Great Western Coffee Shop

Journey by Journey => Transport for London => Topic started by: grahame on April 22, 2015, 13:08:05



Title: Call for transfer of south London suburban lines to Overground
Post by: grahame on April 22, 2015, 13:08:05
I missed this one when it was published in January ... what do our members think?

http://www.standard.co.uk/comment/comment/andrew-adonis-the-future-of-south-londons-rail-network-has-to-be-orange-9958169.html

Quote
The next Mayor of London should turn South London orange ^ by incorporating London^s local and suburban main line services into the successful Overground network. This would hugely improve London transport and boost jobs, housing and regeneration.

The Underground largely serves London north of the Thames and is managed by TfL. Most of south London, despite 227 stations serving five million people, depends on suburban services which play second fiddle to long-distance rail firms, and which are underdeveloped and poorly managed.

Much of south London suffers from skeleton services through bleak stations barely touched for a century. It^s a key part of London^s north/south divide.

The Overground network, opened over the past decade, shows how different it could be. The orbital line, extending from Islington and Hackney to Peckham and Clapham, was the result of visionary reform begun under Ken Livingstone. It took existing underused stations and services, upgrading, extending and linking them to create an integrated metro service, under TfL control, as with the Tube.

Passenger journeys on the orange network have increased by 450 per cent since Overground^s launch, compared with 50 per cent on south-eastern suburban rail lines. Passenger satisfaction ratings have risen from 57 to 92 per cent, thanks to better, more frequent trains, new routes, brighter stations and improved reliability. Capital investment made this possible but the change was as much about TfL management overcoming complex operational issues by focusing on the ^orange vision^ of a transformed metro system.

Operating subsidies on the Overground have been reduced by the passenger surge, while long-distance and freight services sharing the orange lines have not suffered. This orange vision now needs to sweep across the rest of our suburban rail network.

As a first step, management of the south London suburban lines should transfer to the Overground when the various southern rail franchises come up for renewal over the next seven years. There should be an immediate ^orange transfer^ of the south-western suburban lines through Wimbledon ^ including the major commuter stations in Kingston, Surbiton and Chessington ^ to accelerate progress on Crossrail 2.

Article continues

by Andrew Adonis - a former Transport Secretary.


Title: Re: Call for transfer of south London suburban lines to Overground
Post by: ChrisB on April 22, 2015, 13:38:19
Don't see any gain personally. NR will maintain the track, presumably at the same cost, times etc


Title: Re: Call for transfer of south London suburban lines to Overground
Post by: paul7575 on April 22, 2015, 15:06:10
Don't see any gain personally. NR will maintain the track, presumably at the same cost, times etc

The original London Overground commenced from a very low baseline.  They've subsequently maxed out the use of existing paths in amongst the freight on the NLL and WLL, and are running the ELL core at very near capacity for a conventionally signalled route using 'mainline' stock, although limited to 5 car for now.

However if they took over from SWT inner suburban services AFAICT they'd find it just as impossible as the TOC to add extra trains, and impossible to lengthen trains beyond the currently planned 10 cars.

I think the effect of an LO takeover on a more representative inner suburban service heading into a major terminus will be seen to be fairly limited - such as on the West Anglia routes into Liverpool St being taken over from the GA TOC next month. I believe there's a fairly naive belief amongst many Londoners that LO can automatically make fantastic improvements to any existing service, but I don't think the early gains on the NLL will ever be matched again.

There's also a theory that many passenger gains are simply down to the routes appearing on the tube map.  So why not stop printing the tube map and hand out the 'Oyster Rail services' map instead - it might have a similar effect on usage at less cost...

Paul


Title: Re: Call for transfer of south London suburban lines to Overground
Post by: onthecushions on April 22, 2015, 18:11:50

Perhaps it represents the aspiration for a mini NetworkSouthEast - where there is common planning, ticketing and marketing, even with different operators, rather than disjointed DfT service specifications.

OTC


Title: Re: Call for transfer of south London suburban lines to Overground
Post by: Surrey 455 on April 22, 2015, 23:27:20
Whenever we hear a call for TfL to take over National Rail lines the reason seems to be that more emphasis needs to be put on the needs of commuters in Greater London. Well as a commuter on SWT living outside Greater London I would be very concerned if my service was reduced from half hourly (hourly after 7.30pm and Sundays) just so Londoners could get a train every 5 minutes or so.

So no, I am not in favour of a TfL takeover


Title: Re: Call for transfer of south London suburban lines to Overground
Post by: ellendune on April 22, 2015, 23:46:59
Whenever we hear a call for TfL to take over National Rail lines the reason seems to be that more emphasis needs to be put on the needs of commuters in Greater London. Well as a commuter on SWT living outside Greater London I would be very concerned if my service was reduced from half hourly (hourly after 7.30pm and Sundays) just so Londoners could get a train every 5 minutes or so.

So no, I am not in favour of a TfL takeover

I agree TfL should not run lines that are largely used by long distance services.   


Title: Re: Call for transfer of south London suburban lines to Overground
Post by: Bmblbzzz on April 23, 2015, 09:53:07
I don't know these lines at all; so I won't attempt to say anything about efficiency blah blah. But to me this looks like another small battle in the slow war of power-balance between London, Central Government, and Elsewhere.


Title: Re: Call for transfer of south London suburban lines to Overground
Post by: onthecushions on April 23, 2015, 21:47:07
]

I agree TfL should not run lines that are largely used by long distance services.   

