Great Western Coffee Shop

Sideshoots - associated subjects => Campaigns for new and improved services => Topic started by: ellendune on August 25, 2014, 19:26:08



Title: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: ellendune on August 25, 2014, 19:26:08
Has anyone seen this proposal to reopen the Cirencester branch from Kemble to Chesterton Lane on the outskirts of Cirencester?

Cirencester Community Railway (http://cirentrain.org.uk/index.html)


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: ChrisB on August 25, 2014, 19:32:28
4 miles? Just right for a bus?


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: grahame on August 25, 2014, 20:46:20
4 miles? Just right for a bus?

comparison with other restored / restoring public transport corridors

Bere Alston to Tavistock (pop 11k), 5 miles
Kemble to Cirencester (pop 19k), 5 miles
Brigend to Maesteg (pop 20k), 9 miles
Stirling to Alloa (pop 18k), 7.5 miles
Cambridge to St Ives (pop 16k), 16 miles

From Cirencester, the 4 miles is a bit of a red herring as most passengers would be headed for Swindon.  But is there capacity south of Kemble.   Oh - wait  ;D ;D ;D - there is now!


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: John R on August 25, 2014, 20:47:28
Some very suspect assumptions in the document.

Cost of 5km of reinstated track and ballast is put at 300k - that sounds very light.

The comment about adding a halt purely for the B&B also raised an eyebrow. Really? Constructing a halt purely for one B&B? And you can stop the train there by sending a text or an email.

Finally, it talks about having a battery operated vehicle to minimise noise pollution, although it then states that such technology doesn't exist yet, but later on assumes that one of the 3 ROSCOs will be willing to provide suitable rolling stock. Yeah, right?  They're going to be falling over themselves to provide one unit of a design type that doesn't yet exist. (And why is noise such an issue for a unit that will shuttle up and down a couple of times an hour.)

Ironically, I think there are worse candidates for reinstatement of a branch line, but it needs a better thought through proposal than this.


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: ellendune on August 25, 2014, 20:55:00
I agree with al that has been said.

I think the only service that would make sense would be a Cirencester to Swindon Service, with possible additional stops at Kemble, Purton and Moredon Bridge (for the large estates in North Swindon).


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: patch38 on August 25, 2014, 22:45:37
The best route for that is the old Midland and South Western Junction Railway from Cirencester to Swindon, some of which still exists as the Swindon and Cricklade heritage line. The trouble is that bits of Cricklade and most of North Swindon have now encroached on the old line so it would be a non-starter.


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: eightf48544 on August 25, 2014, 22:50:40
The best route for that is the old Midland and South Western Junction Railway from Cirencester to Swindon, some of which still exists as the Swindon and Cricklade heritage line. The trouble is that bits of Cricklade and most of North Swindon have now encroached on the old line so it would be a non-starter.
I agree with al that has been said.

I think the only service that would make sense would be a Cirencester to Swindon Service, with possible additional stops at Kemble, Purton and Moredon Bridge (for the large estates in North Swindon).

The S&C have plans for station on the Kemble line somewhere in North Swindon.

So a Swindon - Cirencester service with new stations could be a runner.


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: ellendune on August 25, 2014, 22:56:15
The best route for that is the old Midland and South Western Junction Railway from Cirencester to Swindon, some of which still exists as the Swindon and Cricklade heritage line. The trouble is that bits of Cricklade and most of North Swindon have now encroached on the old line so it would be a non-starter.

Re-opening the MSWJ line from a new junction at Moredon to Cirencester via Cricklade would be a much bigger and more expensive project and although it would add Cricklade to the traffic that is only the same size as Purton so the traffic generated would be little different.


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: eightf48544 on August 26, 2014, 08:09:00
A Swindon S Bahn service!


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on August 26, 2014, 23:11:55
The comment about adding a halt purely for the B&B also raised an eyebrow. Really? Constructing a halt purely for one B&B?

