Great Western Coffee Shop

All across the Great Western territory => Across the West => Topic started by: grahame on November 26, 2014, 11:20:54



Title: New trains from old?
Post by: grahame on November 26, 2014, 11:20:54
London Underground D78 tube stock is due to be replaced with new "S" stock from next January, and there's talk in the railway press (Modern Railways) of adding diesel engines into the withdrawn trains and making units which help meet the current stock shortage.   They would be limited to 60 m.p.h., and I can think of certain lines where plenty of doors and large lobby areas would make sense. Would you welcome "new" 30 year old trains of class 278?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Underground_D78_Stock


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: Network SouthEast on November 26, 2014, 11:47:56
What impresses me is that this idea actually has something many ideas do not - money to back it up.

Roger Ford writes in the December issue of Modern Railways that Vivarail (run by UK railway engineers, funded from RRDC (a Pittsburgh company)) has bought all 150 DM cars of D-Stock, plus another 150 cars. The plan is to form 75 units, which would suggest to me 4 car trains and some spares.

The D stock cars are 18m long, so longer than the Pacers. They'll be a smoother ride too.

No toilets or through gangways mind, I suspect they'll be added at refurbishment. I'll also be surprised if the current 4 doors per car are reduced to 2 doors.

Underground trains seeing out their retirement on the mainlines has certainly be done before - see Isle of Wight. But the difference here is that the Standard Stock and 1938 Stock on the Isle of Wight never had any radical re-engineering done to them!


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: ChrisB on November 26, 2014, 12:23:10
Adrian Shooter is involved at a high level - indeed, it was he who provided Roger with the info you read above.

Apparently there are some guaving issues too - the floors of the D78s are 2inches wider than conventional stock. In his email, Roger looked forward to a seeing a mock up once ready at Kinetin. I assume this is where they are being stored?

There's talk of them being Pacer replacements


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: Rhydgaled on November 26, 2014, 13:31:48
Over on the RailUK Forums somebody suggested that, if these D78 thingys come off, and can keep the 3rd rail capability, some could be used to extend the Wrexham Central - Bidston service into Liverpool. I'm not sure how comfortable they would be, but provided they have toilets I would probably be supprised if they are much worse than class 150s so I think that would probably be a good idea. Not suitable for 'my' lines (Aberystwyth and Carmarthen/Fishguard/Haverfordwest) though I expect.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: eightf48544 on November 26, 2014, 16:24:37
Ian Walmsley wrote in Septembers Modern Railways an article called "Yorkshire Tripe" referring to their use on the Leeds Harrogate trains.

He gives 10 reasons why they are not suitable starting with age and including structural weakness, lack front crashworthiness, floor not strong enough tos upport diesel engine etc.

May be as straight electrics they could do Wrexham Bidston it's relatively short and flat.Bt woudl possibly need toilets more seats etc.

As diesels there are a few services they might do Ashford Hastings but not through to Brighton. As they are quite short 3 car on the Marlow or 4 on the Windsor/Henley branches


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: paul7575 on November 26, 2014, 17:44:30
Ian Walmsley wrote in Septembers Modern Railways an article called "Yorkshire Tripe" referring to their use on the Leeds Harrogate trains.

Yes, and didn't it draw an OTT reaction from Alan Williams in the next issue.  Handbags at ten paces...  :o

Interesting that you can get so many different views about the same proposal in such a relatively short time...

Paul


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: onthecushions on November 27, 2014, 11:55:46
It must be a good idea to re-use redundant but basically modern, servicable stock, where it is superior to existing units out in the sticks. Rail vehicles have a near indefinite life if given proper maintenance.

The Isle of Wight springs to mind, where two generations of tube stock made their home.

The lack of electrification is a problem and I can't see underfloor diesels being a solution. Better would be to build a new vehicle, like the old loco brake tenders but loaded with traction batteries and a charging diesel engine. This could be operated as a hybrid, allowing units to accelerate and climb using engine +battery current, batteries on level and charging on lay-over. It would need a power train line connection (traction cable) so might be restricted from a few single line tunnels. I would rather have this than a pacer.

Thoughts?

OTC


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: grahame on November 27, 2014, 12:58:16
Thoughts?

My thoughts went to tadpoles - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Rail_Class_206

Not a full battery / diesel engine vehicle in that case, but ... and they were useful for a number of years, even though they looked really odd.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: eightf48544 on November 27, 2014, 19:42:30
The southern often used old coach underframes and put new bodies on them a lot of the early electric units used ex steam coach underframes.

I have a feeling that at least some of the Hastings 206 trailer coaches were ex steam hauled stock from the line.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: grahame on December 03, 2014, 23:09:21
Looks like the consensus is "go for it ..."  ;D

http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=14985.msg166535#msg166535

Bristol - Keynsham - Saltford - Oldfield Park - Bath Spa - Batheaston (pause in loop to let 800 pass) - Box - Corsham - Chippenham (reverse in platform 0) - Melksham - Holt New Town - Bradford-on-Avon - Avoncliff - Freshford - Limpley Stoke - Batheaston - Bath Spa - Oldfield Park - Saltford - Keynsham - Bristol


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: eightf48544 on December 04, 2014, 09:42:24
From December Modern Railways it appears that another  consortium has bought most of the D78 stock and are proposing a different solution to the 278 with the use of an underfloor Ford truck engine power package with two under each motor coach, rather than  the previous idea of an above floor engine like the Thumpers. Roger Ford doubts the robustness of a highly stressed engine in rail use with constant cycle of acceleration and idiling.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: ChrisB on December 04, 2014, 09:46:31
Same article as referred to in post 1....

Adrian Shooter involved, money coming from a Pittsburgh Transport Company


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: eightf48544 on December 04, 2014, 10:12:59
Looks like the consensus is "go for it ..."  ;D

http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=14985.msg166535#msg166535

Bristol - Keynsham - Saltford - Oldfield Park - Bath Spa - Batheaston (pause in loop to let 800 pass) - Box - Corsham - Chippenham (reverse in platform 0) - Melksham - Holt New Town - Bradford-on-Avon - Avoncliff - Freshford - Limpley Stoke - Batheaston - Bath Spa - Oldfield Park - Saltford - Keynsham - Bristol

Not sure if the 278 is the right vehicle for this service being  limited to  60mph it would need phenominal acceleration to keep out of the way  of the 800s. Or the new stations will have to be built with 4 tracks as per the 1906 GW/GC joint line from South Ruslip to Ashendon Jn where most stations were 4 track with loops and platforms either side. Chiltern would dearly love at least some of those loops still to be in place now so they could speed up their fast services to Birmingham.

They'd learnt a thing or two about building a multipurpose railway to cater for fast expresses, commuter services local stoppers and freight by 1906.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: onthecushions on December 04, 2014, 11:19:29
Roger Ford doubts the robustness of a highly stressed engine in rail use with constant cycle of acceleration and idiling.

...which is why the hybrid system of a smaller engine working at mostly constant output for longer periods charging a battery pack would be more suitable for rail than a directly coupled diesel.

C'mon Hitachi!

OTC


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: chrisr_75 on December 04, 2014, 12:04:08
Roger Ford doubts the robustness of a highly stressed engine in rail use with constant cycle of acceleration and idiling.

Presumably he has failed to notice the relatively reliable use of marine & bus/truck derived diesel engines in assorted diesel-electric, -hydraulic & -mechanical trains over the last 60 years or so ???


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: John R on December 04, 2014, 12:08:04
Given his early career was spent at English Electric I don't think you should assume that he writes from a position of ignorance on the subject.


Ford trained as a mechanical engineer with English Electric at Rugby, specialising in prime movers, and on qualification joined the head office of the company^s Traction Division. While at English Electric Traction he was seconded to the Maintenance Division, spending time at Finsbury Park and Stratford locomotive depots.
(source - Wikipedia)


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: chrisr_75 on December 04, 2014, 12:25:51
Given his early career was spent at English Electric I don't think you should assume that he writes from a position of ignorance on the subject.


Ford trained as a mechanical engineer with English Electric at Rugby, specialising in prime movers, and on qualification joined the head office of the company^s Traction Division. While at English Electric Traction he was seconded to the Maintenance Division, spending time at Finsbury Park and Stratford locomotive depots.
(source - Wikipedia)

I wasn't making assumptions he was ignorant, merely stating my surprise that he is of that opinion given that we've had 60+ years of generally successful use of marine & road derived diesel engines in rail applications. Indeed, most of the large EE engines of the modernisation era were marine derived. Given his background with EE, it surprises me even more that he is of the opinion that there are no road derived diesel engines currently available that would be suitable for this application.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: ellendune on December 04, 2014, 22:43:02
Having read Roger Ford's articles for many years and heard the respect with which he is held within the industry I put my money on his judgement.  However, if you read the article, he does respect those involved in the project, so he does not totally dismiss the possibility that it might work. He just remains to be convinced that a transit van engine is up to the vibration that comes from steel wheel on steel rail. 


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: grahame on December 17, 2014, 14:14:05
http://www.transportxtra.com/magazines/local_transport_today/news/?ID=40073

Quote
A rolling stock engineering firm says it has reached agreement with Transport for London to purchase surplus District Line trains, with the intention of converting them to diesel power so they can replace ageing and unpopular Pacer and Sprinter units running on many provincial lines in Britain, writes John W E Helm.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: devon_metro on December 17, 2014, 18:28:12
I think i'd rather travel on a 14x than D stock!!


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: stuving on December 17, 2014, 19:49:23
If you want to see Vivarail's own case for the "D-train", it's here (http://www.vivarail.co.uk/) - with that Roger Ford article too.

Perhaps I should add - that's only a simple glossy web-site spiel, not the 43-page technical brochure.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: thetrout on December 18, 2014, 06:57:38
I think it's a great idea if I'm honest. Eversholt refurbished a Class 321 which I had the pleasure of traveling on a while back. The refurbishment was very well done and as a layman I would easily have thought it was a brand new train. Windows were nice and wide, lighting was good, felt alot more open and spacious.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: onthecushions on December 18, 2014, 11:13:48

I think that the logic is as follows:

The lease cost per annum of a rail passenger carriage is in the range ^75k - ^150k of which about 1/3 is for capital - the rest being heavy maintenance. Thus the "rent" proper is ^25k - ^50k. If you could get this for ten years, after interest the capital value (NPV) would be ^200k - ^400k. You can buy a seviceable but scrap carriage for ^5k - ^10k. As this would be a bogie vehicle it would have a value towards the higher end. Put in ^100k  per car and you double your money or more.

Good luck to Adrian Shooter and Vivarail.

The figures are around if anyone wants to check.

OTC


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: Network SouthEast on December 18, 2014, 11:42:56
I think that the Vivarail proposed D-Train might have a chance, but only if they can bring this to market quickly.

I think the biggest enemy of Vivarail is not their proposed technology, but time.

We're seeing a massive programme of electrification. Network Rail in their Route Studies are now outlining possible future electrification projects beyond 2019. In the next five years we are going to see a large surplus of DMU stock from the Transpennie, Thames Valley, North West, Electric Spine and Central Scotland electrification schemes.

So the D-Train will be competing against tried and tested rolling stock. Some of it (in the case of the 185s) barely a decade old.

The cost of conversion will need to be low. The leasing companies will expect a Section 54 Undertaking to spend any money financing the D-Train, and will the DfT really be in the mood for this?

Well there are currently 156 Pacers in service. So even with a large cascade and electrification there might be a need for the D-Train.

For it to work, they'll need to be able to do the conversions sooner rather than later, and the cost needs to have as short a pay back period as possible.



Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: chrisr_75 on December 18, 2014, 12:20:10
I think that the Vivarail proposed D-Train might have a chance, but only if they can bring this to market quickly.

I think the biggest enemy of Vivarail is not their proposed technology, but time.

We're seeing a massive programme of electrification. Network Rail in their Route Studies are now outlining possible future electrification projects beyond 2019. In the next five years we are going to see a large surplus of DMU stock from the Transpennie, Thames Valley, North West, Electric Spine and Central Scotland electrification schemes.

So the D-Train will be competing against tried and tested rolling stock. Some of it (in the case of the 185s) barely a decade old.

The cost of conversion will need to be low. The leasing companies will expect a Section 54 Undertaking to spend any money financing the D-Train, and will the DfT really be in the mood for this?

Well there are currently 156 Pacers in service. So even with a large cascade and electrification there might be a need for the D-Train.

For it to work, they'll need to be able to do the conversions sooner rather than later, and the cost needs to have as short a pay back period as possible.



There is, of course, the potential for these re-engineered units to be marketed internationally, which I'm sure this company will have given due consideration to if there is a limited potential lifespan in the UK.

An interesting project if it comes to fruition, and goes very much against recent trends of scrapping/exporting relatively young rolling stock rather then refurbishing or re-engineering.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: TonyK on December 18, 2014, 23:37:36

I think that the logic is as follows:

The lease cost per annum of a rail passenger carriage is in the range ^75k - ^150k of which about 1/3 is for capital - the rest being heavy maintenance. Thus the "rent" proper is ^25k - ^50k. If you could get this for ten years, after interest the capital value (NPV) would be ^200k - ^400k. You can buy a seviceable but scrap carriage for ^5k - ^10k. As this would be a bogie vehicle it would have a value towards the higher end. Put in ^100k  per car and you double your money or more.

Good luck to Adrian Shooter and Vivarail.

The figures are around if anyone wants to check.

