Great Western Coffee Shop

Sideshoots - associated subjects => Heritage railway lines, Railtours, other rail based attractions => Topic started by: PhilWakely on January 19, 2017, 16:19:17



Title: Okehampton to Paddington - Saturday, 18th March 2017
Post by: PhilWakely on January 19, 2017, 16:19:17
I haven't seen anything about this other than a post on Facebook referring to a(n unidentified) newspaper article.......

(http://i725.photobucket.com/albums/ww255/PhilWakely/16115041_1496515577043102_3862798052900683664_n_zps7ui999pi.jpg)

Can anybody shed any light on this?


Title: Re: Okehampton to Paddington - Saturday, 18th March 2017
Post by: ChrisB on January 19, 2017, 16:45:12
Nothing in the last UK Railtours e-newsletter.

£40 does seem rather cheap.

The paper is the Cornish & Devon Post, and another reference appears online here (http://www.thepost.uk.com/article.cfm?id=107035&headline=Rail%20consultation%20event%20to%20be%20held%20at%20the%20Parkhouse%20Centre%20in%20Bude&sectionIs=news&searchyear=2017) in a different article





Edit note: Rather long hyperlink inserted within text, purely for ease of reference. CfN.


Title: Re: Okehampton to Paddington - Saturday, 18th March 2017
Post by: bobm on January 19, 2017, 17:11:58
It does appear on RTT

Outward
http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/V20001/2017/03/18/advanced (http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/V20001/2017/03/18/advanced)

Return
http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/V20002/2017/03/18/advanced (http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/V20002/2017/03/18/advanced)

ECS Moves
http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/V20006/2017/03/18/advanced (http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/V20006/2017/03/18/advanced)
http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/V20008/2017/03/18/advanced (http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/V20008/2017/03/18/advanced)


Title: Re: Okehampton to Paddington - Saturday, 18th March 2017
Post by: trainbuff on January 19, 2017, 22:19:53
I would urge anyone interested in this train to check out the facebook page of OkeRAIL here:-

https://www.facebook.com/events/1133731563370177/permalink/1163580573718609/

I believe that priority will be given to those people living within the Okehampton catchment are. This also includes Bude and Holsworthy I believe.

Patience is required here

Chris


Title: Re: Okehampton to Paddington - Saturday, 18th March 2017
Post by: RichardB on February 23, 2017, 15:04:51
Now fully booked.  It took just a week to sell all the seats.



Title: Re: Okehampton to Paddington - Saturday, 18th March 2017
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on February 25, 2017, 03:11:39
Thanks for that update, RichardB.  ;)

I'm rather surprised it took as long as a week, frankly!  ;D



Title: Re: Okehampton to Paddington - Saturday, 18th March 2017
Post by: PhilWakely on February 25, 2017, 11:06:15
Now fully booked.  It took just a week to sell all the seats.
Purely as a matter of interest....as the original advertising included an Exeter pick-up, how many are expected to join the train there?


Title: Re: Okehampton to Paddington - Saturday, 18th March 2017
Post by: RichardB on February 25, 2017, 13:08:03
Now fully booked.  It took just a week to sell all the seats.
Purely as a matter of interest....as the original advertising included an Exeter pick-up, how many are expected to join the train there?

I don't know I'm afraid but I doubt it'll be many.  The train has been underwritten by Okehampton United Charities and they were keen to make sure it is mainly people in the wider Okehampton catchment area on the train, as Chris (trainbuff) alluded to above.  Such publicity as there was was mainly in that area. 

Everyone is delighted that it has sold so quickly and there is already talk of another train later in the year.


Title: Re: Okehampton to Paddington - Saturday, 18th March 2017
Post by: LiskeardRich on March 18, 2017, 09:41:04
Up Terminated at Exeter due to wheel flats incurred on slippery rails early in the journey.

The 0918 from Paignton has been cancelled with that HST taking the passengers onwards from Exeter.


Title: Re: Okehampton to Paddington - Saturday, 18th March 2017
Post by: JayMac on March 18, 2017, 10:11:57
Power car 43194, newly re-liveried in GWR green and only returned to traffic in recent days, was the one that suffered WSP problems resulting in severe wheel flats.

0918 from Paignton is now starting at Bristol TM, presumably with some set juggling there.


