Great Western Coffee Shop

Journey by Journey => London to Reading => Topic started by: johoare on December 27, 2007, 16:34:21



Title: Today 27/12/2007
Post by: johoare on December 27, 2007, 16:34:21
Well.. Having worked most of the night, and being allowed a couple of hours sleep.. I decided to get the (later than I planned) 11.37 Maidenhead to Paddington to work.. It was one of the few (hourly) fastish trains timetabled...

But it was cancelled.. I ended up on the 11.12 which was running very late, stopped everywhere and was, as expected in the circumstances, crammed full of people..

And all I wanted to do was get to work! I felt quite ill by the time I got to Paddington...

Oh, and despite the fact it was a quietish train day, we got dumped on platform 14 anyway.. why do they keep doing this? Those platforms should be for emergencies only... There were other empty platforms today. I didn't want a 5 minute walk with hundreds of other people just to get to Paddington when I was already late..

Thank you to the train driver for all his annoucements though.. and keeping us well informed..


Title: Re: Today 27/12/2007
Post by: devon_metro on December 27, 2007, 16:44:05
Bear in mind there was a broken down train which threw the whole of Reading - Paddington into chaos (again)

I'm sure there was also a perfectly good reason why that platform was used   :)


Title: Re: Today 27/12/2007
Post by: BBM on December 27, 2007, 19:21:24
I'm sure there was also a perfectly good reason why that platform was used   :)

Well if there is a good reason I'd like to hear it! I've lost count of the number of times over the past few years when I've been dumped in 13 or 14 at off-peak times whilst 9, 10, 11 & 12 were all completely empty. It happens time and time again!  >:(


Title: Re: Today 27/12/2007
Post by: Ollie on December 27, 2007, 19:26:19
Platforms 13 and 14 are only used by Turbo operated services.

Platform 12 is primarily for the Heathrow Connect except in peak when is sometimes used by Turbo operated services.

Platforms 1-5 and 8-11 can be used by Turbo and HST/Adelante

During times of disruption it is better to put a turbo on 13/14 so a HST can possibly use some of the other platforms.

Also the fact Platform 14 could have been the booked platform anyway, e.g. the train you came in on could have been going back out to Greenford?


Title: Re: Today 27/12/2007
Post by: devon_metro on December 27, 2007, 19:39:33
I'm sure there was also a perfectly good reason why that platform was used   :)

Well if there is a good reason I'd like to hear it! I've lost count of the number of times over the past few years when I've been dumped in 13 or 14 at off-peak times whilst 9, 10, 11 & 12 were all completely empty. It happens time and time again!  >:(

The driver has no control, I don't think Slough IECC are overly bothered that some punters have to walk further either.


Title: Re: Today 27/12/2007
Post by: johoare on December 27, 2007, 23:29:34
Platforms 13 and 14 are only used by Turbo operated services.

Platform 12 is primarily for the Heathrow Connect except in peak when is sometimes used by Turbo operated services.

Platforms 1-5 and 8-11 can be used by Turbo and HST/Adelante

During times of disruption it is better to put a turbo on 13/14 so a HST can possibly use some of the other platforms.

Also the fact Platform 14 could have been the booked platform anyway, e.g. the train you came in on could have been going back out to Greenford?

So even though FGW tell us that local services are not less important than HST's... they are?

I could just about understand it if it was a busy rush hour, but it wasn't! Half the platforms were empty, and I am sure they stayed that way...  I am fed up with having an extra 5 minutes added to my (usually) delayed train by having to walk the rest of the way. I know of no other London mainline stations where two platforms are further away from the main station than leicester square tube is to covent garden tube.. As someone else on here said a while back, it's like another station. And should be treated as such!


Title: Re: Today 27/12/2007
Post by: johoare on December 27, 2007, 23:31:08
I'm sure there was also a perfectly good reason why that platform was used   :)

Well if there is a good reason I'd like to hear it! I've lost count of the number of times over the past few years when I've been dumped in 13 or 14 at off-peak times whilst 9, 10, 11 & 12 were all completely empty. It happens time and time again!  >:(

The driver has no control, I don't think Slough IECC are overly bothered that some punters have to walk further either.