OTC

I'm not even an armchair accountant, but I see the issues here through the eyes of an armchair layman. There is a parallel with aviation. Budget airlines operating in the UK - I shall not name whom I have in mind, but one came from Ireland, and the other is easy to guess - began operations with basically hand-me-down Boeing 737s. They now use the latest Airbus models, and I returned from my tan-topping sojourn to Tenerife last month on easyPeasy's (whoops! nearly gave the game away!) latest A320, only a month off the production line. These operators see the value of leasing new energy efficient aircraft, in the same way that I first bought a 15-year old Mini in 1978 and now drive a year old (bought new) Nissan. My first car did about half the mpg of my current, carried less, and necessitated me spending my weekends under the bonnet with a Haynes manual, trying to figure out what was wrong. I drove without brakes for a week, which was interesting, until I could get the piston repair kit, fit it, and bleed it. In the unlikely event of my brakes failing now, I would call the RAC (complimentary), have the car towed to my local dealer, and have the fault repaired under warranty, FOC.

Like RyanAir any Irish airline would do. Cheap is not necessarily the least expensive, and your accountant will tell a pretty story to suit the taxman, your investors, and the missus if need be.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: JayMac on December 19, 2014, 00:24:31
Say what you like about mpg, but spending a Sunday under the bonnet of a BMC Mini, referring back and forth to a Haynes Manual, is far more enjoyable than T-cutting a Nissan Micra.

Did both recently. Gettng the Mini to splutter into life was far more enjoyable than being able to see my reflection in the bonnet of Mum's Micra.

Sorry, I digress. D stock with strap on Diesels on the national network? No thanks.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: Tim on December 19, 2014, 11:06:48


Sorry, I digress. D stock with strap on Diesels on the national network? No thanks.

I agree.  And I don't buy the economics here either.  I understand is that their is a reluctance to invest in diesel units because future electrification might make them redundant before their full life, but if the economics make sense for converting D-stock to diesel, then the economics ought to make sense for converting a diesel to electric mid-way through its life.   


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: TonyK on December 19, 2014, 15:22:38
Say what you like about mpg, but spending a Sunday under the bonnet of a BMC Mini, referring back and forth to a Haynes Manual, is far more enjoyable than T-cutting a Nissan Micra.


The difference is between hobby and necessity.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: Surrey 455 on December 20, 2014, 10:59:24
Budget airlines operating in the UK - I shall not name whom I have in mind, but one came from Ireland, and the other is easy to guess - began operations with basically hand-me-down Boeing 737s. They now use the latest Airbus models......

easyJet exclusively use Airbus planes, Ryanair exclusively use Boeing planes. By sticking to one manufacturer their maintenance costs are lower apparently.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: 4064ReadingAbbey on December 20, 2014, 21:39:39

easyJet exclusively use Airbus planes, Ryanair exclusively use Boeing planes. By sticking to one manufacturer their maintenance costs are lower apparently.

It also means that flight crew don't have to be certificated for two types of aircraft. If a plane goes technical than the flight crew can simply switch, if the type is different and some or all of the flight crew are not certificated for the other type then delays are pre-programmed.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: grahame on February 19, 2015, 17:55:27
Looking back at the poll - only 6% said "no" ... and the story carries on in the Express:

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/559130/Train-railway-District-Line-London-underground-rural-line-north

Following selectively quotes from a longer article to give the drift

Quote
Retired carriages from the District Line, which runs from Ealing Broadway in west London to Upminster in the east, are being redeveloped for rural lines up north. Enough cars for 75 two or three-car diesel trains are being taken to Vivarail^s depot in Long Marston, Warwickshire for redevelopment before being sold on. With a maximum speed of 60mph the carriages are perfect for slower routes with many stops rather than the faster inter-city links.

They will be fitted with four 200hp Ford 3.2L Duratorq TDCi engines that are normally seen in Ford Rangers and Transit vans. It is hoped they will be approved to run on National Rail tracks by mid-Autumn.

The carriages are already designed to cope with the busy London Underground at rush hour, which is ideal for commuter services or to ^move a lot of people for football matches^. Others, however, will be completely redeveloped with more conventional high-quality seats.

^These will be some of the greenest trains because they are lightweight and use a lot less fuel,^ Mr Shooter said. ^They are ideal for rural areas and some commuter routes like Manchester or Leeds. They can perform better, faster and greener than normal diesel trains. ^These are basically new trains that are affordable because we have reused some components.^

Mr Shooter, who was awarded a CBE for his services to the railway, is already talking to several customers including the Northern franchise.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: JayMac on February 23, 2015, 01:17:32
Looking back on the poll also.

I see 10.5% said no. But 83.3% of the vote options were for a 'yes' answer.

My 'no' vote was fighting an uphill battle. 1 in 6 in fact.  :-\ ;) ;D



Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: TonyK on February 24, 2015, 22:02:41
It also means that flight crew don't have to be certificated for two types of aircraft.

Which is just as well, because they can't be. Converting from A320 to Boeing 737 or vice versa takes time. An airline pilot can be rated to fly several marks of A320 / 321, and even A330 because of the commonality of the decks. He may instead be able to fly a B757 and a B767. But he can't be rated to fly a B737 and an A320 as an airline pilot at the same time. There are too many differences, beginning with joystick as against yoke for steering the thing.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on February 28, 2015, 17:30:16
Meanwhile, and vaguely, back on the original topic ;) - from the BBC (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-31650705):

Quote
New northern rail franchises 'must scrap Pacer trains'

(http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/81278000/jpg/_81278923_80828740.jpg)
The Pacer trains were introduced in the 1980s and were supposed to be a short-term solution

The government has confirmed it wants to scrap the 30-year-old Pacer trains on railways in northern England.

Companies bidding for the government's new rail franchises in the North will be required to replace them by 2020, the Department For Transport said.

Northern and TransPennine bidders will have to add 200 new train services daily and accommodate 19,000 extra Manchester commuters.

Built in the 1980s, Pacers were intended for short-term use.

Transport Secretary Patrick McLoughlin said: "Pacers have had their day, they are not suitable for modern commuting. There was a bit of pressure on us not to push this forward because people were arguing the financing did not match up, we have decided we are going ahead."

But Mick Cash, general secretary of the RMT transport union, said: "Any new trains are light years away with passengers forced to endure the misery of the clapped-out Pacers, and the ancient London Underground rolling stock that's heading north, way off into the future. The tender documents allow bidders to axe guards and move to driver-only operation, compromising safety in the interests of private profit."

Shadow transport secretary Michael Dugher added: "If we had a new piece of rolling stock for every time ministers 'announced' the end of the Pacer trains, the network would be full of shiny new carriages."

The Pacer trains would contravene disability discrimination legislation from 2020.

The transport select committee is meeting next month to take evidence from Mr McLoughlin to examine the specification for the Northern and TransPennine Express franchises and question him on the future of Pacer trains currently in use in Wales and the south-west.

The chairman of the committee, Liverpool Riverside MP Louise Ellman, said: "It is unacceptable that Pacer trains - built in the mid-1980s and of questionable safety - are still in use on busy rail lines."

Resembling the body of a bus with train wheels bolted on, Pacers are still being used on the railways across the north of England even though they were supposed to be a temporary solution to a rolling stock shortage.

It was thought the trains would have a 20-year lifespan but they currently run on routes in Greater Manchester, Merseyside, Lancashire, Cheshire, Yorkshire, Teesside, Northumberland and Cumbria.

Prime Minister David Cameron signalled in November that the Government was considering scrapping Pacers.

The Northern franchise operates local, commuter and rural services and long-distance services linking major cities and towns such as Leeds, Sheffield, Nottingham, York, Manchester, Bradford, Preston and Blackpool.

(http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/81113000/jpg/_81113350_train2.jpg)
One company is offering converted London Underground trains to the franchise bidders

The TransPeninne Express (TPE) franchise provides longer-distance intercity-type services, connecting Newcastle, Leeds, Sheffield, Manchester, Hull, Liverpool, Edinburgh and Glasgow, as well as Manchester Airport.

Companies shortlisted to run the new franchises were announced in August. Competing for Northern are Arriva, Govia and Abellio, while on the shortlist for TPE are FirstGroup, Keolis/Go Ahead and Stagecoach.

Firm Vivarail is in talks with some of the operators competing for the franchises, offering them the use of converted London Underground trains.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: ray951 on September 22, 2015, 09:20:06
According to Modern Railways the Vivarail D78 Class 230 trains are going to be trailed on the Plymouth to Gunnislake branch.
Apparently GWR are quite keen but Dft are not.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: ChrisB on September 22, 2015, 09:24:29
apparently this testing is in the franchise agreement...


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: eightf48544 on September 23, 2015, 10:00:48
Had a chance to see and ride on the 270 at the Vivarail test track. Only one coach, but very quite reasonable ride considering it was basically a siding. I started a sceptic but think it could be goer.

Very inovative power pack engine change in 10 minutes and doesn't require a pit just a concrete standing by the track to stand the lift on to slide the old engine pack out and insert the new. Connections for fuel and coolant etc. are plug in connectors.

Brake blocks can be changed trackside. They are also working on regen braking with storage.

They could also be converted back to a straight EMU.

So could be a goer. The only problem I see is if the Dft insist on the TOCs packing the seats in rather than having more units. The longer range version with 2*2 seats and loo is planned to be very spacious.

The other selling point is that all the componets except the body shell including bogies, engines, seats, loo (disabled) ect are off the shelf from exisitng manufactures.



Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: IndustryInsider on September 23, 2015, 11:24:55
I started a sceptic but think it could be goer.

Same here - watching this one with interest...


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: chrisr_75 on September 23, 2015, 11:40:08
Only one coach, but very quite reasonable ride considering it was basically a siding

I always thought the D78 stock had one of the more pleasing ride qualities of the LUL assortment - pretty smooth even on poor track, but with a rather satisfying solidity, in much the same way as a MK3 coach - so I'm not surprised it seemed pretty decent, assuming they've not messed about with the suspension too much?

If it works, it's an excellent use of a fleet with a lot of (structural) life left in it and one which has recently been the subject of some considerable tidying up. As long as performance & reliability are ok, I think they'd be a big improvement over the dreadful 'Pacers' many of us have to endure! Good luck to them!


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: Tim on September 24, 2015, 13:50:03
Only one coach, but very quite reasonable ride considering it was basically a siding

I always thought the D78 stock had one of the more pleasing ride qualities of the LUL assortment - pretty smooth even on poor track, but with a rather satisfying solidity, in much the same way as a MK3 coach - so I'm not surprised it seemed pretty decent, assuming they've not messed about with the suspension too much?

If it works, it's an excellent use of a fleet with a lot of (structural) life left in it and one which has recently been the subject of some considerable tidying up. As long as performance & reliability are ok, I think they'd be a big improvement over the dreadful 'Pacers' many of us have to endure! Good luck to them!

I tend to agree so long as they are only used on lines suited to them (low speed, short distance)  Truth is the Pacers are not so bad on those lines.  The problems with Pacers is that they have found their way onto trips of over 1 hour. 


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: Oberon on September 24, 2015, 16:58:47
I wonder if they might be suited to the Looe branch or even St Ives?


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: Visoflex on September 25, 2015, 09:33:19
When the new timetable comes in which removes the direct PAD runs from the Henley branch, then a D78 would be quite a good fit.  A maximum speed of 60 mph on the Henley branch with one train working on what is effectively a long shunt.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: Puffing Billy on September 25, 2015, 14:54:55
I wonder if they might be suited to the Looe branch or even St Ives?
I believe the Bakerlooe line stock is already earmarked for that


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: Chris125 on September 26, 2015, 13:37:10
You can get some idea of what is in Modern Railways from Roger Ford's 'e-preview' which is well worth subscribing too:

http://live.ezezine.com/ezine/archives/759/759-2015.09.21.04.00.archive.txt

Quote
Class 230 in the metal
Informed Sources Fourth Law commands ^When in doubt build a demonstrator^. While it is easy to rubbish a concept, something in the metal demands objective criticism.

During August Mr Walmsley and I were among the 195 guests who visited the Quinton Rail Technology Centre to examine Vivarail^s first conversion of a D78 Tube Stock vehicle into a Class 230 Diesel Electric Multiple Unit and have a ride on the test track. In ^Pan Up^ Ian has covered ambience and the market while I provide the technical description.

Introducing the Vivarail project in the December 2014 column, I admitted to being in a quandary. On the one hand a rival D78 stock conversion seemed a complete non-starter. On the other hand, at Vivarail Adrian Shooter had assembled a team of engineers for whom I have the highest regard.

So I wrote a technical description of Vivarail^s proposal, expressed some reservations over the practicality of the underfloor Ford automotive engines and reserved further comment until I could see the D-Train in the metal. Some readers were less charitable and asked why I hadn^t said what I really thought of the concept.

For our test run we bimbled around the Quinton track reaching a maximum speed of 30-35 mile/h. The five cylinder engines purring away under the floor were less noticeable than, say, a Cummins in a Meridian. When we started power pick-up was smooth and vibration free and the ride was agreed by my fellow travellers to be better than a Pacer (not difficult). You can find the sound level measurements in Mr Walmsley^s column.

Engineering
However, my main interest was in the workshop where conversion of the other two vehicles for the demonstration unit was advanced. With the second powered vehicle up on stands it was possible examine the underfloor equipment layout and the column has an illustrated guide to what goes where and how.

There was one disappointment. It was not possible to look inside one of the engine modules produced by Revolve Technologies. However, Vivarail subsequently provided a photograph, which gives an indication of the packaging.

Early criticism of the Vivarail project focused on the lack of crashworthiness of the cab ends. But from inside the cab the safety cage is massive and has been beefed up following the crash test. Mr Walmsley reckons protection is superior to a Pacer and could even be better than the Class 150 front end.

