Title: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: woody on July 10, 2010, 23:45:52 I understand the that today the 1306 Paddington to Penzance hit a tree at Lavingdon near Westbury causing severe damage to the front power car cab.The tree crashed through the power cars cab side and exited through the windscreen luckily missing the driver.Can anyone confirm or add any further details.ie which power car was involved in the collision.
Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: devon_metro on July 11, 2010, 00:00:41 43041, dragged to WSB by 59201. Driver only minor injuries. Arrival into Westbury over 400 late. Whole set has wherlflats so will all require attention, with 41 needing a new cab!
Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: JayMac on July 11, 2010, 00:09:17 Glad to hear the driver is OK. 43041 needing a new cab and driver needing new pants I expect!
Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: bigdaz on July 11, 2010, 07:06:26 It sounds to me like the driver and passengers were extremely lucky not to have suffered a derailment.
I assume the tree must have been nearing the track bit by bit for some time before falling foul of the train's clearance area. Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: inspector_blakey on July 11, 2010, 08:10:49 Just for the record, it's Lavington not Lavingdon.
Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: BBM on July 11, 2010, 10:59:35 Mark Few has some photos of the set on arrival at Westbury on his Fotopic site:
http://markfew.fotopic.net/c1870413.html Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: JayMac on July 11, 2010, 12:07:20 Jeez..... looking at the damage, the driver was indeed very lucky to get away with only minor injuries.
Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: 6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01 on July 11, 2010, 18:53:05 i guess this means no spare powercars now
Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: ReWind on July 11, 2010, 22:29:40 Rumour that another HST powercar hit an electric cable pole at Hayes & Harlington today too.
Anyone confirm this? Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: Super Guard on July 12, 2010, 01:27:47 i guess this means no spare powercars now I don't think there were any spare before the Penzance derailment! Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: LiskeardRich on July 12, 2010, 06:05:47 Rumour that another HST powercar hit an electric cable pole at Hayes & Harlington today too. Anyone confirm this? there were reports of an obstruction on the line in that area, and a paddington-plymouth train terminated at Slough, and was restarted from exeter, i initially thought due to the tree incident, but why wouldnt they of terminated it further along such as at reading? Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: Timmer on July 12, 2010, 06:20:25 Shame FGW no longer have their long distance loco hauled sets that were taken off lease a few years back as I think they may need them if they lose another set. Sorry to say the Cotswold line will probably find more of their HST booked services operating as Turbos when FGW need every set to run summer services to the South West.
Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: JayMac on July 12, 2010, 06:42:07 Can FGW not spot hire a XC HST set? They're under utilised at the moment.
Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: 6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01 on July 12, 2010, 08:29:45 i wonder if there are any dvt's spare that can work hith hst's, class 67's have a top speed of 120 but doubt they are compatible with the hst mk 3's electrics, plenty of mk2 stock around but can this do 125?
on a slightly different subject STOP MOANING ABOUT TURBOS, would you like pacers insted?? Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: willc on July 12, 2010, 08:49:36 FGW has 118 Class 43s and 53 rakes of MK3s, not all of which are in traffic due to servicing, so if they can't supply enough sets each day out of that lot, even with a number of 43s and this rake needing emergency repairs, one does wonder. And I don't know where they might be getting any more Turbos from, the fleet is flat out already on weekdays and one or two sets at a time are out of traffic for refresh work, so precious little slack there.
Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: BBM on July 12, 2010, 10:10:42 Rumour that another HST powercar hit an electric cable pole at Hayes & Harlington today too. Anyone confirm this? there were reports of an obstruction on the line in that area, and a paddington-plymouth train terminated at Slough, and was restarted from exeter, i initially thought due to the tree incident, but why wouldnt they of terminated it further along such as at reading? Apparently 43148 was damaged yesterday at Hayes, here's a link to a photo of the damage: http://i332.photobucket.com/albums/m325/jhillman_photos/IMG00087-20100711-1334.jpg Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: 6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01 on July 12, 2010, 10:17:24 also does the number of mk 3's include the 7 buffet cars which have just gone into storage?
Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: Super Guard on July 12, 2010, 11:46:52 FGW has 118 Class 43s and 53 rakes of MK3s, not all of which are in traffic due to servicing, so if they can't supply enough sets each day out of that lot, even with a number of 43s and this rake needing emergency repairs, one does wonder. And I don't know where they might be getting any more Turbos from, the fleet is flat out already on weekdays and one or two sets at a time are out of traffic for refresh work, so precious little slack there. I can't remember the source, but someone posted after the Penzance derailment that all power car sets were in traffic, so losing 1 will knock a set out of use. I guess losing another will not change the number of sets in traffic. Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: LiskeardRich on July 12, 2010, 11:57:29 FGW has 118 Class 43s and 53 rakes of MK3s, not all of which are in traffic due to servicing, so if they can't supply enough sets each day out of that lot, even with a number of 43s and this rake needing emergency repairs, one does wonder. And I don't know where they might be getting any more Turbos from, the fleet is flat out already on weekdays and one or two sets at a time are out of traffic for refresh work, so precious little slack there. I can't remember the source, but someone posted after the Penzance derailment that all power car sets were in traffic, so losing 1 will knock a set out of use. I guess losing another will not change the number of sets in traffic. i have also seen this, and cant remember the source, this leaves at least 3 sets out of action (pz derailment, tree damaged set, telegraph pole damaged set) any others i'm forgetting? i think i seen there was only 2 spare sets, so this would leave a set down at least, and this is on the basis that the other 2 spare sets were ready to go when these have been withdrawn due to damage! Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: woody on July 12, 2010, 17:14:15 FGW has 118 Class 43s and 53 rakes of MK3s, not all of which are in traffic due to servicing, so if they can't supply enough sets each day out of that lot, even with a number of 43s and this rake needing emergency repairs, one does wonder. And I don't know where they might be getting any more Turbos from, the fleet is flat out already on weekdays and one or two sets at a time are out of traffic for refresh work, so precious little slack there. I can't remember the source, but someone posted after the Penzance derailment that all power car sets were in traffic, so losing 1 will knock a set out of use. I guess losing another will not change the number of sets in traffic. Full Member *** Re: Derailed train at Penzance sidings ^ Reply #51 on: July 03, 2010, 02:39:01 PM ^ A quick trawl round FGW maintenace depots reveals. Spare power cars ..... Nil 4 HST coaching sets under maintenance. Class 57...... 3 available For once the West Sprinter fleet has had 2 spare sets available for service. http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=7013.45 Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: anthony215 on July 12, 2010, 20:40:17 i wonder if there are any dvt's spare that can work hith hst's, class 67's have a top speed of 120 but doubt they are compatible with the hst mk 3's electrics, plenty of mk2 stock around but can this do 125? on a slightly different subject STOP MOANING ABOUT TURBOS, would you like pacers insted?? I think someone has joked about using pacers to cover some services i know 1 has worked at least as far as Swindon and possibly Reading As for spare stock i think crosscountry have at least 2 HST sets out of use which could be used or even hiring the Virgin loco hauled stock (Maybe to cover London - Cheltenham/Hereford services perhaps?) Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: willc on July 12, 2010, 21:23:56 Well, four HST sets under maintenance sounds rather like what one would expect from a fleet that size under normal circumstances.
Were any services cancelled/replaced by other stock today? Not that i noticed, which would suggest that there are enough rakes of FGW stock and Class 43s still serviceable. Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: JayMac on July 12, 2010, 21:52:58 From the Wiltshire Times (http://www.wiltshiretimes.co.uk/news/8267034.Driver_hurt_after_train_hits_a_tree/):
Quote Driver hurt after train hits a tree Hundreds of rail passengers travelling to Cornwall were left stranded in Wiltshire on Saturday after their train collided with a tree. The incident happened at Crockwood, near West Lavington, at about 2pm. The 13.06 First Great Western train from London Paddington to Penzance was travelling at about 120 mph through Crockwood when it struck a tree that had fallen in front of the train. The train came to a stand still for about two hours while a shunter train pushed the commuter train into Westbury Station at 4mph. Off-duty station staff returned to work to reopen the cafe to allow the hundreds of stranded passengers to get something to eat and drink. Passenger Cassandra Nixon, added: ^We certainly felt the tree hit the train. We were very concerned.^ Fellow passenger Marjorie James from Cornwall said she thought the train was going to be derailed. The train driver, who is from Plymouth, was treated by an ambulance crew at the scene and later taken to the Royal United Hospital in Bath. Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: devon_metro on July 12, 2010, 22:31:26 I somewhat suspect it wasn't doing 120mph!!! Funny time for a commuter train as well, 1306 to Penzance on Saturday ::)
Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: dog box on July 12, 2010, 23:13:13 heard it was 110mph...it all arrived at Bristol overnight. suspect P/C will go to Brush for repairs, all wheelsets of coaches have severe tread damage
Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: Gordon the Blue Engine on July 13, 2010, 13:49:27 ... all wheelsets of coaches have severe tread damage Not sure why all the coaches had severe tread damage - I assume we're talking about flats. I thought each wheelset had its own wheelslide slide protection (WSP), so it would be surprising if they all failed at the same time. But the WSP's on HST coaches have always been less than perfect - most of us have watched an HST braking sedately into a station and still some of the WSP's are "hissing" as they (wrongly) release the brakes on their axle. And many coaches have slight flats which don't yet warrant tyre-turning (sorry, re-profiling - HST coaches don't have tyres).Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: devon_metro on July 13, 2010, 14:21:28 ... all wheelsets of coaches have severe tread damage Not sure why all the coaches had severe tread damage - I assume we're talking about flats. I thought each wheelset had its own wheelslide slide protection (WSP), so it would be surprising if they all failed at the same time. But the WSP's on HST coaches have always been less than perfect - most of us have watched an HST braking sedately into a station and still some of the WSP's are "hissing" as they (wrongly) release the brakes on their axle. And many coaches have slight flats which don't yet warrant tyre-turning (sorry, re-profiling - HST coaches don't have tyres).The electrical control box for the WSP etc on the lead powercar was destroyed by the tree impact Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: JayMac on July 13, 2010, 16:43:00 From The (Plymouth) Herald (http://www.thisisplymouth.co.uk/news/Undefined-Headline/article-2406218-detail/article.html) (13/07/2010):
