|
Title: Campaigning for a station for Lockleaze Post by: Red Squirrel on August 01, 2021, 14:40:01 FoSBR held a meeting with local residents at Constable Road bridge, Lockleaze on 31st July, as part of a joint campaign for a new station at this site. The proposed station is on Filton Bank, 1km north of the planned Ashley Down station and 1.7km south of Filton Abbey Wood.
We were joined by Don Alexander, Bristol City Council's new cabinet member for transport, and local councillor Heather Mack. FoSBR chair Rob Dixon explained how a new station would fit in with FoSBR's Plan for Rail (https://fosbr.org.uk/campaigns/fosbr-plan-for-rail/), and how well it would integrate with existing bus services (including those to Southmead Hospital). Over 1000 new homes are due to be built in the area. (https://fosbr.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/locakleaze_20210731.jpg) Local MP Darren Jones planned to attend, but had to spend the day in hospital with his daughter who had injured herself instead! David Wilcox, Green shadow cabinet member for transport was 'pinged' and unable to come, though he has met FoSBR previously (https://fosbr.org.uk/a-station-for-lockleaze/) to support this scheme. (https://fosbr.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/group3scaled.jpg) Spot the seasoned campaigner! FoSBR were very pleased to see a good number of local people turn out in support! Title: Re: Campaigning for a station for Lockleaze Post by: ChrisB on August 01, 2021, 14:57:39 Two stations 1,000 metres apart?…..
Title: Re: Campaigning for a station for Lockleaze Post by: Red Squirrel on August 01, 2021, 17:04:04 Two stations 1,000 metres apart?….. Absolutely! In an urban context this is close to the optimal gap. The average gap between stations on the North London Line between Gospel Oak and Hackney Central is 1081.5m. Caledonian Road and Barnsbury to Highbury and Islington is a mere 764m. Closer to home, Redland to Montpelier is 756m, and Shirehampton to Portway P&R will be 917m. Title: Re: Campaigning for a station for Lockleaze Post by: Lee on August 01, 2021, 18:14:40 Sorry - Had to remove my post on this as a map image wouldnt "stick".
My basic message was that I am sure FoSBR have considered operational issues, wish them every success with Lockleaze campaign, and credit where credit is due, they certainly seem to have got the numbers out for this. Title: Re: Campaigning for a station for Lockleaze Post by: Bmblbzzz on August 02, 2021, 10:09:43 The map on FOSBR has separate site slightly south by the footbridge, marked as "site proposed by station for council". Does that indicate BCC's support for a station being built – or factional squabbling? What are the pros and cons of each site? AIUI GWR are opposed to more than one new station (ie Ashley Down) on this line.
Title: Re: Campaigning for a station for Lockleaze Post by: johnneyw on August 02, 2021, 18:13:39 The map on FOSBR has separate site slightly south by the footbridge, marked as "site proposed by station for council". Does that indicate BCC's support for a station being built – or factional squabbling? What are the pros and cons of each site? AIUI GWR are opposed to more than one new station (ie Ashley Down) on this line. Very much the same with me. I recall some discussions on the subject a few years ago (at about the same time as four tracking Filton Bank was in the construction stage). I think the question of accessibility was brought up then, particularly off road approach and access which I believe is somewhat less plentiful at the former Horfield Station site off Bonnington Walk. I also vaguely recall issues raised regarding stations built on gradients. A summary of the current pros and cons would be interesting now that the debate seems to be shifting from "if" to "where". Title: Re: Campaigning for a station for Lockleaze Post by: Red Squirrel on August 02, 2021, 18:57:24 The map on FOSBR has separate site slightly south by the footbridge, marked as "site proposed by station for council". Does that indicate BCC's support for a station being built – or factional squabbling? What are the pros and cons of each site? AIUI GWR are opposed to more than one new station (ie Ashley Down) on this line. Very much the same with me. I recall some discussions on the subject a few years ago (at about the same time as four tracking Filton Bank was in the construction stage). I think the question of accessibility was brought up then, particularly off road approach and access which I believe is somewhat less plentiful at the former Horfield Station site off Bonnington Walk. I also vaguely recall issues raised regarding stations built on gradients. A summary of the current pros and cons would be interesting now that the debate seems to be shifting from "if" to "where". The site south of the footbridge was one of the locations considered in the CH2MHILL Report (https://travelwest.info/app/uploads/2020/05/4.-GRIP2-App-B-New-Stations-Report.pdf) for BCC in 2014, which looked at three potential locations for stations between Stapleton Road and Filton Abbey Wood. This site was seen as a potential alternative to the chosen option at Ashley Down. It is perhaps a bit confusing to refer to it as 'proposed by the Council'; 'previously proposed...' might be clearer. One of the reasons for investigating the site south of the footbridge was to try to avoid the gradient - but it was considered no better. Presumably, given that the gradient problem has been overcome for Ashley Down it will be similarly fixable at Constable Road. FoSBR and Lockleaze residents believe that there is scope for an additional station north of the location earlier proposed by BCC but south of Constable Road. Title: Re: Campaigning for a station for Lockleaze Post by: Bmblbzzz on August 02, 2021, 19:43:32 So I take it the "historic Horfield" site on Bonnington Walk mentioned in the CH2MHILL report has been discounted? And how historic is that site? The name as well as the appearance of the houses suggest the area was developed in or shortly after 1953 but I'm presuming the station is somewhat older.