Spend.
So far Vivarail has spent around ^4million on the project and it shows in the quality of the engineering. Based on the capital rental figures provided by Vivarail I estimate the cost of a converted Class 230 vehicle at around ^800,000, roughly half the price of a putative new DMU.

Certification of the demonstrator three car Class 230 is scheduled by the end of this year. Testing in passenger service will follow ^in the new year^, initially on the Plymouth-Gunnislake branch fulfilling a requirement in the First Great Western Direct Award franchise agreement.

This has exposed some interesting internal DfT politics. Rail Minister Claire Perry, who is clearly not a Vivarail fan, claimed in a recent written answer that the obligation in the FGW franchise agreement covers only an initial feasibility study. According to Claire, the franchise agreement makes clear that any proposals for a trial that might derive from that report would be subject to a separate decision by the Secretary of State and would be subject to initial examination confirming likely viability.

Well, FGW inspected the first vehicle back in July and has begun planning for the trial. So it looks as though ^likely viability^ has been confirmed and someone in New Minster House has given the go ahead. As ever, is it Claire or the civil servant who drafted the reply the one out of the loop?


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: SandTEngineer on September 26, 2015, 14:06:40
I look forward to a trial trip on the Gunnislake branch in the new year.  Hope its better than the Pacer demonstrator that ran on there back in the 1980s ::) :P


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: PhilWakely on September 26, 2015, 20:04:23
I look forward to a trial trip on the Gunnislake branch in the new year.  Hope its better than the Pacer demonstrator that ran on there back in the 1980s ::) :P

You mean the one that couldn't cope with the tight curves IIRC  :D  ;D


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: SandTEngineer on September 26, 2015, 22:15:34
I look forward to a trial trip on the Gunnislake branch in the new year.  Hope its better than the Pacer demonstrator that ran on there back in the 1980s ::) :P

You mean the one that coudn't cope with the tight curves IIRC  :D  ;D

You remember it as well then.........

(http://i102.photobucket.com/albums/m92/cbrailways/Pacer%20Demonstrator_zpsp8n9l9oh.jpg)
Image (c)2015 SandTEngineer


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: Chris125 on November 04, 2015, 14:39:26
They've updated the exterior and interior visuals on their website (http://www.vivarail.co.uk/) with what appears to be the finalised design:

Interior (http://www.vivarail.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/header-interior.jpg)

Exterior 1 (http://www.vivarail.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/header-2-car-visual.jpg)

Exterior 2 (http://www.vivarail.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/header-2-trains.jpg)


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: Red Squirrel on November 04, 2015, 17:36:46
What a shame that 230 003 isn't going to 'Wise'...


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: Chris125 on November 10, 2015, 15:15:21
For anyone that missed the articles in October's 'Modern Railways' about these, they are now available as pdf files on RRDC's website (http://www.rrdc.com/news_current.html).


Roger Ford: Class 230 Confounds Critics (http://www.rrdc.com/article_10_2015_vivarail_rogerford_MR.pdf)

Ian Walmsley: Shooter Misses Foot (http://www.rrdc.com/article_10_2015_vivarail_ianwalmsley_MR.pdf)



Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: ChrisB on November 10, 2015, 15:17:28
Big files - warniong - 11.55mb the first, 3.66mb the second. Broadband only!


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: Chris125 on November 15, 2015, 12:16:36
You may find the following 9 minute video interesting - it's the 230 doing a circuit of their test track, accelerating up to the maximum linespeed (around 30mph IIRC) around 6mins in.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNmRi6cDNY8

It certainly doesn't seem appreciably different or noisier than conventional D Stock at those speeds, with the traction motors the predominant sound.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: Surrey 455 on November 15, 2015, 19:44:41
You may find the following 9 minute video interesting - it's the 230 doing a circuit of their test track, accelerating up to the maximum linespeed (around 30mph IIRC) around 6mins in.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNmRi6cDNY8

It certainly doesn't seem appreciably different or noisier than conventional D Stock at those speeds, with the traction motors the predominant sound.

As a grumpy middle aged git, it amazes me that the likes of Apple and Google allow people to take videos in portrait mode. If I had my way, I'd issue a software update forcing phone users to turn their phones 90 degrees so that only landscape videos could be made. The phone gyroscope would prevent any attempt to film in portrait mode.

Portrait photos would still be acceptable though. ;D


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: grahame on November 15, 2015, 21:57:52
As a grumpy middle aged git, it amazes me that the likes of Apple and Google allow people to take videos in portrait mode.

Don't look at this video (https://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/fp/news/scotland/752644/video-heart-warming-moment-man-proposes-girlfriend-train-whole-carriage-erupts-song/) then.   For the rest of you, it's heart-warming ... enjoy!


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: Surrey 455 on November 15, 2015, 23:50:30

Don't look at this video (https://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/fp/news/scotland/752644/video-heart-warming-moment-man-proposes-girlfriend-train-whole-carriage-erupts-song/) then.   For the rest of you, it's heart-warming ... enjoy!

Ahhh, Its a video of a man showing everyone else how to hold your phone to take a video  ;)


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: ray951 on July 22, 2016, 14:24:08
These are going to be operating on the Coventry to Nuneaton line for 12 months later this year, so no visits to GWR territory.
Further details here http://www.vivarail.co.uk/class-230-to-enter-passenger-service-this-year/ (http://www.vivarail.co.uk/class-230-to-enter-passenger-service-this-year/)


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: RichardB on July 23, 2016, 22:51:55
These are going to be operating on the Coventry to Nuneaton line for 12 months later this year, so no visits to GWR territory.
Further details here http://www.vivarail.co.uk/class-230-to-enter-passenger-service-this-year/ (http://www.vivarail.co.uk/class-230-to-enter-passenger-service-this-year/)

This strikes me as a very good move - not too far from Long Marston so Vivarail can be close at hand.  I'll go up for a trip when they start.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: IndustryInsider on July 25, 2016, 09:25:19
This strikes me as a very good move - not too far from Long Marston so Vivarail can be close at hand.  I'll go up for a trip when they start.

Agree completely.  One of several excellent candidates for these trains as it has a 45mph top speed, is of reasonably short length and has three intermediate station stops.  The capacity of the three car train over the current (usually) one car Class 153 will also prove useful in allowing for growth on the route from the two new stations.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: grahame on September 03, 2016, 12:24:18
From Transport Xtra (https://www.transportxtra.com/publications/local-transport-today/news/49979/d-train-hire-will-cost-just-500-a-day-says-west-midlands?)

Quote
D-Train hire will cost just £500 a day, says West Midlands

02 September 2016
 
West midlands Combined Authority has revealed details of the financial deal that will see a former London Underground train trialled on the Coventry-Nuneaton line, the first passenger-carrying trial of the vehicles.

The Class 230 ‘D-Train’ has been developed by Vivarail using refurbished London Underground District Line surface stock built in the 1980s.

Works out at around £180k per annum per train.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: IndustryInsider on November 29, 2016, 12:32:01
The Class 230 has been out and about testing on the main line for the first time between Tyseley and Leamington Spa.  Bodes well for introduction into service between Coventry and Nuneaton late this year, or early next year:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xy72b2VrQRk


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: Surrey 455 on November 29, 2016, 22:58:41
Sounds quite noisy


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: Noggin on December 01, 2016, 11:53:33
A slightly different twist on this story is that there are rumours across on WNXX that a 319 has gone in to have a diesel engine fitted as an experiment to see if it could result in a cheap-ish electro-diesel MU. Underfloor as apparently there is enough space to slide an engine on a raft underneath, not sure whether it is would be a conventional direct-drive arrangement or EDMU powering the traction motors. 

For the benefit of the less technical amongst us, the 319's are the 4-car dual-voltage former Thameslink stock built in the late 1980's. Northern (who have initially received 319's to run services in the north-west) are supposedly not the intended client, might be TPE, but I wonder whether GWR might be keen on the idea for the North Downs services to Gatwick?


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: SandTEngineer on December 30, 2016, 14:31:32
...oh dear something drastic has happened...https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C07b79tW8AA_FD5.jpg

And a report from the fire service http://news.warwickshire.gov.uk/fireincidents/2016/12/30/train-fire-station-road-kenilworth-one-fire-engine-kenilworth-and-one-fire-engine-leamington-attending/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

Looks like it was a test run http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/U50548/2016/12/30/advanced

Hope everybody involved is OK.



Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: ChrisB on December 30, 2016, 14:44:33
oh no.....hopefully a set back that can be overcome


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: grahame on December 30, 2016, 14:49:41
oh no.....hopefully a set back that can be overcome

Vivarial have tweeted: "There is a problem on the test train, all staff are safe and procedures worked as expected"


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on December 30, 2016, 14:54:39
"We can confirm that the smoke alarms worked perfectly."   ::)


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: SandTEngineer on December 30, 2016, 15:23:47
This was published on the WNXX Forum (as a copy of a news release from Vivarail):

Quote
Class 230 incident
30th December 2016

Whilst undertaking a test run today a fire started in one of the detachable engine modules on one of the power cars. There were no passengers on the train and Vivarail staff were able to get off the train without a problem. This has now been extinguished by the Fire Service and the train is being prepared to move back to Tyseley. Until it is possible to access the engine module the cause of the fire can not be determined. A thorough investigation will take place in conjunction with the Railway Accident Investigation Bureau and whatever steps necessary will be undertaken. Vivarail regrets that this means the planned trial on the Coventry to Nuneaton line will be postponed. Further information will be provided when available.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: grahame on December 30, 2016, 17:00:56
And the Birmingham Mail (http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/train-fire-kenilworth-manchester-delays-12386670) has perhaps been doing a bit of journalistic exhaduration:

Quote
A train is on fire this afternoon - with three carriages already destroyed in the blaze

and the video that accompanies that paper to show the destruction (!) is (here) (https://twitter.com/i/videos/tweet/814848458335092736)

Serious - but hardly destroyed!


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: ChrisB on December 30, 2016, 17:21:28
"The media could not be played" - removed already?


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: grahame on December 30, 2016, 17:27:36
"The media could not be played" - removed already?

Played for me from the link - couple of screen shots attached while I look to work it out.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: SandTEngineer on December 30, 2016, 17:29:09
There's a better video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUr44fmhnvw


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: grahame on December 30, 2016, 21:23:50
From the Daily Mail (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4076618/Ten-passengers-rescued-emergency-services-train-burst-flames-tested-tracks-Kenilworth.html)

Quote
Firefighters had to rescue 10 people from a train carriage after it burst into flames.

... sounds rather more serious from this report than others  ;)



Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: SandTEngineer on December 30, 2016, 21:30:46
From the Daily Mail (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4076618/Ten-passengers-rescued-emergency-services-train-burst-flames-tested-tracks-Kenilworth.html)

Quote
Firefighters had to rescue 10 people from a train carriage after it burst into flames.

... sounds rather more serious from this report than others  ;)

...I liked this bit actually stated by Adrian Shooter......
Quote
'This is a new train, it has only done a few miles
::) :P


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: ellendune on December 30, 2016, 21:33:59
From the Daily Mail (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4076618/Ten-passengers-rescued-emergency-services-train-burst-flames-tested-tracks-Kenilworth.html)

Quote
Firefighters had to rescue 10 people from a train carriage after it burst into flames.

... sounds rather more serious from this report than others  ;)


Of course it does this is the Daily Mail.  "small fire in train in warwickshire" doesn't sell papers.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: grahame on December 30, 2016, 21:36:00
And it seems that the Association of British Commuters don't want them on Southern ... to be fair, this is a member post on the Facebook page, but it does show an unfortunate negative vote.

Quote
So imagine: (ok so it circumstantial however...) a 12 car train being run without an OBS as Southern say they would do this in "Exceptional Circumstances" and the terrifying prospect of this happening ...This is another example of things being done on the cheap....A Private Company purchasing old LU rolling stock in the hope of selling/leasing them on


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: IndustryInsider on December 30, 2016, 21:56:10
Rather ironically it looks like it was the first train to stop at Kenilworth's new station!

Hopefully just a set back rather than the end of the project.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on December 30, 2016, 22:13:20
This was published on the WNXX Forum (as a copy of a news release from Vivarail):
Quote
... A thorough investigation will take place in conjunction with the Railway Accident Investigation Bureau ...

It's the Rail Accident Investigation Branch - if they can't even get that bit right, it doesn't exactly inspire confidence ...  ::)



Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: ChrisB on December 31, 2016, 08:43:02
Rather ironically it looks like it was the first train to stop at Kenilworth's new station!

Hopefully just a set back rather than the end of the project.

Hmm, nice thought, but the station hasn't yet been built!


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: IndustryInsider on December 31, 2016, 09:12:49
No, but looks like it stopped right in the middle of the building site for where it is going to be!


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: John R on December 31, 2016, 11:13:40
Would the RAIB really be that interested?  Nobody was hurt, and the unit was on trial.  I'd have thought at most they would have asked to be kept informed as to what was the cause and what modifications are proposed to address the failure.  As far as being a setback for Vivarail, it certainly is, and I worry that time is running out for them, with apparently several engine failures in the limited amount of testing done so far. With the East Anglian franchise releasing a fair number of dmus in a couple of years, their window of opportunity appears limited.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: eightf48544 on December 31, 2016, 13:36:21
I would have thought that a fire in the engine module would be of interest to the RAIB. After all the engine module is one of the main innovative features of the 230.

Have just received an email from Vivarail saying:

"Vivarail regrets that this means the planned trial on the Coventry to Nuneaton line will be postponed."


