Great Western Coffee Shop

Journey by Journey => South Western services => Topic started by: grahame on January 27, 2024, 09:42:08



Title: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: grahame on January 27, 2024, 09:42:08
On 1st November, I parked in the APCOA car park at Woking Station as Storm Ciaran developed, and for the first time found myself faced with electronic register and pay as the only way to pay - not even a machine with a contactless card panel.

I phoned in to the automated system and entered my details - registration, time I wanted to park for (system confirmed price back), credit card long number, expiry date and security code. I declined to pay extra for text reminders and receipts, and headed off to London for the 50th celebration event of the Campaign for Better Transport.

Imagine my shock at getting a letter a week later with a picture of me entering and leaving the car park (yes, that was me) and telling me I had not paid, and was required to pay a penalty charge.  Hindsight and subsequent evidence suggests that my phone connection cut out before I answered final questions covering the make and colour of the vehicle, and although the fee had been agree by me and details give, APCOA had not taken the money and considered me to be in breech.



On the grounds that I had every reason to believe I has paid, I questioned the fee with APCOA who pointed out that I had been parked there, that they had not received my money, and they upheld the penalty charge.  Most unsatisfactory; I had made every effort to pay and as a first time user of their system had no way of knowing that I had not done so.



The Car Parking industry has a trade body - POPLA - who will take appeals from motorists who feel that one of their members (APCOA in this case) has got it wrong, and as I believe that the APCOA system is out of order, I appealed - result back in the last few days.   Here is the judgement:

Quote
Decision:  Unsuccessful

Assessor Name: Bethany Young

Assessor summary of operator case: The parking operator has issued the penalty notice (PN) for use of private car park without making a valid payment.

Assessor summary of your case: The appellant has raised the following points from their grounds of appeal: • They registered by telephone and paid on the day. • They believed the payment had been completed as it was their first time using this system. • They had opted to not receive confirmation texts so were not aware the payment was unsuccessful. • They do not believe they should have to pay the penalty. After reviewing the operator’s evidence, the appellant reiterates their grounds of appeal and states their history shows they pay for parking. In support of their appeal, the appellant has submitted their original appeal to the parking operator. This evidence has been considered in making my determination.

Assessor supporting rational for decision: When assessing an appeal POPLA considers if the parking operator has issued the penalty correctly and if the driver has complied with the rules of the car park. This penalty has been issued for a breach of the Railway Byelaws. The Byelaws make the owner of a vehicle responsible for the charge, who the operator can assume is the registered keeper. The parking operator has provided evidence of the signs on the car park, which advise that a £85 PN will be issued to drivers who fail to purchase a valid parking session via RingGo, rail ticket vending machine or ticket office. The parking operator has provided evidence of a system search for the registration XXddXXX, to show that there was no payment made for the vehicle in question to park. I appreciate the appellant attempted to pay for their parking in good faith. I also acknowledge that they always pay for their parking. I cannot take into consideration any previous parking experiences as this does not dispute the validity of the PN issued. Whilst I completely understand the driver had no intention of failing to comply with the signs, the parking operator has obtained the RingGo call transcripts for the day in question. This confirms that the appellant failed to enter the additional details required to progress to process the payment. There is no evidence to confirm that a valid payment was made on the day. Therefore, I am not satisfied the appellant complied with the terms and conditions or that their parking was authorised. POPLA’s remit is to determine whether the PN has been issued correctly. Upon consideration of the evidence, the motorist used a private car park without making a valid payment and did not comply with the rules and regulations. I conclude this PN has been issued correctly and refuse this appeal.



A tale of caution. I have "sat on" this decision for a couple of days, wondering whether to follow up.  I feel very hard done by in that I am a reasoanble person and what I consider to be a shortcoming of the system - a hole into which I fell - has been denied.  You will note that the assessor fully accepts that I had every intention of following the signs (which I did) to pay - and indeed I believed that I had.

Actually "hard done by" doesn't cut it - more "furious".

What now?
* A learning experience - and indeed I suppose that is a silver lining.
* A story I can (and will, loudly and for a long time) share.
* Perhaps a letter someone at APCOA or SWR to invite them to comment.


Edit to add - short URL to this thread - http://www.passenger.chat/apcoa - to allow easy sharing


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: JayMac on January 27, 2024, 10:34:01
Pay only the parking fee due. Don't pay any penalty. Railway land covered by byelaws so they'd have to take you to magistrates court. Highly unlikely.


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: grahame on January 27, 2024, 11:23:07
* Perhaps a letter to someone at APCOA or SWR to invite them to comment.

Done, and I will share the response I get (in addition to the immediate one from their automated system

Quote
We endeavour to respond to all customer complaints in 14 working days.  However, if we are unable to resolve a complaint within 28 days (due to the nature of your complaint), we will write to you to advise you of our progress.


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: Mark A on January 27, 2024, 11:47:10
Not surprised you're furious. They've taken a lot of personal data from you, and it's galling that parking systems are set up to be very capable at the task of recording times of entry/leaving but they tend to drop the ball when it comes to collecting payment - almost as though they're set up to generate some of their income in penalties.

