Great Western Coffee Shop

Journey by Journey => Swindon to Gloucester / Cheltenham => Topic started by: Lee on June 10, 2008, 20:36:57



Title: New plans for the Gloucester railway triangle
Post by: Lee on June 10, 2008, 20:36:57
The future of the Railway Triangle in Gloucester is under discussion - with plans for a new city railway station at the forefront once more (links below.)
http://thisisgloucestershire.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=231771&command=displayContent&sourceNode=231754&home=yes&more_nodeId1=231776&contentPK=20832947

http://www.thisisgloucestershire.co.uk/gloucester.html/Talks-reopen-plans-Railway-Triangle/article-185403-detail/article.html


Title: Re: New plans for the Gloucester railway triangle
Post by: Shazz on June 10, 2008, 22:52:56
I give it a few months before it gets scrapped again.


Title: Re: New plans for the Gloucester railway triangle
Post by: 12hoursunday on June 13, 2008, 12:55:13
There was not so long talks about the building of a new stadium for Gloucester Rugby in this area. What happened about that?


Title: Re: New plans for the Gloucester railway triangle
Post by: Btline on June 13, 2008, 19:03:17
I give it a few months before it gets scrapped again.
;D

The other point is that Cheltenham station will get a reduced service by expresses if some sort of "joint" station is built.


Title: Re: New plans for the Gloucester railway triangle
Post by: Shazz on June 13, 2008, 21:15:10
...no it won't

The station proposed by the above is still firmly in gloucester.


Title: Re: New plans for the Gloucester railway triangle
Post by: Graz on June 13, 2008, 22:54:56
I remember reading somewhere Virgin would not call every service at Chelt Spa and the Gloucester new station should that be built, but I'm not sure what Arriva's stance would be...


Title: Re: New plans for the Gloucester railway triangle
Post by: eightf48544 on June 20, 2008, 11:15:50
Things come round in circles, wasn't it the Gloucester T staion that helped hasten the end of Brunel's Broad Gauge? With the problems of changing from the Midland to the Great Western and the famous cartoon.

Now it seems Gloucester is still causing problems due to the location of its station.

Perhaps Estgate should not have been shut, which I believe was a case of the motorist not being inconvinienced by the level crossings on the line.


Title: Re: New plans for the Gloucester railway triangle
Post by: Btline on June 20, 2008, 17:24:15
XC will not want to call at both stations, with or without the reversal.

They are seeking to slash journey times not adding to them.

That is why they want "Gloucestershire Parkway" - will would be built nearish the triangle - so they get passengers from both cities.


Title: Re: New plans for the Gloucester railway triangle
Post by: John R on June 20, 2008, 17:41:48
Yes, interesting that 125mph running between Barnt Green and Westerleigh is back on the Agenda. Although in my view you could save a couple of minutes by grade-separating Westerleigh and moving the junction half a mile west to permit a fast diverge and avoid the 30mph restriction. Would also improve train regulation at this point as more services are planned for Yate.

But it'll never happen..... 


Title: Re: New plans for the Gloucester railway triangle
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on September 04, 2008, 00:36:04
"Ambitious plans to transform Gloucester's Railway Triangle have gone on show.  The proposals for the 86-acre wasteland site off Metz Way were officially unveiled by developers LxB in partnership with Gloucester Heritage Urban Regeneration Company and the city council."

For full details, see http://www.thisisgloucestershire.co.uk/latestnews/Plans-Railway-Triangle/article-303120-detail/article.html


Title: Re: New plans for the Gloucester railway triangle
Post by: Graz on September 04, 2008, 09:24:39
Interesting that the article didn't focus too much on the plans for a new station. There's no doubt at all Gloucester needs better rail services (especially to/from Bristol), but I still have reservations on the impact on services to Cheltenham Spa if that station was built.


Title: Re: New plans for the Gloucester railway triangle
Post by: G.Uard on September 04, 2008, 21:51:18
I share the concerns of Graz, (above).


Increased line speeds may not gel with two stops within less than 8 miles.  If the triangle station is ever built, XC could well take a long hard look at both Cheltenham and the new station before deciding which to serve.  An alternate service may be the answer, but I can't see that being well received in Cheltenham, nor justifying the expense of a new station in Gloucester.

