|
Title: Different opinions on spending review Post by: CyclingSid on November 26, 2020, 10:11:28 Sustrans sees the more positive side
https://www.sustrans.org.uk/our-blog/news/2020/november/our-response-to-the-spending-review/ (https://www.sustrans.org.uk/our-blog/news/2020/november/our-response-to-the-spending-review/) Cycling UK sees it in more negative terms https://www.cyclinguk.org/blog/spending-review-sees-guaranteed-cycling-and-walking-budget-slashed-15 (https://www.cyclinguk.org/blog/spending-review-sees-guaranteed-cycling-and-walking-budget-slashed-15) This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net |