Great Western Coffee Shop

Journey by Journey => Bristol (WECA) Commuters => Topic started by: Red Squirrel on February 23, 2021, 10:59:23



Title: FoSBR: Every 15 Minutes
Post by: Red Squirrel on February 23, 2021, 10:59:23
FoSBR has launched a new campaign to increase the frequency of local train services in the Bristol area to four trains per hour:

Quote
FoSBR sees MetroWest as the core of an integrated transport network for Bristol, Bath and the West of England. But to achieve this, we need a turn-up-and-go service. This means a train every 15 minutes.

During FoSBR’s January 2021 AGM, members voted for this resolution:

“Although MetroWest is bringing much-needed and long-awaited train frequency improvements, FoSBR seeks a 15-minute frequency train service to all Bristol stations for a true metro-style service”.

[...]

The wording “all Bristol stations” has been left deliberately loose.  Some stations will benefit from a 15-minute service before others achieve the 30-minute service. In the longer term we believe there will be sufficient demand to justify a 15-minute service to most stations across the West of England Combined Authority (WECA) area.

Full article (https://fosbr.org.uk/a-train-every-15-minutes/)


Title: Re: FoSBR: Every 15 Minutes
Post by: GWR 158 on February 23, 2021, 11:16:55
Every 15 minutes would be wonderful, but the question is if there are enough trains and enough staff to run the service.


Title: Re: FoSBR: Every 15 Minutes
Post by: Noggin on March 04, 2021, 16:05:43
Every 15 minutes would be wonderful, but the question is if there are enough trains and enough staff to run the service.

I'd suggest that the Severn Beach will need stretches of track redoubling, which means station rebuilds, plus Temple Meads to Parson Street probably needs 4-tracking as well, but I think it would make a massive difference to the city and rail use.


Title: Re: FoSBR: Every 15 Minutes
Post by: Red Squirrel on March 04, 2021, 16:22:40
Yes, there is no doubt that the Severn Beach line would at the very least need more loops. The WECA Rail Plan acknowledges this.


Title: Re: FoSBR: Every 15 Minutes
Post by: johnneyw on March 04, 2021, 23:01:48
Yes, there is no doubt that the Severn Beach line would at the very least need more loops. The WECA Rail Plan acknowledges this.

The question there perhaps is what would be cheaper/more cost effective? Redoubling some of the line or additional passing loops with the associated S&T complications and costs?


Title: Re: FoSBR: Every 15 Minutes
Post by: Bmblbzzz on March 04, 2021, 23:04:10
I believe the WECA Plan is to double the line between Narroways Junction and Montpellier station. I'm not aware of any other improvements planned so far, but there might be.


Title: Re: FoSBR: Every 15 Minutes
Post by: Red Squirrel on March 04, 2021, 23:42:00
The WECA plan, as Bmblbzzz says, only covers Montpelier to Narroways . From memory, I think that would allow a 20-minute frequency to Avonmouth. For a reliable 4tph service, it would seem likely that more, probably much more redoubling would be required.


Title: Re: FoSBR: Every 15 Minutes
Post by: grahame on March 05, 2021, 11:13:17
The WECA plan, as Bmblbzzz says, only covers Montpelier to Narroways . From memory, I think that would allow a 20-minute frequency to Avonmouth. For a reliable 4tph service, it would seem likely that more, probably much more redoubling would be required.


I was asking myself how frequent a service can be run on a single track railway as a general thought for "The Beach". And in GB, the most frequent multi-'train' service I came up with was a 20 minute headway on the Seaton Tramway. The Stourbridge Town branch runs at a 10 minute headway - and indeed from Network Rail (https://www.networkrailmediacentre.co.uk/news/britains-shortest-branch-line-gets-superfast-upgrade)

Quote
Britain’s shortest branch line gets superfast upgrade

Journeys on Stourbridge’s unique 'people mover' will soon be much smoother for passengers after a week-long upgrade of its railway line.

Network Rail engineers will replace track along just under a mile of track on the Stourbridge Town branch line in just seven days between Saturday 6 and Saturday 13 March.

From planning to completion, the whole project will take eight weeks – normally it would take 18 months.

The superfast approach has been possible as Network Rail has worked closely with train operator West Midlands Railway to complete major upgrades while passenger numbers are low during the latest lockdown to stop the spread of Covid-19.

On "The Beach", 30 minutes looks like it works well save for the need to have a train idle at Temple Meads almost all of the time if it's not linked on to another service.   

As I read it (sitting back in my armchair!) a 20 minute service would need loops 10 minutes either side of Clifton Down - so that's around Shirehampton / Portway Parkway, and Montpelier - or perhaps double from there to Narroways. Another loop somewhere out beyond Avonmouth, where the loop would only be used in times of disruption or if some trains turned back there.