I think that TfL is thinking about operating the trains, not controlling the infrastructure and therefore paths, which are still in DfT's gift.

Perhaps the first test may be Crossrail versus our Semi-fasts from Reading in-bound.

OTC


Title: Re: Call for transfer of south London suburban lines to Overground
Post by: ellendune on April 24, 2015, 00:00:18
Transport for London chief: commuter trains into capital are 'shit'  (http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/apr/23/london-transport-chief-tfl-sir-peter-hendy-capital-trains-shit)

Quote
The man who oversees London^s tube and bus network has described national rail services running into the capital as ^shit, awful^ and ^like the wild west^.

Sir Peter Hendy, the commissioner of Transport for London, said commuters hated their suburban rail services, and singled out Southeastern ^ one of the busiest rail franchises, carrying more than 600,000 passengers every weekday ^ for particular criticism.

He also accused the train operators of putting ^Gestapo-like^ inspectors on trains to fine as many people as possible, including customers who had simply made mistakes with their tickets.

In an interview with Management Today, Hendy said: ^People hate the suburban rail service, they hate it. If you make a mistake on your oyster card on the tube, we^ll refund it. On South West Trains, they^ll fine you. That^s a big philosophical difference.^

He continued: ^On Southeastern, the trains are like the wild west. They are shit, awful. And then every now and then some people who look like the Gestapo get on and fine everyone they can. It doesn^t improve your day, does it?^

Southeastern has consistently scored lowest on national passenger-satisfaction surveys, and the number of commuters who would agree with the colourfully expressed sentiment has likely increased recently after widespread disruption largely caused by engineering works at London Bridge, where the station and track is being reconstructed.

Hendy implied that Mark Carne, the chief executive of Network Rail, risked failing in his job because of the disruption.


Title: Re: Call for transfer of south London suburban lines to Overground
Post by: didcotdean on April 24, 2015, 09:57:18
Transport for London chief: commuter trains into capital are 'shit'  (http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/apr/23/london-transport-chief-tfl-sir-peter-hendy-capital-trains-shit)

Quote
In an interview with Management Today, Hendy said: ^People hate the suburban rail service, they hate it. If you make a mistake on your oyster card on the tube, we^ll refund it. On South West Trains, they^ll fine you. That^s a big philosophical difference.^
So what are all those ^80 penalty fare notices on the tube about then?


Title: Re: Call for transfer of south London suburban lines to Overground
Post by: JayMac on April 24, 2015, 10:17:11
And of course, SWT can't fine anybody.


Title: Re: Call for transfer of south London suburban lines to Overground
Post by: onthecushions on April 24, 2015, 11:14:25
And of course, SWT can't fine anybody.

Be patient with him. He probably read about people who live and travel South of the Thames in a library book when he was at Oxbridge.

OTC



Title: Re: Call for transfer of south London suburban lines to Overground
Post by: Electric train on April 24, 2015, 18:12:28
And of course, SWT can't fine anybody.
when he was at Oxbridge.

OTC

Leeds ..........eeeeee lad nowt as posh as Oxbridge


Title: Re: Call for transfer of south London suburban lines to Overground
Post by: onthecushions on April 25, 2015, 18:55:17
Leeds ..........eeeeee lad nowt as posh as Oxbridge

So was I (BSc Chem Eng, 1971)

I just wasn't the grandson of a 6th Baron.

Still its nice to see Leeds U getting a better class of students.

Let's toast him with a glass of John Smith's (or Tetley's if you must), but at Leeds prices.

OTC


Title: Re: Call for transfer of south London suburban lines to Overground
Post by: Electric train on April 26, 2015, 08:04:18
Leeds ..........eeeeee lad nowt as posh as Oxbridge

So was I (BSc Chem Eng, 1971)

I just wasn't the grandson of a 6th Baron.

Still its nice to see Leeds U getting a better class of students.

Let's toast him with a glass of John Smith's (or Tetley's if you must), but at Leeds prices.

OTC

Only if its proper Johns Smiths or Tetley's and not the modern fizmister stuff.



Title: Re: Call for transfer of south London suburban lines to Overground
Post by: JayMac on April 26, 2015, 10:06:31
John Smith's Cask is brewed in Burtonwood, Cheshire.
Tetley's Cask is brewed in Wolverhampton.


Title: Re: Call for transfer of south London suburban lines to Overground
Post by: Electric train on April 26, 2015, 15:19:24
John Smith's Cask is brewed in Burtonwood, Cheshire.
Tetley's Cask is brewed in Wolverhampton.

Brewed  :-\  what you mention is fizmister; I'll agree there is a chemical reaction that could be loosely referred to as brewing but it ain't Yorkshire ale ................... needs to be Tadcaster


Title: Re: Call for transfer of south London suburban lines to Overground
Post by: JayMac on April 26, 2015, 16:20:08
I'm referring to the John Smith's Cask Ale product, unfiltered, unpasteurised, not Original (carbonated) or Smoothflow (nitrogenated). Although I did get the current location wrong. From 2007 to 2011 it was brewed at Burtonwood Brewery in Cheshire. In 2011 production of John Smith's Cask moved to Cameron's Brewery in Hartlepool.

If you want a John Smith's from the Tadcaster Brewery it'll be a choice of fizzy Original or creamy Smoothflow.



This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net