Great Western Coffee Shop

All across the Great Western territory => Buses and other ways to travel => Topic started by: grahame on July 09, 2017, 13:03:19



Title: MetroBus - a time to help make it a success?
Post by: grahame on July 09, 2017, 13:03:19
I read quite a bit on this forum that's not supportive of MetroBus, with relatively little than talks of it being what's right for public transport users. However, the project is nearing completion, and I wonder if now it the time to stop sniping at it and "name calling" it, and to start feeding constuctive tuning comments to the people who will be running it.    Would it be too much to suggest that public transport advocates partner with the team behind MetroBus to help market, promote, and snag the new service.   It may not be what you wanted, but isn't it an improvement on nothing, and won't you have more input into future developements if you work with (rather than against) the team providing it?

Discuss

Quote
When will services start?

Services will start in Autumn 2017.

The MetroBus route between Ashton Vale, Temple Meads and the city centre will be the first to launch. This will replace the 903 Park & Ride service. This will be followed by the route between Cribbs Causeway and Hengrove Park via UWE and the city centre.

The route from Emersons Green to the city centre, originally due to start in the Autumn, has been delayed due to South Gloucestershire Council’s repairs to the Bromley Heath viaduct on the A4174 ring road. This service will now start once the Bromley Heath viaduct work has been completed in the summer of 2018.


Title: Re: MetroBus - a time to help make it a success?
Post by: JayMac on July 09, 2017, 14:37:10
Simple answer to all that.

No.


Title: Re: MetroBus - a time to help make it a success?
Post by: simonw on July 09, 2017, 15:47:59
The problem with Bristol Transport, and Metrobus in particular, is that to many congestion points exist, and too many buses link multiple ones.

Hence scheduled bus journeys that take 45minutes, can take 90+ minutes, and buses disappear from parts of the city as all the buses are stuck somewhere else.

The advent of Metrobus just alleviates aspects of this, but does not address it.

If Metrobus had been 6 primary routes that where were 'free', linking with train and bus interchanges, and all other bus routes where paid as normal. This would of encouraged people out of there cars, and to use reliable local buses that where frequent, say every 5 minutes to complete journeys.

The current plan will change my 45 minutes bus route to 37 minutes. As it stands, cycling and train takes 30 minutes!

So whilst Metrobus may be a success, it could have, in my opinion, have been so much better.

Finally, the game changer in Greater Bristol will be MetroWest I&II.


Title: Re: MetroBus - a time to help make it a success?
Post by: bobm on July 09, 2017, 17:59:09
Simple answer to all that.

No.

I don't live in Bristol but visit the city fairly regularly.  As a result I have an open mind about the scheme.  I haven't had to put up with the undoubted disruption its construction has/is causing which may have coloured some city residents' minds.  I don't have the luxury of a car so anything which improves public transport is a bonus for me.

As a former resident of the area would you like to summarise your concerns with the scheme so I can see both sides?


Title: Re: MetroBus - a time to help make it a success?
Post by: Red Squirrel on July 10, 2017, 15:21:05
Simple answer to all that.

No.

An understandable reaction, given the history of the thing.

I was one of the people who took every available opportunity to shout 'NO' when this chimera was being conceived - of course light rail would have been infinitely better; arguably nothing would have been better as it would have left the floor clear for a better option. There's an old joke about someone replying 'I wouldn't start from here' when asked directions; I'm sure few people would start here given the choice, but here is indeed where we have to start.

So here's my initial two penn'orth:  We need to start lobbying for 100% electric buses - not the hybrid ones we have a few of now, but 100% electric ones (http://www.greenpowerbus.com/).

The problem with Bristol Transport, and Metrobus in particular, is that to many congestion points exist, and too many buses link multiple ones.

Yes. Bristol does not have a traffic problem - it has a planning problem; particularly in that part of Bristol currently known as South Glos.

The advent of Metrobus just alleviates aspects of this, but does not address it.

It won't alleviate it. Some motorists will 'shift modes' and use MetroBus, but the road space they vacate will soon be filled by others.

If Metrobus had been 6 primary routes that where were 'free', linking with train and bus interchanges, and all other bus routes where paid as normal. This would of encouraged people out of there cars, and to use reliable local buses that where frequent, say every 5 minutes to complete journeys.

