Great Western Coffee Shop

Sideshoots - associated subjects => The Lighter Side => Topic started by: grahame on July 27, 2021, 17:33:29



Title: Wet, wet, wet - where?
Post by: grahame on July 27, 2021, 17:33:29
Inspired by floods at Yeovil (http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/25276)

Where are these?   (one each, please, for first 24 hours)

1.
(http://www.wellho.net/pix/rwq_1.jpg)

2.
(http://www.wellho.net/pix/rwq_2.jpg)

3.
(http://www.wellho.net/pix/rwq_3.jpg)

4.
(http://www.wellho.net/pix/rwq_4.jpg)

5.
(http://www.wellho.net/pix/rwq_5.jpg)

6.
(http://www.wellho.net/pix/rwq_6.jpg)

7.
(http://www.wellho.net/pix/rwq_7.jpg)



Title: Re: Wet, wet, wet - where?
Post by: brooklea on July 27, 2021, 17:46:52
1. Newbury


Title: Re: Wet, wet, wet - where?
Post by: Zoe on July 27, 2021, 17:47:49
6 is Penzance.


Title: Re: Wet, wet, wet - where?
Post by: Clan Line on July 27, 2021, 18:07:10
5.  The car wash at Warminster Station.


Title: Re: Wet, wet, wet - where?
Post by: stuving on July 27, 2021, 18:20:56
3 is still Melksham


Title: Re: Wet, wet, wet - where?
Post by: PhilWakely on July 27, 2021, 20:17:32
2. Dawlish


Title: Re: Wet, wet, wet - where?
Post by: grahame on July 28, 2021, 10:13:05
All correct so far - just 4. and 7. (the historic ones!) to work out.  Clue - both stations shown are now closed.


Title: Re: Wet, wet, wet - where?
Post by: chuffed on July 28, 2021, 10:48:04
WOT..no Taunton? Is this a first for a picture quiz??  ;D


Title: Re: Wet, wet, wet - where?
Post by: Witham Bobby on July 28, 2021, 15:31:35
4 is Glastonbury


Title: Re: Wet, wet, wet - where?
Post by: Witham Bobby on July 28, 2021, 16:10:57
7 - Corsham? Maybe.  Would be a lot easier if that station nameboard was clearer  :D


Title: Re: Wet, wet, wet - where?
Post by: grahame on July 28, 2021, 16:24:09
WOT..no Taunton? Is this a first for a picture quiz??  ;D

All correctly worked out.

1 Newbury - brooklet
2 Dawlish - PhilWakely
3 Melksham - Stuving
4 Glastonbury - Witham Bobby
5 Warminster - Clan Line
6 Penzance - Zoe
7 Corsham - Witham Bobby

 I couldn't find a picture of Taunton Station flooded - probably too high.   Best I could find:

(http://www.wellho.net/pix/rwq_0.jpg)


Title: Re: Wet, wet, wet - where?
Post by: Clan Line on July 28, 2021, 18:57:48
To digress slightly............

The frequent flooding under the line at Warminster Station defied many attempts over quite a few years to solve the problem. One "solution" (pun intended) involved fixing two vertical rulers to the walls of the underbridge to indicate the depth of the water to approaching drivers. However.................the rulers were so far back from the lowest point of the road under the bridge that there would have to be at least 18" (45.72 cm  ;)) of water under the bridge before even the Zero marks on the rulers were reached. I never actually saw the water get anywhere near the zero mark !


Title: Re: Wet, wet, wet - where?
Post by: stuving on July 28, 2021, 20:15:34
To digress slightly............

The frequent flooding under the line at Warminster Station defied many attempts over quite a few years to solve the problem. One "solution" (pun intended) involved fixing two vertical rulers to the walls of the underbridge to indicate the depth of the water to approaching drivers. However.................the rulers were so far back from the lowest point of the road under the bridge that there would have to be at least 18" (45.72 cm  ;)) of water under the bridge before even the Zero marks on the rulers were reached. I never actually saw the water get anywhere near the zero mark !

Presumably, the logic of that was to make sure drivers could see the marks in time - there being no point putting them where the water was, because they would only be seen too late.


Title: Re: Wet, wet, wet - where?
Post by: Clan Line on July 29, 2021, 10:08:48

Presumably, the logic of that was to make sure drivers could see the marks in time - there being no point putting them where the water was, because they would only be seen too late.
To pass under the bridge needs a 90° turn on entry and exit, so the rulers were directly in front of the approaching drivers, and were visible before any flood water would be seen. The driver needs to know the deepest depth of the water, not that there is no measurable water at the rulers, which were located outside of the bridge. The "zero" mark on the rulers should have started at 18" not at 0". Apart from which, as I said, the water never reached the rulers anyway.................................absolutely pointless. Even with the rulers, the depth of water was still unknown.


Title: Re: Wet, wet, wet - where?
Post by: froome on July 29, 2021, 14:17:47
In my opinion a more important point about the flooding under the bridge in Warminster is that it is the only route a wheelchair user, someone pushing a push chair or pram, or a cyclist can exit the station if they have got off on the south-eastbound platform. It has happened to me with a bike, though only with very minor flooding which I could get through.

Imagine what happens if you are in a wheelchair and find yourself rounding a corner and coming face to face with 18" of water to go through...


Title: Re: Wet, wet, wet - where?
Post by: Clan Line on July 29, 2021, 18:18:36
My comments were somewhat historical as I no longer live that side of the railway line, I must confess that I have not seen it flooded of late, so the problem may have been solved by now. The last activity I saw there seemed to be placing a (new ?) pump in the bottom of a large sump on the town side of the bridge.



This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net