Maybe the people in charge of putting trains on platform 13/14 (when there is no apparent good reason) should be made to do this journey every day then!


Title: Re: Today 27/12/2007
Post by: devon_metro on December 28, 2007, 10:44:30
Platforms 13 and 14 are only used by Turbo operated services.

Platform 12 is primarily for the Heathrow Connect except in peak when is sometimes used by Turbo operated services.

Platforms 1-5 and 8-11 can be used by Turbo and HST/Adelante

During times of disruption it is better to put a turbo on 13/14 so a HST can possibly use some of the other platforms.

Also the fact Platform 14 could have been the booked platform anyway, e.g. the train you came in on could have been going back out to Greenford?

So even though FGW tell us that local services are not less important than HST's... they are?

I could just about understand it if it was a busy rush hour, but it wasn't! Half the platforms were empty, and I am sure they stayed that way...  I am fed up with having an extra 5 minutes added to my (usually) delayed train by having to walk the rest of the way. I know of no other London mainline stations where two platforms are further away from the main station than leicester square tube is to covent garden tube.. As someone else on here said a while back, it's like another station. And should be treated as such!

Its not FGW saying that.

Railways work by classing trains and by using headcodes.

A headcode is basically the identity of the train seen at the signal box and through various other railway systems.

A headcode is a 4 digit/letter code, 1A05 for example, in this case the 0640 Bristol - Paddington.

The first number is how important the train is. 1 stands for an express passenger train such as an HST. 2 would be a local surburban service such as the stopping turbo you are on. As a result your train is less important to the signal box and a class '1' train would get priority over a junction/platform.

The second letter in the headcode is the destination, 'A' referring to London, and the last two letters are the individual identity.

Hope that clears up why local commuter trains are often not given the same priority as high speed trains, regardless of FGWs view on it. At the end of the day Slough IECC (the signal box) make the decision as to which train goes in front of you, which platform etc etc


Title: Re: Today 27/12/2007
Post by: Lee on December 28, 2007, 11:08:50
More on yesterday's events (link below.)
http://www.maidenhead-advertiser.co.uk/news_article.php?section=5&category=89&story=5208


Title: Re: Today 27/12/2007
Post by: devon_metro on December 28, 2007, 11:17:52
Didn't think to mention that it WASN'T a FGW train that broke down did they?


Title: Re: Today 27/12/2007
Post by: vacman on December 28, 2007, 12:27:49
A class 2 train is a "normal" passenger train whilst a class 1 is an "express" passenger or mail train, don't mean to be a smart arse but i'm bored.  :D


Title: Re: Today 27/12/2007
Post by: TerminalJunkie on December 28, 2007, 12:37:42
Quote from: vacman
don't mean to be a smart arse but i'm bored.  :D

Do you mind? That's my excuse! (http://www.takeforum.com/forum/images/smiles/cy.gif)


Title: Re: Today 27/12/2007
Post by: vacman on December 28, 2007, 12:39:10
Well it is Christmas  ;D


Title: Re: Today 27/12/2007
Post by: johoare on December 28, 2007, 18:20:09
Didn't think to mention that it WASN'T a FGW train that broke down did they?

Well unless FGW were misquoted, they hadn't mentioned it wasn't one of their trains either.. I guess the Maidenhead advertiser were just reporting what they'd been told?

I quote from the article...
"A spokesman for the company said: "There were problems this morning with broken down services at Hayes and Harlington."

Usual lack of information then!


Title: Re: Today 27/12/2007
Post by: Mookiemoo on December 28, 2007, 20:15:50
Didn't think to mention that it WASN'T a FGW train that broke down did they?

Well unless FGW were misquoted, they hadn't mentioned it wasn't one of their trains either.. I guess the Maidenhead advertiser were just reporting what they'd been told?

I quote from the article...
"A spokesman for the company said: "There were problems this morning with broken down services at Hayes and Harlington."

Usual lack of information then!

All FGW had to do was say....

"A spokesman for the company said: "There were problems this morning with broken down XYZ services at Hayes and Harlington."



This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net