Also, it's not good enough that businesses who give the nod to this approach think it's ok to shrug and say 'Nothing to do with us' when one of their customers is immolated by practices like this.

If parking is to be paid for I'm trying to think of a reason why contactless payment terminals wouldn't suffice, but while we're here, a querty keyboard to enter reg. numbers or the option of a QR scanner to enter the reg number would be good, the client tasked with generating a QR code (on paper or via an app on their phone) that lists their registration number.

As for installing and using an app provided by a parking provider, no, no and thrice no.

And also, given the scale of the income generated by car parking charges/taxi access, why are so many station car parks so scruffy? You'd think they'd be lovely, with flower beds and wildflower plantings, but noooooh...

Mark


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: ChrisB on January 27, 2024, 11:55:21
Any sign online of your account being semi-complete, for example? Anything that might point to your attempt to pay?


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: grahame on January 27, 2024, 12:01:14
Any sign online of your account being semi-complete, for example? Anything that might point to your attempt to pay?

I have the full Ring-go log from the POPLA appeal, which shows all of the steps taken including which questions were answered. That includes the questions on card no., expiry date and security code, after each of which it moved on to the next question.   You will notice from the appeal decision that my intent to pay was not questioned.  What I did not complete was the make and colour of the car - didn't know the call had dropped rather than going on to these.  Odd that they appear to be the last questions!


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: bobm on January 27, 2024, 12:59:54
In my experience it is very unusual these days for a mobile call to drop mid conversation when the user is not moving about.  Almost makes you wonder if “the system” hung up. 


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: grahame on January 27, 2024, 13:23:42
In my experience it is very unusual these days for a mobile call to drop mid conversation when the user is not moving about.  Almost makes you wonder if “the system” hung up. 

Indeed - or it's possible that the user jammed the phone against his ear in the storm and hit or squeezed the wrong button - again most unusual (only time I have done that). The reason for the call terminating is not known.   


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: ChrisB on January 27, 2024, 14:14:17
Hmmm - I get calls dropping quite regularly, even in built-up areas. It does still happen.


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: bradshaw on January 27, 2024, 17:35:58
It is worth reading the reviews on the Apple app store. A number had the same problem.
We have to park in Yeovil and i have to remember to take cash as the app/phone based parking has reviews which mean I would not wish to use it.


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: grahame on January 28, 2024, 21:30:23
... A number had the same problem. ...

I have learned over the weekend that I am far from the only one - sounds like APCOA or the agents they use may have a systemic problem, but be putting the onus on their customers rather than admitting to the issues.   Is it just me, or does that remind others too of another organisation that's in the news at the moment; the problems of APCOA users, mind you, are many orders of magnitude less.


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: PhilWakely on January 28, 2024, 22:56:30
... A number had the same problem. ...

I have learned over the weekend that I am far from the only one - sounds like APCOA or the agents they use may have a systemic problem, but be putting the onus on their customers rather than admitting to the issues.   Is it just me, or does that remind others too of another organisation that's in the news at the moment; the problems of APCOA users, mind you, are many orders of magnitude less.

Sounds like a job for BBC's Watchdog team   :o


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: Witham Bobby on January 29, 2024, 10:44:43
On 1st November, I parked in the APCOA car park at Woking Station as Storm Ciaran developed, and for the first time found myself faced with electronic register and pay as the only way to pay - not even a machine with a contactless card panel.

I phoned in to the automated system and entered my details - registration, time I wanted to park for (system confirmed price back), credit card long number, expiry date and security code. I declined to pay extra for text reminders and receipts, and headed off to London for the 50th celebration event of the Campaign for Better Transport.

Imagine my shock at getting a letter a week later with a picture of me entering and leaving the car park (yes, that was me) and telling me I had not paid, and was required to pay a penalty charge.  Hindsight and subsequent evidence suggests that my phone connection cut out before I answered final questions covering the make and colour of the vehicle, and although the fee had been agree by me and details give, APCOA had not taken the money and considered me to be in breech.



On the grounds that I had every reason to believe I has paid, I questioned the fee with APCOA who pointed out that I had been parked there, that they had not received my money, and they upheld the penalty charge.  Most unsatisfactory; I had made every effort to pay and as a first time user of their system had no way of knowing that I had not done so.



The Car Parking industry has a trade body - POPLA - who will take appeals from motorists who feel that one of their members (APCOA in this case) has got it wrong, and as I believe that the APCOA system is out of order, I appealed - result back in the last few days.   Here is the judgement:

Quote
Decision:  Unsuccessful

Assessor Name: Bethany Young

Assessor summary of operator case: The parking operator has issued the penalty notice (PN) for use of private car park without making a valid payment.

Assessor summary of your case: The appellant has raised the following points from their grounds of appeal: • They registered by telephone and paid on the day. • They believed the payment had been completed as it was their first time using this system. • They had opted to not receive confirmation texts so were not aware the payment was unsuccessful. • They do not believe they should have to pay the penalty. After reviewing the operator’s evidence, the appellant reiterates their grounds of appeal and states their history shows they pay for parking. In support of their appeal, the appellant has submitted their original appeal to the parking operator. This evidence has been considered in making my determination.