The cynic in me suggests that this is an exercise in publicity for the as yet under subscribed regeneration project at Gloucester Docks.


Title: Re: New plans for the Gloucester railway triangle
Post by: Graz on September 05, 2008, 12:13:05
^ That's exactly right.

In my view, in regards to Gloucester's current station, it would be best to leave things as they are but look into increasing fast trains from Bristol to Gloucester. Gloucester as it is now has a great service to Cardiff (2 tph), an adequate service to Swindon (and Paddington - 1tph), soon to have 1tph to Worcester and the XC services provide an OK service to Birmingham (1tph) for the time being. However services to Bristol aren't so good, being fairly slow and with small trains. I'm certainly not suggesting trains to Cam & Dursley and Yate be cut, rather that there should be another train the opposite half hour that is fast and will stop people taking the car down the M5. This train is definitely needed in peak times as morning trains from Bristol to Gloucester are grossly inadequate.

Another thing I will add (And I won't stop! ;D ) is Cheltenham Spa needs a 3rd bay platform to cope with the amount of trains which terminate there now.


Title: Re: New plans for the Gloucester railway triangle
Post by: John R on September 05, 2008, 18:41:22
^ That's exactly right.


Another thing I will add (And I won't stop! ;D ) is Cheltenham Spa needs a 3rd bay platform to cope with the amount of trains which terminate there now.

Agree. And if the third platform were built on the trackbed of the Broadway line, then what would be to stop it being extended into the centre as a second stage.


Title: Re: New plans for the Gloucester railway triangle
Post by: bemmy on September 05, 2008, 18:51:01
Agree. And if the third platform were built on the trackbed of the Broadway line, then what would be to stop it being extended into the centre as a second stage.
The taxi drivers?  ;D


Title: Re: New plans for the Gloucester railway triangle
Post by: Btline on September 05, 2008, 20:15:06
Or First Group (buses).


Title: Re: New plans for the Gloucester railway triangle
Post by: G.Uard on September 07, 2008, 07:57:42
In my opinion, the constant calls for a new Gloucester station seem more of a knee jerk reaction than a planned campaign.  Virgin's and subsequently AXC's decision not to serve the city have led to a severe denting of civic pride; but as discussed above, there is no guarantee that XC services would call, in viable numbers, at a new station.

We have already examined the operational problems a new station would engender, but that is only a portion of the picture.  Gloucester has little in the way of prime employment in its centre.  Much of the manufacturing and service sectors are concentrated either in the Barnwood area, admittedly ideal for the new station; or some distance south of the city in Quedgely. (Miles from the current station and even further from the proposed Triangle site).  With the so called regeneration plan poised to split the city even further, I maintain that the last thing Gloucester needs is a station on its periphery.

As such, development of a major bus/rail interchange at the current station site could be a more effective option.  The current bus station is life expired and Gloucester station in need of a major makeover.

An improvement to GCR-BRI services is long overdue, but given the importance of both Yate and Filton AW as revenue sources, non stop services between GCR and BPW are probably not viable.  Another pair of 158 units and tighter timings would be well received on this line though.

However, there is always the possibility that any improvements may also work against Gloucester by funnelling even more potential customers/employees to nearby competitor towns and cities.



Title: Re: New plans for the Gloucester railway triangle
Post by: willc on September 08, 2008, 10:35:23
Agree. And if the third platform were built on the trackbed of the Broadway line, then what would be to stop it being extended into the centre as a second stage.
The taxi drivers?  ;D

Quote
Or First Group (buses).

Define "the centre". Cheltenham St James station's site (still a brisk five-minute walk from the centre and lousy road access) has disappeared under offices and Waitrose and the nearest the Honeybourne line gets to the town centre is on a bridge and brick arches over the northern extremity of the High Street - not exactly a promising station site. Better a bay platform at the end of the southbound platform, with replacement car parking provided by demolishing the redundant Royal Mail shed.

And Stagecoach would be most surprised to learn that First operate Cheltenham's buses.