A 15 minute service, being an exact multiple of a 30 minute service should in theory work with extra loops around Montpelier (or double to Narroways from there) and between Sea Mills and Shirehampton.  Out beyond Avonmouth, either another loop would be needed or alternate trains (making in every half hour) to Severn Beach;  that latter would work with the extra trains threaded in to go up from 2 to 4 an hour turning at Avonmouth while the others carried on - you have a neat "dance" rather than trains arriving at Avonmouth having a conflict of interest in terms of whether or not they go on.

The 30 minute service coming in December  ;D carries on to Westbury. A step up to a 15 minute service would eliminate the operational need to make that linkage for efficiency, though for through passengers it should be a real asset and traffic builder.  However, a 15 minute single line service would be very prone to knock-on disruption unless there was a "never mind, drop back 15 minutes" philosophy rather than trying to catch up if the train from Westbury presented late.


Title: Re: FoSBR: Every 15 Minutes
Post by: Bmblbzzz on March 05, 2021, 13:01:48
A train every 15 minutes gives a "turn up and go" service for passengers, tube-style. No need to think about timetables. But looking beyond that, what would make the service easier to use? Beyond Clifton Down, there's only one station every couple of miles; nothing like a tube service! New stations are expensive of course, but if we imagine a magic money wand, might it at some point be better used on more frequent stations rather than more frequent trains?


Title: Re: FoSBR: Every 15 Minutes
Post by: DaveHarries on March 05, 2021, 18:33:19
A train every 15 minutes gives a "turn up and go" service for passengers, tube-style. No need to think about timetables. But looking beyond that, what would make the service easier to use? Beyond Clifton Down, there's only one station every couple of miles; nothing like a tube service! New stations are expensive of course, but if we imagine a magic money wand, might it at some point be better used on more frequent stations rather than more frequent trains?
TBH I think even before the current situation a service of 4tph would have needed 2-carriage trains only. I think 2tph Avonmouth - Temple Meads is enough whereas only one train running beyond Avonmouth is merely a good start: I think WECA is missing an opportunity, especially if the new station at Henbury goes ahead (and the one at North Filton).

Dave


Title: Re: FoSBR: Every 15 Minutes
Post by: Red Squirrel on March 05, 2021, 19:03:56
A train every 15 minutes gives a "turn up and go" service for passengers, tube-style. No need to think about timetables. But looking beyond that, what would make the service easier to use? Beyond Clifton Down, there's only one station every couple of miles; nothing like a tube service! New stations are expensive of course, but if we imagine a magic money wand, might it at some point be better used on more frequent stations rather than more frequent trains?
TBH I think even before the current situation a service of 4tph would have needed 2-carriage trains only. I think 2tph Avonmouth - Temple Meads is enough whereas only one train running beyond Avonmouth is merely a good start: I think WECA is missing an opportunity, especially if the new station at Henbury goes ahead (and the one at North Filton).

Dave

According to the recent WECA mass transit briefing, we need to reduce the number of car journeys in Bristol by a bewildering 80% by 2030 to achieve carbon reduction targets. Some of those journeys will be made on foot, or by bus, or bicycle, or scooter; some may no longer be made at all. But doesn't planning for a much more usable train service with higher capacity seem like a step in the right direction? With a greater choice of destinations and connections becoming available over the next few years, Bristol's most under-used asset - its local rail network - could become the core of its sustainable transport system.


Title: Re: FoSBR: Every 15 Minutes
Post by: DaveHarries on March 05, 2021, 21:01:49
According to the recent WECA mass transit briefing, we need to reduce the number of car journeys in Bristol by a bewildering 80% by 2030 to achieve carbon reduction targets. Some of those journeys will be made on foot, or by bus, or bicycle, or scooter; some may no longer be made at all. But doesn't planning for a much more usable train service with higher capacity seem like a step in the right direction? With a greater choice of destinations and connections becoming available over the next few years, Bristol's most under-used asset - its local rail network - could become the core of its sustainable transport system.
Yes but when people start switching to purely electric vehicles - which, I think, will be when the ranges on them get bigger for one thing: the last one I looked at had a range of only 50 miles on electric which is rather less than I would need - then the target will be achieved faster. I gather that First have said they will no longer buy diesel buses after, I think, 2022 and that will help things too.

As for the Severn Beach route I also wonder whether the rail infrastructure is there to support 4tph. Redoubling of Montpelier to Narroways Hill is one thing. Sea Mills would also need redoubling. I think you are looking at something like this:

2tph Bristol Temple Meads to Avonmouth
1tph Bristol Temple Meads to Severn Beach, via. Avonmouth
1tph Bristol Temple Meads to Bristol Parkway, via. Avonmouth & Henbury (the missed opportunity I referred to earlier)

4tph might work fine at peak times but perhaps not off-peak. 3tph at the most perhaps.

Also where did that 80% figure come from? If it was BCC then I would be sorely tempted not to give that stat the time of day as I don't trust half the stuff they come up with.