Assessor supporting rational for decision: When assessing an appeal POPLA considers if the parking operator has issued the penalty correctly and if the driver has complied with the rules of the car park. This penalty has been issued for a breach of the Railway Byelaws. The Byelaws make the owner of a vehicle responsible for the charge, who the operator can assume is the registered keeper. The parking operator has provided evidence of the signs on the car park, which advise that a £85 PN will be issued to drivers who fail to purchase a valid parking session via RingGo, rail ticket vending machine or ticket office. The parking operator has provided evidence of a system search for the registration XXddXXX, to show that there was no payment made for the vehicle in question to park. I appreciate the appellant attempted to pay for their parking in good faith. I also acknowledge that they always pay for their parking. I cannot take into consideration any previous parking experiences as this does not dispute the validity of the PN issued. Whilst I completely understand the driver had no intention of failing to comply with the signs, the parking operator has obtained the RingGo call transcripts for the day in question. This confirms that the appellant failed to enter the additional details required to progress to process the payment. There is no evidence to confirm that a valid payment was made on the day. Therefore, I am not satisfied the appellant complied with the terms and conditions or that their parking was authorised. POPLA’s remit is to determine whether the PN has been issued correctly. Upon consideration of the evidence, the motorist used a private car park without making a valid payment and did not comply with the rules and regulations. I conclude this PN has been issued correctly and refuse this appeal.



A tale of caution. I have "sat on" this decision for a couple of days, wondering whether to follow up.  I feel very hard done by in that I am a reasoanble person and what I consider to be a shortcoming of the system - a hole into which I fell - has been denied.  You will note that the assessor fully accepts that I had every intention of following the signs (which I did) to pay - and indeed I believed that I had.

Actually "hard done by" doesn't cut it - more "furious".

What now?
* A learning experience - and indeed I suppose that is a silver lining.
* A story I can (and will, loudly and for a long time) share.
* Perhaps a letter someone at APCOA or SWR to invite them to comment.


Edit to add - short URL to this thread - http://www.passenger.chat/apcoa - to allow easy sharing

The whole "car parking industry" is full of deliberate traps, ready for the unwary to fall into.  It's designed this way to maximise revenue.  A legalised form of robbery.  I'd offer to pay for the parking and defy them to take you to court if they think you owe any more


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: IndustryInsider on January 29, 2024, 11:21:00
As a councillor and general person of influence, I would not blame Graham for not wanting to risk a court appearance.


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: Witham Bobby on January 29, 2024, 12:23:12
As a councillor and general person of influence, I would not blame Graham for not wanting to risk a court appearance.

Agreed - it is a daunting prospect and a lottery as to any outcome.

As I type, I am waiting on a judge's decision in Manchester today on a case involving a fatal (but entirely foreseeable) "accident" which the defendants may well succeed in getting thrown out of court, simply because of a mis-placed hyphen in an email address used for service


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: Clan Line on January 29, 2024, 13:30:20

Sounds like a job for BBC's Watchdog team   :o

No ........ go to ITV.    "Mr Ellis vs APCOA"..................peak hours on Saturday evening !


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: grahame on January 29, 2024, 14:06:34
What I have learned ...

1. I am far from the only one to have had issues like this, and it is best described as a systemic problem. Thank you so much to others writing here and in private.

2. Even after reading the unedited (apart from removal of the vehicle registration) reasons for my appeal being dismissed, members here feel that the penalty fare notice in these circumstances is unfair.

3. Options have been suggested as to how I may take it further.  For the moment, though, I had already offered to pay the due amount for car parking on 1st November and that offer remains open.  And I have emailed the address given by APCOA explaining my dis-satisfaction and asking them to take a further look. I await there response, and until I receive it or it becomes overdue, I am putting those options carefully to one side as possibilities if worst comes to worst.



Of note - and a different car park operator - but I am aware and informed of the car parking arrangements put into place at Melksham Station in 2021, including how the revenue was to be split.  As former TransWilts CRP Community Rail Officer, my name had also been left as the contact on their App and web site (years out of date) and I received a number of communications from people who had been issued with penalty charges. These calls educated me further into the way these thing work.  As of this month, the Station Car Park has become a public car park operated by Wiltshire Council rather than TransWilts CRP, so any user experiences there are now historic.


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: Electric train on January 29, 2024, 14:56:50
Pay only the parking fee due. Don't pay any penalty. Railway land covered by byelaws so they'd have to take you to magistrates court. Highly unlikely.

I agree, on the bases that they have accept that you intended to pay so pay the parking fee due and provide you with the evidence.


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: TaplowGreen on January 29, 2024, 21:21:58
Maybe worth seeking some Legal advice Graham.


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: grahame on January 30, 2024, 06:19:23
Maybe worth seeking some Legal advice Graham.

Noted, yes, should I consider pursuing the issue on principle rather than pragmatically choosing to go along with the notice, and that's assuming that APCOA don't get back to me with a "right" solution.  At the moment, I await their reply to my email, noting https://www.apcoa.co.uk/fileadmin/user_upload/APCOA_Complaints_Policy.pdf says
Quote
Our complaints policy is an opportunity for customers to tell us when we might have fallen short of expectation, and how we can put things right.