As for Gloucester, there is no one size fits all answer. Other than being on the through lines, Barnwood has absolutely nothing going for it as a station site, as it's out on a limb, the same problem the Parkway station on the edge of the city poses (the only people who liked that idea were the county council and Virgin, who would then have abandoned Cheltenham). One of Virgin's issues was always the number of people just doing the hop between Cheltenham and Gloucester on their stupidly short and overcrowded trains, which probably outweighed the through traffic they picked up.

A regular, reliable FGW service between Gloucester and Bristol might take some of the heat out of the argument. And to be fair to FGW and Arriva Wales, when it's all working well, a lot of the connections to/from Gloucester at Cheltenham are short and slick, with little hanging around.

A major problem is the through running of FGW's Weymouth/Brighton services with Worcester/Malverns, which is just a recipe for delays upon delays and often breaks those connections.


Title: Re: New plans for the Gloucester railway triangle
Post by: Graz on September 08, 2008, 13:47:27
Agree. And if the third platform were built on the trackbed of the Broadway line, then what would be to stop it being extended into the centre as a second stage.
The taxi drivers?  ;D

Quote
Or First Group (buses).

Define "the centre". Cheltenham St James station's site (still a brisk five-minute walk from the centre and lousy road access) has disappeared under offices and Waitrose and the nearest the Honeybourne line gets to the town centre is on a bridge and brick arches over the northern extremity of the High Street - not exactly a promising station site. Better a bay platform at the end of the southbound platform, with replacement car parking provided by demolishing the redundant Royal Mail shed.

And Stagecoach would be most surprised to learn that First operate Cheltenham's buses.

As for Gloucester, there is no one size fits all answer. Other than being on the through lines, Barnwood has absolutely nothing going for it as a station site, as it's out on a limb, the same problem the Parkway station on the edge of the city poses (the only people who liked that idea were the county council and Virgin, who would then have abandoned Cheltenham). One of Virgin's issues was always the number of people just doing the hop between Cheltenham and Gloucester on their stupidly short and overcrowded trains, which probably outweighed the through traffic they picked up.

A regular, reliable FGW service between Gloucester and Bristol might take some of the heat out of the argument. And to be fair to FGW and Arriva Wales, when it's all working well, a lot of the connections to/from Gloucester at Cheltenham are short and slick, with little hanging around.

A major problem is the through running of FGW's Weymouth/Brighton services with Worcester/Malverns, which is just a recipe for delays upon delays and often breaks those connections.
Couldn't have put it better myself- 100% agreed with all your points.


Title: Re: New plans for the Gloucester railway triangle
Post by: Btline on September 08, 2008, 22:48:09
My mistake, but in my defence, I had about a  33% chance in getting it right!

PS: The LM service from Gloucester to Worcester will be worked by a 153 (from the Stourbridge line, or Walsall line) not a 170 as indicated on previous threads (I knew that LM would not have enough 170s!).


Title: Re: New plans for the Gloucester railway triangle
Post by: John R on September 09, 2008, 07:23:26
My mistake, but in my defence, I had about a  33% chance in getting it right!

PS: The LM service from Gloucester to Worcester will be worked by a 153 (from the Stourbridge line, or Walsall line) not a 170 as indicated on previous threads (I knew that LM would not have enough 170s!).

Is that the Walsall-Wolverhampton line that is closing in December after the DaFT refused to continue support for it?


Title: Re: New plans for the Gloucester railway triangle
Post by: Btline on September 09, 2008, 22:33:23
It may be that carriage.

The campaign to keep the line open was stopped suddenly when LM said that the carriage "was needed elsewhere" and had been "allocated already."

I expect that the the carriage being needed was the main reason for the closure - passenger numbers had been going up greatly recently, so I would be surprised if the gov withdrew the funding.

Stupid! One (potentially profitable) line has to close to enable a carriage to be released!


Title: Re: New plans for the Gloucester railway triangle
Post by: JayMac on August 05, 2010, 15:08:37
From the Gloucester Citizen (http://www.thisisgloucestershire.co.uk/news/New-masterplan-approved-Gloucester-s-Railway-Triangle/article-2495407-detail/article.html):

Quote
New masterplan approved for Gloucester's Railway Triangle

A new masterplan for the transformation of Gloucester's Railway Triangle has been approved.