Interestingly, John R, there is a precedent for just such an arrangement - on the other old branch line out of Kemble, towards Tetbury: Trouble House Halt.

See http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=7639.0  ;) :D ;D


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: Oberon on August 29, 2014, 16:24:12
If this project ever gets legs I'll eat my hat. It's a nice thought but I imagine the cost, whatever they say, would be prohibitive. Cirencester-Swindon with re-opened stations on the main line makes more sense but again cost would surely rule this out. My own preference for re-opening would be Savernake-Marlborough, with a railhead & park & ride at the terminus, electrified all the way to Paddington - dream on..


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on March 11, 2016, 22:34:46
Re-opening the Cirencester Branch is talked about from time to time including on the Coffee Shop: http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=14439.0 (http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=14439.0)

I really don't think they will get far as the route has been built over in Cirencester and that means that you would have to travel to a station on the outskirts for a 3 mile ride to Kemble.

Nice but hopeless.

Hence the profusion of smileys in my post.  Although the re-opened Portishead branch line will involve travelling to a new station further out of the centre of town than the original one. ;)


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: Bmblbzzz on April 27, 2016, 11:55:12
Reopening the branch to Ciren would not be worth it, it's only a few miles anyway. However, if the entire length of the old line could be rebuilt all the way to Moreton-in-Marsh, calling at Northleach, Bourton-on-the-Water and Stow-on-the-Wold (useful for the fire brigades college!)...

(<insert smilies of choice>)


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: Richard Fairhurst on April 27, 2016, 15:07:56
That would be an all-new line (albeit a rather good one) - Northleach never had a railway station. The line north from Cirencester Watermoor went to Chedworth, Andoversford, and Cheltenham: at Andoversford, there was a junction to Bourton, Stow and Kingham, and thence to Chipping Norton and Banbury.

I don't think there was ever a connection between this line and the GWR branch from Kemble, which terminated at Cirencester Town rather than Watermoor.

That said, if you're around Cirencester and have a few million pounds and an excavator, restoring the Thames & Severn Canal would be a much more enjoyable cause. :D


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: Bmblbzzz on April 27, 2016, 16:01:41
That's a lesson in the dangers of over-interpreting what you see on an OS map.  :-[ ;)


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: ellendune on April 27, 2016, 20:07:52
That would be an all-new line (albeit a rather good one) - Northleach never had a railway station. The line north from Cirencester Watermoor went to Chedworth, Andoversford, and Cheltenham: at Andoversford, there was a junction to Bourton, Stow and Kingham, and thence to Chipping Norton and Banbury.
An interesting view I think the GWR would have put it as:

The line north from Cirencester Watermoor went to Chedworth, and joined the Cheltenham to Banbury (via, Bourton, Stow and Kingham and Chipping Norton) at Andoversford.


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: patch38 on May 09, 2016, 11:35:11
Plans in motion to bring new trainline to Cirencester

http://www.wiltsglosstandard.co.uk/news/14479243.Plans_in_motion_to_bring_new_trainline_to_Cirencester (http://www.wiltsglosstandard.co.uk/news/14479243.Plans_in_motion_to_bring_new_trainline_to_Cirencester)

Quote
THE capital of the Cotswolds may soon have its first train link in 50 years.

Early plans are afoot to reopen the defunct line between Cirencester and Kemble, serviced by an ultra-modern, eco-friendly train.

Cirencester's Mayor Cllr Mark Harris is spearheading the innovative project along with Richard and Jane Gunner, of Whiteway Farm, to lay 5km of track from the commuter station to the edge of the proposed Chesterton development.

At a Cotswold District Council (CDC) cabinet meeting in April, Cllr Harris and Kemble councillor Tony Berry laid out the vision to fellow members, saying a car park could be laid under electricity pylons in Cirencester and a regular bus route could ferry passengers to the town centre.

They explained the proposal was being driven by Warwick University, among others, where researchers were keen to test a new driverless ^very light train^ train it is developing.