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: bradshaw on January 30, 2024, 12:23:58
 Came across an interesting one this morning while meeting for coffee in Bridport. Someone had received a penalty notice for overstaying at Morrisons. They had got the local MP to help look into it.
It seems that the car park is run by Euro Car Parks. Shoppers can use it free of charge for visiting the store with a two hour limit and no return for three hours.
However Euro Car Parks have an alternative for non shoppers with 50p per hour increments to a maximum of £2.00 for 24 hours. This is pay by phone only or by app. It is not advertised as far as I can see and I only came across it by chance on the Parkopedia website and the app by searching the Euro Car Park site.
Any challenge to a penalty notice need the Morrisons receipt as evidence.
I would think that very few know the rules in this car park!


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: ChrisB on January 30, 2024, 12:40:12
People are useless at reading instructions and expect everything to "work out of the box". In car park terms, there are instructions on a poster somewhere within the car park, usually as you enter or exit (to the station/shop etc). Always worth  a look.


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: grahame on January 30, 2024, 13:10:16
I'll give them top marks for speed in answering

Quote
Dear Graham,

Thank you for your email dated 27th January 2024 which has been passed to me to investigate and respond.

After a full investigation, I can confirm APCOA enforce Woking Station Oriental Road on behalf of South Western Railways. Unfortunately, APCOA are not the payment provider for this location. Payment for this location is to be made via RingGo. Unfortunately, your complaint regarding the system will need to be made to RingGo directly as it is their system your complaint relates to. Unfortunately, RingGo is not operated by APCOA, it is a separate payment provider.

As no payment was made for parking on this date, the vehicle was parked in breach of the Terms and Conditions of parking. As a result of this, the notice was issued correctly. After checking the system, I can confirm the notice was appealed and your appeal was rejected with the option to pay the notice at the discounted rate of £50 or further to appeal to POPLA. After checking the system, I can see the appeal to POPLA was rejected and the notice is now outstanding at the full amount of £85. As the notice was correctly issued and your appeal to POPLA has been rejected the £85 is outstanding.

Kind regards,
Emma Millar
Complaints Handler
APCOA Parking UK

As I understand it, that's rather like me complaining to GWR about a cancellation and asking for Delay Repay, and being told to contact Hitachi because they failed to provide a train to run the service.   


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: bradshaw on January 30, 2024, 13:58:18
It seems that you have to go through all of this again but directed to Ring Go, with copies to APCOA to hold the penalty payment.


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: ChrisB on January 30, 2024, 14:06:04
Or even to SWR, copies to both APCOA & RingGo - it is the SWTR that contract APCOA. Can you find out who has contracted RingGO for the payment solution? Is that SWR too, or APCOA? If the latter, you have them by the short & curlies as RinGGo has failed in their contract.


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: JayMac on January 30, 2024, 17:41:08
Buck passing buckers.

I predict RingGo and SWR will continue the buck passing. Car parking penalties are a racket that all parties (except the customer) benefit from.

Were it me I'd ask them to take me to court. APCOA can't as the land is under railway byelaws and they have no standing, being merely the agent of the land owner. So it's down to SWR who manage the land on behalf of Network Rail.

APCOA want their pound of flesh as it's the only way they make a decent return for their shareholders. Their small cut from the parking tariff and the 'management' fee from the landowner doesn't cut it for them. The penalty charges are their main income.

Court would be my preferred option. Even if you lose APCOA and SWR get nothing. In the Magistrates Court any costs award wouldn't cover their actual expenses in taking you to court. Any fines and victim surcharge goes to the state. That's why the private parking pirates and those they act for so rarely do court for parking 'transgressions' on railway land.


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: Kempis on January 30, 2024, 20:40:46
All I will say is this: if someone as tech-savvy as grahame can be caught out, what hope for the rest of us?


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: Trowres on January 31, 2024, 00:26:07
Let's have a trawl through what's available, starting with South Western Railway:

https://www.southwesternrailway.com/travelling-with-us/at-the-station/car-parking (https://www.southwesternrailway.com/travelling-with-us/at-the-station/car-parking)

Quote
You can pay for parking at our stations by downloading the RingGo app. Once it’s set-up on your smartphone, you’ll get lots of great features such as text messages to tell you when your parking is running out and extending your stay virtually without having to return to your car. You can also book for parking online or calling RingGo on 01256 80 28 04.

Daily parking tickets are also available from self-service ticket machines in stations.

SWR's T&C at https://www.southwesternrailway.com/-/media/files/travelling-with-us/at-the-station/conditions-of-parking-motor-vehicles-and-bicycles/conditions-of-parking-motor-vehicles-and-bicycles-december-2022.pdf (https://www.southwesternrailway.com/-/media/files/travelling-with-us/at-the-station/conditions-of-parking-motor-vehicles-and-bicycles/conditions-of-parking-motor-vehicles-and-bicycles-december-2022.pdf)

Quote
If you are in charge of any motor vehicle, bicycle or other conveyance you must not park where charges are made for parking without paying the appropriate charge at the appropriate time in accordance with instructions given by South Western Railway.
Any motor vehicle, bicycle or other conveyance used, left or parked in breach of this condition may
incur liability of payment of a penalty and may be clamped or removed. The owner of the vehicle,
bicycle or other conveyance shall be liable to South Western Railway for the cost incurred by South
Western Railway in clamping, removing, storing or disposing of it.