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: TonyK on December 31, 2016, 14:10:49
Quote
A train is on fire this afternoon - with three carriages already destroyed in the blaze

Serious - but hardly destroyed!

A lick of paint should suffice.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: SandTEngineer on December 31, 2016, 16:46:38
Quote
A train is on fire this afternoon - with three carriages already destroyed in the blaze

Serious - but hardly destroyed!
A lick of paint should suffice.

...or a new layer of sticky back plastic.... ::)


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: grahame on December 31, 2016, 17:31:30
Oh dear ... another train fire.

From The Standard (http://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/rail-passengers-stranded-in-london-after-east-midlands-train-catches-fire-a3430246.html)

Quote
Rail passengers stranded in London after East Midlands Train catches fire

Rail passengers were left stranded on a train in north London after it caught fire soon after leaving St Pancras.

Travellers on an East Midlands Trains service from London to Nottingham were stuck as the train broke down in Cricklewood soon after it departed at around 12.15pm on Saturday.

The blaze broke out a under one of the train's power cars following a "technical issue" which has caused significant delays for passengers.

Those on the train told how they were left stranded for more than an hour before they left the train.

Katie Calderwood told the Standard: “The train stopped mid-track in Cricklewood and we are waiting for an engineer to come from London.

[snip]

A spokeswoman for East Midlands Trains said: "The 12.15pm St Pancras to Nottingham service was delayed due to a technical issue which occurred near Cricklewood and resulted in a small fire underneath one of the train's power cars.

"The power cars do not hold any passengers and, as the fire was extinguished very quickly by the driver, there was no immediate safety risk to customers on the train.

Picture is a class 222 which (however) has passenger accommodation in the power cars; I suspect an HST incident.   Posting here as a confirmation the train fires are not unique to any type of train.






Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: Timmer on December 31, 2016, 20:38:14
Yes the xx.15 STP-NOT services are HSTs.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: stuving on January 01, 2017, 12:28:23
Would the RAIB really be that interested?  Nobody was hurt, and the unit was on trial.  I'd have thought at most they would have asked to be kept informed as to what was the cause and what modifications are proposed to address the failure.  ...

I did wonder whether there might be some required fire protection system not fitted to these trains as prototypes. That might interest RAIB, along with the rules/principle for allowing prototype or test stock on the network. However, the only thing required on all diesels on trains is fire detection. Fire suppression is required by the TSI only on goods locomotives.

There are other requirements for barriers against fire spread, and for the safe siting and other protective measures for fuel tanks. The other main area of regulations is about minimum distance to run after the fire is detected, which is usually 4 or 15 minutes linked to the length of tunnels on the route. I'm not quite sure how that works for electric trains where the fire is in the working transformer, though. Essential control cables need to follow protected routes, of course.

(See Railway Group Standard GM/RT2130 and the TSI, Reg 1302/2014 - which are similar.)


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: stuving on January 01, 2017, 12:29:40
The obvious source of a problem like this fire is that the companies responsible are operating outside their area of experience. Vivarail was set up specifically for the D-train project, and Revolve Technologies who are making the engine raft (really the whole motor-generator set) have never done one of those let alone one for a train. They were originally racing engine tuners, who have spread into other areas of road vehicle engineering such as military and emission control. There's always a danger in extrapolating too far from what you know - "I can see how to do that" rates as famous last words in that case.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: grahame on January 05, 2017, 21:00:58
Rather ironically it looks like it was the first train to stop at Kenilworth's new station!

A year early ...
Quote
The opening of Kenilworth’s railway station has been delayed until December 2017
... according to the Warwick Courier[/quote] (http://www.warwickcourier.co.uk/news/transport/kenilworth-station-opening-delayed-until-december-2017-due-to-signalling-problems-1-7759014)


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: stuving on January 08, 2017, 23:48:20
I did wonder whether there might be some required fire protection system not fitted to these trains as prototypes. That might interest RAIB, along with the rules/principle for allowing prototype or test stock on the network. However, the only thing required on all diesels on trains is fire detection. Fire suppression is required by the TSI only on goods locomotives.

While fire suppression may not be formally required, Hitachi included one in the IEP design:
Quote
In addition to the GU, other components installed under the floor of drive cars include the traction converter, fuel tank, fire protection system, and brake system. An automatic fire-fighting system is installed to deal with fires in the top part of the engine. This system is designed to quickly extinguish any fire by using high-pressure nitrogen gas to spray it with water.
(From Hitachi Review Vol. 63 (2014), No. 10, p. 43)


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: TonyK on January 09, 2017, 19:45:09
How very sensible! In terms of the overall cost, it has to be worth it. Although fire extinguishers are like insurance - you buy it hoping you never use it.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: stuving on January 09, 2017, 20:19:07
How very sensible! In terms of the overall cost, it has to be worth it. Although fire extinguishers are like insurance - you buy it hoping you never use it.

Mind you, sticking one on the wall in the garage or kitchen is a lot less hassle than carting it around the countryside all day every day and checking its water and gas every night.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: TonyK on January 09, 2017, 21:15:03
Mind you, sticking one on the wall in the garage or kitchen is a lot less hassle than carting it around the countryside all day every day and checking its water and gas every night.

I used to do that in an aeroplane before every flight, meaning that on nice summers days, it may have been checked half a dozen or more times by different pilots!
I now have three in the garage and one by the kitchen. There is one place where I am required by insurers to have one in the kitchen, and it is cheaper to buy new every two years than pay to have them checked, hence my burgeoning collection. When I next replace the one in the cottage, I might light a small fire and try the oldest one out.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: grahame on January 11, 2017, 18:17:35
From Rail (http://www.railmagazine.com/news/network/vivarail-d-train-trial-cancelled-after-fire)

Quote
Following a fire aboard the prototype Vivarail D-Train at Kenilworth on December 30, the planned trial with London Midland has been cancelled.

The eight-month trial that was due to begin next month on the Coventry-Nuneaton line, during which 230001 was to be pressed into revenue-earning service for the first time with London Midland. This is because the D-Train was undergoing final testing and had yet to receive its safety certification when it caught fire.

In a joint statement, trial sponsors Coventry City Council, Coventry and Warwickshire Local Enterprise Partnership, London Midland, Warwickshire County Council and the West Midlands Combined Authority said on January 9 that the likely delay in receiving certification meant that “there is no longer enough time to run and evaluate a pilot service using these trains before the next local rail franchise starts in October”.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: TonyK on January 12, 2017, 08:57:31
This has gone from "A couple more runs, then start loading passengers" to "Cancelled" in the wink of an eye. There has been no attempt to give a window for further testing. Given the need for transport, this is being taken more seriously by the Powers That Be than meets the eye. Would that have been the case had there been an automatic fire suppression system on board?  (A propos which, it wouldn't have been water based, would it?)


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: ChrisB on January 12, 2017, 09:26:29
That may be the route they go - but of course they need to investigate & identify the cause, then I suspect work with the engine module suppliers to iron out the fault / decide whether to fit (if space allows of course) suppression equipment.

It was always going to be tight getting them certified in time for the new franchise start in just a few months. I suspect the immediate decision is linked with that, so as to give the new franchise a definite so they can plan ahead.

Adrian Shooter just doesn't work the way you describe


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: stuving on January 12, 2017, 10:12:47
This has gone from "A couple more runs, then start loading passengers" to "Cancelled" in the wink of an eye. There has been no attempt to give a window for further testing. Given the need for transport, this is being taken more seriously by the Powers That Be than meets the eye. Would that have been the case had there been an automatic fire suppression system on board?  (A propos which, it wouldn't have been water based, would it?)

Well, the fire suppression on the IEPs is a water spray. And it's what fire brigades use on cars, and on trains - the pictures of this incident show that. Not recommended unless you have a big tank of water, so not a viable "first aid" extinguisher for your boot.

You can't flood an underfloor engine with inert gas - it would all run away!


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: eightf48544 on January 12, 2017, 11:43:39
I've helped, with the driver, put out a fire under a 33 in traction motor blower trunking  in Uckfield station. No fire brigade had a fitter meet us at Brighton.

Using a CTC pump extinguisher.  (Now banned?)

Admittedly it was the 1960s


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: TonyK on January 12, 2017, 15:58:05
Thanks folks, for the education. I see now that water is more appropriate - presumably to get rid of the heat rather than starve oxygen? Gas is for confined spaces, like jet engine nascelles, where HFCs replaced Halon some 20 years ago.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: stuving on January 12, 2017, 16:36:44
Thanks folks, for the education. I see now that water is more appropriate - presumably to get rid of the heat rather than starve oxygen? Gas is for confined spaces, like jet engine nascelles, where HFCs replaced Halon some 20 years ago.

Excluding oxygen is a strategy that only works in the right circumstances. The general principles I remember are to separate fuel from burning fire and from ignition source (including heat which vaporises the fuel). Water can do those, and extract heat, but also protect fire-fighters with a water screen.

I get quite twitchy when I see someone take a gas torch to the underside of a car. A long time ago I saw an exhaust fitter doing that who, for speed, put the torch behind him over his shoulder so he could take off his goggles and see the bracket he was cutting. Of course he pointed it at the side of the petrol tank, with the predictable result that petrol flowed out, caught fire, and ran down his back.

His colleagues were quick to get him away and beat that fire out, but were left with a car on a hoist, petrol on the floor, and fire licking up at the tank. They made various attempts at it with CO2 and water extinguishers, but each time someone put out the fire on the ground or under the tank they would shift to the other site and the fire relit. No-one though to use two at once - and then the manager came haring out of his office with a dry powder extinguisher and put it out in one second.

I was very impressed by that, and came away with several learning points (as the RAIB would put it). I didn't come away with any new tyres, as the fire brigade arrived and sent all us customers home so they could get all the staff in the office and treat them to some "learning points" of their own.

Dry powder (commonly baking soda) is of course excluding oxygen in a sense, but by creating its CO2 locally. Good for small fires, and it does stick to surfaces. I've used a very small one on a chip-fryer in a neighbour's house, and it worked but was rather messy. Mind you he still thanked me, for obvious reasons, despite an off-duty fireman turning up and demonstrating how to do it with just wet cloths and no extra mess to clean up.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: TonyK on January 12, 2017, 16:59:06
Dry powder (commonly baking soda) is of course excluding oxygen in a sense, but by creating its CO2 locally. Good for small fires, and it does stick to surfaces. I've used a very small one on a chip-fryer in a neighbour's house, and it worked but was rather messy. Mind you he still thanked me, for obvious reasons, despite an off-duty fireman turning up and demonstrating how to do it with just wet cloths and no extra mess to clean up.

The "two wet, but not dripping, tea cloths" approach would have saved a former (now late) boss from serious burns. When he awoke to a burning chip pan (the old story of a post-pub plate of chips before bed), he grabbed it by the handle, and threw it out of his back door. That greatly increased the surface area of the oil open to air, so the flames grew instantly. The wind caught it, with the result that he was lucky to escape with only moderately severe burns.

I too have seen a frying pan fire put out using two wet cloths. I have a fire blanket in the kitchen of the cottage (insurance demand) but would use the tea cloths in preference.

Sorry - where were we? Ah yes. I hope this experiment resumes, maybe with fire suppression or whatever may be found likely to have prevented the fire. We aren't getting enough new rolling stock, so the more practical use we can make of recycled kit, the better.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: SandTEngineer on January 16, 2017, 21:13:44
A photograph of the burnt out engine can be found here: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C2TG-13XAAEknjk?format=jpg&name=large


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: ChrisB on January 16, 2017, 21:51:27
Adrian Shooter is talking to CILT South tomorrow evening on the D-Train. Opportune moment to find out the latest. Redhill Harlequin Theatre 1830 free


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: Western Pathfinder on January 16, 2017, 22:43:03
A photograph of the burnt out engine can be found here: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C2TG-13XAAEknjk?format=jpg&name=large

That looks like the remains of a Ford Transit Diesel engine to me .


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: John R on January 17, 2017, 07:46:59
A photograph of the burnt out engine can be found here: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C2TG-13XAAEknjk?format=jpg&name=large

That looks like the remains of a Ford Transit Diesel engine to me .

Yes, that's correct. On its very first (and last) outing apparently having just been swapped in.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: eightf48544 on January 17, 2017, 15:49:39
Said to be a fuel leak wonder if they didn't tighten the fuel line properly after swapping engine?


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: Western Pathfinder on January 17, 2017, 17:02:13
By the looks of things I would say that from the picture it was the high pressure fuel rail and the injectors that caused the problem only my guess mind ?.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: 4064ReadingAbbey on January 17, 2017, 20:45:06
I love the mug!


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: chuffed on January 17, 2017, 21:06:13
 The aforesaid mug is not half as red, as the face of the person, who made the original error that led to the engine fire. :o


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: ChrisB on January 17, 2017, 21:15:29
Adrian Shooter stated that he released an interim report into this incident yesterday, and should be finding the press picking up on it very soon. Can anyone find it?

The full report will be published he said on Jan 31st. They are taking several mitigating actions & expect normal 'service' to resume. He has retained '2 or 3' customers going forward but obviously has signed confidentiality sgreements with them.

The engines are the same as used in USA versions if the Transit, not those in UK versions


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: Gordon the Blue Engine on February 02, 2017, 14:03:06
The Vivarail Report on the Class 230 fire at Kenilworth is here:

http://www.vivarail.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/VR-QA-17-001-Class-230-Full-Fire-Report-Action-Plan.pdf (http://www.vivarail.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/VR-QA-17-001-Class-230-Full-Fire-Report-Action-Plan.pdf)



Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: John R on February 02, 2017, 14:28:16
I think it makes fairly sorry reading, in terms of all the things that went wrong, not only with the engine and subsequent fire, but unrelated faults that transpired in the aftermath.  It does call into question the rigour of the development in my mind.  On the plus side, they have found several things that are likely to have caused the fire, so to that end they know what actions they can take to reduce the likelihood of a reoccurrence.



Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: Gordon the Blue Engine on February 02, 2017, 17:23:50
Full marks to Vivarail for publishing this Report, although I suspect that this was a condition of RAIB standing back.

Viviarail have a lot of work to do, and some of the issues mentioned - eg no indication to the Driver of a Genset fault in coaches 2 and 3, and the lack of effectiveness of the fire extinguishant system - are a bit concerning.  I think NR will now be taking a closer interest in Class 230’s compliance with Rolling Stock TSI’s (Technical Standards for Interoperability) – I wouldn’t want to bet on when they will be allowed out again. 


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: 4064ReadingAbbey on February 02, 2017, 17:45:38
I think it makes fairly sorry reading, in terms of all the things that went wrong, not only with the engine and subsequent fire, but unrelated faults that transpired in the aftermath.  It does call into question the rigour of the development in my mind.  On the plus side, they have found several things that are likely to have caused the fire, so to that end they know what actions they can take to reduce the likelihood of a reoccurrence.



That's why one builds prototypes.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: stuving on February 02, 2017, 17:56:15
It looks as if I was right to suspect Revolve Technologies were trying to play several leagues above their engineering comfort zone. Of course that just passes the buck back to Vivarail, who chose and vetted (or should have) their most important supplier.

And Western Pathfinder was right to name the fuel rail as the likely site of a leak. I guess this is a modern common rail design (Ford Duratorq), and apparently they work at ferociously high pressures - around 2000 bar. Not to be messed with.



Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: Western Pathfinder on February 02, 2017, 18:11:28
Care needs to be taken with the duratorq fuel rail as they can be extremely difficult to mate together without leaking also they are buggers for becoming air locked after maintenance .


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: John R on February 02, 2017, 19:46:38
I think it makes fairly sorry reading, in terms of all the things that went wrong, not only with the engine and subsequent fire, but unrelated faults that transpired in the aftermath.  It does call into question the rigour of the development in my mind.  On the plus side, they have found several things that are likely to have caused the fire, so to that end they know what actions they can take to reduce the likelihood of a reoccurrence.



That's why one builds prototypes.
But if you read the report in full you will find some howlers that should never have been allowed to happen, even in a prototype. Such as the plastic pipe which was clearly the wrong standard for the job it was doing. That feels more like engineering incompetence, and I'd concur with the comment that RT appear to have been out of their depth.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: 4064ReadingAbbey on February 02, 2017, 20:11:42
I think it makes fairly sorry reading, in terms of all the things that went wrong, not only with the engine and subsequent fire, but unrelated faults that transpired in the aftermath.  It does call into question the rigour of the development in my mind.  On the plus side, they have found several things that are likely to have caused the fire, so to that end they know what actions they can take to reduce the likelihood of a reoccurrence.



That's why one builds prototypes.
But if you read the report in full you will find some howlers that should never have been allowed to happen, even in a prototype. Such as the plastic pipe which was clearly the wrong standard for the job it was doing. That feels more like engineering incompetence, and I'd concur with the comment that RT appear to have been out of their depth.

That would seem to be the case. But it's still why one builds prototypes. :)


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: onthecushions on February 02, 2017, 21:46:57

Having been in an Adelante carriage that was filling with smoke, with no alarm triggered or staff around, I do not want to be in any underfloor diesel unit, especially when working hard climbing or in a tunnel.

The thought of the air reservoir also going, presumably supplying the door pneumatic actuators....

Perhaps the Class 230 should have gone to Derby, Loughborough or even Newton Aycliffe.

And I am told that 3rd/4th rail dc is dangerous (when did its clearances last have to be raised?)

Shivering,

OTC



Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: onthecushions on February 09, 2017, 00:10:39

Apologies if this is the wrong thread but I've just located the power figures for the Class 319 flex (the bi/tri-mode  ex "Thameslink/FCC" unit that we nearly had on the WR).

On ac they have 990kW motor output, i.e at rail.

On diesel, using the MAN2876, there are a range of figures but the continuous output is lowest, being about 250kW. This has to go through transmission, alternator, thyristor drive, traction motor etc which would leave about 200kW (x2 on a good day!).

So, 40% of power on diesel.

Power to weight ratios are (kW/t): electric 7.1, diesel 2.9, heritage DMU: 2.7 (1 motor car, 80% transmission).

Back to the future,

OTC






Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: grahame on February 09, 2017, 09:04:36
Power to weight ratios are (kW/t): electric 7.1, diesel 2.9, heritage DMU: 2.7 (1 motor car, 80% transmission).

For comparative purposes, what is the ratio for a more modern diesel (turbo, sprinter or pacer?)

For a predominantly electric service with a diesel offshoot, I guess 2.9 may not be too bad. Southampton stopper to Swanage, anyone?  And dare I mention Reading to Bedwyn?


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: onthecushions on February 09, 2017, 13:03:21

I've calculated the following kW/t figures from power at rail (kW at c80%) and unit or car mass (t)

150: 4.8
159: 6.3
166: 5.2
170: 5.6
101: 3.1
180: 8.6
220: 9.3

The transmission losses don't have a uniform effect. The 101, having a gearbox, can't exert its full power continuously, unlike a unit with an electric or hydraulic power train. The advantage of a bigger engine is clear. The 560kW Cummins QSK19 is the reason than the adelantes and voyagers perform well; also they can have an engine for each car, the 319/4 has two per four car set. The 319 might go a little better if its engine management system allowed use of its short term ratings, i.e overloading the engine with maintenance and service life consequences.

In the end we come back to the fact that railways with lots of traffic, lots of stops, lots of hills and lots of high speed need electrification but that an auxiliary diesel is superb for rural rambles, for reaching the ends of branches and for getting home on a bad day. Hope this helps.

E&OE

OTC


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: TonyK on February 11, 2017, 23:55:26
A possible threat to new trains from old is new trains in the form of the Very Light Rail vehicle. See Warwick University's website (https://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/sci/wmg/research/hvmcatapult/research/rail/vlr/) on the project. Today's Times reports that trials could start within 18 months, so around 2020 probably. These lightweight trains with lorry engines and a maximum speed of 50 to 70 mph are intended to be used on quiet branch lines, including reopened Beeching victims.

Sadly, Portishead is shown on the map that accompanies the article - sadly because it needs heavy trains to run to Parkway, Bath, Severn Beach etc.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: eightf48544 on February 12, 2017, 01:21:52

Sadly, Portishead is shown on the map that accompanies the article - sadly because it needs heavy trains to run to Parkway, Bath, Severn Beach etc.

Or tram trains with street running through Bristol.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: grahame on March 03, 2017, 15:31:21
I saw a D-Train in action today - respondent in Silver with Red and Blue bits, running between Gloucester Road and Earls Court.

Oh ... wait ... I think that was the electric variant!


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: grahame on May 18, 2017, 22:35:19
http://www.railtechnologymagazine.com/The-Sleepers-Daily-Blog/vivarail-d-trains-now-ready-for-sale-

Quote
Vivarail: D-Trains now ready for sale

Vivarail has announced that its first two production D-Trains are ready for sale, with delivery likely to be completed in early 2018.

The trains can be built and delivered ahead of the forecast schedule due to increased production capacity as Vivarail scale up for 2017 and beyond.

Preparation for construction is already underway at the Quinton Rail Technology Centre. The carriages can be supplied as either two or three car units with or without UAT.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: Richard Fairhurst on May 19, 2017, 10:30:24
Ah, I see Vivarail are now marketing their Unpredictable Ablaze Traction feature as an optional extra.

"No, we said passengers may alight here. Not 'the train should set itself alight'..."


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: Chris125 on July 02, 2017, 17:54:56
Citytransportinfo has uploaded a video with clips from 230001's recent shuttle workings to the Rail Live event - having recently 'enjoyed' several 150s recently, the unit comes across as having a much brighter and airier interior with surprisingly unobtrusive engine noise.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTdrtRmSUO0


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: CyclingSid on July 03, 2017, 16:45:44
Would the VivaRail units be suitable for the Isle of Wight? I don't know what the gauge limits on IoW are, previously they have used old Underground (deep level?) stock. Presumably there will have to thoughts of some sort of replacement for the existing rolling stock, whoever is going to pay for it. I believe the idea is to move towards a community rail set-up.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: John R on July 03, 2017, 16:49:51
Would the VivaRail units be suitable for the Isle of Wight? I don't know what the gauge limits on IoW are, previously they have used old Underground (deep level?) stock. Presumably there will have to thoughts of some sort of replacement for the existing rolling stock, whoever is going to pay for it. I believe the idea is to move towards a community rail set-up.
The IoW uses the lower profile tube stock, whereas the D Train is sub-surface stock. So I suspect the answer is that it would not be suitable.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: grahame on July 03, 2017, 16:53:59
Would the VivaRail units be suitable for the Isle of Wight? I don't know what the gauge limits on IoW are, previously they have used old Underground (deep level?) stock. Presumably there will have to thoughts of some sort of replacement for the existing rolling stock, whoever is going to pay for it. I believe the idea is to move towards a community rail set-up.

My understanding is that the tunnel at Ryde is so limited that it has to be true deep level tube stock, and the old sub-surface District Line units are too big.   There was a suggestion of a light rail / tram services, using roads across Ryde.

There is already a CRP (Community Rail Partnership) for the Isle of Wight - and very active they are to (their dancers in Waterloo on 17th May left me tired just from looking at them).   But it would be a whole different kettle of fish for them to become in essence the operators.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: paul7575 on July 03, 2017, 17:00:52
SWT have been consistent (over about 5 or 6 years or more) in saying that the next IOW stock is earmarked to be ex LU 73 stock (Piccadilly Line) whenever it becomes available.   

AIUI anything of a more normal size, even most trams, would need some track lowering through Ryde Tunnel.

Paul



Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: onthecushions on July 03, 2017, 18:35:38

I've read that the height of the Ryde tunnel invert is 12' 31/2" or 3746mm.

For comparison a class 507/8 maximum height is 3582mm, a 45x is 3774mm and Mark 1 slammers are 3860 - 3899. A tube train height is 2772mm.  Clearances are of course a little more complicated than this as there are profile, static and dynamic spacings to be considered.

Balfour Beatty etc do slab track, quoted as 370mm from base to rail height, saving 300/400mm on ballasted, sleepered track. It's probably gentler on any services, pipes and drains underneath.

Where there's a will...

OTC



Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: rogerw on July 03, 2017, 20:49:09
The clearance in Ryde tunnel used to be greater as it took normal mainline stock in steam days.  However it was prone to flooding which does not mix with third rail electrification so when the line was electrified the decision was taken to raise the track bed as ex tube stock was being used.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: johnneyw on July 03, 2017, 22:15:34
A back issue of Parry News on the Parry People Movers site addressed this issue suggesting that their products might be a solution. The back issues are on their site. The article is in their Nov 2015 issue on their news archive pages. The general website also features the current story on the couple visiting all of the UK stations.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: onthecushions on July 04, 2017, 00:48:26

Raising the Ryde tunnel track may have made sense in the milder 1960's but the floods of 2010 and 2014 filled the tunnel half way and then fully, rendering the loss of clearance of little value.

Better drainage and prevention of water ingress might help but there are times when nature must win temporarily. As not many people travel when the weather is that bad, suspension of service is reasonable.

The problem with the Parry vehicle is its low capacity - heavy rail's real advantage.

A bi-mode class 230 that could reach both Shanklin and Wootton might just lead to greater things.

OTC


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: Chris125 on July 04, 2017, 16:56:21

Raising the Ryde tunnel track may have made sense in the milder 1960's but the floods of 2010 and 2014 filled the tunnel half way and then fully, rendering the loss of clearance of little value.

The recent floods have been caused by Monktonmead Brook (which the railway follows from Smallbrook) bursting it's banks and following the track down into the tunnel - that would happen whatever the clearances in the tunnel, which I presume were reduced to minimise the impact of high tides.

While headroom isn't ideal the tight reverse curve in the tunnel and esplanade platform also restrict length as well as some very restrictive overbridges too. That said the photo below shows a gauging trial when ex-Merseyrail 503s were under serious consideration in the 80s; a relatively compact design not so different from sub-surface LU stock.

https://twitter.com/MrTimDunn/status/622851071229186048


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: IndustryInsider on September 17, 2017, 11:33:41
Don't think there's been an official announcement yet, but being widely rumoured that three Class 230s will be used on Bedford to Bletchley services from December 2018 as part of the rolling stock plan for the new West Midlands Franchise.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: grahame on September 17, 2017, 11:37:24
Don't think there's been an official announcement yet, but being widely rumoured that three Class 230s will be used on Bedford to Bletchley services from December 2018 as part of the rolling stock plan form the new West Midlands Franchise.

There's a great deal of logic in using them on that line.  Lots of stops, no main line running, and (certainly when I last used it) some trains formed of a 153 which was more full than comfortable.  Also an isolated diesel outpost within a sea of electrification in the area in that franchise.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: ChrisB on September 17, 2017, 17:20:25
Good stop gap until EWR comes along


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: IndustryInsider on September 17, 2017, 18:19:53
Indeed, although the existing Marston Vale line stopping service is supposed to continue alongside the EWR services when they commence, so perhaps they will last even longer than that?