Title: Re: Okehampton to Paddington - Saturday, 18th March 2017
Post by: TaplowGreen on March 18, 2017, 11:09:48
Whoops!

http://m.devonlive.com/first-train-to-london-in-50-years-scrapped-after-engine-slips-down-bank/story-30212627-detail/story.html


Title: Re: Okehampton to Paddington - Saturday, 18th March 2017
Post by: bobm on March 18, 2017, 11:25:07
The replacement train has the wrong kitchen so they couldn't do the silver service breakfast as planned either.


Title: Re: Okehampton to Paddington - Saturday, 18th March 2017
Post by: stuving on March 18, 2017, 11:36:37
http://m.devonlive.com/first-train-to-london-in-50-years-scrapped-after-engine-slips-down-bank/story-30212627-detail/story.html

The false impression created by "scrapped" and "slipped down a bank" may be intentional on the part of the "journalist(s)" involved. But what about "the train slipped down the rails as it left Dawlish, leaving it with 'a flat'"?

A bank? On leaving Dawlish?


Title: Re: Okehampton to Paddington - Saturday, 18th March 2017
Post by: JayMac on March 18, 2017, 11:56:17
All told, not a great advertisement for either OkeRail or GWR.


Title: Re: Okehampton to Paddington - Saturday, 18th March 2017
Post by: PhilWakely on March 18, 2017, 13:44:04
All told, not a great advertisement for either OkeRail or GWR.
A tad unfair methinks as neither was at fault for the wheel flat - think of it as you having a puncture on a bicycle. A little unfortunate that the only available replacement was a 2+7 HST. I had heard that the train was full and standing from Okehampton, but whether that was true or not I do not know.

And as for the latest on the BBC Website (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-39314849)  ???  >:(
Quote
A historic train journey had to be abandoned minutes after setting off when the train slipped from the rails.



Title: Re: Okehampton to Paddington - Saturday, 18th March 2017
Post by: PhilWakely on March 18, 2017, 17:56:45
I think GWR needs to be congratulated as it appears that the 'other Green set' was pulled off its scheduled diagram and allocated to the return leg of The Royal Oke.

Well done to all concerned!


Title: Re: Okehampton to Paddington - Saturday, 18th March 2017
Post by: grahame on March 18, 2017, 18:08:11
I think GWR needs to be congratulated as it appears that the 'other Green set' was pulled off its scheduled diagram and allocated to the return leg of The Royal Oke.

Well done to all concerned!

Carefully, now, up to Okehampton  ;D


Title: Re: Okehampton to Paddington - Saturday, 18th March 2017
Post by: JayMac on March 18, 2017, 19:00:36
A tad unfair methinks as neither was at fault for the wheel flat

If it was a WSP fault then that's down to GWR, no?

Whatever the cause of the problems my comment about not showing the organisers in a good light is reflected by press and media coverage. Most headlines are rather negative.


Title: Re: Okehampton to Paddington - Saturday, 18th March 2017
Post by: LiskeardRich on March 18, 2017, 20:28:37
The wheel flat occurred in the rear powercar leaving Okehampton. Why they're reporting dawlish is anyone's bet.


Title: Re: Okehampton to Paddington - Saturday, 18th March 2017
Post by: ChrisB on March 18, 2017, 20:38:06
Why would a flat caused by the state of Network Rail's rails be the fault of the train operator?


Title: Re: Okehampton to Paddington - Saturday, 18th March 2017
Post by: John R on March 18, 2017, 20:40:28
A tad unfair methinks as neither was at fault for the wheel flat

If it was a WSP fault then that's down to GWR, no?


This sort of event (special trains, open days etc) is much less common than in the pre-privatised era, and I am glad that GWR make the effort to do them.  Social media comment that talks about "fault" when things don't run smoothly is hardly likely to encourage their management to continue with such events, which must create a lot of additional work for no reward.  So the adhesion was poor on the privately owned section of line this morning. Was that GWR's fault?  Maybe they should have undergone numerous additional checks prior to agreeing to run the service, and imposed conditions on the owner of the line as to the level of adhesion on the day, else there would be financial penalties, in which case I suspect the service would never have run.  Maybe that is a better outcome?