On the  SWR website, no mention of APCOA that I could see.


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: Trowres on January 31, 2024, 00:59:47
Now onto RingGo:
 
Don't bother with https://myringgo.co.uk/howitworks (https://myringgo.co.uk/howitworks), as it starts with "Create an account" and appears to be dealing with the app method of payment.

I couldn't see anything intended as an explanation of the pay-by-phoning method (its as if they don't want you to use it  ::) ). So, I went to the site's T&C section. https://myringgo.co.uk/static/onlineterms (https://myringgo.co.uk/static/onlineterms). It isn't clear if these terms apply to all transactions or just interactions via the website (only the URL has the "online" qualifier. Anyway...

Quote
If you use instant access (access without account registration) you have accepted our Terms of Service by using instant access. You will have been made aware that you can access and read these Terms of Service at the following URL https://www.myringgo.co.uk/onlineterms and our office address (Ground Floor East, Maplewood, Chineham Business Park, Basingstoke, Hampshire, RG24 8YB) and that you can request a copy of these terms is sent to you.

Quote
You acknowledge that the use and availability of our parking payment systems is highly dependent on the operation of ‐ for example ‐ your mobile device, the internet, your GPS receiver and other resources you can use to access our services. If you are unable to access and use our parking payment systems, for any reason, you, and not we, are required to use alternative payment methods to pay for parking or there may be a risk that you could be liable for additional parking fees and parking tickets.

Quote
You can access our parking payment systems and related services via one of the tools made available to you, including smartphone, personal web page, text messaging, interactive voice recognition (IVR) by telephone and mobile/in‐car applications. A description of our tools, including instructions how to use them, can be reviewed here https://www.myringgo.com/howitworks.
(Spoiler: the link works but it does not include relevant instructions for all "tools" including telephone access).

Quote
Certain ways to access our parking payment systems do not require pre‐registration of an account, but allow instant access. Where you use instant access, we will create an instant account based on the telephone number or payment information used for the relevant access to our parking payment systems. Instant access is provided at our discretion and may be refused.

Quote
You are responsible for providing all of the necessary and correct details for your parking action, such as vehicle number plate and the correct location code. Your parking action will be automatically processed on our parking payment systems on the basis of these details. The details you provide about your parking action are key for us to correctly process your parking fees. You alone are responsible for providing us with the correct details for your parking action and you will be responsible for paying any penalty charge or parking fee issued as a result of incorrect parking action details.

Please take note of the following: We are not responsible for verifying whether your parking action details are correct. We emphasize that you must read the instructions before you start using our parking payment systems, as incorrect use might lead to penalty charges, incorrect payments or other consequences.

Quote
You may choose to receive confirmation messages that your parking action is still active or to confirm that your parking session has commenced. In addition you can elect to receive a reminder advising you when your parking session is due to end. We emphasize that your parking action still remains your responsibility. You acknowledge that receipt of the reminder depends on the availability of your network and can be interrupted/delayed. Any additional costs relating to these reminders will be charged simultaneously with all other charges. Costs for these services are detailed https://www.myringgo.co.uk/parkinglocator.

So, it appears that you have to pay extra ( 10p at the moment ) to ensure that you have successfully paid for parking... or is there a final stage in the voice payment process that tells you? Obviously Grahame didn't get that far, so does anyone else on the forum know how a successful RingGo telephone payment ends?

The addition of charge for confirming the transaction reminded me of current moves to outlaw "Drip pricing" - see
Quote
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-laws-set-to-ban-mandatory-hidden-fees-from-online-shopping-saving-money-for-consumers
. Perhaps RingGo wouldn't be affected as their hidden fee is "optional"... maybe some words to MPs during the progession of the bill would be useful? I'd argue that getting a receipt isn't optional.

I think my main line of attack on this one, though, would be SWR. This is the organisation that has made a decision to offload car park payment onto organisations with a distinctly unhelpful approach.


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: grahame on January 31, 2024, 02:53:35
So, it appears that you have to pay extra ( 10p at the moment ) to ensure that you have successfully paid for parking... or is there a final stage in the voice payment process that tells you? Obviously Grahame didn't get that far, so does anyone else on the forum know how a successful RingGo telephone payment ends?...

I WAS offered the opportunity to pay more for texts - I think (but it's 3 months ago now) twice - once to be texted a receipt, and once to be texted (what was it?) a reminder of when my parking was about to expire.  And, yes,  declined the optional "drip payment" stuff.

I *have* heard from other friends who use the system via the App and are registered and it works for them;

All I will say is this: if someone as tech-savvy as grahame can be caught out, what hope for the rest of us?

Yeah - and I appreciate the comment.  I think I was unlucky with the cutting out, and I don't know why it did. My memory is of standing around in a storm in a car park that felt a bloomin long way from the actual station and doing an "oh shit" when I realised that I could not pay in cash, could not pay contactless, and had to either try and find and download an App, or do that darned thing by phone.   I did that latter and then move on, thinking no more of it than a slight positive that I had been forced into trying a system and having the experience.