It is hoped funding could come from county business promoter GFrist LEP, the EU or other funding bodies.

Cllr Harris told the Standard that proposals were in their early stages but if everything went to plan trains could be whistling along the track in three to five years.

^We^re lucky that it is already very flat, though there is still a lot of work to do, including putting up a bridge over the Kemble road,^ he said.

^But it would reduce the need for parking, reduce cars on the road, and allow people in Cirencester to get to places like Gloucester and Stroud much more easily.^

Around 1,700 more travel in to Cirencester every day than travel out, creating congestion on the roads and pressure on parking.

A new train line with carriages able to fit around 100 people could ease these problems, while giving commuters a fast link to London.

Cirencester station was closed as part of the Beeching Report in the 1960s, along with thousands of smaller stations across the country deemed ^unprofitable^. The former station in Sheep Street was one of the 2,128 which closed.

Mayor Harris and the Gunners are meeting with the team from Warwick University and Geoffrey Clifton Brown to discuss the idea. He hopes a cycle track could accompany the line if plans go ahead.

The move received tentative support from CDC deputy leader Nicholas Parsons who said it was ^an interesting concept^.

Many other other groups in Cirencester have also voiced their support for the project.

They hope the move will bring down the Cotswolds^ carbon footprint while taking cars off the road.

To find out more about the project go to cirentrain.org.uk.


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: Bmblbzzz on May 09, 2016, 13:56:49
Having the landowner in favour has to be a good sign, though I can't actually find Whiteway Farm on a map. Nevertheless, it does sound more than a little... experimental. 


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: Stroud Valleys on May 09, 2016, 14:03:40
Its cheaper to run a bus service.

If the council provide the funds for a 6 month trial, matching whatever proposed timetable for the proposed link, lets see how many would use the service.


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: patch38 on May 09, 2016, 14:18:22
though I can't actually find Whiteway Farm on a map.  

I think that may be poor journalism. If you download the scheme document, its authors are from Whiteway House, The Whiteway - which is a road off the A417 to the NE of Ciren (i.e. not particularly near the scheme itself...)


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: grahame on May 09, 2016, 14:33:26
Its cheaper to run a bus service.

If the council provide the funds for a 6 month trial, matching whatever proposed timetable for the proposed link, lets see how many would use the service.

Our evidence from the TransWilts is that only a small proportion of people who would use a train would use a bus, and that it's not practical to run a bus to train times .... by the time the bus reaches its destination on the first run of the day, the train would be halfway back to where it started.

My comment isn't about Kemble to Cirencester links - not something I've studied - but just to suggest that a trial bus service wouldn't map without fudge factors onto a train service, and those fudge factors would dominate the results to the degree that the results would be highly questionable.


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: patch38 on May 09, 2016, 14:46:27
There are already bus services from Cirencester to Kemble (93, 855 and 881 from three different operators). I have no knowledge of how well used these are and how well they connect with the rail services from Kemble.

Presumably the biggest bonus of the proposed scheme is that there will be plentiful car parking at the Cirencester end which may well not be the case with the current bus services. Parking in Cirencester does, in my limited experience, seem to require a second mortgage!


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: Bmblbzzz on May 09, 2016, 14:47:31
though I can't actually find Whiteway Farm on a map.  

I think that may be poor journalism. If you download the scheme document, its authors are from Whiteway House, The Whiteway - which is a road off the A417 to the NE of Ciren (i.e. not particularly near the scheme itself...)
When poor journalism meets assumptions on the part of the reader, the result is error.  :-[

I did find a Railway Covert though.  8)
http://streetmap.co.uk/map.srf?X=400962&Y=199229&A=Y&Z=115


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: grahame on May 16, 2016, 07:05:18
Latest discussions in part of Kemble car park thread at http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=462.msg195131#msg195131

Also from the Wilts and Glousester standard (http://m.wiltsglosstandard.co.uk/news/14479243.Plans_in_motion_to_bring_new_trainline_to_Cirencester/?ref=rl&lp=1)

(http://www.wellho.net/pix/ccslight.jpg)


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: eightf48544 on May 16, 2016, 10:32:37
Very interesting picture. What's the unit? Looks like a single car Desiro/ Talent/Flirt?