A bit of an increase in capacity as well, as in my experience the line is usually worked with one of their three 2-car 150s and a single car Class 153.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: stuving on February 24, 2018, 19:49:50
Vivarail recently announced (http://vivarail.co.uk/battery-train-update/) they have just about finished their first "production" battery D78s.
Quote
(http://vivarail.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/230002-in-production-BEN-JONES_preview-2-232x300.jpeg)Photo credit: Ben Jones
230002 nearing completion in Vivarail’s main workshop.  This 2-car train is the first production battery unit in the UK and will be in passenger service by the summer.  The train is powered by 2 lithium ion batteries per car (4 in total) and has a range of 40 miles.

Battery trains are not new but battery technology is – and Vivarail is leading the way in new and innovative ways to bring them into service.  230002 has a total of 4 battery rafts each with a capacity of 106 kWh and requires an 8 minute charge at each end of the journey. With a 10 minute charge this range is extended to 50 miles and battery technology is developing all the time so these distances will increase.

The train can be charged through existing infrastructure – OHL or 3rd rail – and for non-electrified lines Vivarail has developed a static battery bank as an alternative. In each case the train is charged automatically through a patented Automatic Charging Point.  This is a simple and elegant design that will allow battery trains to replace diesel units with a minimum of time and effort.
...

Now, the words do seem to suggest they have agreement with a ToC to run some of their trains. But where is this passenger service going to be? And where will the recharging be done? I'm pretty sure they will not have fitted any pantographs yet. Would they be installing these rapid charging points at a station, with or without buffer batteries? that sounds like it would need a pretty big stack of safety documents, even for a trial. I can believe they could put the 3rd rail shoe gear back, or more likely pick some bogies with it still on, but that seriously limits where it could run. 

There's more details on that page and others. Peering closely at the pictures of the battery packs, not only are they the same rather bilious shade of green as the LIMP batteries removed from the Harwich IPEMUs, but they have Valence labels - so they are still using those old things (the cheapskates).



Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: paul7575 on February 24, 2018, 20:11:36
Would Bedford - Bletchley be in range?  That was/is supposed to be getting 3 x 230s according to earlier plans by the new TOC?  I had assumed they’d be diesel though...

Paul


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: stuving on February 24, 2018, 20:15:17
Would Bedford - Bletchley be in range?  That was/is supposed to be getting 3 x 230s according to earlier plans by the new TOC?  I had assumed they’d be diesel though...

Paul

I think that plan went up in smoke, since diesel 230s will no longer be available in time for the new franchise. And it's not 3rd rail territory, is it?


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: paul7575 on February 24, 2018, 20:20:54
The diesel electric 230s didn’t involve 3rd rail pickup as far as I recall.  There have been so many different reports in forums though I may be out of date.

Googling suggests they were to be introduced for Dec 2018, so not actually planned for the first year of that franchise...

Paul


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: Surrey 455 on February 24, 2018, 20:33:57
I hadn't realised that Vivarail had moved to battery power. Robert Llewellyn (Kryten from Red Dwarf) took a look at the new train in a video posted in November 2017. The train shown also has a diesel generator as well as a battery. The purpose wasn't fully explained so I don't know if it was there just during development or whether it will appear in the production models.

https://youtu.be/9s4heZe7ChM


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: grahame on February 24, 2018, 22:59:57
Would Bedford - Bletchley be in range?  That was/is supposed to be getting 3 x 230s according to earlier plans by the new TOC?  I had assumed they’d be diesel though...

Paul

I think that plan went up in smoke, since diesel 230s will no longer be available in time for the new franchise. And it's not 3rd rail territory, is it?

There were various stock plans floating around ... a chance meeting with one of the key people involved in stock resourcing as one franchise moved to another would suggest that the was not completeness or certainly in any of the plans ...



Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: JayMac on February 24, 2018, 23:43:14
They keep trying don't they?

And still no firm orders for these re-purposed D78s.

I truly hope I never see a large fleet of them on the UK network. Vivarail have recently been hawking them to the Wales & Borders bidders. I hope the WAG have insisted on new build in the tender.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: Western Pathfinder on February 24, 2018, 23:50:22
This might prove of interest https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SnNaMPR-e1I&feature=youtu.be.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: stuving on February 25, 2018, 00:31:29
I hadn't realised that Vivarail had moved to battery power. Robert Llewellyn (Kryten from Red Dwarf) took a look at the new train in a video posted in November 2017. The train shown also has a diesel generator as well as a battery. The purpose wasn't fully explained so I don't know if it was there just during development or whether it will appear in the production models.

https://youtu.be/9s4heZe7ChM


I reckon the train with one diesel and one battery was just to demonstrate that modularity. But Vivarail's use of "production" for the trains they are building now is a bit questionable, since they hand-build them all anyway. As far as they are concerned, the diesel modules and trains are fully approved and in production. Do they have all the systems and software to manage a diesel/battery hybrid?

The original first public use for Coventry-Nuneaton was lost due to the fire and the loss of a grant from Coventry City. The Marston Vale trains were announced (if only indirectly, via the press) long after that, though the franchise bid went in just before the fire. They are reportedly diesel, but only two-car units rather than the three-car ones planned for Leamington. WMT need something new, pretty soon, so I guess they don't have so many options (though only three are needed).

What they have just announced are electric two-car trains to be in use this summer. The batteries should not have been too hard to configure, as they were made to run a train. That's still true if they buy some more from Valence, as they have chosen to go with them as suppliers. It's likely the DC voltage in a class 379 isn't 750V, but that may not be a big issue. There should be standard boxes to manage charge/discharge from the common DC bus too.

But the 379s had all the 25 kV input stuff already, and I think they were charging only while sitting waiting and then switching over just once. Having to install that - pantograph, transformer, cables, rectifier - and then manage its operation, that doesn't sound easy. And even if you buy existing bits (Who from? Off old trains?)  finding space is not going to be easily. So while that's certainly possible, I've seen no sign it's been tried let alone ready to run.

And as for their charging points, if they need to be installed in several stations in less than six months, with their feed at 11 kV or more ... sound likely?


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: grahame on February 25, 2018, 05:08:58
Would Bedford - Bletchley be in range?  That was/is supposed to be getting 3 x 230s according to earlier plans by the new TOC?  I had assumed they’d be diesel though...

Paul

I think that plan went up in smoke, since diesel 230s will no longer be available in time for the new franchise. And it's not 3rd rail territory, is it?

There were various stock plans floating around ... a chance meeting with one of the key people involved in stock resourcing as one franchise moved to another would suggest that the was not completeness or certainly in any of the plans ...



Seriously bad following up my own post with contradictory evidence ... a couple of weeks old but the Bedford to Bletchley line users association write on their Facebook page (https://www.facebook.com/BedfordtoBletchleyRailUsersAssociation/photos/a.595682580566543.1073741827.168487219952750/1183883311746464/?type=1&theater) after a visit to Long Marston earlier this month

Quote
The team at Vivarail are an enthusiastic and dedicated bunch and they and our hosts wmtrains made us very welcome.

Our units will have 6 to 8 full width tables with a remainder of airline and tip up style seats to enable bicycle storage. There will also be shared space which can be used for cycles buggies and wheelchairs total 108 seats. We emphasised the need for luggage space and bins for waste; the location of these is still to be decided. We also confirmed the need for onboard ramps which had been missed. Trains will have anti slip protection, sanders and drive through all bogie wheels.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: TonyK on February 25, 2018, 10:10:09
And as for their charging points, if they need to be installed in several stations in less than six months, with their feed at 11 kV or more ... sound likely?

Doesn't sound at all likely. That means you would be limited to a trial involving a branch line of a length that would match the capacity of the batteries and fit the kit in just one station. You could do that at Temple Meads for the Severn Beach line (26 miles the round trip) but you reduce that to a shuttle service and spoil the diagrams that extend beyond BRI.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: grahame on February 25, 2018, 10:53:45
And as for their charging points, if they need to be installed in several stations in less than six months, with their feed at 11 kV or more ... sound likely?

Doesn't sound at all likely. That means you would be limited to a trial involving a branch line of a length that would match the capacity of the batteries and fit the kit in just one station. You could do that at Temple Meads for the Severn Beach line (26 miles the round trip) but you reduce that to a shuttle service and spoil the diagrams that extend beyond BRI.

Interesting, I gave that some thought and came up with around a dozen services in our area or close by that would be candidates.  Two or three are innovative (for example Swanage to Wareham and Honeybourne to Long Marston), two or three would really upset the current user or advocate base, but the majority would be operationally and politically in spec.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: IndustryInsider on February 25, 2018, 11:40:12
Lots of potential candidates throughout Britain, should any initial trials go well.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: broadgage on February 25, 2018, 12:14:05
Charging only at stations should be doable.
I doubt that an 11KV supply would be needed for these relatively short range and lightweight units.
A 3 phase 100 amp supply at 230/400* volts should do. After losses that would be about 70KW* into the battery.

A short length of conductor rail would be the obvious means of charging. Although the health and safety industry are opposed to new conductor rail installations, this could be made much safer by only energising the rail when a train was either over it, or so close that being run over was the greater risk.

*presuming that the nominal 400 volt supply is in fact a bit higher than 400 volts, most are nearer 420 volts.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: TonyK on February 25, 2018, 12:59:53
Another question that needs to be answered is exactly how many different types of motive technology we really want. As things seem to be progressing, we could conceivably end up with a station having overhead and third rail electrification, hydrogen and diesel refuelling systems on hand, with class 139s running a shuttle service to somewhere not far away.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: stuving on February 25, 2018, 14:43:10
Charging only at stations should be doable.
I doubt that an 11KV supply would be needed for these relatively short range and lightweight units.
A 3 phase 100 amp supply at 230/400* volts should do. After losses that would be about 70KW* into the battery.

A short length of conductor rail would be the obvious means of charging. Although the health and safety industry are opposed to new conductor rail installations, this could be made much safer by only energising the rail when a train was either over it, or so close that being run over was the greater risk.

*presuming that the nominal 400 volt supply is in fact a bit higher than 400 volts, most are nearer 420 volts.

There's a lot of (unknown to us) factors that go into the range and recharging calculations, but some of them are given by Vivarail. However, I can't work out what 40 miles with 8 minute charge each end or 50 milles with 10 minutes means in terms of power or energy. The two-car train has four 100 kWhr batteries, so a full recharge in 10 minutes  would need over 600 kW* 2.4 MW.

Of course you would not reckon on a full recharge, and there's trade-offs between turn-round time, range, and battery weight, but it's still a bit mysterious. Mind you, I just read what Vivarail say:
Quote
The charging point can draw power from existing infrastructure – it simply needs an electrical supply of 11kV or 33kV.

However if the supply is not strong enough then a static battery bank can be used instead to provide an energy reserve at the charging points.  Vivarail is spearheading this design for the rail industry but it is already used in other applications – such as motorway service area electric car charging.

* True as written, but truer is better.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: broadgage on February 25, 2018, 16:04:01
As a full charge in 10 minutes is said to need over 600KW, then that to me suggests a 70KW supply would fully charge the battery in about 100 minutes, or say at 1% a minute.
But surely they are not reckoning on fully discharging the battery every trip ? So a partial charge during each layover and a full charge at night might suffice.

OTOH, they state four batteries with a total capacity of 400KWH, to fully charge that in 10 minutes would take about 2.6MW (allowing an estimate for losses in battery and in the charger) which is beyond any reasonable supply at 230/400 volts, and borderline for 11KV.

So perhaps they mean a total battery capacity of 400KWH, with about one fifth of that capacity used per trip. If 80KWH is used per trip, then to replace that 80KWH in 10 minutes would need 480KW without any losses, and perhaps 530KW with losses, or about the stated 600KW with some pre heating of the passenger saloon.
600KW is excessive at low voltage but readily available from an 11KV supply, though 33KV might be preferred for such a disturbing load.

More confirmed detail needed, in particular total battery capacity, and the capacity used per single or return trip.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: JayMac on February 25, 2018, 18:15:06
Or just admit that Vivarail are flying kites with no real prospect of finding widespread users for their speculative punt on the D78 stock.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: ChrisB on February 25, 2018, 18:21:38
I'm sure Vivarail, and Adrian Shooter - have checked out everything battery & charging-wise & are happy with their research & development. I certainly respect them & if they're happy I think we don't need to query this, especially until we have full facts which I'm sure will be available to anyone emailing & asking.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: stuving on February 25, 2018, 18:52:40
More confirmed detail needed, in particular total battery capacity, and the capacity used per single or return trip.

I did, I think, distinguish Vivarail's data from my sums (which are not guaranteed error-free), and their data are all accessible. The battery capacity they do quote as 106 kWhr and on one of those videos as 90 kWhr, but I take that to be two different ways of rating a battery.

In any case we are not reckoning to that sort of accuracy. The two biggest unknowns - unknown by far more than that - are the real-world ones: how much power it will need for particular route, and how much charge needs to be kept in reserve "just in case". It is awfully embarrassing to run out, after all. If fast charging causes battery degradation then that would become a constraint you would need to factor in too.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: JayMac on February 25, 2018, 19:45:22
I'm sure Vivarail, and Adrian Shooter - have checked out everything battery & charging-wise & are happy with their research & development. I certainly respect them & if they're happy I think we don't need to query this, especially until we have full facts which I'm sure will be available to anyone emailing & asking.

I prefer blind cynicism to blind faith.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: broadgage on February 25, 2018, 20:39:35
Presuming that these battery units work as intended, they might be attractive to heritage or preserved railways that wish to run economical commuter services outside of their steam operating season.