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: grahame on January 31, 2024, 03:03:20
"Are you loosing sleep at night?" - I think that was one of the questions on the Martin Lewis show last night about whether to carry on with something, along with "can you afford to loose" and there was a third question ...

Yes - I am loosing sleep sitting here at 3 a.m. and typing and Lisa is awake too.

I am convinced - utterly convinced - that the car parking scheme at Woking and probably many other stations is unfairly loaded against the reasonable person doing his or her very best to to use it.  You will note that Bethany Young, in her judgement, confirms that I had every intention of paying and that I believed that I had; assuming she accepts that I am a reasonable person (I wonder myself at times), that is a tacit acceptance that the system that I used to (try to) pay failed (in my case) to meet the objective of accepting payments for parking which it was advertised as doing.  I believe, totally, that I have been wronged in the way the system has worked, and I have been happy so share my data, and my failure to realise I had failed to pay, here in public.  However, now it the time for me to take a pragmatic decision, reach into my "pocket" and pay the people at APCOA, or RingGo, or SWR, the £85 that I believe they are unreasonably charging.

The most enormous "THANK YOU" to friends who are reading this for all your advise, support and hard work researching which is truly appreciated.  But I need to move on, not be consumed by worry, not drop other balls to take on this one of the parking companies, and not be snapping at my wife and keeping her awake.

I know my decision may disappoint some of you, and there is a need to publicise / be reminded of the whole ugly (in my opinion) business of car parking penalty notices, but that is not going to be my battle. This thread and correspondence remains here, at least, as a something that can be found to help inform others into the future. At http://www.passenger.chat/apcoa if you want to share it. Search engines welcome.

31st January.  An empty diary but a long todo list. And a need to get out and get some fresh air once its light.  We then into the second month of 2024 ... a spring in my step.  I expect I'll be "rubbishing" APCOA for the next 30 years as I do a certain airline from 30 years ago, or a food company my parents did from 60 years ago.

Again, thank you to friends. Please forgive me for not taking this one on to the ultimate and not being a banner bearer. Sorry if my decision and cowardice disappoints you, but I need to get on with life.


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: Electric train on January 31, 2024, 07:24:31
I'll give them top marks for speed in answering

Quote
Dear Graham,

Thank you for your email dated 27th January 2024 which has been passed to me to investigate and respond.

After a full investigation, I can confirm APCOA enforce Woking Station Oriental Road on behalf of South Western Railways. Unfortunately, APCOA are not the payment provider for this location. Payment for this location is to be made via RingGo. Unfortunately, your complaint regarding the system will need to be made to RingGo directly as it is their system your complaint relates to. Unfortunately, RingGo is not operated by APCOA, it is a separate payment provider.

As no payment was made for parking on this date, the vehicle was parked in breach of the Terms and Conditions of parking. As a result of this, the notice was issued correctly. After checking the system, I can confirm the notice was appealed and your appeal was rejected with the option to pay the notice at the discounted rate of £50 or further to appeal to POPLA. After checking the system, I can see the appeal to POPLA was rejected and the notice is now outstanding at the full amount of £85. As the notice was correctly issued and your appeal to POPLA has been rejected the £85 is outstanding.

Kind regards,
Emma Millar
Complaints Handler
APCOA Parking UK

As I understand it, that's rather like me complaining to GWR about a cancellation and asking for Delay Repay, and being told to contact Hitachi because they failed to provide a train to run the service.   

That is APCOA sayin not our problem guv, pay up or with take you to Court ............... basically they don't give a pile of dodo for the users of the carpark just the bubbly at the share holders meeting.

There attitude is the same as you buying a pint of milk that is off from a supper market and them saying    "we are not the providers of the milk ..... you will have to contact the Farmer"


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: Mark A on January 31, 2024, 12:26:30
From Ringo's web site I've appended the pricing information for Oriental Road, Woking. Considerably more puzzling even than a range of train fares: 'Confuse the customer' looks to be part of their business model. Perhaps it's actually integral to their business model?

I now have Talking Heads 'Once in a lifetime' as an earworm but the lyrics are rapidly evolving...

Mark

https://www.myringgo.com/parkinglocator (https://www.myringgo.com/parkinglocator)