I think this has been tried elsewhere. Again, any modal shift that this generates is soon soaked up by other motorists who see new road-based journey opportunities.

So whilst Metrobus may be a success, it could have, in my opinion, have been so much better.

I think we can all agree with at least part of that sentence!

Finally, the game changer in Greater Bristol will be MetroWest I&II.

Again, I doubt that it will achieve net modal shift. But it will be nice for those of us who like trains and can use it.




Title: Re: MetroBus - a time to help make it a success?
Post by: martyjon on July 10, 2017, 16:01:04

Yes. Bristol does not have a traffic problem - it has a planning problem; particularly in that part of Bristol currently known as South Glos.



A typical example of this is a local high street, 28 foot wide kerb to kerb, 6 foot car parking bays marked both sides of the highway leaving just 16 foot for two 8 foot 6 inch buses to pass each other. Even the village idiot can work out that that isn't going to work, something the highly paid planners can't do, then they wonder why there is congestion.


Title: Re: MetroBus - a time to help make it a success?
Post by: GBM on July 10, 2017, 16:46:29

A typical example of this is a local high street, 28 foot wide kerb to kerb, 6 foot car parking bays marked both sides of the highway leaving just 16 foot for two 8 foot 6 inch buses to pass each other. Even the village idiot can work out that that isn't going to work, something the highly paid planners can't do, then they wonder why there is congestion.
[/quote]
10 inches?  We're always taught to treat as 8 feet 10 inches for safety.


Title: Re: MetroBus - a time to help make it a success?
Post by: Bmblbzzz on July 10, 2017, 17:13:55

Yes. Bristol does not have a traffic problem - it has a planning problem; particularly in that part of Bristol currently known as South Glos.



A typical example of this is a local high street, 28 foot wide kerb to kerb, 6 foot car parking bays marked both sides of the highway leaving just 16 foot for two 8 foot 6 inch buses to pass each other. Even the village idiot can work out that that isn't going to work, something the highly paid planners can't do, then they wonder why there is congestion.
This is Standard for Parking. Not a specific Bristol problem (though even the "green-tinged" red-trousered mayor's RPZs were too timid to touch it) but one general to the perceived need for everyone to park on their own street.


Title: Re: MetroBus - a time to help make it a success?
Post by: Bmblbzzz on July 10, 2017, 17:15:56
To my mind the biggest potential problem of MetroBus is the roads that have been built specifically for it. Not the disruption they've caused or the allotments or nature reserves or buildings or whatever they're destroyed, but the fact that they are new roads which will almost inevitably in time be opened up to general traffic. Modal shift my arse!


Title: Re: MetroBus - a time to help make it a success?
Post by: Red Squirrel on July 10, 2017, 18:10:42
To my mind the biggest potential problem of MetroBus is the roads that have been built specifically for it. Not the disruption they've caused or the allotments or nature reserves or buildings or whatever they're destroyed, but the fact that they are new roads which will almost inevitably in time be opened up to general traffic. Modal shift my arse!

MetroBus (or more specifically the MetroBus millions) brought different things to different interest groups. Bristol, for example, has long sought ways to squeeze motor cars out of The Centre; MetroBus has provided funding and given justification for a significant public realm improvement here. This is a rare example of how modal shift can actually work - it's getting harder for cars to go there, so alternative modes start to look preferable. Similarly, whilst not a MetroBus project, the simplification of the Temple Circus junction will make the area less permeable to motorists and more permeable to everyone else, so more modal shift away from the mobile death greenhouse.

As to the South Bristol link road - speaking as a north-central Bristolian, it has made getting out of Bristol to the south by car a lot easier, and has opened up a very useful cycle link. And it's hard to conceive that the bus-only junction on the M32 will not improve journey times for bus users.

So not all bad, really, is it?



Title: Re: MetroBus - a time to help make it a success?
Post by: simonw on July 10, 2017, 18:38:52
The MetroBus budget has done several very good things, that are worth the money spent!

  • South Bristol Link Road
  • Stoke Gifford Bypass
  • M32 Junction for UWE
  • M32/Newfoundland Rd Bus Priority lane

but these do not make a transport system, or the backbone of one!