Title: Re: Campaigning for a station for Lockleaze Post by: Bmblbzzz on August 02, 2021, 19:44:57 As for Constable Road v Dovercourt Road, the former has a bus service, the latter does not (at least I don't think it has, I've certainly never seen a bus there).
Title: Re: Campaigning for a station for Lockleaze Post by: Red Squirrel on August 02, 2021, 23:42:22 So I take it the "historic Horfield" site on Bonnington Walk mentioned in the CH2MHILL report has been discounted? And how historic is that site? The name as well as the appearance of the houses suggest the area was developed in or shortly after 1953 but I'm presuming the station is somewhat older. Yes, it has. Too many switches and crossings there. A quick check on Wikipedia reveals that Horfield Halt opened in 1927 and closed in 1964. As for Constable Road v Dovercourt Road, the former has a bus service, the latter does not (at least I don't think it has, I've certainly never seen a bus there). That's one of the strong selling points of Constable Rd - potential for really good bus integration. Title: Re: Campaigning for a station for Lockleaze Post by: grahame on August 03, 2021, 06:48:32 Taking a step back from all the various individual station options ... doesn't there seem sense on urban 4 track lines to have two lines on which express trains and fast freight are run, with only strategic stations, and two lines with stations about every kilometre (1000 yards if you want the old system) served by clock face electric trains every 7.5, 10, 15 or 20 minutes - perhaps dropping to every 30 minutes on the outer sections and through to the next city or urban area, and branches? Call it a MetroTrain service, run it from early to late 7 days a week and have a simple fare system using a robust and easy fare collection system.
Title: Re: Campaigning for a station for Lockleaze Post by: Bmblbzzz on August 03, 2021, 09:52:58 I thought that was meant to be one of the reasons for the four-tracking: two lines for whizzing up to Parkway, Birmingham and Cardiff, two lines for trundling along via Lawrence Hill, Stapleton Road, Ashley Down, Lockleaze, Filton Abbey Wood...