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: grahame on May 16, 2016, 10:49:19
Very interesting picture. What's the unit? Looks like a single car Desiro/ Talent/Flirt?

I don't know what it is.   It says "St Erth for St Ives". I haven't been that far down for many years ... thought it was still mostly 150s  ;D


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: patch38 on May 16, 2016, 11:06:38
I believe it's a proposed VLR (Very Light Rail) vehicle. Details here (http://www.verylightrail.com/).


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: Oberon on May 21, 2016, 21:44:07
Does anybody know anything about this?

 https://www.facebook.com/?ref=tn_tnmn


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: JayMac on May 21, 2016, 22:27:14
The Facebook log in page?

Or, if already logged in, the top of one's timeline?


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: Oberon on May 22, 2016, 08:25:18
Sorry - this was a story from the Wilts & Gloucester Standard newspaper: -


Quote
"EARLY plans to bring a new railway line into Cirencester are steaming ahead after a meeting with top government officials.

The capital of the Cotswolds was buzzing with excitement last week after the Standard broke the news that new track could be laid along the line to Kemble, opening Cirencester to the national rail network for the first time since 1964.

Mayor Mark Harris and Richard and Jane Gunner, of Whiteway Farm, are forging forward with the proposal which would see an ultra-modern, eco-friendly train running the 5km from station to station.

Mayor Harris, who was elected for a second term last week, said he had been "inundated with messages of support for the vision".

"Everyone is incredibly excited about the prospect of reopening the Kemble to Cirencester railway line," he said.

"It is important to stress that at this stage we are looking at carrying out a feasibility study which will address issues such as: is it physically possible? How will landowners be effected? Does it have public support and, crucially, will people actually use it?"

Last Wednesday he went to London to pitch the idea to the Department of Transport in order to get funds for that feasibility study.

The "Dragon's Den-type event" included a panel of Lord Faulkner of Worcester, millionaire and train enthusiast Sir William McAlpine, senior tourism figure Debbie Wells and Mark Garnier MP."

The phrases "steaming ahead" and "top government officials" do little to inject any optimism into this story, but who knows, somebody on the Forum might be able to shed some light on this.



Edit by FT. N! for a bit of tidying up of fonts.


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: ellendune on May 22, 2016, 08:27:35
We have a thread on this somewhere. 
http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=14439.0 (http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=14439.0)


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: bobm on May 22, 2016, 09:30:32
With thanks to ellendune for pointing it out, I have now merged the two topics in question.


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: Spaceship on May 22, 2016, 19:41:00
Maybe a bigger / faster version of a Class 139 could be used here or a DMU shuttling back and fourth

From a practical point of view the trackbed in Cirencester is a little built on so if using the branch from Kemble they would need to realign slightly and terminate next to the industrial estate near the allotments or compulsory purchase property to get any closer to the old station site in the town centre.


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: eightf48544 on May 22, 2016, 23:53:38
Just a thought. Wouldn't a through service to Swindon be more useful given the relatively short distance which makes a change at Kemble a nuisance?

Possibly also serving the proposed junction station with the Swindon and Cricklade Railway in north Swindon.


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: TonyK on May 26, 2016, 22:34:26
By sublime coincidence, Mrs FT, N! was today left hanging around Kemble station for half an hour for the bus to Cirencester.

As Spaceship points out, the track bed has been largely built on within Cirencester, and what remains of the station is surrounded by buildings and roads. The trackbed from Kemble is still very obvious, as is that to Tetbury so far as Tesco, albeit missing a few bridges. In another political climate, it could be a contender for light rail, but I can't see it happening.


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: ChrisB on July 19, 2016, 14:58:54
I'm sure there was a thread on this topic...