Title: Re: MetroBus - a time to help make it a success?
Post by: Bmblbzzz on July 11, 2017, 11:12:41
MetroBus to increase house prices (after reducing them?) and boost house building.
Quote
MetroBus 'will add at least 10 per cent to value of homes on the route'
The £220 million bus lane project will 'transform where people choose to live in Bristol'

SHARE
4
COMMENTS
BYTRISTAN CORK
09:00, 11 JUL 2017
NEWS

WATCH NEXT
Andrew Lewis
SHARE
4
The council chiefs behind the controversial MetroBus project have claimed it will increase house prices along the route - just a week after revealing a scheme allowing people to claim compensation if it devalues their homes.

While councils in North Somerset, Bristol and South Gloucestershire prepare to receive claims from people alleging that being right on the route has meant the value of their home has decreased, MetroBus and the very same council chiefs from across the area say experience in other cities with new mass-transit systems meant they could confidently predict a house price rise for those living along the route.

The Bristol Post revealed the compensation scheme last week - but this week MetroBus has come out fighting and predicted the opposite would happen when the buses start running in the autumn.

The scheme's backers pointed to what happened in Edinburgh along the route of tram lines that began running in 2014 – where average house prices have gone up around ten per cent in the three years since.

READ MORE
How you can claim compensation if you live near MetroBus route
And they quoted the examples of London, where homes near a tube station are on average much more expensive than places without easy access to the tube.

They said that in 2014, building society Nationwide reported that being near a tube station added £42,000 to the price of a London house, being near a Metrolink stop in Manchester adds £12,000, while proximity to a Glasgow railway station added £9,400. They also found that buyers in London would pay an average of 10.5 per cent more for a home within 500m of a tube station.


The MetroBus route being built near in south Bristol. The MetroBus stop here will serve the 184 residential units at Paxton Drive, pictured, and 120 new flats and 30 houses that are proposed for the nearby Ashton Station site.
But those examples quoted are of trams or trains – whereas the MetroBus is a bespoke bus lane, designed to connect north and south Bristol with a quicker bus service.

READ MORE
Bristol MetroBus costs increase by £16million in two years
MetroBus insisted that other places which had a designated ‘busway’ saw similar house price increases.

“MetroBus is expected to have the same effect as similar schemes in other UK cities,” a spokesman said. “Demand for houses along the Cambridge busway significantly increased since it opened in 2011 and earlier this year the Independent reported that 2016 house prices in Luton, where the area’s Fast Track scheme operates, have increased at double the UK’s annual price growth.”

MetroBus has also instigated a scheme where people can claim compensation if they can prove

The first MetroBus route to open will start later this year, and see Ashton Vale and the Long Ashton park and ride connected to Bristol Temple Meads with a mixture of a busway around Ashton Gate and a bus lane on the existing road network along Spike Island and Redcliffe.

Map showing the route of the Metrobus from Ashton Vale to Temple Meads
Map showing the route of the Metrobus from Ashton Vale to Temple Meads
Ashton Vale is already earmarked for large-scale housebuilding, and Metrobus said those homes will be much sought-after because of the good transport links.

READ MORE
New era dawns for Temple Circus as flourishing area's regeneration begins
“Academics at Portland State University examined schemes similar to MetroBus and discovered strong evidence that they had positive impact on economic growth by generating development, attracting higher-wage jobs and affordable housing,” said a Metrobus spokesman.

“Bus Rapid Transit schemes like MetroBus are designed to fit between local bus and rail networks and cater for trips of a length or stopping frequency less well-served by these modes.


Map showing the Cribbs Patchway Metrobus Extension (dotted line)
“They’re also faster and more reliable than traditional local bus services.

“Quicker journey times are achieved by less dwell time at stops, smart ticketing and dedicated lanes separated from traffic. BRT routes are often longer but have fewer stops than regular bus services.

READ MORE
First Bus Bristol named as Metrobus operator for Ashton Vale to Temple Meads route
“The American study found that BRT routes encouraged office growth with employers choosing to relocate to areas on BRT routes. Areas served by BRT routes also performed better during the economic recovery that followed the 2008 recession and attracted more higher-wage and manufacturing jobs.”

Metrobus listed the new developments along the route – some of which are already being lived in, others are several years from being built.