In this instance it looks as though control were pretty sharp at stopping the ECS Laira to Paignton at Newton Abbot, diverting it to run it to Exeter instead, and full credit to them for taking that decision to enable the charter to continue (albeit at the inconvenience of passengers from Paignton who found their train cancelled this morning).


Title: Re: Okehampton to Paddington - Saturday, 18th March 2017
Post by: SandTEngineer on March 18, 2017, 20:50:44
The rails at Bow (or anywhere between Okehampton and Yeoford) are not the responsibility of NR. ;)


Title: Re: Okehampton to Paddington - Saturday, 18th March 2017
Post by: Umberleigh on March 18, 2017, 21:05:49
It would appear that Devonlive.com doesn't employ people who can report coherently or with any regard for the facts. Whoever this Neil Shaw is he shouldn't have been let out with out a subeditor or 6 in tow. But I suppose we shouldnt expect anything too much from them as they set low standards and dont achive them Fact 1 Okehampton is Inland, Dawlish is on the Coast... there is no direct rail link Fact 2 the Train wasn't scrapped, it had a set swap, the leasing company wouldnt be pleased if a gas axe was taken to their asset for a wheel flat issue Fact 3 The train was taken to Exeter where the set off the Paignton-Paddington service was substituted and the train left Exeter 53 late with an expectation of making up 13 minutes over the journey to London Fact 4 The wheels werent worn away that suggests they disintegrated the train was running OK when I saw it pass Cowley in Exeter Slapdash and incoherent reporting is an affront to the journalists of the past...;.

 |    30
Report
image: http://i.thelocalpeople.co.uk/profile_images/small/05.jpg

Profile image for BayOracle
BayOracle  |  March 18 2017, 10:21AM
The train slipped down the rails as it left Dawlish. That doesn't make sense. Listen to the video commentary and it is clear that the train slipped down the rails as it left Okehampton -- which is what you would expect. This is only a very short article, surely somebody could have checked it for sense before it was posted?


Read more at http://www.devonlive.com/first-train-to-london-in-50-years-scrapped-after-engine-slips-down-bank/story-30212627-detail/story.html#hjWF6Z2hFzHb6UmU.99

Rubbish reporting for what seems to have been a great event, indeed why are we even looking at the negatives?


Title: Re: Okehampton to Paddington - Saturday, 18th March 2017
Post by: Umberleigh on March 18, 2017, 21:14:31
I just want to add that the Crosscountry Voyagers that entered service in 2001 can't make it through Dawlish if its a bit windy

I'm really annoyed over the negative coverage of great initiative, it really does add fuel to the conspiracy fire when it comes to Network Rail and the Okehampton route


Title: Re: Okehampton to Paddington - Saturday, 18th March 2017
Post by: JayMac on March 18, 2017, 21:20:08
My information about a Wheel Slip Protection fault comes from industry sources. However, GWR are publicly saying it was poor railhead conditions.

Poor railhead conditions are what the WSP system is meant to ameliorate.


Title: Re: Okehampton to Paddington - Saturday, 18th March 2017
Post by: LiskeardRich on March 18, 2017, 21:58:10
My information about a Wheel Slip Protection fault comes from industry sources. However, GWR are publicly saying it was poor railhead conditions.

Poor railhead conditions are what the WSP system is meant to ameliorate.

The rear powercar suffered wheel flats due to poor rail conditions. It returned to Exeter at low speed, losing nearly an hour between okehampton and Exeter.

I wonder if the line still had remains of washing up liquid style substance that's used on it for skid practice, as of course it's a stretch of line GWR use for skid practice. Combined with leaf residue from the fact the line is considerably over grown, it's going to have poor adhesion.

The return working was 4 late arriving at okehampton, and I bet the driver was more cautious with braking!


Title: Re: Okehampton to Paddington - Saturday, 18th March 2017
Post by: TaplowGreen on March 19, 2017, 07:20:11
I think GWR needs to be congratulated as it appears that the 'other Green set' was pulled off its scheduled diagram and allocated to the return leg of The Royal Oke.

Well done to all concerned!

I'm not sure that the hundreds of passengers whose service was cancelled as a result of their allocated train being "pulled off" would necessarily concur?