Dave


Title: Re: FoSBR: Every 15 Minutes
Post by: Red Squirrel on March 05, 2021, 21:12:55
The 80% figure came, as I said, from WECA. I agree it sounds high; I'd previously heard that we only needed a 60% reduction.

Electric cars will help with NOx and CO2 emissions, but they still emit tyre and brake particulates and it still isn't possible for mass motoring and liveable cities to coexist.



Title: Re: FoSBR: Every 15 Minutes
Post by: rogerw on March 05, 2021, 22:03:56
Electric cars are not the total solution. A significant number of dwellings in the Greater Bristol area do not have off street parking. So where can the occupiers easily charge an electric car?


Title: Re: FoSBR: Every 15 Minutes
Post by: DaveHarries on March 05, 2021, 23:38:10
Electric cars are not the total solution. A significant number of dwellings in the Greater Bristol area do not have off street parking. So where can the occupiers easily charge an electric car?
Good point. I am looking to change my car and am considering a hybrid which may be a plug-in type but which I could drive on 100% electric when in town if I had enough charge available. I could possibly charge it from the mains at work if the boss allows (which he probably would). However I don't have a garage and would have to run an extension lead the whole length of my garden path which, in wet weather, would probably not be a very good idea when the length of cable from the mains to my car would be about 75ft! The manufacturer does provide charging points but my Dad, who looks after the garden, would be none too keen on it being dug up. So that makes the idea of a hybrid rather a difficult one.

Dave


Title: Re: FoSBR: Every 15 Minutes
Post by: GBM on March 06, 2021, 09:21:39

Good point. I am looking to change my car and am considering a hybrid which may be a plug-in type but which I could drive on 100% electric when in town if I had enough charge available. Dave
WAAY off topic, but many hybrids are self charging (which is what we are looking at as an interim until the full electric vehicle range has gone up considerably, and the technology therein has settled down.
Does this also mean a steady decline in the motor mechanic personnel, as all the youngsters coming through will all be electric trained (and is there much to manually service in an all electric car?

And now back to the serious topic of FoSBR; Every 15 Minutes


Title: Re: FoSBR: Every 15 Minutes
Post by: Bmblbzzz on March 06, 2021, 14:20:31
A train every 15 minutes gives a "turn up and go" service for passengers, tube-style. No need to think about timetables. But looking beyond that, what would make the service easier to use? Beyond Clifton Down, there's only one station every couple of miles; nothing like a tube service! New stations are expensive of course, but if we imagine a magic money wand, might it at some point be better used on more frequent stations rather than more frequent trains?
TBH I think even before the current situation a service of 4tph would have needed 2-carriage trains only. I think 2tph Avonmouth - Temple Meads is enough whereas only one train running beyond Avonmouth is merely a good start: I think WECA is missing an opportunity, especially if the new station at Henbury goes ahead (and the one at North Filton).

Dave
They might be only one carriage. One carriage four times an hour gives a far more usable service than four carriages once an hour.


Title: Re: FoSBR: Every 15 Minutes
Post by: DaveHarries on March 06, 2021, 14:45:46
They might be only one carriage. One carriage four times an hour gives a far more usable service than four carriages once an hour.
True, until you realise that there are, AFAIK, no single carriage units left in GWR's fleet: I can't recall the last time I saw a Class 153 unit anywhere.

Dave


Title: Re: FoSBR: Every 15 Minutes
Post by: grahame on March 06, 2021, 16:02:09
They might be only one carriage. One carriage four times an hour gives a far more usable service than four carriages once an hour.
True, until you realise that there are, AFAIK, no single carriage units left in GWR's fleet: I can't recall the last time I saw a Class 153 unit anywhere.

Dave

Take a look at Cardiff / Portsmouth.   When 5 of 6 car loco hauled trains running every few hours that were less than crowded were replaced by 2 car trains every hour - about the same number of carriages running overall - passenger numbers rocketed.  Frequency does it!

But ... indeed, no single carriage units left on GWR (nor in East Anglia). Transport for Wales has quite a few - some having loos converted to disabled (and that does leave a handful of seats) and others always being used to strengthen trains. Some also with a temporary allowance to run this year without disabled loo.    Northern still has some, East Midlands a few, and Scotrail are converting some for carriage of cycles and other paraphernalia.   And a number are stored.

Single carriage trains were know in the past as "Coffin Nails" as they were the last day to day trains to use a line as wound down prior to closure.   But more recently they have worked very well for us (and for other lines such as Paignton) providing experimental services at less than the cost of a multi-carriage train as passenger numbers were built up - so they have become to some of us a passing phase on the way up, rather than a passing phase on the way down.   I do suspect that a line that's running with most of its trains single carriage over an extended period is rarely going to make economic sense.   So 4 trains an hour on "The Beach" even if not all the way to Severn Beach, please.   They probably cannot be 4 cars any longer though - my understanding is that some of the platform upgrades reduced the maximum length of a train than can open all doors to just three carriages,




This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net