Hengrove/Filwood 8,000 new homes

Wapping Wharf – 700 homes

General Hospital (Bathurst Basin) – 205 homes

City centre & Enterprise Zone (Temple Meads) – 7,400 new homes, 150,000sqm of new office space, new £300m University of Bristol campus which includes significant student accommodation, the forthcoming extensive redevelopment of Broadmead will include 150 residential units

Bedminster Green - Plans for 800 homes

Metrobus route in Ashton from the air
Metrobus route in Ashton from the air
Ashton Vale - Plans for 140 new homes, including 56 new council houses

Ashton Station - Plans for 120 flats, 30 houses and commercial space.

Emersons Green - 2000 new homes

Harry Stoke - 2000 new homes

Coldharbour Lane - 500 new homes

“We’ve known for a long time that communities benefit from improved public transport,” said Bristol city council’s deputy mayor, Asher Craig. “Bus networks, like MetroBus, increase the number and range of jobs accessible to people. This is especially critical for people on low incomes or who are less skilled, who are less likely to have access to a car.

“These people usually qualify for a narrower range of jobs, which are often scattered across a large area. MetroBus will make it easier for people to make those longer cross-city journeys that our existing bus services don’t cater for.”

READ MORE
Complaints about new Severn Beach turbo trains as children left stranded for almost three hours
Metrobus said it will soon start to change the way the city runs, and where people choose to live.

“Easy access to public transport is an important consideration for more people when choosing where to live,” said a spokesman. "Demand for housing near public transport is rising, and especially amongst younger people. Recent studies reveal people under 30 drive less, walk more and are more dependent on public transport.

“Good public transport in cities increases connectivity, accessibility and helps create healthy and desirable neighbourhoods. High frequency bus and rail services reduce congestion, encourage economic investment and improve air quality.

“The economic benefits of transport improvements are already in evidence in Bristol where a hotel recently sold for more than £1.6 million because of its proximity to the South Bristol Link, a combined road and MetroBus route,” he added.

“MetroBus will make it easier for people to leave their car at home and choose public transport for more journeys,” said South Gloucestershire’s transport chief, Colin Hunt.


“We expect that MetroBus will have the same impact as similar schemes across the UK. Homes near MetroBus routes are going to be in greater demand as easy access to reliable public transport is now a key factor when choosing where to live. The great thing about MetroBus is that it has been designed to serve existing communities and many of the new housing developments that are being built across our region.”

Steve Pearce, Bristol’s cabinet councillor for transport, said the MetroBus would be ‘very different’ to a regular bus service.

READ MORE
MetroBus boss quits council job days after report reveals cost has gone up again
“MetroBus will transform public transport in the West of England area,” he said. “MetroBus is very different to the bus services we’re used to. The greater segregation and gaps between stops and higher frequency of service mean passengers will benefit from more reliable and faster services.”
http://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/metrobus-will-add-least-10-185194


Title: Re: MetroBus - a time to help make it a success?
Post by: rogerw on July 11, 2017, 16:59:24
I think that the reasoning behind the predicted increase in property values is somewhat optimistic.  All the examples quoted related to rail based rapid transit systems which are accepted to be attractive to users than buses.  I don't know if there are any comparative figures for the Cambridge busway, although this is more of an inter-urban route so probably not a good comparison for Metrobus


Title: Re: MetroBus - a time to help make it a success?
Post by: grahame on July 11, 2017, 18:14:28

Quote

Ashton Station - Plans for 120 flats, 30 houses and commercial space.


http://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/metrobus-will-add-least-10-185194


Ashton Station ?  Is that a railway station, or a bus station?


Title: Re: MetroBus - a time to help make it a success?
Post by: Red Squirrel on July 11, 2017, 18:32:14
It is a potential site for a new railway station on the potential Portishead railway  line.


Title: Re: MetroBus - a time to help make it a success?
Post by: Bmblbzzz on July 12, 2017, 09:40:12
I think in this case it's a name given to a housing development, regardless of what transport facilities might or might not come about.


Title: Re: MetroBus - a time to help make it a success?
Post by: JayMac on July 17, 2017, 09:55:12
Simple answer to all that.

No.

I don't live in Bristol but visit the city fairly regularly.  As a result I have an open mind about the scheme.  I haven't had to put up with the undoubted disruption its construction has/is causing which may have coloured some city residents' minds.  I don't have the luxury of a car so anything which improves public transport is a bonus for me.

