Great Western Coffee Shop

Journey by Journey => Portsmouth to Cardiff => Topic started by: grahame on August 23, 2018, 07:39:16



Title: The maths of short forms and where we are headed
Post by: grahame on August 23, 2018, 07:39:16
106 short forms over the GWR area this morning ... longest list I can recall.   Lots of 3 cars down to 2.

I read elsewhere that a turbo ran a Cardiff to Portsmouth service for the first time (? yesterday), turning around at Fareham, and other data suggests that they're still not cleared into Portsmouth Harbour - said to be due to the position of a couple of ground signals.   Not sure if that's a limited clearance issue of whether the train might actually hit the signals.

One thing that puzzles me - if the Cardiff - Portsmouth service is stepping up to 5 car 16x trains soon and there are 8 or 9 of them in the daily cycle, where are they all coming from?  "Newbury must be electric by the New Year" is what I hear, and yet I can't see that releasing more that a handful of Turbos on its own.   Another 3 x 3 car are released when the Bedwyn services go over to 802s. Does "Cardiff / Portsmouth to 5 car" rely on something else - such as 769 to Gatwick?  Is there a thin air machine due for commissioning in coming months out of which turbos can be produced?

Any help explaining the maths by those in the industry would be appreciated!



Edit to clarify text


Title: Re: The maths of short forms and where we are headed
Post by: Timmer on August 23, 2018, 09:41:38
Thinking back to the early days of the Coffee Shop when discussion and listing the many short formed West local services was an almost daily occurance, if you had told me years later we'd be discussing short formed Intercity services I'd have never believed you. Broadgage saw it coming in his crystal ball though!


Title: Re: The maths of short forms and where we are headed
Post by: broadgage on August 23, 2018, 11:52:33
I suspect that a lot of plans are "hopes, wishes, and aspirations" rather than proper planning based on actual stock availability.

For some years, FGW, then GWR suffered from "new train disease" I refer here not to the merits or otherwise of the new trains but to the belief that all would be well once they had the new trains.

I refer not just to the IETs but also to the new EMUs for Thames valley services. It was widely believed that once these EMUs arrived, that there would be "loads" of turbos spare to be cascaded further west in order to provide longer or more frequent services. For various reasons this has not worked, and many of the assumptions about timescales and availability of both the new EMUs and the cascaded Turbos have proved unduly optimistic.

And as for IETs, It was originally stated that there would be "plenty" of the new DMUs and "a lot of extra capacity" and eventually this may indeed be achieved, meanwhile single 5 car DMUs instead of full length HSTs are becoming the new normal.


Title: Re: The maths of short forms and where we are headed
Post by: Timmer on August 23, 2018, 12:09:34
meanwhile single 5 car DMUs instead of full length HSTs are becoming the new normal.
Thus ruining the new train experience for those using or trying to use the train as most passengers will think this five car train is the replacement for 8 carriage HST.


Title: Re: The maths of short forms and where we are headed
Post by: grahame on August 23, 2018, 12:14:59
meanwhile single 5 car DMUs instead of full length HSTs are becoming the new normal.
Thus ruining the new train experience for those using or trying to use the train as most passengers will think this five car train is the replacement for 8 carriage HST.

Indeed ... and those of us with long memories remember the HSTs being (largely) replaces by "something for the future" on journeys from the South West and Bristol to Birmingham and the north, but the future not feeling as spacious and not feeling that way still - after all these years!


Title: Re: The maths of short forms and where we are headed
Post by: devonexpress on August 23, 2018, 12:24:23
I suspect that a lot of plans are "hopes, wishes, and aspirations" rather than proper planning based on actual stock availability.

For some years, FGW, then GWR suffered from "new train disease" I refer here not to the merits or otherwise of the new trains but to the belief that all would be well once they had the new trains.

I refer not just to the IETs but also to the new EMUs for Thames valley services. It was widely believed that once these EMUs arrived, that there would be "loads" of turbos spare to be cascaded further west in order to provide longer or more frequent services. For various reasons this has not worked, and many of the assumptions about timescales and availability of both the new EMUs and the cascaded Turbos have proved unduly optimistic.