Monday to Friday

12:00pm - Midnight

Up to 1 Hour

£2.10

2 Hours

£4.20

3 Hours

£6.30

Event Day

24 Hours

Free

24hrs

All Week

7 Days

£51.00

Monday to Friday
Midnight - 12:00pm

For every 1 Day

£12.80

Monday to Friday
12:00pm - Midnight

1 Day

£6.40

Monday to Friday
Midnight - 12:00pm

For every 1 Day

£12.80

Monday to Friday
12:00pm - Midnight

1 Day

£6.40

Saturday And Sunday

For every 1 Day

£6.40

Monday to Friday
Midnight - 12:00pm

For every 1 Day

£12.80

Monday to Friday
12:00pm - Midnight

1 Day

£6.40

Saturday And Sunday

For every 1 Day

£6.40

Fridays
Midnight - 12:00pm

1 Day

£12.80

Fridays
12:00pm - Midnight

1 Day

£6.40

2 Days

£12.80

5 Days

£44.80

Fridays

4 Days

£19.20

Monday to Friday
Midnight - 12:00pm

For every 1 Day

£12.80

Monday to Friday
12:00pm - Midnight

1 Day

£6.40

Saturday And Sunday

For every 1 Day

£6.40

Fridays
Midnight - 12:00pm

1 Day

£12.80

Fridays
12:00pm - Midnight

1 Day

£6.40

2 Days

£12.80

5 Days

£44.80

Fridays

4 Days

£19.20

Bank Holiday

1 Day

£6.40

7 Days

£51.00

1 Month

£179.50

Monday to Friday
Midnight - 12:00pm

For every 1 Day

£12.80

Monday to Friday
12:00pm - Midnight

1 Day

£6.40

Saturday And Sunday

For every 1 Day

£6.40

Fridays
Midnight - 12:00pm

1 Day

£12.80

Fridays
12:00pm - Midnight

1 Day

£6.40

2 Days

£12.80

5 Days

£44.80

Fridays

4 Days

£19.20

Bank Holiday

1 Day

£6.40

7 Days

£51.00

1 Month

£179.50

1 Month

£179.50

Monday to Friday
Midnight - 12:00pm

For every 1 Day

£12.80

Monday to Friday
12:00pm - Midnight

1 Day

£6.40

Saturday And Sunday

For every 1 Day

£6.40

Fridays
Midnight - 12:00pm

1 Day

£12.80

Fridays
12:00pm - Midnight

1 Day

£6.40

2 Days

£12.80

5 Days

£44.80

Fridays

4 Days

£19.20

Bank Holiday

1 Day

£6.40

7 Days

£51.00

Maximum stay

7 Days

Extendable

Forever

Last updated

05 October 2023


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: rogerw on January 31, 2024, 13:15:50
very clear - I don't think


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: PhilWakely on February 01, 2024, 07:07:07

12:00pm - Midnight
Midnight - 12:00pm


[pedant mode]
Aaaaarrggggghhh!
There is no such time as 12pm!
They use Midnight correctly, but 12pm means '12 hours after midday', which, in my world means 'Midnight'
[/pedant mode]


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: ChrisB on February 01, 2024, 08:37:13
I'd disagree - surely 12am is midnight? And therefore 12pm is midday.


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: GBM on February 01, 2024, 09:59:37

12:00pm - Midnight
Midnight - 12:00pm


[pedant mode]
Aaaaarrggggghhh!
There is no such time as 12pm!
They use Midnight correctly, but 12pm means '12 hours after midday', which, in my world means 'Midnight'
[/pedant mode]

AM I usually take as 'daylight or daytime' with PM meaning afternoon onwards.


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: PhilWakely on February 01, 2024, 12:26:34
I'd disagree - surely 12am is midnight? And therefore 12pm is midday.

Not so technically.  See here (https://www.rmg.co.uk/stories/topics/noon-12-am-or-12-pm)


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: PrestburyRoad on February 01, 2024, 12:52:31
There's a simple solution: use "12 noon" and "12 midnight", as PhilWakely and Royal Museums Greenwich recommend.

At work we used the 24-hour clock for our expense claim forms, with a day running from 00:00 to 24:00.


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: bobm on February 01, 2024, 13:01:14
There's a simple solution: use "12 noon" and "12 midnight", as PhilWakely and Royal Museums Greenwich recommend.

At work we used the 24-hour clock for our expense claim forms, with a day running from 00:00 to 24:00.


Or should that be 00:00 to 23:59?   ;D


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: PrestburyRoad on February 01, 2024, 13:16:03
Quote
Or should that be 00:00 to 23:59?

Good point.  We had to use 24:00 to make clear that the claim covered the full 24 hours - this ensured that we didn't get short-changed.


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: Clan Line on February 01, 2024, 16:44:38
Quote
Or should that be 00:00 to 23:59?

Good point.  We had to use 24:00 to make clear that the claim covered the full 24 hours - this ensured that we didn't get short-changed.

But.............surely 2400 on day 1 is 0000 on day 2 ?  My experience of 23 years in the RN was that 0000 did not exist - events started at 0001 and ended at 2359 ......................NO confusion. AM or PM totally irrelevant.

Even telling the time succintly appears to be (deliberately ?) made difficult in this day and age.  Don't get me started on GMT/UTC !! (The ultimate in lunacy ......)


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: bobm on February 01, 2024, 16:54:17
I still get grief when I mention "five and twenty past five".  It was the way I was taught.


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: stuving on February 01, 2024, 18:28:52
I think the problem we have with am and pm results from adding the hh:mm style of giving a time, made common by railway timetables, to the older way of telling the time in hours. If you add a part of an hour as before or after X o-clock, that still leaves the naming of hours unchanged. With the same hour number appearing twice, they were labelled as in the forenoon or afternoon; adding or subtracting hours from noon didn't come into it. AM and PM start off used by just the literate few, but become common where something short is needed, in a timetable.