Quote Plymouth train driver lucky to be alive after crash at almost 100mph A Plymouth train driver was described as "lucky to be alive" after crashing into a fallen tree at nearly 100mph. The driver, who was taken to hospital with cuts, bruises and two fractures to his wrist, was the only person injured in the high-speed smash. But shocked passengers said they feared the train was about to derail when it hit the tree at a disused station in Wiltshire. The 13.06 First Great Western service from London Paddington to Penzance was passing the former Lavington Station when the incident happened on Saturday. The train is understood to have been travelling at about 120mph when the driver noticed an obstruction ahead. He was able to slow to about 90mph before the collision, which shattered the front window of the driver's cab. Paramedics and police were called to the scene, along with Network Rail staff. After a two-hour standstill, a shunter train pushed the carriages into nearby Westbury Station, where off-duty staff reopened the cafe for the 200 stranded passengers. A First Great Western spokesman said the driver was taken to the Royal United Hospital in Bath after his "lucky escape". Network Rail, which said the tree belonged to a local landowner, said it was "taking this matter seriously". The Rail Accident Investigation Branch (RAIB) has been informed and British Transport Police (BTP) is investigating. The incident, which happened at about 2.15pm on Saturday, is not being treated as suspicious, said a BTP spokesman. Dan Moran, district organiser for train drivers' union Aslef, said he understood the impact "could have killed" the driver, but declined to comment further until the RAIB report was released. Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: Gordon the Blue Engine on July 13, 2010, 16:47:59 I'm not doubting what you say, devon_metro, but I thought all the WSP's had their own little battery and they powered a solenoid which momentarily released the air pressure on the brake cylinders on that axle, so as to help stop it sliding. How does anything happening on the lead power car affect how each WSP operates on the trailers?
Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: MrC on July 13, 2010, 17:54:12 Not sure about HSTs but on most if not all modern stock WSP is disabled when the brakes are in emergency.
Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: Electric train on July 13, 2010, 18:10:52 i wonder if there are any dvt's spare that can work hith hst's, class 67's have a top speed of 120 but doubt they are compatible with the hst mk 3's electrics, plenty of mk2 stock around but can this do 125? I do not think the GWML rules of the route allow the use of DVT's, also the HST's train wire is not compatible with DVT's and 67's (HST Mk3's do not have the BR conventional lighting control wire system) also HST Mk3's have 415v 3 phase train power (ETH) system 67's will have 850v single phase.Mk2's top speed is 100 mph WSP is disabled in an emergency application as far as I can remember Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: Gordon the Blue Engine on July 13, 2010, 18:54:50 Not sure about HSTs but on most if not all modern stock WSP is disabled when the brakes are in emergency. It's a while since I was involved with HST's, but I can't recall a train wire which disabled WSP's during emergency braking. Maybe they are disabled if Brake Pipe pressure falls to 0 Bar (ie during an emergency brake application)? Is there an HST electrician out there?Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: inspector_blakey on July 13, 2010, 19:02:01 I was under the impression that the "emergency" brake step on an HST didn't involve a train wire but simply opened a hole in the pipe (just like brake valves of old) and dumped all the air out very quickly. But obviously open to correction by those who are more in the know that I am.
Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: Gordon the Blue Engine on July 13, 2010, 19:16:17 I was under the impression that the "emergency" brake step on an HST didn't involve a train wire but simply opened a hole in the pipe (just like brake valves of old) and dumped all the air out very quickly. But obviously open to correction by those who are more in the know that I am. I think you are right, IB. I'm just questioning the "fact" that the WSP's failed to work because of "damage to a control box" on the leading Power Car. It is more likely, that during an emergency brake application from high speed, maybe with poor adhesion conditions, the WSP batteries were not able to power repeated brake cylinder air releases and therefore "gave up". Hence the tread damage.When HST's were introduced in 1976 we had many initial problems on the trailer cars (of which the toilet door locks were the most infamous, but that's anoither story...). Only 2, the PA system and the trailer car WSP's, have never been properly resolved. Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: Timmer on July 13, 2010, 19:38:01 When HST's were introduced in 1976 we had many initial problems on the trailer cars (of which the toilet door locks were the most infamous, but that's anoither story...). Only 2, the PA system and the trailer car WSP's, have never been properly resolved. Can I mention a 3rd? Not that I think it's a problem but some might not like it too much. If the brakes are suddenly applied quite strongly the smell comes through the air con. For me it's part of the charm of a 125 and brings back memories of travelling on them in childhood as you don't smell the brake application much these days, only if the driver has to suddenly apply the brakes when travelling at high speed.Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: Chris from Nailsea on July 13, 2010, 19:43:23 More information on the 'fragrance' produced by HST brakes is at http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=3163.msg26867#msg26867 ;)
Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: 6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01 on July 13, 2010, 19:58:42 some class 73's are compatible with hst mk 3's, but thats gunna be a slow trip :-)
Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: smithy on July 13, 2010, 20:49:33 From the Wiltshire Times (http://www.wiltshiretimes.co.uk/news/8267034.Driver_hurt_after_train_hits_a_tree/): Quote Driver hurt after train hits a tree Hundreds of rail passengers travelling to Cornwall were left stranded in Wiltshire on Saturday after their train collided with a tree. The incident happened at Crockwood, near West Lavington, at about 2pm. The 13.06 First Great Western train from London Paddington to Penzance was travelling at about 120 mph through Crockwood when it struck a tree that had fallen in front of the train. The train came to a stand still for about two hours while a shunter train pushed the commuter train into Westbury Station at 4mph. Off-duty station staff returned to work to reopen the cafe to allow the hundreds of stranded passengers to get something to eat and drink. Passenger Cassandra Nixon, added: ^We certainly felt the tree hit the train. We were very concerned.^ Fellow passenger Marjorie James from Cornwall said she thought the train was going to be derailed. The train driver, who is from Plymouth, was treated by an ambulance crew at the scene and later taken to the Royal United Hospital in Bath. speed of impact was 90mph the driver was already slowing before he noticed the tree due to change of line speed ahead. it could have been so much worse if the driver did not see the tree say at night he would have taken full force of the tree as it was he managed to get out of the way in time. Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: devon_metro on July 13, 2010, 21:12:09 Quoting a knowledgeable source: "The CCB tripped on the leading power car so all the WSPs turned off"
As for the smell of Mk3 brakes, think I prefer the cast iron blocks on mk2s, very nice :D Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: willc on July 14, 2010, 00:24:56 Should the need ever arise (and if they could get their hands on the stock anyway) FGW already has the right under its track access agreement to use Class 67s (or 57/6s) with up to 10 Mk2s or Mk3s on pretty much all the main routes on its network, but there is no mention of DVTs in the paperwork.