From the BBC (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-gloucestershire-36823803)

Quote
A Cotswold town could be linked to mainline rail services again if a plan for a new line is approved.

Services from Cirencester were axed in the 1960s as part of the Beeching cuts leaving only services from the nearby village of Kemble.

But now, Cirencester Community Railway wants to raise funds for a feasibility study to lay four miles of track.

The plan involves a "light" rail service which would link to mainline services in Kemble.

Recently, a scheme to double the track at Kemble at a cost of £45m, was completed by Network Rail.




That route links Cheltenham, Gloucester and Kemble with Swindon and London Paddington.

And a light train service from Cirencester could link up to Kemble meaning people would not have to drive and park there.

The group's Richard Gunner said £75,000 is needed to fund a study to estimate how many people would use the service.

Cirencester mayor Mark Harris said the plan was at "very, very early stages" but added it would "free up the roads" and help with under-pressure parking in the town.

He added that the plan would also help link up the town with London and make it "so much easier" to do business with the capital.

The £13m proposal includes a new station in Cirencester at Chesterton and a bridge being built over the A429 at Kemble.

The scheme could also alleviate parking issues in Kemble where a small car park is often full with motorists having to park in nearby roads.

A Great Western Railway spokesman said the firm wanted to build a new car park.

"We are currently awaiting planning consent from Cotswold District Council which we understand should be granted shortly."



Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: Adelante_CCT on July 19, 2016, 16:45:50
I'm sure there was a thread on this topic...

I'm guessing you mean here: http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=14439.0


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: ChrisB on July 19, 2016, 16:56:19
Yep, that's it - Mods, please merge. Sorry


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on July 19, 2016, 22:17:37
Topics now merged, as requested.  :-X


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: TonyK on July 20, 2016, 20:15:25
Sorry - this was a story from the Wilts & Gloucester Standard newspaper: -


Quote
"EARLY plans to bring a new railway line into Cirencester are steaming ahead after a meeting with top government officials.

The capital of the Cotswolds was buzzing with excitement last week after the Standard broke the news that new track could be laid along the line to Kemble, opening Cirencester to the national rail network for the first time since 1964.

Mayor Mark Harris and Richard and Jane Gunner, of Whiteway Farm, are forging forward with the proposal which would see an ultra-modern, eco-friendly train running the 5km from station to station.

Mayor Harris, who was elected for a second term last week, said he had been "inundated with messages of support for the vision".

"Everyone is incredibly excited about the prospect of reopening the Kemble to Cirencester railway line," he said.

"It is important to stress that at this stage we are looking at carrying out a feasibility study which will address issues such as: is it physically possible? How will landowners be effected? Does it have public support and, crucially, will people actually use it?"

Last Wednesday he went to London to pitch the idea to the Department of Transport in order to get funds for that feasibility study.

The "Dragon's Den-type event" included a panel of Lord Faulkner of Worcester, millionaire and train enthusiast Sir William McAlpine, senior tourism figure Debbie Wells and Mark Garnier MP."

The phrases "steaming ahead" and "top government officials" do little to inject any optimism into this story, but who knows, somebody on the Forum might be able to shed some light on this.

No "green light" then, but at least it hasn't "hit the buffers".

Translated into everyday English, the article tells us that a self-publicist councillor has been given permission to think about a feasibility study into having a feasibility study into a possible study into the feasibility of relaying a railway from Kemble to Cirencester, via the bits that haven't been built over, and has received a few supportive tweets plus a number of "likes" on his Facebook page.

Work is unlikely to start within the next couple of weeks...


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on July 20, 2016, 21:42:27
By sublime coincidence, Mrs FT, N! was today left hanging around Kemble station for half an hour for the bus to Cirencester.

I am on record as stating that, second to Nailsea & Backwell, my favourite railway station is Kemble.  It's well worth having a wander around there, if you have that half hour to spare, as an occasional visitor.  ;)


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: TonyK on July 20, 2016, 23:04:56
I am on record as stating that, second to Nailsea & Backwell, my favourite railway station is Kemble.  It's well worth having a wander around there, if you have that half hour to spare, as an occasional visitor.  ;)

If you are at Kemble station, you will almost certainly have time on your hands.