Title: Re: Okehampton to Paddington - Saturday, 18th March 2017
Post by: grahame on March 19, 2017, 07:57:22
I think GWR needs to be congratulated as it appears that the 'other Green set' was pulled off its scheduled diagram and allocated to the return leg of The Royal Oke.

Well done to all concerned!

I'm not sure that the hundreds of passengers whose service was cancelled as a result of their allocated train being "pulled off" would necessarily concur?

I suspect the train that the other green set was due to run wasn't cancelled, but rather replaced by a blue train; Real Time Trains is showing a full set of actual departure times for yesterday.  And I can't imagine too many "normal" passengers would have even know about the change.

I would agree that the morning passengers due to use the commandeered 1A15 set (09:18 Paignton to Paddington via Bristol might have been none to chuffed at it's none running between Paignton and Bristol, where it started with (I presume) a set that was Saturday spare at St Phillip's Marsh.


Title: Re: Okehampton to Paddington - Saturday, 18th March 2017
Post by: bobm on March 19, 2017, 08:06:22
Indeed the second green set (LA16) was pulled off a lunchtime arrival from the West Country and sent to Old Oak Common before returning for the early evening departure back to Okehampton.

Another set was brought from OOC to take up the next working the West Country train would have done.  There was no cancellation.

Agreed the morning alterations would have inconvenienced some however.


Title: Re: Okehampton to Paddington - Saturday, 18th March 2017
Post by: TaplowGreen on March 19, 2017, 08:20:59
Indeed the second green set (LA16) was pulled off a lunchtime arrival from the West Country and sent to Old Oak Common before returning for the early evening departure back to Okehampton.

Another set was brought from OOC to take up the next working the West Country train would have done.  There was no cancellation.

Agreed the morning alterations would have inconvenienced some however.

OK fair enough......the service from Paignton  wasn't cancelled, it was just "non running" and subject to "alterations".....I'm sure that distinction was of great comfort to those left on the platforms!  ::)


Title: Re: Okehampton to Paddington - Saturday, 18th March 2017
Post by: bobm on March 19, 2017, 08:46:27
Just to be clear, my remark "There was no cancellation" was in relation to the afternoon arrangements at the London end to get the second green set on the return working.

I would class the morning situation as a cancellation - indeed the customer screens would have said as much.


Title: Re: Okehampton to Paddington - Saturday, 18th March 2017
Post by: LiskeardRich on March 19, 2017, 08:50:26
Just to be clear, my remark "There was no cancellation" was in relation to the afternoon arrangements at the London end to get the second green set on the return working.

I would class the morning situation as a cancellation - indeed the customer screens would have said as much.

Cancelled but alternative services would have left anyone for Reading or Paddington less than 30 late at destination

Edit- barring Weston super mare passengers, the Paignton passengers who were displaced onto the following XC service would have made it beyond Bristol on time as XC service normally over takes the gwr service at WSM, so arrives in Bristol prior to the Paignton one departing . WSM passengers would have incurred a 30 min delay.


Title: Re: Okehampton to Paddington - Saturday, 18th March 2017
Post by: trainbuff on March 19, 2017, 13:58:41
As A Director of OkeRAIL CIC and a member of OkeRAIL Forum, I must say that GWR were totally supportive to us and went above and beyond. Not just on the day but in the run up to organising this event. The efforts that Great Western have gone to show a real commitment to an Okehampton Service, not just on the Sunday Rover.

Even after the 'set swap' at Exeter there was still an almost carnival atmosphere on the train. I know because I went through every coach. When I mentioned that had the railway been used by a daily service, the wheel flats would have been less likely, and added that we wanted a daily service there was a great deal of cheering and clapping.

On arrival a small number of us met with Paul Maynard for a short, informal, friendly and positive meeting.

The return trip was uneventful with Dartmoor Railway ensuring that the track was sanded repeatedly and thanks to them for that also.

I must pass on my thanks to all staff on the day. Not just the Train Managers who kept us fully informed and the catering staff who were all excellent. There were additional GWR staff who had volunteered for the train for no payment. One worked at Swindon on timetables! A real credit and despite the fact I announced this on the train I feel a more public comment is needed.