But please forget the idea that a 67 can do 125mph. I think that speed may have been reached once or twice in testing but the maximum in normal service is 110mph (or 80mph for the Scottish sleeper ones fitted with cast iron brake blocks) and I don't think the civil engineers were too thrilled about that, given the 22-tonne axle load. Not exactly gentle on the track. Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: eightf48544 on July 14, 2010, 08:41:51 Somebody allegely timed a return Minehead Excursion with 67 and Mark 1s at a max of 120 somewhere between Westbury and Reading. We were going pretty fast but it was in the dark and not sure about accurracy.
Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: Tim on July 14, 2010, 09:40:15 I was under the impression that the "emergency" brake step on an HST didn't involve a train wire but simply opened a hole in the pipe (just like brake valves of old) and dumped all the air out very quickly. But obviously open to correction by those who are more in the know that I am. I am not an expert but what you say sounds right. Wasn't there a BR Cross country "incident" a few years back where the driver lost normal braking on his HST due to an electrical problem but retained "full service" brake availability? (IIRC, There was a mixup with the train radio communication meaning that BR control thought the driver had lost all brakes and there was goiing to be a major problem whereas the driver in fact stayed calm used the gradients to his advantage and coasted into Temple Meads to stop at a platform and let the passengers off) Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: JayMac on July 14, 2010, 13:48:30 The Daily Mail have picked up the story. Nothing new to add to the facts save for a rather dramatic picture of the HST cab...... damn lucky driver to escape with just a broken wrist, cuts and bruises.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1294613/Miracle-escape-train-driver-120mph-express-struck-falling-tree.html?ito=feeds-newsxml Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: devon_metro on July 14, 2010, 14:13:38 90mph more like
Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: JayMac on July 14, 2010, 14:15:38 Cut the journos some slack d_m. 90mph doesn't have quite the 'impact' as 120mph. ;)
Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: smithy on July 14, 2010, 15:42:58 Cut the journos some slack d_m. 90mph doesn't have quite the 'impact' as 120mph. ;) do you mean at more than 120mph???? Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: Gordon the Blue Engine on July 14, 2010, 21:02:28 Quoting a knowledgeable source: "The CCB tripped on the leading power car so all the WSPs turned off" So who was this knowledgeable source? Reprofiling 32 wheelsets (ie 8 trailers X 4 wheelsets/ vehicle) will cost FGW a fair bit - I'm sure they would like to know exactly why this damage occurred. And If I was MD of FGW I would like a bit more of an explanation than a "CCB tripped". Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: smithy on July 14, 2010, 21:28:12 Quoting a knowledgeable source: "The CCB tripped on the leading power car so all the WSPs turned off" So who was this knowledgeable source? Reprofiling 32 wheelsets (ie 8 trailers X 4 wheelsets/ vehicle) will cost FGW a fair bit - I'm sure they would like to know exactly why this damage occurred. And If I was MD of FGW I would like a bit more of an explanation than a "CCB tripped". if you saw the state of the wiring in and around desk then you would understand why the MCB tripped,dont forget the 4 wheelsets per power car also need turning. as for MD of FGW needing more of an explanation than CCb tripped believe me they will get more than that,it will not be the sort of info that should be in public domain though. I would also hazard a guess FGW will claim costs back from somewhere else probably NR in first instance??? Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: Chris from Nailsea on July 14, 2010, 21:44:44 I would also hazard a guess FGW will claim costs back from somewhere else probably NR in first instance??? From The (Plymouth) Herald (http://www.thisisplymouth.co.uk/news/Undefined-Headline/article-2406218-detail/article.html) (13/07/2010): Quote Network Rail, which said the tree belonged to a local landowner, said it was "taking this matter seriously". Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: Sprog on July 14, 2010, 22:48:19 Quoting a knowledgeable source: "The CCB tripped on the leading power car so all the WSPs turned off" X This situation is not possible, as each vehicle has an individual WSP system and whilst on 'other' forums, it has been claimed that the CCB tripped in the leading power car which (as has already been commented upon) is not surprising considering that the desk has been destroyed inevitably causing electrical shorts, this would have only disabled the WSP system in the leading powercar, not throughout the train. The flats (Burns is probably a more appropriate word) were caused by...how can i put it...a slight operational error when the set was being rescued, but considering the unusual circumstances and the pressure to recover the stricken set, it is understandable. Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: Sprog on July 14, 2010, 23:04:03 BTW, sorry for double post, for the benefit of the 'norms' here who like their acronyms to be explained, CCB = Control Circuit Breaker, which is part of the large bank of breakers fitted to the Electrical Control Cubicle inside a power car.