I have recently taken to the air again, an activity I hope to pursue at Kemble aerodrome. I wish communication between station and airfield were easier. I shall have to drive (before flying).
 


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: patch38 on January 27, 2020, 16:52:58
After a fair while, an update:

https://www.wiltsglosstandard.co.uk/news/18190465.plans-new-kemble-cirencester-railway-line-back-track/ (https://www.wiltsglosstandard.co.uk/news/18190465.plans-new-kemble-cirencester-railway-line-back-track/)

Quote
Plans to build a new railway line from Kemble to Cirencester look to be back on track.

Fundraising for a £53,000 feasibility study had stalled but Cotswold District Council will now invest £13,000 to make up the shortfall.

Now the plan, which has been four years in the making, can be put into motion with the aim of unlocking Government funding from a £500m pot designed to reopen lines closed in the 1960s following the Beeching Report.

Cllr Mark Harris, who, with Cllr Tony Berry, has been involved with the Cirencester Community Railway since its inception, proposed a motion for the funding to be granted at a meeting of the full Council last week which was duly passed.

Cllr Harris said: “Being able to carry out this feasibility study is the first step in bringing forward the line which will be of tremendous benefit for commuters and tourists alike.

“It will also be a very light railway which will have minimal impact on the environment and encourage people to stop using their cars for commuting, so helping our commitment to combating climate change.”

It is intended to build a single-track line with passing places which will follow the old route as far as possible before terminating near the centre of Cirencester.

The service will then link in with the recently dualled line between Swindon and Kemble which in turn connects to London Paddington.

It is hoped that the new line will also provide a template for others in the Cotswolds, including Tetbury and Bourton.

For more information visit cirentrain.org.uk

'A template for Tetbury' - interesting.


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: mjones on January 27, 2020, 20:07:41
Got to be at least 100 million, surely.


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: ChrisB on January 28, 2020, 09:30:10
I also suspect business cases for lines that connect with other lines at each end, rather than branch lines, will be far better....the case for this one must be quite small


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: Bmblbzzz on January 28, 2020, 09:36:40
“It will also be a very light railway which will have minimal impact on the environment and encourage people to stop using their cars for commuting, so helping our commitment to combating climate change.”

I suspect "would" rather than "will".


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: grahame on January 28, 2020, 10:19:37
I also suspect business cases for lines that connect with other lines at each end, rather than branch lines, will be far better....the case for this one must be quite small

Relaying a track rather than adding trains to even a freight line is an extra hurdle.

A line to a terminus rather than an end to end connecting service is an extra hurdle.

Doesn't rule things out ... look at Tweedbank, but sure as heck makes it harder.



Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: Red Squirrel on January 28, 2020, 10:41:33
... look at Tweedbank...

I'd say look at Stourbridge - a low-cost, low-energy shuttle service? Stourbridge is a town of 60,000 at the end of a 1km branch; Cirencester is 20,000 people 2km from the junction, so not directly comparable but not that different either!


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on April 22, 2020, 02:45:35
I really do wish them all the best - but I honestly can't see it actually happening.

They are apparently basing their projections (partly) on commuter demand?

How many people actually commute from Cirencester towards London, never mind into London itself?

And, from Tetbury?  :-X



Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: infoman on April 22, 2020, 05:36:15
Maybe some one should do a survey on how many passengers join the direct trains to London at Kemble in the rush
As well as the local trains from Kemble to Swindon,when everything settles down.
Okay,I volunteer so If everything has settled down maybe september would be a good time


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: grahame on April 22, 2020, 07:33:15
Maybe some one should do a survey on how many passengers join the direct trains to London at Kemble in the rush
As well as the local trains from Kemble to Swindon,when everything settles down.
Okay,I volunteer so If everything has settled down maybe september would be a good time

Kemble to London ticket numbers (up to March 2020) will be known already ... and there is a noticeable flow, I understand - witness the car parking.   Looking back at circumstantial evidence over 20 years old,  I recall comments about abandoned cars in station car parks at Kemble and Reading in the days after the Ladbroke Grove collision. But ... a noticeable number of passengers joining the hourly London peak train (and with current and full evidence) is far from a business case; it could be one small indicator of potential.