After Gloucester Rugby decided to remain at Kingsholm four years ago - instead of relocating to a new community stadium at the Railway Triangle - the new masterplan was finally approved by the Gloucester Heritage Urban Regeneration Company (GHURC) Board last Friday.

It sets out a vision for the 30-acre site, which has been derelict for years and is currently owned by Network Rail, to be a sustainable, residential-led mixed use development with green spaces and community orchards connecting the site right through to the City centre.

The plan includes 360 new homes, of which  a quarter will be apartments, around 700 square metres of community retail, a health innovations centre, allotment spaces and a landmark pedestrian bridge across the railway line.  Network Rail will relocate to the southern part of the Railway Triangle, on the other side of Metz Way.

A series of new connections into the city will be constructed from an area that has never had public access before.   These will include a new junction for pedestrians, cyclists and motor traffic off Metz Way, new pedestrian and cycle access crossing the railway onto Derby/Horton Road and another link onto Armscroft Park via an upgraded Blinkhorns Bridge Tunnel.

Direct pedestrian access to the City Centre from Great Western Road will be via the station subway, which is shortly to undergo a ^100,000 improvement scheme to improve lighting and security via CCTV.

Chris Oldershaw, Chief Executive of the GHURC, said: ^This has always been a challenging site but we now have a scheme which makes sense for the city and for which there is already expressions of interest from the private sector.^


Title: Re: New plans for the Gloucester railway triangle
Post by: JayMac on August 17, 2010, 14:49:04
Also from the Gloucester Citizen (http://www.thisisgloucestershire.co.uk/gloucester/Railway-triangle-housing-plans-slammed/article-2532322-detail/article.html) (17/08/2010):

Quote
Railway triangle housing plans slammed

Campaigners have slammed plans for housing on Gloucester's railway triangle, saying it will cripple any future for a new train station. Concerned residents and railway enthusiasts say passing up the chance to look at developing a new station on the land would be a missed opportunity. Plans for the transformation of the derelict railway triangle were revealed earlier this month.

The proposals were drawn up by the Gloucester Heritage Urban Regeneration Company (GHURC) and include 360 new homes, around 700 square metres of community retail, a health innovations centre, allotment space and a landmark pedestrian bridge.

Former Mayor of Barton Horton Cameron, an ex rail guard, said the infrastructure for a new station was already in place.

He said: "All that would be needed is three crossover loop lines from the present main lines into the new station. We are appealing to the GHURC team to have a further look at their plans, to see the benefits and attraction a railway station at the triangle has to offer and to attract strangers and rail travellers to visit the city. They should try to end the discrimination certain train operators are using against Gloucester at present."

Former mayor and Labour party campaigner Terry Haines said: "Everybody is behind the idea of developing the railway triangle, I have been for most of my life. It's important that the development is used for the regeneration of the city, and the problems with the railway station need to be addressed."

He said the space should be used to build better facilities for trains so Gloucester could be on more main-line routes.

Chris Oldershaw, chief executive of the GHURC, said he did not believe a new railway station would be possible.

He said: "Extensive discussions between the GHURC, landowner Network Rail and the train operators were held last year to scope the building of a new railway station on the railway triangle. The train operators did not support this course of action and Network Rail finally ruled this out as unviable. Network Rail has said that the future of Gloucester central station is not in doubt and confirmed its intention to retain the station and invest in improvements over the next three years."

The latest plans were drawn up after Gloucester Rugby decided against moving to a new community stadium on the land, which sits behind the city's railway station.

The GHURC is trying to get backing from business leaders for the plans, which it has previously said could take up to seven years to complete.


Title: Re: New plans for the Gloucester railway triangle
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on February 09, 2011, 13:46:53
From the BBC (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-gloucestershire-12402532):

Quote
Gloucester railway triangle development plans unveiled

Plans to redevelop an area of derelict land in Gloucester known as the railway triangle have been unveiled.

The proposals, which include a Morrisons food-only supermarket and light industry units, could create up to 1,000 jobs.

Owner Network Rail has agreed to sell the 15-acre site to developer LXB.