As the name suggests, the CCB protects the 110V supply to the various control systems within the powercar, such as the WSP system, Control Modules & Control circuits. For future reference, excuse any typos this is all from memory!! CCB - Control Circuit Breaker CMCB - Compressor Circuit Breaker FCB - Fire system Circuit Breaker BMCB1 - Blower Motor Circuit Breaker (For #1 & #2 Traction Motors) BMCB2 - Blower Motor Circuit Breaker (For #3 & #4 Tracion Motors) FPCB - Fuel Pump Circuit Breaker LCB1 - Lighting Circuit Breaker (1) LCB2 - Lighting Circuit Breaker (2) EFCB - Extractor Fan Circuit Breaker BCB - Battery Charger Circuit Breaker BCCB - Brake Control Circuit Breaker PACB - Public Address Circuit Breaker HCB1 - Heating Circuit Breaker (1) HCB2 - Heating Circuit Breaker (2) TPWSCB - Train Protection & Warning System Circuit Breaker TSCB - Train Supply Circuit Breaker PHCB - Pre-Heater Circuit Breaker (Replaced the NRNCB - National Radio Circuit Braker) Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: Chris from Nailsea on July 14, 2010, 23:10:52 Thanks very much for that helpful explanation, Sprog!
I won't add all of these to our 'acronyms and abbreviations (http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/acronyms.html)' page, as hopefully we won't see too many of them being 'tripped' in future? C. :o Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: JayMac on July 15, 2010, 00:22:39 Thanks for that insight into the 'gubbins' on a HST power car, Sprog.
I take it 43041 is in St Phillips Marsh at the moment. Will repairs and fitting of a replacement cab be undertaken there or is the PC likely to be removed to another TMD? Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: The SprinterMeister on July 15, 2010, 09:10:54 Quoting a knowledgeable source: "The CCB tripped on the leading power car so all the WSPs turned off" So who was this knowledgeable source? Reprofiling 32 wheelsets (ie 8 trailers X 4 wheelsets/ vehicle) will cost FGW a fair bit - I'm sure they would like to know exactly why this damage occurred. And If I was MD of FGW I would like a bit more of an explanation than a "CCB tripped". Although Rail conditions were good on Saturday it is likely that leaves displaced from the tree initiated wheelslide which by virtue of the damage to the front cab and CCB tripping couldn't be avoided. The informed source (I see a quote from '50031' on WNXX has been used) maintains them for a living so should have some knowledge of what he is talking about..... ;D Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: The SprinterMeister on July 15, 2010, 10:00:13 I would also hazard a guess FGW will claim costs back from somewhere else probably NR in first instance??? As I understand things the tree was situated in private land outside of the railway boundary line. Examination of some of the photographs reveal that parts of the tree found in the cab appear to be dead / rotten and I understand the landowner has already been interviewed by BTP.http://tomcurtisrailgallery.fotopic.net/p65868283.html (http://tomcurtisrailgallery.fotopic.net/p65868283.html) Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: The SprinterMeister on July 15, 2010, 10:06:05 Thanks for that insight into the 'gubbins' on a HST power car, Sprog. Finding another serviceable cab to put on it will probably be more of an issue. From what I gather from elsewhere there is only one cab not attached to a powercar (which is itself damaged) and the moulds used to manufacture the cabs are not currently useable. I take it 43041 is in St Phillips Marsh at the moment. Will repairs and fitting of a replacement cab be undertaken there or is the PC likely to be removed to another TMD? Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: LiskeardRich on July 15, 2010, 11:00:45 Thanks for that insight into the 'gubbins' on a HST power car, Sprog. Finding another serviceable cab to put on it will probably be more of an issue. From what I gather from elsewhere there is only one cab not attached to a powercar (which is itself damaged) and the moulds used to manufacture the cabs are not currently useable. I take it 43041 is in St Phillips Marsh at the moment. Will repairs and fitting of a replacement cab be undertaken there or is the PC likely to be removed to another TMD? there is currently 2 cabs in DML in Plymouth for refurbishment i believe! Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: The SprinterMeister on July 15, 2010, 11:37:03 there is currently 2 cabs in DML in Plymouth for refurbishment i believe! Correct. Those two cabs are off / for Grand Central power cars which are currently in Brush for fitting of MTU engines. The cabs are being refurbished under subcontract by Babcock Marine (the former DML).Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: LiskeardRich on July 15, 2010, 11:47:16 there is currently 2 cabs in DML in Plymouth for refurbishment i believe! Correct. Those two cabs are off / for Grand Central power cars which are currently in Brush for fitting of MTU engines. The cabs are being refurbished under subcontract by Babcock Marine (the former DML).would this mean there are cabs available spare when these refurbishments are complete, or are they not available being Grand Central cabs? Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: The SprinterMeister on July 15, 2010, 12:01:43 would this mean there are cabs available spare when these refurbishments are complete, or are they not available being Grand Central cabs? What it means is that there are two power cars (43068 & 43080 I believe) standing in Brush Loughborough without cabs on them awaiting return of the two cabs from Babcock Marine. http://staceys-fots.fotopic.net/p65434734.html (http://staceys-fots.fotopic.net/p65434734.html) The two power cars are buffer fitted examples but this has no practical difference as far as the cab module itself is concerned. Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: The SprinterMeister on July 15, 2010, 12:41:42 This situation is not possible, as each vehicle has an individual WSP system and whilst on 'other' forums, it has been claimed that the CCB tripped in the leading power car which (as has already been commented upon) is not surprising considering that the desk has been destroyed inevitably causing electrical shorts, this would have only disabled the WSP system in the leading powercar, not throughout the train. What is the effect on the Westinghose WSP racks on the trailers due to the removal of voltage from train line 12? What is the effect on the wheel slip sytem of a vehicle if all axles on that vehicle simultaniously cease to rotate? Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: smithy on July 15, 2010, 16:29:17 Quoting a knowledgeable source: "The CCB tripped on the leading power car so all the WSPs turned off" X This situation is not possible, as each vehicle has an individual WSP system and whilst on 'other' forums, it has been claimed that the CCB tripped in the leading power car which (as has already been commented upon) is not surprising considering that the desk has been destroyed inevitably causing electrical shorts, this would have only disabled the WSP system in the leading powercar, not throughout the train. The flats (Burns is probably a more appropriate word) were caused by...how can i put it...a slight operational error when the set was being rescued, but considering the unusual circumstances and the pressure to recover the stricken set, it is understandable. the actual cause of flats throughout the set were as a result of losing train wire 12 when the desk was totalled,this then turned all WSP systems off and locked all wheels when emergency brake went in around 90mph. as for repairs it is rumoured brush traction will be doing the work there is 1 cab assembly available in country that needs some slight repairs before being fitted. Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: 57604 on July 16, 2010, 08:10:24 Quoting a knowledgeable source: "The CCB tripped on the leading power car so all the WSPs turned off" X This situation is not possible, as each vehicle has an individual WSP system and whilst on 'other' forums, it has been claimed that the CCB tripped in the leading power car which (as has already been commented upon) is not surprising considering that the desk has been destroyed inevitably causing electrical shorts, this would have only disabled the WSP system in the leading powercar, not throughout the train. The flats (Burns is probably a more appropriate word) were caused by...how can i put it...a slight operational error when the set was being rescued, but considering the unusual circumstances and the pressure to recover the stricken set, it is understandable. Very wrong on both counts. 1. The Westinghouse WSP racks need to see a feed on train wire 12 from the leading power car, granted the old WSP units were a self contained item, but not now. If you stand next to the trailer cars when the desk is opened you can hear the blow down valves operating as the unit runs through its self test. No train wire 12 and they turn off. Huge chunk of tree trashing the desk caused CCB to trip, hence no TW12. Simples. 2. The flats occurred due to the above happening. Nice try, but no prize. At least you got the circuit breaker initials right. Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: JayMac on July 16, 2010, 09:01:33 Welcome to the forum 57604! Or can we call you "Pendennis"? ;) ;D
Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: Henry on July 16, 2010, 09:09:43 Anyway at least the train can be be put right. How is the driver, believe he sustained fractures ? Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: The SprinterMeister on July 16, 2010, 10:32:01 Anyway at least the train can be be put right. How is the driver, believe he sustained fractures ? I believe he was due to fly out somewhere on his rostered two weeks annual leave today...... The last I heard from Plymouth people was that he was shaken (as obviously you would be) but not too upset by the accident at this point in time. Hairline fracture to wrist I understand. Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: Gordon the Blue Engine on July 16, 2010, 10:40:23 Very wrong on both counts. 1. The Westinghouse WSP racks need to see a feed on train wire 12 from the leading power car, granted the old WSP units were a self contained item, but not now. If you stand next to the trailer cars when the desk is opened you can hear the blow down valves operating as the unit runs through its self test. No train wire 12 and they turn off. Huge chunk of tree trashing the desk caused CCB to trip, hence no TW12. Simples. 2. The flats occurred due to the above happening. Nice try, but no prize. At least you got the circuit breaker initials right. Thank you for providing an informed response to this rather technical issue re Trailer WSP's. Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: Sprog on July 16, 2010, 11:02:27 Quoting a knowledgeable source: "The CCB tripped on the leading power car so all the WSPs turned off" X This situation is not possible, as each vehicle has an individual WSP system and whilst on 'other' forums, it has been claimed that the CCB tripped in the leading power car which (as has already been commented upon) is not surprising considering that the desk has been destroyed inevitably causing electrical shorts, this would have only disabled the WSP system in the leading powercar, not throughout the train. The flats (Burns is probably a more appropriate word) were caused by...how can i put it...a slight operational error when the set was being rescued, but considering the unusual circumstances and the pressure to recover the stricken set, it is understandable. Very wrong on both counts. 1. The Westinghouse WSP racks need to see a feed on train wire 12 from the leading power car, granted the old WSP units were a self contained item, but not now. If you stand next to the trailer cars when the desk is opened you can hear the blow down valves operating as the unit runs through its self test. No train wire 12 and they turn off. Huge chunk of tree trashing the desk caused CCB to trip, hence no TW12. Simples. 2. The flats occurred due to the above happening. Nice try, but no prize. At least you got the circuit breaker initials right. Sorry you're right, i forgot that they are all Westinghouse fitted now. The flat cause was what ive been told from some high-up people at my place who should be pretty informed, but perhaps not. Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: IndustryInsider on July 16, 2010, 11:14:19 The flat cause was what ive been told from some high-up people at my place who should be pretty informed, but perhaps not. Even 'high-up' people often fall foul of the rumour mill. ;) Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: The SprinterMeister on July 16, 2010, 11:30:21 The flat cause was what ive been told from some high-up people at my place who should be pretty informed, but perhaps not. Even 'high-up' people often fall foul of the rumour mill. ;) I doubt the driver of the 59/2 would have proceeded any great distance had the HST been resisting forward motion to the extent of causing the wheel damage that was observed. The Train Manager off 1C84 (26+ years service as a guard / TM) attached the 59/2 to the train so I very doubt any errors occured on that account. Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: 57604 on July 16, 2010, 13:55:05 Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: 57604 on July 16, 2010, 13:56:41 Welcome to the forum 57604! Or can we call you "Pendennis"? ;) ;D Pen or Dennis, either is fine. ;D Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: Sprog on July 16, 2010, 17:53:28 Wonderful....so vein......! Really, without causing any undue panic, it is abit an oversight really, as the old fail-safe system has been replaced with one which is obviously less so. So should power to train wire 12 be lost for any reason (i.e. dislodged or disconnected 36-way, CCB trip either end, Master Switch to OFF either by error or unsolicited) you potentially massively extend the braking distance of the train. Scenario 1 - You are running along and the train hits some bulky debris on the line, this knocks out the 36-way jumper and the driver applies the anchors. The debris was dropped by a train ahead of you which also stopped quickly because of a sudden fault. Your train is now in an uncontrolled slide heading towards the back of the stationary train. Scenario 2 - You are driving along at high speed and you suddenly see the line ahead is blocked; you hit the EMG plunger, Put the MC to OFF, anything that might help in the panic and then take cover. Train Wire 12 is now de-energised, you hit the obstruction at 110 in an uncontrolled slide rather than 75 with all the WSPs behind you doing their job. Scenario 3 - You suffer an onboard fire whilst on the move. For the Fire Supression system in a powercar to function, the MC has to be in the OFF position. Granted, the Inergen will not discharge until the set speed falls below 6mph, but upon hearing the firebells, the Driver may instinctivley operate the EMG plunger and shut the desk down. Weeeeeeeeeeeee off we go into a slide.... Just a little bit of a design flaw!!! Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: The SprinterMeister on July 16, 2010, 18:17:42 And, as ever so wonderfully modest with it! ;D ;D Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: The SprinterMeister on July 16, 2010, 18:28:37 Scenario 1 - You are running along and the train hits some bulky debris on the line, this knocks out the 36-way jumper and the driver applies the anchors. The debris was dropped by a train ahead of you which also stopped quickly because of a sudden fault. Your train is now in an uncontrolled slide heading towards the back of the stationary train. I think this is one of the reasons why we have a signalling sytem which ensures a red signal is displayed in rear of each train on most of the main lines. If a train stops for whatever reason the train in rear receives caution and danger aspects. And there is usually a goodly overlap between the red and the train in front on lines where the permitted speeds are 50mph or more. Therefore train one in your scenario is protected in rear by a red signal at least 200 yards in rear and cautionary signals anything up to 2000 yards in rear. Train two isnt therefore running at full chat when it is going towards stationary train one when it hits the obstruction that stopped train one. I can see the issues with the WSP as a former HST driver and no doubt somebody will have to address them but there is no great need to panic I think. I understand 1C84 stopped in about one mile even with the WSP apparently not functioning. Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: The SprinterMeister on July 16, 2010, 18:42:33 Scenario 2 - You are driving along at high speed and you suddenly see the line ahead is blocked; you hit the EMG plunger, Put the MC to OFF, anything that might help in the panic and then take cover. Train Wire 12 is now de-energised, you hit the obstruction at 110 in an uncontrolled slide rather than 75 with all the WSPs behind you doing their job. I can't remember ever putting the F&R to off as an emergency measure in 21 years of driving. Moving the F&R while the traction unit was moving was at one time a Form 1 offence. I cannot think of an occasion why a driver would want to do so in all honesty. It wouldnt increase the brake effort so it is to all intents and purposes a somewhat pointless thing to do, particularly if you have been briefed that by doing so you could disable the WSP system on the train. Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: Sprog on July 16, 2010, 19:03:57 . I cannot think of an occasion why a driver would want to do so in all honesty. It wouldnt increase the brake effort so it is to all intents and purposes a somewhat pointless thing to do, particularly if you have been briefed that by doing so you could disable the WSP system on the train. Panic!? And, to enable the Inergen Fire bottles to discharge, as instructed on the label next to the Fire Override Plunger on the cab desk! Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: The SprinterMeister on July 16, 2010, 20:07:59 Panic!? And, to enable the Inergen Fire bottles to discharge, as instructed on the label next to the Fire Override Plunger on the cab desk! Is it normal to want to discharge the Innergen Bottles on a HST that is actually moving? Surely the drill is to bring it to a stop in a suitable location and deal with the situation once the train has stopped. If you move the F&R to off it will of course stop, no doubt somewhere totally unsuitable. I can't see a driver wanting to twiddle the F&R in an emergency somehow not even in a panic in all honesty. Although I'm waiting for '57604' to rise to the occasion... ;) Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: JayMac on July 16, 2010, 21:27:25 For those of us less gen'd up on terminology, can we have a plain English explanation for 'Innergen Bottles' and 'F&R'.