A pity from the current shutdown is that the (Railfuture meeting) presentation at Kemble early this month didn't happen - but perhaps every cloud has a silver lining, as I couldn't make that day.  I would love to see the case and the evidence presented.  I have severe concerns, but might be surprised - and (even) should the total case be found wanting or incomplete, good elements may point a different way forward.


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: patch38 on April 22, 2020, 10:42:15
Maybe some one should do a survey on how many passengers join the direct trains to London at Kemble in the rush
As well as the local trains from Kemble to Swindon,when everything settles down.
Okay,I volunteer so If everything has settled down maybe september would be a good time

I think the real question is, of those who commute from Kemble to Swindon/London in the rush hour, how many of them come from Cirencester itself? My suspicion is that the majority (myself included) come from a wide geographical spread of villages rather than from central Ciren. Therefore, most will still drive the few extra miles and park at Kemble (especially now the overflow car park exists and is never full) rather than drive to an industrial estate on the edge of the town, park, and take a shuttle.


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: Bmblbzzz on April 22, 2020, 12:32:34
A Ciren to Swindon shuttle might make more sense than one terminating at Kemble.


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: grahame on April 22, 2020, 15:32:37
I think the real question is, of those who commute from Kemble to Swindon/London in the rush hour, how many of them come from Cirencester itself? My suspicion is ....

A Ciren to Swindon shuttle might make more sense than one terminating at Kemble.

Questions at both ends.   

The Newquay branch has been reported as not generating bread and butter commuter traffic very well because it runs out at Par when people want to to to St Austell or Plymouth, and I question people from Cirencester wanting to change at Kemble.  However, what I have read suggests a light rail solution, and I'm not sure about light rail vehicles mixing with heavy rail on the Kemble to Swindon run.   

Another example of trains that join the main line but (over the years) have been extended through ... trains no longer turn around at Dovey Junction ...

Agree with the question of whether people would be in walking / cycling scope of Cirencester; I cannot see them driving and parking there to catch the train to Kemble when they could drive to Kemble - even if they drive past Cirencester Station. 

Now - there were two intermediate halts on the line. Wonder if the plan includes either of them?


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: patch38 on April 22, 2020, 17:42:04
Now - there were two intermediate halts on the line. Wonder if the plan includes either of them?

The halts were Park Leaze Farm (near Ewen) and Chesterton Lane. Well, Chesterton isn't on the new route (which skirts the proposed housing development there and then passes the Royal Ag, ending up almost where the original Cirencester Town station was) and a halt to serve a single farm seems unlikely. It looks like the Royal Ag would get its own halt though. It'll need plenty of parking for Range Rovers  ;) 


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: johnneyw on July 02, 2022, 16:12:28
Saw this article about local response to the news that Cirencester has missed out on further progress with the Restoring the Railways initiative.  They seem undeterred to make their Very Light Rail link a reality but acknowledge that this willl slow down the process.
https://www.wiltsglosstandard.co.uk/news/20247038.plans-new-cirencester-railway-line-suffer-setback/



Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: patch38 on January 19, 2023, 14:27:54
Still smouldering away...

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-gloucestershire-64318647 (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-gloucestershire-64318647)

And what on earth is the 'Local Democracy Reporting Service'?

Edit: Ah, it explains itself further down the page.


Title: Re: Reopening of Kemble to Cirencester Branch Line (merged topic, ongoing discussion)
Post by: Bmblbzzz on January 20, 2023, 18:24:59
First time I've heard a railway referred to as "single file".  :D



This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net