Since then some more new ways of giving a time have come in: the 24-hour clock and digital displays. 24-hour times use 00:00 as midnight and 12:00 only as noon. That encourages the idea (already present) that continuity is to be expected at midday, and not at midnight. But the discontinuity at noon is still there: we switch from am to pm at 12:00, but don't switch from 12:xx to 00:xx then. Demanding continuity from 11:59 am leads to 12:00 am as noon, demanding it onward to 12:01 pm leads to 12:00 pm as noon.

Wikipepia tells us that several of the kind of US agencies that publish rules on this kind of thing have changed their rules on this is the last 20 years - but not why. Noon used to be 12:00 am in the last century, now it's 12:00 pm. I can think of one obvious reason, to do with digital clock displays.

You expect your 12-hour clock display to show am or pm, but not to manage noon or even md/mn - there is no convention for such an abbreviation anyway. When it shows 12:00 at noon, whether it adds am or pm,  what do you infer the time to be? Not exactly noon, of course, that's an instant - too short for you to see anything during it. It shows 12:00 for a whole minute so, put precisely, what it shows is its running time at that instant, rounded down to hours and minutes. Its display changes to 12:00 on the instant of 12:00, and then again on the instant of 12:01.

So in its operation, the display interval (i.e. during which it is valid) includes the starting instant, and excludes the ending one.  As a result, it becomes logical to say 12:00 noon is pm because the times during its display interval are pm - 12:00:00.0563 pm, for example.

This business of whether a time like 9:34 specifies an instant or a one-minute interval comes up more widely, and if talking to a computer (or a programmer!) you need to make clear which you mean. If you adopt the clock's interval definition of times, and apply that to noon as well, then noon (or midday) is the minute starting with instantaneous noon, so it is obviously pm. That solves the problem ...  at the cost of being very confusing!


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: Clan Line on February 01, 2024, 20:16:33
Noon used to be 12:00 am in the last century, now it's 12:00 pm.

To be really pedantic "Noon" is not am or pm - it is midday.  It gets even more silly if you use the "12 hour" clock...............30 mins after midday is 30 mins into the 13th hour..........that just cannot be so in a 12 hour clock - if it starts at midnight it finishes at midday ! You are 30  minutes into nothingness  :-\

I regret to say that I do find the time used on this very website somewhat annoying - at the moment it tells me that the time is 07:59 pm.....................no it isn't ! 07:59 is one minute to eight in the morning ....if you are using the 12 hr clock the opening "zero" is not needed - it just confuses.

Enough is enough - I'm off to bed ..............when I've worked out if it's bed or breakfast time  ???




Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: grahame on February 01, 2024, 22:05:30
Thread split to look at the Coffee Shop's time format - see http://www.passenger.chat/28442


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: grahame on February 09, 2024, 09:18:57
Moving on ... but this thread remains.  I have paid, under protest, the £85 demanded by APCOA to APCOA, and I asked for them (APCOA) to confirm that the payment had been received. I still do not believe that a penalty charge was correctly applied, however I have sadly given in to what I believe is their bullying me. I am still sufficiently pissed off about it to shout my protest in public and share their final response in public

Quote
Thank you for your response. As previously advised RingGo is a separate payment provider chosen by South Western Railways to take payments on their behalf. APCOA Parking UK do not take payments on behalf of SWR. APCOA Parking UK are a private company who are in no way associated with RingGo. For clarity, APCOA Parking UK manage and enforce this location but do not take payments.

Your complaint is regarding the payment system provided by RingGo, due to this, your complaint regarding the system would need to be made to RingGo directly. APCOA are unable to assist with the complaint regarding RingGo payment systems.

After checking the system, I can confirm the notice has been paid and is now settled on our system and no further action is required from yourself regarding this notice now.

I am still scratching my head as to how "APCOA are in no way associated with RingGo" when they are chasing me for payment (done through their URL) for a failure of what they (APCOA) tell me is the potential problem in the RingGo system.  Their Emma (APCOA Complaints Handler) says "for clarity".  Sorry, Emma, it's far from clear.


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: Oxonhutch on February 09, 2024, 12:18:52
Graham, this is the kind of subject the 'Blackbelt Barrister' on YouTube likes to cover. I would drop him a line outlining your case.


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: grahame on February 09, 2024, 12:31:58
Graham, this is the kind of subject the 'Blackbelt Barrister' on YouTube likes to cover. I would drop him a line outlining your case.

Thank you.  And I am happy to help correspond / fill people in.


Title: Re: Car Parking, APCOA (in this case, Oriental Road, Woking) - a cautionary tale
Post by: Red Squirrel on February 09, 2024, 13:41:41
Bit slow to come to this thread, but I share your pain.

I can think of two or three occasions where I have been fined in circumstances where it was very clear that I had no intention of trying to avoid paying what was due. Perhaps the most annoying of these was when I failed to redeclare a statutory offroad notification for a motorcycle which had been in pieces in my shed for 10 years. There was no question that the bike had been on or anywhere near a public road, but I missed the reminder letter (which came a few months after the birth of our twins, and was presumably somehow lost in the chaos) and was fined £40 which at the time I really couldn't afford. I'm still furious about it 18 years on...



This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net