Great Western Coffee Shop

Journey by Journey => London to Swindon and Bristol => Topic started by: grahame on February 01, 2016, 22:34:51



Title: Problems faced with the contraction of railways in the region
Post by: grahame on February 01, 2016, 22:34:51
19:30 on 18th February at Melksham Assembly Hall - Slide show by Mike Stone. ^3 guests

There's a bus back to Bath after the show (around 10:30 / route 271) - but (sorry) Well House Manor (http://www.wellhousemanor.co.uk) is fully booked that night

(http://www.wellho.net/pix/mdha201602.jpg)


Title: Re: Problems faced with the contraction of railways in the region
Post by: Red Squirrel on February 02, 2016, 09:02:35
Gosh, that threw me for a moment. Could have been fascinating hearing about the problems faced with the contraction of railways, but the actual topic concerns their construction..!


Title: Re: Problems faced with the contraction of railways in the region
Post by: stuving on February 02, 2016, 10:01:47
Gosh, that threw me for a moment. Could have been fascinating hearing about the problems faced with the contraction of railways, but the actual topic concerns their construction..!
I was puzzling over that too - but thinking maybe it was about contracting, which I'm sure is what Brunel did with most of the building work. But the same double-take happens when you consider the role of tenders (if not tendering) in the operation of railways, ancient and modern. Mysterious stuff, vocabulary.


Title: Re: Problems faced with the contraction of railways in the region
Post by: grahame on February 02, 2016, 14:17:21
Gosh, that threw me for a moment. Could have been fascinating hearing about the problems faced with the contraction of railways, but the actual topic concerns their construction..!

Yeah ... I was posting late in the day there. 

The contraction from 7'1" to 4'9" happened a few years laterer.


Title: Re: Problems faced with the contraction of railways in the region
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on February 06, 2016, 21:47:33
If I may just pick you up on a minor typo there, grahame, it was actually a 'contraction' from 7' 1/4" to 4' 81/2".  ;) :D ;D



This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net