Clean, green, near silent, and possibly also attractive to some enthusiasts for the novelty value. The limited seating capacity should be of little concern, if the passenger numbers are likely to exceed this capacity then running a steamer or heritage diesel starts to look more viable.



Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: lympstone_commuter on February 26, 2018, 16:57:10
I wonder if a key point here is the suggested use of a large 'battery bank' at each charging location, rather than charging the trains 'directly from the mains'? This would cut down on the need for an expensively beefy electrical supply to charging points.

(the idea of a 'battery bank' is mentioned towards the end of Geoff Marshall's video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SnNaMPR-e1I (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SnNaMPR-e1I) )

Presumably this means an array of [stationary] batteries at the charging locations which are "trickle" charged continuously (or perhaps charged at night when electricity is cheaper). The battery bank would then discharge (into the train batteries) at a much higher rate, during the relatively short periods when trains are stationary at the terminus and connected via 3rd rail / OHLE.

A domestic supply can (I think) provide around 25kW in total so accumulating 400kWhr in a battery bank over the course of a day would be quite feasible with just a standard domestic supply.

How quickly could the battery bank charge the train's batteries? I don't know if the limiting factor here is the batteries or the 3rd rail / OHLE, but given that power ratings for trains are in the several MW ball park, charging the train at up to 1 - 2 MW sounds reasonable (if the batteries can take it). This would suggest that a *full* recharge (of 400kWhr batteries at a rate of over 1MW) in under 15 minutes is not unreasonable.

The key ratio would be the fraction of each day in which the battery bank was discharging into a train - i.e. the proportion of the time that a train was present in the terminus. For 2tph with a 3 minute layover this would be 6 minutes per hour or 1/10. This would mean the battery bank could be recharged using 10% of the current at which it is discharged.

No idea if this argument is correct but it seems plausible to me!


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: ChrisB on February 26, 2018, 17:33:51
8 mins quoted to recharge batteries in that video


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: broadgage on February 26, 2018, 17:36:32
Yes, a domestic electricity supply can supply up to about 25KW, the largest single phase supply is usually 100 amps which is from 22 to 25KW, depending on the actual supply voltage which varies a fair bit.

I am not however very keen on large static batteries that are slowly charged from the grid and then fast discharged into the train.
Another layer of cost, complexity and losses is thereby introduced.
It MIGHT be worthwhile IF the large static battery can be charged at an attractive off peak tariff. A 100 amp 3 phase supply should be available in most places and is about 70KW. On an economy 7 tariff or similar that would be about 500KWH put into the static battery each night, at about 7 pence a KWH, or about £35 a night.

The battery would however be a very costly item, and the cost might be better put towards a supply upgrade. Fast charging direct from a suitable grid supply would avoid the losses in the static battery and the charger for same.

Depending on electricity tariffs, the best option is probably a full charge each night from cheap off peak electricity, together with top up charging during the day from full price electricity.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: TonyK on February 26, 2018, 21:48:21
I prefer blind cynicism to blind faith.

In the realm of the blind, the one-eyed man is king. But you'll do pretty well, too.

Presumably this means an array of [stationary] batteries at the charging locations which are "trickle" charged continuously (or perhaps charged at night when electricity is cheaper).

This could give rise to further complexity in ticketing:
"Which ticket would you like, Sir? Advance single, Anytime return, Economy Seven..."

But when I worked in a tin mine in the latter part of the reign of William IV, one of my jobs on the afternoon shift was to collect the electric locos from where they had been working underground, stick them in the cage two at a time, and send them to the surface. Later in the shift, I would receive them back with replaced battery pack, which was a box around 4' x 6' x 3' high, and try and remember where I had got them from. It didn't take long to change them, I am told, but in fairness they weren't inside or slung underneath anything remotely like a passenger train. I am sure, though, that if proper thought goes into the design of both train and workshop, it could be done very easily. That would add yet another technology to the mix, though.

Depending on electricity tariffs, the best option is probably a full charge each night from cheap off peak electricity, together with top up charging during the day from full price electricity.

A caveat. If we have battery powered trains, and if electric cars and lorries rise in number quickly (and it looks as though that might well be the case) we may find that night time is no longer off peak.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: broadgage on February 26, 2018, 22:32:38
The battery locomotives to which you refer probably had lead acid batteries that are not well suited to rapid charging.
Are you certain that you got them back with the SAME battery packs ? I consider it likely that the batteries were swapped for fully charged ones, with the depleted batteries being charged before the next swap.

Returning to the present, it is likely that the proposed  battery trains would not be designed for routine battery swaps.
If rapid swapping is required, then the vehicles would probably need redesigning.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: TonyK on February 26, 2018, 23:08:55
The battery locomotives to which you refer probably had lead acid batteries that are not well suited to rapid charging.
Are you certain that you got them back with the SAME battery packs ? I consider it likely that the batteries were swapped for fully charged ones, with the depleted batteries being charged before the next swap.

Returning to the present, it is likely that the proposed  battery trains would not be designed for routine battery swaps.
If rapid swapping is required, then the vehicles would probably need redesigning.

They definitely were not returned with the same packs. I'm not sure they were as modern as lead acid either.  ;D But they certainly hauled plenty of weight.

The idea of swapping battery packs is possible, but I can't see that it could be viable on a passenger railway. Modern batteries charge much more quickly, are a lot lighter than lead acid, and have many other advantages. There are a few disadvantages, though, as seen in Boeing's Dreamliner incidents, involving Lithium Ion batteries. One would expect a very stringent safety testing programme for any new battery powered vehicle.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: devonexpress on February 27, 2018, 00:37:30
Seems Angel Trains can't even tell the difference between a 153, and a 150 :( pretty disappointing for a train leasing company. http://www.angelrailway.com/class-153.html


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: ChrisB on February 27, 2018, 11:59:30
the Battery packs on the D Trains are modular, and can be swapped in & out at ease. (but probably onlyin the depot under normal use)


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: johnneyw on February 27, 2018, 22:19:27
I recognise that D Train has divided opinion on the forum but I must declare myself a fan. Reuse of an existing resource, if done properly has to be applauded, especially if it is at a comparatively low cost in a cash strapped industry with an historic shortage of rolling stock. Give it a try I say. Adrian Shooter and co are taking the real risk rather than the taxpayer/rail customer and they have shown some of the innovation the industry needs with the various modes they are introducing of powering them.
While the aesthetics of any rolling stock may be of secondary importance, I reckon the modern take on kind of vintage stock looks quite good!


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: onthecushions on February 28, 2018, 21:04:13

I would rather Shooter & Co tried their alternative drives on the various EMU classes that seem to be coming off lease early in life such as the class 317- 322 family and even the Networkers.

OTC


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: paul7575 on March 01, 2018, 12:26:01
Vivarail have finally confirmed the 3 x 230 conversions for Bedford - Bletchley this morning:
http://vivarail.co.uk/vivarail-supply-new-trains-marston-vale-line/

Paul


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: johnneyw on March 01, 2018, 13:25:56

I would rather Shooter & Co tried their alternative drives on the various EMU classes that seem to be coming off lease early in life such as the class 317- 322 family and even the Networkers.

OTC

A success with D Train might be the testbed needed for such applications.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: Surrey 455 on March 01, 2018, 22:36:14
Vivarail have finally confirmed the 3 x 230 conversions for Bedford - Bletchley this morning:
http://vivarail.co.uk/vivarail-supply-new-trains-marston-vale-line/

Paul

How are these powered? If that's a press release I'd expect them to be going OTT if it was a green, battery powered train.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: stuving on March 01, 2018, 23:25:22
Vivarail have finally confirmed the 3 x 230 conversions for Bedford - Bletchley this morning:
http://vivarail.co.uk/vivarail-supply-new-trains-marston-vale-line/

Paul

How are these powered? If that's a press release I'd expect them to be going OTT if it was a green, battery powered train.

Earlier press reports said diesel. WMT put out the same press release, with a few altered pronouns, and some extra "notes for editors" underneath including:
Quote
About the D-Train

The D-Train is a cost-effective solution to the need for new rolling stock and is designed to keep both upfront and running costs to a minimum. The D-Train uses the best of modern technology and is specifically designed to appeal to passengers and operators alike. Innovative systems and high tech equipment, such as the advanced RCM system, ensure the trains are able to be customised to suit different route requirements.

The trains are designed to accept power modules which can be diesel, battery or, in the future, hydrogen fuel cells. Vivarail is leading the UK market in battery technology and will introduce its first production battery vehicle in Spring 2018 – fully approved and ready for passenger service.

The D-Train meets all current standards up to and including the 2020 PRM-TSI regulations.

You are now officially none the wiser.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: ChrisB on March 02, 2018, 15:17:02
3 x 2car diesel units


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: grahame on March 03, 2018, 08:03:00
3 x 2car diesel units

From Rail Technology Magazine (http://www.railtechnologymagazine.com/Rail-News/vivarail-to-supply-three-d-trains-to-west-midlands-trains-for-marston-vale-route) though motive power not quoted as far as I can see (and discussed with thoughts both ways in the comments on the article)

Quote
Vivarail has today announced that it has entered an agreement with West Midlands trains to build three new Class 230 D-Trains for the Marston Vale Line between Bedford and Bletchley.

West Midlands Trains is the first franchise to have made an order for the rolling stock, which are expected to get on track for operation in 2018.

The news follows a number of months where there was little word about the innovative battery-powered rolling stock, before the company announced in February that the first production train had entered its final build stage.

Vivarail’s CEO, Adrian Shooter, stated: “This is a big day for Vivarail. We have invested considerable time and money to bring our innovative D-Train to this point and we are delighted to be working with West Midlands Trains to introduce them into passenger service.
 
“As a West Midlands based company it will be extremely gratifying to see our trains running on local lines and we look forward to passenger feedback. Our trains will be built to the high standards West Midlands Trains has committed to and will provide the flagship service for the region.

[etc]

West Midlands Trains’ customer service director, Andrew Conroy, explained that the Class 230 would be “ideal” for the Bedford to Bletchley route.

“We are investing in almost £700m of new trains for our passengers,” he stated. “The class 230s will be the first of over 400 extra carriages we are adding to our network.

“I am sure our passengers will welcome the new look and feel of the carriages and the extra space.

“When the new trains come on stream in December we will also be adding extra early morning and late night services on the Marston Vale line Monday to Saturday.”

Congratulations on the extra services ... now, can we have something later please?  18:32 is a shocking early last train on a (normal) Saturday night!


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: Chris125 on May 06, 2018, 19:34:56
Vivarail presentation by Adrian Shooter to the LT Museum Friends (from 27mins)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7k8W7QWRWMk


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: chuffed on May 06, 2018, 19:43:35
Mods ..this presentation is already highlighted in the rumour mill section.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: stuving on May 15, 2018, 18:00:34
And the next contender is ... Eversholt, climbing into bed with Alstom. From Railway gazette (http://www.railwaygazette.com/news/traction-rolling-stock/single-view/view/alstom-and-eversholt-plan-fuel-cell-emus.html).
Quote
Alstom and Eversholt plan fuel cell EMUs
15 May 2018

(http://www.railwaygazette.com/typo3temp/_processed_/d/4/csm_tn_gb-greateranglia-class321-renatus_03_28aa6b911e.jpg)
UK: Plans to fit hydrogen fuel cells to redundant electric multiple units were announced by Alstom on May 14. Confirming that ‘hydrogen technologies and solutions will play a key role in our global vision for the future’, the manufacturer said it was working with rolling stock leasing company Eversholt Rail on what it calls ‘the first substantive industry response to the government's challenge to remove diesel rolling stock by 2040’.

Alstom and Eversholt Rail are looking to ‘upcycle’ Class 321 EMUs which will be rendered surplus to requirements following the delivery of a complete new rolling stock fleet for the Greater Anglia franchise over the next two years.

Described as ‘some of the best proven electric trains on the network’, the four-car Class 321s were built at the former British Rail Engineering Ltd works in York between 1988 and 1991. Eversholt had placed a contract in 2015 for Wabtec to refurbish 30 units under its Renatus programme, and to fit new three-phase traction equipment from Kiepe.

The trains would be fitted with hydrogen storage tanks and fuel cells similar to those used on Alstom’s prototype iLint multiple-unit now on test in Germany, for which series orders have already been placed.

'We think the potential long-term application of hydrogen in the UK is very significant’, said Nick Crossfield, Managing Director, Alstom UK & Ireland. ‘Less than 50% of the UK network is electrified. Starting with this conversion, we think hydrogen could offer the right zero carbon solution for many parts of the network.’

I suppose that having been (expensively, no doubt) life extended then retired sooner than (Eversholt) expected makes those 321s prime candidates. If nothing else, the new electric boxes should make them more omnivorous when it comes to the juice.

How many are going to be done is not clear. Another report made it sound like just a couple initially, but as that was City AM it shouldn't be seen as better informed.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: eightf48544 on May 16, 2018, 10:47:14
Hoping to visit Vivarail later this month to see the new trains. Will report.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: trainbuff on June 07, 2018, 15:01:52
Hi all,

Just had an email from Vivarail saying that they are supplying five 3 coach trains to the  new KeolisAmey Wales and Borders franchise. This is copied and pasted below:



Vivarail is delighted to announce that it has been chosen as preferred bidder to supply a fleet of Class 230 D-Trains to KeolisAmey for the Wales and Borders franchise.

The trains will be the first to come into service as part of the new franchise and will demonstrate KeolisAmey’s commitment to providing new, high quality rolling stock to Welsh passengers.
 
Adrian Shooter, CEO of Vivarail, said “This is a very exciting day for us and we are proud to be supplying the first of the new trains for Wales.
 