A successful day that achieved its aims of getting people to London, raising the profile of the line and meeting the minister ;D


Title: Re: Okehampton to Paddington - Saturday, 18th March 2017
Post by: JayMac on March 19, 2017, 13:59:57
Would passengers have been advised to make such a connection though, given that the time between the XC timetabled arrival and timetabled 1A15 departure was less than the minimum allowed connection at Bristol TM?

Anyone who'd intended travelling on 1A15 from Paignton, and stations up the line, who had sought information on their options may not have been told to connect from XC to 1A15 at Bristol TM as industry systems wouldn't show such a connection as valid.

Whatever actually happened on the ground, I don't think it right that a scheduled service should be cancelled to provide rolling stock for a charter. Then again, there was a Rail Minister to meet, and inconveniencing* a number of passengers in South Devon is seemingly less important than ensuring a politician is kept sweet.  ::)

*Yes, even if arrival in Reading and London was on time, it's still inconvenient to have to take three trains for a journey that should have been on one through train.


Title: Re: Okehampton to Paddington - Saturday, 18th March 2017
Post by: John R on March 19, 2017, 14:26:27
Would passengers have been advised to make such a connection though, given that the time between the XC timetabled arrival and timetabled 1A15 departure was less than the minimum allowed connection at Bristol TM?

Anyone who'd intended travelling on 1A15 from Paignton, and stations up the line, who had sought information on their options may not have been told to connect from XC to 1A15 at Bristol TM as industry systems wouldn't show such a connection as valid.

Whatever actually happened on the ground, I don't think it right that a scheduled service should be cancelled to provide rolling stock for a charter. Then again, there was a Rail Minister to meet, and inconveniencing* a number of passengers in South Devon is seemingly less important than ensuring a politician is kept sweet.  ::)

*Yes, even if arrival in Reading and London was on time, it's still inconvenient to have to take three trains for a journey that should have been on one through train.

I suspect GWR would have held the connection at Bristol given the circumstances.

The publicity would have been much worse if the train had been cancelled, and I suspect the number of passengers inconvenienced was a fraction of those who would have had their day out ruined if the swap had not been made.  GWR had contracted to get those passengers to London too, so they had every much of a right to have their journey disrupted as little as possible.  As trainbuff noted many of the staff gave up a day of their weekend to make it work, and I endorse his comments in respect of GWR and their staff in making the day a success despite the unexpected problems.


Title: Re: Okehampton to Paddington - Saturday, 18th March 2017
Post by: RichardB on March 19, 2017, 14:28:58
Whatever actually happened on the ground, I don't think it right that a scheduled service should be cancelled to provide rolling stock for a charter.

We had a full train from Okehampton - around 500 people.  There was no perfect solution that would have kept everyone happy but I think what was done was right.  If it hadn't been, there would have been the nightmare scenario of getting everyone back to Okehampton and people having to be refunded.   The fallout would have been much, much bigger than it will have been with the cancellation of the Paignton - Paddington.

A huge call but GWR got it spot on.


Title: Re: Okehampton to Paddington - Saturday, 18th March 2017
Post by: grahame on March 19, 2017, 14:41:00
Whatever actually happened on the ground, I don't think it right that a scheduled service should be cancelled to provide rolling stock for a charter.

In the case of an unplanned failure of a train, every effort should be made to minimise the inconvenience to everyone who's paid to travel.   I can't imagine that more than 60 people would have been late at their destination by up to 30 minutes with the action taken (1,800 delay minutes) whereas bringing the spare HST down from Bristol would have held up 500 passengers by at least 60 minutes (30,000 delay minutes).

I would tend to agree that service trains should not be cancelled in order to allow a special to run in the first place - though that does happen for Glastonbury, for the GoldCup meeting, and is (I understand) happening on Maundy Thursday for one of the Berks and Hants trains beyond Newbury, but in the event of something going wrong on the day, dumping 500 paying customers who you have committed to at Exeter St Davids would be rather poor form.

I'm noting others taking the same view as mine as I wrote this!


Title: Re: Okehampton to Paddington - Saturday, 18th March 2017
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on March 21, 2017, 21:30:56
Purely for the record, here is a 'video recap' item from devonlive (http://www.devonlive.com/video-okehampton-rail-campaigners-on-right-tracks-after-successful-ish-okerail-london-journey/story-30213025-detail/story.html):

Quote
Fight for Okehampton to London direct train goes on despite 'hiccup': video recap

The first direct train from Okehampton to London in 50 years was stopped in its tracks by flats on the wheels.