Gloucester's conservative MP Richard Graham said it was "the most promising proposal yet in the long history of proposals".

About 400 jobs would be created at the supermarket alone.

The site has been unused for more than 20 years.

Previous plans have included a snow dome, an ice rink, a new stadium for Gloucester Rugby and hundreds of new homes, but none of the schemes have got off the drawing board.

Chris Oldershaw, chief executive of the Gloucester Heritage Urban Regeneration Company, said: "The difference now is we have a very live proposal from Morrisons. I'm sure they'll be working to a very tight time scale and LXB are very keen to move forward on this project very quickly. It's a very interesting proposal. We do need to explore these issues with [the developers] in detail."

Consultation will now take place to see if the scheme can go ahead and a planning application could be submitted before the end of the year.

The development would be funded through the private sector.


Title: Re: New plans for the Gloucester railway triangle
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on December 03, 2011, 20:06:46
From Thisisgloucestershire (http://www.thisisgloucestershire.co.uk/Railway-Triangle-s-pound-34m-revamp-gets-green/story-14029650-detail/story.html):

Quote
Railway Triangle's ^34m revamp gets green light

A ^34 million transformation is on its way to Gloucester's eyesore Railway Triangle.

The site, off Metz Way, has been derelict for 20 years but will now be home to a new Morrisons supermarket and petrol station after the plans were granted full permission.

A pub, restaurant, takeaways, car showroom and other business units will follow, but detailed plans for them are yet to be heard.

The new supermarket development is welcomed by many as a chance to improve the site, but for others, it kills off any hope of the city getting a new railway station on the site.

Gloucester City Council's planning committee called a special meeting on Thursday night, outside its normal schedule, to discuss the proposals.

Nick Alford, property manager of LXB Properties ^ the developer behind the plans, said: "We are very excited about this opportunity. It will assist in the revitalisation and regeneration of the wasteland that is the Metz Way triangle and develop a scheme of which we can all be proud."

He said 1,000 jobs will be created at the site and his vision is for a "vibrant business environment as opposed to an industrial trading estate".

Morrisons is set to be a food-only store, allaying fears that it could hit city centre retailers.

Councillor Mary Smith (Lab, Robinswood and Matson) said at the meeting: "The fact is it's going to cost millions and millions to put a railway station on that site ^ so much so that Network Rail have discounted the idea completely. I know it's not what people want to hear but they are saying categorically they are not interested in building a station there."

Coun Phil McLellan (Lib Dem, Barnwood) added: "Network Rail don't support a new station, the Office of Rail Regulation don't support it, the Department of Transport don't support it. I don't think we can whistle in the wind, hoping in a few years' time they will turn around and support it. Do I think this is a great application? No. I don't think it's wonderful. I want something impressive for the city. Morrisons won't bring that. But it will create jobs and will give a bit of competition to the other supermarkets."

The meeting heard from several Gloucester residents and campaigners wanting the 30-acre site to be used for a new station. Two petitions and 46 letters backing those calls had been sent to the council too.

Concerns about the impact on wildlife living there, including invertebrates and lizards, were also raised by Gloucestershire Wildlife Trust.

But councillors agreed to approve the plans unanimously, paving the way for work to begin as early as next spring.


Title: Re: New plans for the Gloucester railway triangle
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on September 19, 2012, 16:26:53
From the Gloucestershire Citizen (http://www.thisisgloucestershire.co.uk/Calls-end-businesses-Gloucester-Railway-Triangle/story-16909530-detail/story.html):

Quote
Calls for top end businesses on Gloucester Railway Triangle site

Hopes are high that top-end retailers will be enticed into Gloucester as diggers prepare to move in on wasteland.

Work on the Railway Triangle will begin imminently as the developers draw up plans to get big names on board.

​(http://www.thisisgloucestershire.co.uk/images/localpeople/ugc-images/275784/Article/images/16909530/4136852.jpg)
WASTELAND: The triangle of land in Gloucester by the railway line.

A planning application has been made by developers LXB properties to position a sign off Metz Way to the north of the site in a bid to attract businesses to take up the retail units there.