As a former resident of the area would you like to summarise your concerns with the scheme so I can see both sides?

I think my concerns are best summarised by the ongoing thread elsewhere on this forum.

It's the height of folly to support a white elephant. It only encourages those who waste public funds to plan more palid pachyderm schemes.


Title: Re: MetroBus - a time to help make it a success?
Post by: chuffed on July 17, 2017, 10:03:04
Quote
It's the height of folly to support a white elephant. It only encourages those who waste public funds to plan more palid pachyderm schemes.

If metrobust is a pallid pachyderm what does that make HS2 ? A Machiavellian Mammoth Montrosity maybe ??




Edit note: Quote marks fixed, for clarity. CfN.


Title: Re: MetroBus - a time to help make it a success?
Post by: TonyK on July 18, 2017, 16:36:04
I read quite a bit on this forum that's not supportive of MetroBus, with relatively little than talks of it being what's right for public transport users. However, the project is nearing completion, and I wonder if now it the time to stop sniping at it and "name calling" it, and to start feeding constuctive tuning comments to the people who will be running it.    Would it be too much to suggest that public transport advocates partner with the team behind MetroBus to help market, promote, and snag the new service.   It may not be what you wanted, but isn't it an improvement on nothing, and won't you have more input into future developements if you work with (rather than against) the team providing it?

Discuss


Good luck with that, grahame. The whole project is built on mistrust and misinformation, with thinly veiled mendacity and completely unveiled threats to anyone who dares question the Powers That Be. It shows in stark relief the complete inability of our councils to run major projects, and how they are led by the nose by the unaccountable unelected oligarchy that is our LEP, and by the consultants. Prior to MetroBust, I had doubts about our local councils' ability to run public transport. After the debacle (so far) I wouldn't trust them to run a bath.


Title: Re: MetroBus - a time to help make it a success?
Post by: Red Squirrel on July 18, 2017, 17:39:32

It's the height of folly to support a white elephant. It only encourages those who waste public funds to plan more palid pachyderm schemes.



Good luck with that, grahame. The whole project is built on mistrust and misinformation, with thinly veiled mendacity and completely unveiled threats to anyone who dares question the Powers That Be. It shows in stark relief the complete inability of our councils to run major projects, and how they are led by the nose by the unaccountable unelected oligarchy that is our LEP, and by the consultants. Prior to MetroBust, I had doubts about our local councils' ability to run public transport. After the debacle (so far) I wouldn't trust them to run a bath.


I'm not clear what 'support' means in this context. Personally, I won't use it, but then none of the routes are of any use to me. If I lived in Long Ashton or Bradley Stoke I might see things differently. Are you suggesting that such people should boycott it?

As to where we go from here: the answer must be 'forward'. Grahame has shown how patient engagement can reap dividends. We wouldn't choose to start here, but we can't start anywhere else.


Title: Re: MetroBus - a time to help make it a success?
Post by: JayMac on July 18, 2017, 19:03:18
If, in the future, a way can be found to embed some lengths of steel and string up some leccy along the MetroBust routes, replacing the buses with trams, then I'd wholeheartedly support.

Road building disguised as bus 'improvements' was never acceptable to me. Road building to facilitate the start of a tram network would have be infinitely more preferable.

Just because MetroBust is now a fait accompli is no reason to now 'get behind it' and sing its praises.


Title: Re: MetroBus - a time to help make it a success?
Post by: TonyK on July 19, 2017, 19:49:10
If, in the future, a way can be found to embed some lengths of steel and string up some leccy along the MetroBust routes, replacing the buses with trams, then I'd wholeheartedly support.

Road building disguised as bus 'improvements' was never acceptable to me. Road building to facilitate the start of a tram network would have be infinitely more preferable.

Just because MetroBust is now a fait accompli is no reason to now 'get behind it' and sing its praises.

My sentiments exactly. I had hoped that it was a stalking horse scheme for trams, but the councils' (expecially South Glos's) fixation with enlarging MetroBust showed otherwise. They refer to it as "the already successful" MetroBust, despite there having been a grand total of zero passengers carried. They only got an operator by dropping the access charges that formed part of the business case.