Despite the hiccup, more than 500 passengers transferred from the Royal Oke to another train at Exeter St David's Station and were able to proceed to London.

A GWR spokesman said: "Slippery conditions on a privately maintained section of the railway just outside Okehampton caused one of our trains to slide on the tracks, damaging the wheels. The train, which had been chartered by Okerail, continued to the next station where a replacement train had been arranged to complete the journey to London."

(http://www.devonlive.com/images/localworld/ugc-images/276269/binaries/00405.MTS.Still001.jpg)

Campaigners, who organised the event to show there is high demand for regular services from Okehampton to the capital say it only heightened their calls for a service.

Michael Ireland, who is the brains behind the scheme said: "It shows the line needs to be used. The problem has occurred because the line isn't used enough. This only reinforces the need for an Exeter to Okehampton link.

"GWR have been extremely professional in the transfer of passengers to the other train. You couldn't wish for better service and even complimentary refreshments for those who were unable to get their breakfast. People will get to London, it will be a success."

(http://www.devonlive.com/images/localworld/ugc-images/276269/binaries/00430.MTS.Still001.jpg)

Mr Ireland said that if campaigners could get a rail link, it would benefit not just Okehampton, but the whole region. "North Cornwall, to Bude, Holsworthy and Launceston will benefit economically from the new rail line," he said.

(http://www.devonlive.com/images/localworld/ugc-images/276269/binaries/00395.MTS.Still001.jpg)

Kevin Ball, Devon County Councillor for Okehampton Rural added: "I have to give real credit to GWR, they've really worked hard to try and make it work for us. They've cancelled a train to provide a set for us to carry on so I have nothing but praise for GWR. At the end of the day, look at all these people who want to travel. That's the whole point of the message, that a regular service will be well supported."

The train left Okehampton Station at 7:45am this morning and arrived back at 9:15pm. The remarkable journey is down to the voluntary groups of Okerail Forum and Okerail CIC. The whole undertaking has been underwritten by Okehampton United Charity.

The train which left Okehampton used a route proposed as an alternative to the Dawlish line which is frequently cut off by the high tide and storm waves and had eight coaches. One 1st Class, One Pullman Dining coach and six Standard Class.

Mike Davies, chairman of the OkeRail Forum said: "To have a train of this size on such a small platform was quite difficult, but it's wonderful to see so many people from Okehampton and the surrounding area out supporting the train. It's absolutely fantastic and as we saw from the Sunday Rover back in the summer, we had 7,500 passengers over 13 Sundays and with today's event going to London it just shows there is a great demand for a daily service from Exeter to Okehampton."

Secretary of State for Transport Paul Maynard MP will be at Paddington Station to welcome over 500 people who will have travelled up from Devon on Okerail's privately commissioned train the Royal Oke.

(http://www.devonlive.com/images/localworld/ugc-images/276269/binaries/00453.MTS.Still001.jpg)

Central Devon MP Mel Stride said: "This is a great day, it's a great day for rail, it's a great day for Okehampton, and it's a great day for my constituents. For the first time in 50 years we have a train leaving this station that's going to go all the way up to London Paddington. This is just a first step, we're going to be pushing very hard now to get this line reinstated. The demand is there, we've got 500 people on this train, and we sold the tickets out in about a fortnight.

"When we get to the other end we've got the Rail Minister there to meet us and we're going to give him a good shake and we're going to lobby him and press really hard to make sure we reinstate this line going forward."

Clive Eginton, leader of Mid Devon District Council told Devon Live when the train stopped in Crediton: "This is exceptionally important, the reason being, from a pollution aspect; it's going to help places like Cheriton Bishop because it will take traffic off of the A30 and obviously then hopefully make people use the train moving forwards. This is a first and moving forward there could be possibilities for a more regular service."


What exactly is a flat spot?

Passengers had to disembark today because of a flat spot - but what does flat spot mean?