The derelict site has been empty for 20 years but planning permission was granted in December 2011 for a new Morrisons supermarket and petrol station. A pub, restaurant, takeaways, car showroom, a new road junction and other business units are set to follow as part of a ^34million overhaul.

Nick Alford, of LXB, said: "After years of dereliction and under-use of this gateway site, we are encouraged by the interest received from potential occupiers for the planned business park and restaurant units. We are confident that the creation of a major new junction onto Metz Way and construction of the food store will help crystalise the expressions of interest into firm offers."

Around 1,000 jobs will be created on the 30-acre site.

Gloucester City Council leader Paul James hopes to see top businesses stake a claim for units on the site in an effort to raise the profile of the city. He said: "The new Morrisons is the least exciting part of the scheme, but it allows the other parts to flourish. I would like to see the other units taken by high-quality businesses with high-skilled jobs too."

It is hoped work on the site will begin in earnest next week. The long-term aim is to complete the building of Morrisons by July next year.

Morrisons will aim to open in the autumn of 2013.

From the BBC (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-gloucestershire-19617813):

Quote
Railway triangle redevelopment work gets under way

Work has begun on the ^34m redevelopment of derelict land near Gloucester's railway station.

The railway triangle will be see a new business park, restaurant and pub, takeaways and a supermarket.

Gloucester City Council approved the proposals in 2011 after the area had been derelict for 20 years. Previous schemes such as a rugby stadium failed.

Gloucester Conservative MP Richard Graham said the development should "transform a gateway into Gloucester".

"People will look back and think 'that's significantly better than it was'," he said.

The first phase of work costing about ^8m will see a new Morrisons supermarket and access road built, which will provide the infrastructure for the rest of the park.


Title: Re: New plans for the Gloucester railway triangle
Post by: JayMac on September 19, 2012, 20:35:26
Now, what about a Gloucester Parkway station on the mainline to go with this development?


Title: Re: New plans for the Gloucester railway triangle
Post by: bobm on September 19, 2012, 22:31:14
It's timely reading this as I was only thinking on Monday as I passed through Westbury (rather than using the avoiding line) how much land is idle there between the various lines which converge at the station.  I am sure some of it could be put to use.


Title: Re: New plans for the Gloucester railway triangle
Post by: laird on September 20, 2012, 12:25:13
I was surprised it was 20 years ago, I can recall seeing the Railfreight Coal liveried class 37 removing the wagons from the S&TE depot pictured and depositing them on the other side of the main road where they continued to decay. I'm not sure if any of them made it into preservation?

The Gloucester Parkway station idea is good but really should be located near the M5 Junction 12 but with the housing estates not extending south of Quedgley that plan seems off the cards.

Had that station been built then there would be a case I believe for a simple shuttle (2 per hour) service linking Cheltenham Spa, Gloucester and the new station. Services from Bristol Temple Meads and Swindon would go direct from the new station to Cheltenham. The only other services that would call at Gloucester station would be the Cross Country from Cardiff and perhaps a terminating Arriva Trains Wales service.



Title: Re: New plans for the Gloucester railway triangle
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on November 12, 2013, 00:20:42
From the BBC (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-gloucestershire-24896355):

Quote
Gloucester's Morrisons supermarket opens to public

(http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/62932000/jpg/_62932122_railway_170912_wide.jpg)
The site near Gloucester railway station has lain derelict for more than 20 years

A supermarket which forms the first phase of a ^34m scheme to develop a derelict site in Gloucester has opened to the public.

Work began last year on the Morrisons supermarket on the 18-acre site near the railway station, which has been a wasteland for more than 20 years.

Further plans for the railway triangle site include new offices, shops, restaurants and a pub. The body responsible for the scheme said it had been "a long process".

Chris Oldershaw, chief executive of the Gloucester Heritage Urban Regeneration Company, said: "It's taken about eight years but it's great to see Morrisons opening, and hopefully in the next few years we'll have about 400 or 500 extra jobs coming on the employment side."

Over the years, various schemes have been considered for redeveloping the site, such as plans for a snow dome, an ice rink and a new stadium for Gloucester Rugby - but all have failed.

The first phase of work costing about ^8m has seen the new supermarket and access road built, which will provide the infrastructure for the rest of the park.



This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net