Title: Re: MetroBus - a time to help make it a success?
Post by: johnneyw on July 19, 2017, 21:32:22
Congrats FTN, 3,000 posts today! ☺


Title: Re: MetroBus - a time to help make it a success?
Post by: TonyK on July 19, 2017, 22:45:23
Well bugger me blow me down! I could have said something more interesting. Polemical, even. Such is life.


Title: Re: MetroBus - a time to help make it a success?
Post by: Red Squirrel on July 20, 2017, 12:16:19
...string up some leccy

As an aside, I wonder what using onboard batteries instead of overhead knitting would do the the economics of light rail.


Title: Re: MetroBus - a time to help make it a success?
Post by: Rhydgaled on July 21, 2017, 08:24:50
...string up some leccy
As an aside, I wonder what using onboard batteries instead of overhead knitting would do the the economics of light rail.
Even if the initial setup is cheaper (which I have no idea), you also have to consider that batteries are heavy and not reliable. My previous laptop lasted about five years and I hope my current one will last at least as long (prefrably longer) but the battery on both has needed replacement roughly every 1-2 years; the battery life on each charge becomes so short it is useless. So, with battery powered trams there is the potnential need for several tonnes of expensive batteries to be replaced several times during the life of a rail vehicle (not sure what the typical life span of a light-rail vehicle is, but a 40yr old battery EMU would have needed quite a few sets of new batteries over its life). If batteries could be relied upon to hold the same level of charge at every charge they would be a significantly more useful technology than they are in reality.


Title: Re: MetroBus - a time to help make it a success?
Post by: Red Squirrel on July 21, 2017, 11:35:55
...string up some leccy
As an aside, I wonder what using onboard batteries instead of overhead knitting would do the the economics of light rail.
Even if the initial setup is cheaper (which I have no idea), you also have to consider that batteries are heavy and not reliable. My previous laptop lasted about five years and I hope my current one will last at least as long (prefrably longer) but the battery on both has needed replacement roughly every 1-2 years; the battery life on each charge becomes so short it is useless. So, with battery powered trams there is the potnential need for several tonnes of expensive batteries to be replaced several times during the life of a rail vehicle (not sure what the typical life span of a light-rail vehicle is, but a 40yr old battery EMU would have needed quite a few sets of new batteries over its life). If batteries could be relied upon to hold the same level of charge at every charge they would be a significantly more useful technology than they are in reality.

I'm sorry to hear of your laptop woes, but I'd be interested to know what evidence you have that EV batteries are unreliable. My understanding is that in the real world that these batteries are actually retaining capacity better than anticipated and, as an aside, even when they are down to 60% capacity (which they may be after about 12 years) you still have a pretty impressive energy store which you can use elsewhere for many more years.

As to weight, here's an interesting comparison: Diesel has an specific energy of 48MJ/Kg, whereas lithium ion batteries manage an apparently paltry 0.6MJ/Kg. That's an eighty-fold difference in energy density. However if you factor in the fact that electric motors are around three times as efficient as diesel engines, you see that in terms of battery load v fuel load you'd only need to carry 25 times as much weight for equivalent range with batteries. But you wouldn't necessarily do that either; a DC fast charger at the terminus could bump your batteries back up to 80% in under 30 mins, so you could probably get away with a much shorter range.

It is a practical possibility; a number of manufacturers already offer 100% electric buses (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_electric_bus_makers_and_models), with quoted ranges of 100-300km. Zonda Bus quote a battery lifespan of 500,000Km+.

I just can't help thinking the technology would work even better on rails.


Title: Re: MetroBus - a time to help make it a success?
Post by: TonyK on July 22, 2017, 12:19:42
I just can't help thinking the technology would work even better on rails.

So it would, with the vast reduction in friction, and the ability to coast once at a good speed.


Title: Re: MetroBus - a time to help make it a success?
Post by: Rhydgaled on July 22, 2017, 16:14:07
It is a practical possibility; a number of manufacturers already offer 100% electric buses (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_electric_bus_makers_and_models), with quoted ranges of 100-300km. Zonda Bus quote a battery lifespan of 500,000Km+.

I just can't help thinking the technology would work even better on rails.
Well, it should work for trams at least as well as for buses (after all, the Midland Metro are going to use batteries on sections I believe); but how the ongoing costs:benifits work out compared to a tram system with overhead wires installed (like Manchester's and the other parts of the Midland Metro) is an open question.



This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net