A flat spot, or wheel flat, is a fault in railroad wheel shape. A flat spot occurs when a rail vehicle's wheelset is dragged along the rail after the wheel/axle has stopped rotating. Flat spots are usually caused by use of the emergency brake, or slip and slide conditions that cause wheels to lock up while the train is still moving. Flat spots are more common in the autumn and winter when the rails are slippery. Flat spots can also be caused by faulty brakes or wheelset bearings.


I am unfortunately unable to provide direct links to the video clips in my quote of that article, but they are available in the original devonlive (http://www.devonlive.com/video-okehampton-rail-campaigners-on-right-tracks-after-successful-ish-okerail-london-journey/story-30213025-detail/story.html) item: I recommend viewing them!

CfN.  :)



Title: Re: Okehampton to Paddington - Saturday, 18th March 2017
Post by: ChrisB on March 22, 2017, 10:57:57
They quote 7,500 users of the Sunday service as a reason for any regular service to be well used. I wonder how many pf those were visitors in, and thus wouldn't actually be regular users?

And surely they ought to be approaching the local LEP as it will be they who can obtain the money? What do they think?


Title: Re: Okehampton to Paddington - Saturday, 18th March 2017
Post by: kevb8ll on June 26, 2017, 12:15:14
Some interesting reading in this thread. I was one of the organisers of the special train. Despite the technical issues, the event was a success. The feedback was incredible. I appreciate it was a tough call for GWR to use stock from a scheduled service, but from what I understand there was only a few passengers and the special was full with 500 onboard.

I have nothing but praise for the staff of GWR on that day - they were brilliant.


Title: Re: Okehampton to Paddington - Saturday, 18th March 2017
Post by: LiskeardRich on June 26, 2017, 16:33:32
They quote 7,500 users of the Sunday service as a reason for any regular service to be well used. I wonder how many pf those were visitors in, and thus wouldn't actually be regular users?

And surely they ought to be approaching the local LEP as it will be they who can obtain the money? What do they think?

I know a lot of enthusiasts use the okehampton Sunday service, a look on the various Facebook groups verifies this. But then again maybe they are 5% of passengers at most


Title: Re: Okehampton to Paddington - Saturday, 18th March 2017
Post by: kevb8ll on July 20, 2017, 20:59:08
They quote 7,500 users of the Sunday service as a reason for any regular service to be well used. I wonder how many pf those were visitors in, and thus wouldn't actually be regular users?

And surely they ought to be approaching the local LEP as it will be they who can obtain the money? What do they think?

I know a lot of enthusiasts use the okehampton Sunday service, a look on the various Facebook groups verifies this. But then again maybe they are 5% of passengers at most

Every single train that ran was surveyed. However there were passengers that weren't because of time and busyness of some of the services.

Yes there were passengers from Exeter / Crediton etc that travelled to Okehampton - however that would happen with a regular service. We have a new industrial park being developed at the moment and have many businesses who have workers that live towards and in Exeter. But according to the data of the passengers questions it was a 2/3 1/3 split Okehampton area / Exeter area of where passengers lived.

The majority of people joining the train at Okehampton expressed a strong intent to use the service either to go to work, to shop or to travel elsewhere on the network.

Further to that 95% of the 500 people who were on the special train were from within 45 minutes travel time of Okehampton - which for our rural community, is a perfectly reasonable travel time.

While I accept there are some rail enthusiasts that use the sunday train, from my understanding of the data it is a reasonably small number.

While we are not suggesting a sunday train is the be all and end all for a regular service, those in the industry are happy to accept the data as an indicator of what could be achieved on the line when a regular service is restored.


Title: Re: Okehampton to Paddington - Saturday, 18th March 2017
Post by: grahame on July 20, 2017, 22:15:35
The majority of people joining the train at Okehampton expressed a strong intent to use the service either to go to work, to shop or to travel elsewhere on the network.

Further to that 95% of the 500 people who were on the special train were from within 45 minutes travel time of Okehampton - which for our rural community, is a perfectly reasonable travel time.

While I accept there are some rail enthusiasts that use the sunday train, from my understanding of the data it is a reasonably small number.

While we are not suggesting a sunday train is the be all and end all for a regular service, those in the industry are happy to accept the data as an indicator of what could be achieved on the line when a regular service is restored.

A very interesting set of observations with quantities.   It's something we've done and we've found some surprises; great evidence.  IMHO, you're doing this work in just the right way - impressive.



This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net