy?) reason, but I'd like to know what it is!

It looks a poor state of affairs when the electrification seems to have stalled, unsuitable high density Turbos are being refurbished for rural cross-country/middle distance work, the 769 delays continue and (if I have got my identification right ) newer and better OHL (Over-Head Line) trains are being scrapped.
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4362


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: February 07, 2022, 07:36:43 »

Quote
but 20 years on we've just had all the 365s go the same way...

What - is that right - aren't they those the Networker generation, Turbo look-alikes that use to work the Kings Cross-Cambridge-King's Lynn services with nice comfortable 4 across seating?

Why on earth are these being scrapped when those grottier 317s are being slowly and inefficiently bodged as bi-/tri- modes instead?

No doubt there's some technical (or accountancy?) reason, but I'd like to know what it is!

It looks a poor state of affairs when the electrification seems to have stalled, unsuitable high density Turbos are being refurbished for rural cross-country/middle distance work, the 769 delays continue and (if I have got my identification right ) newer and better OHL (Over-Head Line) trains are being scrapped.

465 are being with drawn as well.  There are problems with the traction packages on the X65 Networkers add that to the excess of EMU (Electric Multiple Unit)'s with the introduction of the class 700 on Thameslink etc.

319 are already dual Voltage units where as the X65 EMU are single Voltage making the 319 simpler to modify to bi-mode
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7170


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: February 07, 2022, 12:52:49 »

Classes 319 and 365 have quite a lot in common. Both were designed for both AC and DC (Direct Current) supplies, and have a 750 V DC bus feeding the motor drives. Both use GTO thyristors, which are halfway between plain thyristors and IGBTs (Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistor) in what they can do.

In 319s the thyristors replace the cam switches, resistors etc in controlling DC motors. The 365s were the first (I think) use of AC motors with a variable voltage/variable frequency drive. This is now the standard design, but using IGBTs. While 365s were built for DC as well as AC, this was hardly used and over the years bits have gone missing and become obsolete and unreplaceable. For a thorough rebuilt this isn't a big issue, though perhaps adds cost.

In choosing 319s for the 769 conversion, availability was one factor for Porterbrook. The 365s have the odd "feature" of being accidentally nationalised, though that ought not to matter in this (but I'm sure does). Also, there are only 40 of them, pushing up the fixed costs (design etc.) per each - which is academic, with hindsight.

But the real technical issues are only going to be known to those involved. It may well be that the motor drive in the 365s would not cope well with whatever the motor-generator sets put out. Or maybe the DC motor drive is seen as more robust.

And opinions vary as to the relative grottiness of the two classes.

How much you can afford to change, and still keep the theoretical cost advantage of existing stock, is only going to be apparent in the spreadsheet of costs. But really those are just estimates, and not likely to survive contact with actual trains. As Porterbrook have disccovered.

Almost anything might be "worth" replacing. There was talk at Porterbrook of doing a similar add-a-diesel job on the 455s which have had their old DC motors and controls replaced by modern AC motors/drives but are still now due for scrapping.  That would lack AC capability, so would they do better to transplant those motors into something else?
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5318


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: February 07, 2022, 16:25:03 »

I’ve a funny feeling that the new AC motors on the SW 455s will be tailored to the specific bogies, and will still be fitted during their final move to the scrapyard.  Might the relatively new traction electronic packages be recyclable onto another class though?  I suppose the number of DC (Direct Current) motored classes is quickly reducing to minimal numbers, unfortunately…
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page