Title: Re: Campaigning for a station for Lockleaze Post by: Red Squirrel on August 03, 2021, 11:18:42 Taking a step back from all the various individual station options ... doesn't there seem sense on urban 4 track lines to have two lines on which express trains and fast freight are run, with only strategic stations, and two lines with stations about every kilometre (1000 yards if you want the old system) served by clock face electric trains every 7.5, 10, 15 or 20 minutes - perhaps dropping to every 30 minutes on the outer sections and through to the next city or urban area, and branches? Call it a MetroTrain service, run it from early to late 7 days a week and have a simple fare system using a robust and easy fare collection system. I thought that was meant to be one of the reasons for the four-tracking: two lines for whizzing up to Parkway, Birmingham and Cardiff, two lines for trundling along via Lawrence Hill, Stapleton Road, Ashley Down, Lockleaze, Filton Abbey Wood... Yes and yes. The western pair of lines are the Filton Reliefs which take the local stopping trains. As luck would have it, both the Severn Beach and Henbury lines branch off to the west of Filton Bank. I imagine this is part of the reason an extra line is being laid into Temple Meads on the north-west side as part of the Bristol East Jct work. Even luckier, the Portishead line branches off to the north-west at Parson Street - so when Temple Meads to Parson Street is four-tracked, local trains will still be on the same side. The forthcoming MetroWest services to Yate and Gloucester will have to cross over to reach Bristol Parkway, but that's a whole nother nut to crack given the capacity constraint between Parkway and Westerleigh. Title: Re: Campaigning for a station for Lockleaze Post by: grahame on August 03, 2021, 12:35:55 The forthcoming MetroWest services to Yate and Gloucester will have to cross over to reach Bristol Parkway ... Or reverse at North Filton Platform? ;D Title: Re: Campaigning for a station for Lockleaze Post by: Bmblbzzz on August 03, 2021, 13:32:08 Parkway to Westerleigh jnctn four-tracking with stations on the reliefs at Winterbourne and Coalpit Heath. TonyN can revert to his previous username!
Title: Re: Campaigning for a station for Lockleaze Post by: Red Squirrel on August 03, 2021, 20:46:35 Parkway to Westerleigh jnctn four-tracking with stations on the reliefs at Winterbourne and Coalpit Heath. TonyN can revert to his previous username! Hmm. That would involve demolishing dozens of houses, and widening deep cuttings, high embankments and viaducts. It might work out cheaper to build a new alignment altogether. Title: Re: Campaigning for a station for Lockleaze Post by: ellendune on August 03, 2021, 21:02:57 Parkway to Westerleigh jnctn four-tracking with stations on the reliefs at Winterbourne and Coalpit Heath. TonyN can revert to his previous username! There would be a few very expensive structures (5 viaducts, the M4 bridge and the Stoke Gifford bypass underbridge plus a few others) in that, not to mention quite a bit of digging to widen cuttings. How much difference would grade separation at Westerleigh Jn make to the problem and perhaps reinstating the short loop at Coalpit Heath station. It would be significantly cheaper! Red Squirrel beat me to it. Title: Re: Campaigning for a station for Lockleaze Post by: Red Squirrel on August 04, 2021, 14:12:39 Quote Fresh calls for transport chiefs to build a new Bristol train station Source: Bristol LivePeople living in Lockleaze have kickstarted a fresh campaign to get a new train station built in their area - and they already have the backing of transport chiefs in the city. Lockleaze residents met local councillor Heather Mack and Bristol city council’s new cabinet member for transport, Don Alexander, and urged them to consider a fresh location for the proposed platforms. The main railway line between Temple Meads and Parkway, the Severn Tunnel and the north runs right past Lockleaze, and residents say the massive boom in housing developments taking place in that part of north Bristol should be backed by a station for the area. A plan for a station at Lockleaze has been proposed before - by Bristol City Council back in 2015. But it was planned for a site behind a builders yard, and failed a ‘business case test’, and now a renewed campaign from local residents in Lockleaze is proposing a different, more accessible location at Constable Road, which is also on bus routes. In March this year, Mayor Marvin Rees gave new hope that a station in Lockleaze could be possible - it was listed as one of six possible locations for new stations as part of the council and WECA's mass transit system improvements. Lockleaze has never had a station - the estate was built next to the railway in the 1950s, but a station was never included. Lockleaze residents have been backed by campaigners from Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR), who are campaigning for a rejuvenated suburban railway system around the city with more stations and more trains. ...continues (https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/fresh-calls-transport-chiefs-build-5740717) Title: Re: Campaigning for a station for Lockleaze Post by: Red Squirrel on March 20, 2022, 13:09:21 Quote Lockleaze – development and transport Source: FoSBROn Wednesday 16th March FoSBR joined Bristol Civic Society and the Lockleaze Neighbourhood Trust to study significant new housing development taking place in Lockleaze, and to consider its impact on transport. We met at The Hub, where Suzanne (CEO) and Maria (Community Activator) gave us a talk about Lockleaze Neighbourhood Trust, its role in the community and an overview of housing projects in Lockleaze. ...see full post (https://fosbr.org.uk/lockleaze-development-and-transport/) This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net |