And as for IETs, It was originally stated that there would be "plenty" of the new DMUs and "a lot of extra capacity" and eventually this may indeed be achieved, meanwhile single 5 car DMUs instead of full length HSTs are becoming the new normal.

I do agree, GWR (FGW) had too high a hopes that new trains would solve everything, and sadly for them, other forces have made things go belly up.


As for the IET's they still need more of them, the requirement for more IET's outways the timescale and amount being delivered.   I've also seen that a the Royal Shakespeare company want GWR to serve Stratford Upon Avon from 2020, meaning even less trains available for the rest of the network.


Title: Re: The maths of short forms and where we are headed
Post by: Adelante_CCT on August 23, 2018, 12:55:28
Quote
Newbury must be electric by the New Year" is what I hear, and yet I can't see that releasing more that a handful of Turbos on its own.   Another 3 x 3 car are released when the Bedwyn services go over to 802s. Does "Cardiff / Portsmouth to 5 car" rely on something else - such as 769 to Gatwick? 

Potentially 2 turbos being released from the Newbury's, and as you say another 3 from the Bedwyns. I would guess another handful from ones that are currently doing fast Oxford/Cotswold services being replaced by 80Xs as well.

Whether that's enough to give Portsmouth 5 cars I don't know, but the potential arrival of 769s would be a huge help, though that's not looking likely any time soon


Title: Re: The maths of short forms and where we are headed
Post by: didcotdean on August 23, 2018, 13:40:29
Also there will be the need for something, presumably turbos to cover for 387s gone for HEXification.


Title: Re: The maths of short forms and where we are headed
Post by: broadgage on August 23, 2018, 14:04:26
Are the 769s actually going to happen ? A cynic might suspect that the project has been de facto abandoned, but that no one wants to actually declare it dead just yet.

At best another couple of years delay seems likely, though I doubt that it will happen at all.

And of course whilst the 769 project is still officially alive, that absolves GWR from any need to make other plans "Everything will get better once we have the 769s"


Title: Re: The maths of short forms and where we are headed
Post by: eightf48544 on August 23, 2018, 14:27:18
Viva rail 230s (Battery?)  for Windsor, Marlow and Henley now there's no through services that would release a few more Turbos.

Spelling corrected


Title: Re: The maths of short forms and where we are headed
Post by: broadgage on August 23, 2018, 14:41:51
Viva rail 230s (Battery?)  for Windsor, Marlow and Henley now there's no through services that would release a few more Turbos.

Presuming that the battery units can be procured in a reasonable time, and that they work as intended, that sounds a good idea both on environmental grounds, and by releasing a few turbos for use elsewhere.

My natural cynicism however leads to the suspicion that because the 769 project is not officially dead yet, that no other stock is being considered. Just keep repeating "it will get better once we have the 769s"

After a few years, a statement can be released "we had plans for new trains but have been let down by a supplier, who faced unexpected challenges. We are now reviewing other options" meanwhile short formations and overcrowding have got even worse.


Title: Re: The maths of short forms and where we are headed
Post by: devonexpress on August 23, 2018, 17:24:04
Viva rail 230s (Battery?)  for Windsor, Marlow and Henley now there's no through services that would release a few more Turbos.

Presuming that the battery units can be procured in a reasonable time, and that they work as intended, that sounds a good idea both on environmental grounds, and by releasing a few turbos for use elsewhere.

My natural cynicism however leads to the suspicion that because the 769 project is not officially dead yet, that no other stock is being considered. Just keep repeating "it will get better once we have the 769s"

After a few years, a statement can be released "we had plans for new trains but have been let down by a supplier, who faced unexpected challenges. We are now reviewing other options" meanwhile short formations and overcrowding have got even worse.

I suspect your write, but GWR did reply to someone on twitter saying the 769s are arriving next year.


Title: Re: The maths of short forms and where we are headed
Post by: Adelante_CCT on August 23, 2018, 20:11:25
Also there will be the need for something, presumably turbos to cover for 387s gone for HEXification.

I guess they could just use unused class 319s instead as a temporary measure.



This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net