“We know that KeolisAmey want to bring the best new trains to their passengers so our interior layout has been designed to do exactly that.  As well as the wide and spacious carriages the trains will have a Universal Access Toilet, WiFi, air conditioning, USB ports and 3-pin sockets.  There will be a range of seating layouts and plenty of space for bikes and luggage.  With KeolisAmey we have been determined to give passengers the very best travelling experience and the trains they deserve: modern, comfortable, reliable and environmentally-friendly.
 
“In conjunction with our partners at Creactive we have worked on a livery design that will be seen across the whole fleet.
 
“Our aim has always been to provide innovative solutions for operators and to that end I’m delighted to announce that our trains will be built as battery/diesel hybrids to cut down on emissions and make use of the exciting new technology we have developed over the past two years.  As the UK’s leading battery train manufacturer we know that emission-free trains are the future and we will continue to spearhead that development.  With this hybrid fleet we will deliver a train that is clean, green and reliable making use of GPS systems to cut out the engines in stations and environmentally-sensitive areas.
 
“Our trains will come into service in summer 2019 and will form the flagship fleet for Wales and Borders and I look forward to taking the first journey in North Wales next year.
 
“I would like to congratulate KeolisAmey in their successful bid and thank our many friends from across Wales for their active support over the last few years.”
 
Colin Lea, Mobilisation Director, KeolisAmey Wales Cymru, said: “We are proud to announce that KeolisAmey and Vivarail will provide a step-change in passenger comfort and service quality on three North Wales routes (Wrexham-Bidston, Conwy Valley, Chester-Crewe) by introducing these units, fitted with the latest passenger comfort appliances such as power supply at all seats, high-speed Wi-Fi, air-cooling, bike spaces, and a brand new seating layout reflecting the needs of the passengers on these routes.
 
“In addition, these innovative hybrid trains fitted with state of the art monitoring systems, will provide a significant change in performance and reliability, helping KeolisAmey to deliver a more reliable service for its customers.”
 
Design and build of the 3-car trains is already underway at Vivarail’s two sites and orders have been placed with the leading supplier of Universal Access Toilets based in Cwmbran.   The fleet of 5 trains will move to Wales for final testing and commissioning in early 2019.


Video of interiors here:-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vgLxljI43LQ&feature=youtu.be


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: grahame on June 07, 2018, 15:06:17
They will feel really at home in the longest single track tunnel in Wales on the Conwy Valley line  ;D.   And in all seriousness, probably an excellent line for them.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: Timmer on June 07, 2018, 17:09:15
Hopefully these trains don’t come with the ‘optional extra’ on train BBQ.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: johnneyw on June 08, 2018, 11:28:11
Seen a pic of the proposed red and white livery, looks quite good.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: eightf48544 on June 08, 2018, 15:40:44
Had my trip to Long Marston.

Saw 230 002 the first three car diesel until for Bedford Bletchley.

Also had ride in the new battery powered unit very quite good acceleration. Could be a winner for self contained lines say <30 miles. I think it will depend on the viability of the charger. The plan is for a docking point in the line which the train sits and receives a charge. For safety it is only activated when the train is directly over it.

Nice disabled loo in three car, Light and airy interiors. Range of seats and layouts from comfortable to ironing boards.



Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: grahame on November 01, 2018, 03:49:05
From Rail Technology Magazine (http://www.railtechnologymagazine.com/Rail-News/new-vivarail-trains-for-london-northwestern-railway-delayed-by-technical-issues)

Quote
The delivery of Vivarail’s Class 230 trains for the Marston Vale Line is behind schedule due to “technical issues” and will not be ready for their planned December introduction.

West Midland Trains and Vivarail released a joint statement saying “both partners have worked tirelessly to bring the trains into service for the December timetable change as scheduled,” but technical issues with the first train had a knock-on effect on the rest, delaying the units.

The timetable is due to change on the Marston Vale Line between Bletchley and Bedford in December, with the route forming part of the future East-West Rail service between Oxford, Bedford and eventually Cambridge.

Vivarail said it was “disappointed” that the deadline could not be met and takes full responsibility for the delay, but said it was “confident the full fleet would be ready for service in the New Year.”

Ref: http://vivarail.co.uk/vivarail-official-statement-marston-vale-line/

Quote
Adrian Shooter, CEO of Vivarail, said, “My experience in the rail industry means I am fully aware of the problems that can occur when introducing new trains and that one unforeseen event can easily overturn months or even years of planning.  That is the case here and at Vivarail we hold our hands up to that fact.  However, I am confident that my team will deliver the finished trains with a minimal delay and allow London Northwestern Railway to bring them into service soon.  I know that there is a great deal of anticipation to see the Class 230s in service and I am confident that the short wait will be worth it.”



Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: eightf48544 on November 01, 2018, 10:13:04
Wonder if we'll ever get a quote like Mr. Shooter's from the DfT?


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: IndustryInsider on November 01, 2018, 11:37:59
I'm looking forward to travelling on one early next year then.  Their potential is massive - especially with the new propulsion systems in development - and I hope that the general consensus within this forum that they are a 'good thing' will be realised.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: TonyK on November 05, 2018, 21:20:32
I'm looking forward to travelling on one early next year then.  Their potential is massive - especially with the new propulsion systems in development - and I hope that the general consensus within this forum that they are a 'good thing' will be realised.

I am as yet unsold.The overarching idea of having trains producing no pollution is of course appealing, but I worry about the details.

At the moment, trains are driven by diesel, or electricity, with the sole exception of the Stourbridge Junction to Stourbridge Town services. They all use propulsion systems that are proven - and so does the putative hydrogen vehicle. The motive power behind the hydrogen concept is the electric motor, just as it is in the case of the battery powered train, the diesel powered HST and of course the pure electric train. That also applies to the Perry People Mover, apart from the initial flywheel surge from recovered energy whilst breaking.

Hydrogen is the most abundant element in the universe, although sadly not on Earth. The prevalence of free hydrogen in the atmosphere is so close to zero as you can get. It is easily produced, though, but at a cost. As a schoolboy, I well remember the many experiments, some of which ended with a loud bang, where hydrogen was produced. Some involved chemical reactions, some electrolysis, but for the money shot demonstrations a cylinder of pre-produced hydrogen was needed. In Bristol's Green Jamboree, a hydrogen powered ferry plied its way through the harbour, fuelled ostensibly from a station with a photovoltaic array, but  it vanished within days of the end of the junket, no doubt frisked away to some other green event attended by the same usual suspects.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: stuving on December 14, 2018, 16:57:19
Vivarail appear to have jumped shipbattery supplier (from Vivarail (http://vivarail.co.uk/vivarail-and-hoppecke-announce-long-term-supply-of-batteries-for-class-230s/)):
Quote
Vivarail and Hoppecke announce long-term supply of batteries for Class 230s

Dec 13, 2018

Vivarail and Hoppecke today confirmed that they will be working together to design and integrate batteries for Vivarail’s Class 230 trains.  The deal cements the relationship between the two companies for a long-term future in developing battery trains for the UK rail industry.

Vivarail launched the UK’s first passenger battery train in the last 50 years in October 2018.  The train carried hundreds of passengers over three days of service in Scotland – an event that was supported by Transport Scotland and ScotRail.

As well as demonstrating that battery trains are ready for service now, new data was collected that allowed Vivarail to assess and confirm performance data on a challenging route with many steep gradients.  The train was accompanied by its mobile charging unit which was used for a few hours each night to provide a day’s worth of charge.

A 3-car Class 230 can run for 65 miles between charges which means they are more than able to operate numerous routes throughout the UK, and active conversations are taking place with interested operators.  Battery trains enable emission-free rail travel in areas where electrification is either non- or only partially existent.  The trains are particularly suited to urban routes where authorities wish to eliminate pollution caused by traditional DMUs as well as scenic lines where the natural environment needs protecting.

With the stated desire of the Government to phase out diesel trains by 2040 Vivarail’s Class 230 is a next generation train already proven for today.  The 65 mile range exceeds the expectations of many and shows how Vivarail is leading the market with the only battery train available today in the UK.

Currently Vivarail is building a fleet of diesel/battery hybrids to operate the Wrexham-Bidston line for Transport for Wales, where the diesel gensets will be used to charge the batteries not to power the train.  This power variant gives the range of a diesel train, the performance of an EMU (with acceleration of 1m p/s/s up to 40 miles per hour) and combines it with emission-free travel.   As well as using the genset to charge the batteries the train also has regenerative braking – as do all the battery trains.

Designs for other types of hybrid trains exist including the use of existing OHL with a pantograph and transformer and 3rd rail with shoegear.  Additionally, a new hydrogen variant is being developed which, similarly to the diesel hybrid, will exceed the pure battery train’s range of 65 miles.

Hoppecke’s Lithium Ion batteries are ideally suited for the Class 230s by providing the rapid charging needed for battery trains. Simulations and performance data show that many non-electrified routes can be operated by the Class 230 battery trains and to make this possible in the short-term Vivarail has designed and patented an automatic charging system and battery bank.  This means that costs of both infrastructure upgrades and daily operation are hugely minimised – in some cases by millions of pounds.

Hoppecke are very much an established industrial battery supplier, so that's mainly Lead acid and Nicads. That might seem an odd choice, rather than a lithium specialist, but that may be good for Vivarail. Solid German (Mittelstand) engineering might be conservative, but Vivarail probably can't supply that expertise themselves.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: Lee on March 19, 2019, 11:24:11
Vivarail has completed a demonstration of its fast charging system for Class 230 battery trains - https://www.railway-technology.com/news/vivarail-unveils-fast-charging-system-for-class-230-battery-trains/


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: Witham Bobby on October 16, 2019, 17:07:10
Vivarail trials continue.  Always seems a bit out of place, a couple of District Line coaches bimbling over Littleton & Badsey Crossing.  Saw one this morning.  Couldn't say if it's a battery or diesel powered version.

https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/K12003/2019/10/16/advanced





Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: Celestial on October 16, 2019, 17:36:33
Though TfW has confirmed that the ones for Wales have been delayed into the new year.  Presumably trying to make sure that their launch there is not beset with the problems the ones on the Bedford Bletchley line have faced.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: Timmer on October 27, 2019, 14:14:24
Oh dear another fire:
https://twitter.com/elbell789/status/1188140222917296130?s=21

I totally understand why Mark Hopwood wants nothing to do with them. A noble project but clearly producing new trains from old has its challenges.

Let’s hope adding diesel engines to the 319s is more successful.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: TonyK on October 27, 2019, 18:04:44
There is a video  here (https://twitter.com/i/status/1188140222917296130) courtesy of a neighbour to the station, I think named Ellen Bell. A message purporting to be from the guard says there were no injuries, and presses the case for guards on board all trains.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: grahame on October 28, 2019, 03:10:09
A message purporting to be from the guard says there were no injuries ...

Good call on flagging the uncorroborated nature of that tweet.  Looking at the profile of the account on Twitter does nothing at all to confirm to me the credentials of that message writer and indeed leads me to share your extreme caution.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: TonyK on October 28, 2019, 22:06:04
Good call on flagging the uncorroborated nature of that tweet.  Looking at the profile of the account on Twitter does nothing at all to confirm to me the credentials of that message writer and indeed leads me to share your extreme caution.


The use of the term "guard" as opposed to the more esoteric "train manager" did make me think.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: MVR S&T on October 28, 2019, 22:14:55
And no on or off duty staff of the train company, Network rail/contractors or emergency services should be saying anything publicly, other than 'please contact our press office' as this is now in the hands of the RAIB/BTP. As a rail accident.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: stuving on November 02, 2019, 09:15:24
Vivarail has completed a demonstration of its fast charging system for Class 230 battery trains - https://www.railway-technology.com/news/vivarail-unveils-fast-charging-system-for-class-230-battery-trains/

Vivarail, with Valence and Petalite, had a grant application to Innovate UK approved (£650K, subject to a few more meetings) in July 2019. They describe it thus:
Quote
Towards Realising Accelerated Innovation in Novel (TRAIN) Battery Technologies

Viva rail has produced a proof of concept hybrid train which has been shown to be reliable, energy efficient and cost effective. This work was self-funded and delivered in a very timely and effective way. The TRAIN project will be delivered in a similar way with close cooperation between the partners. Vivarail and our partners Petalite and Valence, provide lightweight versatile cost-effective rail solutions including units that can run as DMU (diesel multiple unit), EMU (electric multiple unit), battery, or battery hybrid depending on power supplies available. Battery technology will incorporate advances from other sectors.

The TRAIN project will develop innovative rapid charging technology and static energy storage to exploit low-rate cheap energy for high-rate charging. Two battery modules hang under each carriage and operate independently or in conjunction with other energy sources (electric). The solution provides significant operational savings, CO2 and noise reductions, and reduces maintenance demands to minimise out-of-service time.

This project will fully develop innovative designs and validate them for production. Outputs include: Modular battery pack to suit specific applications; Rapid charging unit operating at approximately 600V; Integration of hardware/software; Static charging evaluation; Test train with prototype technologies: Duty cycle demonstrations and performance assessment.

You may feel the start of that is just a wee bit presumptuous.


Title: Re: New trains from old?
Post by: 1st fan on April 13, 2020, 14:29:59
I see that Viva Rail have been running a fair few 230 return trips from (Long Marston or) Evesham West Jn to Moreton in Marsh. Sadly even though they stop at MIM I don't get a chance to see them as that wouldn't be essential and would require a car journey to get there.

Last one today was due in at 13:36 and arrived early,.due to leave at 13:41 left early.

https://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/K02077/2020-04-13/detailed



This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net