Ta. ;) Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: The SprinterMeister on July 16, 2010, 21:40:54 For those of us less gen'd up on terminology, can we have an explanation for 'Innergen Bottles' and 'F&R'. Ta. ;) 'Innergen' is the fire extingishant / suppressant carried in large bottles in the luggage section of the power car. As the rear power car is normally unmanned the Innergen bottles will normally discharge automatically in the event of a fire in the rear power car. The engine will also shut down and the firebell will ring in both cabs. The front power car system is disabled from automatic operation of the Innergen fire bottles by the driver as it will not operate with the 'F&R' away from 'Off'. 'F&R' being the forward and reverse master switch / control which requires a master key inserted into it to unlock it from the 'off' position. It therefore follows that the Innergen sytem can be made to work automatically or by means of the buttons inside and outside the cab once the Master switch is turned to 'off'. I think I am basically right with the Innergen part, HSTs were not fitted with it when I last drove them in 1994. Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: JayMac on July 16, 2010, 21:49:33 Thanks, SprinterMeister.
Always learning........ ;) ;D Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: smithy on July 17, 2010, 11:20:54 Scenario 2 - You are driving along at high speed and you suddenly see the line ahead is blocked; you hit the EMG plunger, Put the MC to OFF, anything that might help in the panic and then take cover. Train Wire 12 is now de-energised, you hit the obstruction at 110 in an uncontrolled slide rather than 75 with all the WSPs behind you doing their job. I can't remember ever putting the F&R to off as an emergency measure in 21 years of driving. Moving the F&R while the traction unit was moving was at one time a Form 1 offence. I cannot think of an occasion why a driver would want to do so in all honesty. It wouldnt increase the brake effort so it is to all intents and purposes a somewhat pointless thing to do, particularly if you have been briefed that by doing so you could disable the WSP system on the train. the only time i can see the F&R would be switched off in panic/emergency is if the brake handle came off/broke but i stress extremely unlikely.cannot hink of any other time you could possibly need to do it. as for setting innergen bottles off if i were driving there is no way i would set them off on move i would bring train to stand first at a suitable location,i.e not on viaduct etc. but not being a hst man i am not totally aware of the fire system set up so could well be wrong as to the procedure Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: Sprog on July 17, 2010, 12:50:29 Inergen is a fire supressent as already stated. It is an inert gas that replaces the oxygen in the engine room and thus acts to starve the fire. It is potentially harmful to human, but only from perlonged exposure.
It replaced the previous fire system fitted to the power cars when built called 'Halon', and this workled by releasing a gas onto the fire, which via a chemcial reaction, removed the oxygen from the air and whilst it was a highly effective system, it was leathal and was also damging to the Ozone. Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: The SprinterMeister on July 17, 2010, 21:47:28 the only time i can see the F&R would be switched off in panic/emergency is if the brake handle came off/broke but i stress extremely unlikely.cannot hink of any other time you could possibly need to do it. The possibility of Brake handle breakage or of the handle becoming jammed is presumably why there is an emergency brake plunger (which opens the air train pipe to atmosphere) situated on the HST driving desk a short distance from the brake handle. Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: 57604 on July 18, 2010, 16:24:16 Wonderful....so vein......! Really, without causing any undue panic, it is abit an oversight really, as the old fail-safe system has been replaced with one which is obviously less so. So should power to train wire 12 be lost for any reason (i.e. dislodged or disconnected 36-way, CCB trip either end, Master Switch to OFF either by error or unsolicited) you potentially massively extend the braking distance of the train. Scenario 1 - You are running along and the train hits some bulky debris on the line, this knocks out the 36-way jumper and the driver applies the anchors. The debris was dropped by a train ahead of you which also stopped quickly because of a sudden fault. Your train is now in an uncontrolled slide heading towards the back of the stationary train. Scenario 2 - You are driving along at high speed and you suddenly see the line ahead is blocked; you hit the EMG plunger, Put the MC to OFF, anything that might help in the panic and then take cover. Train Wire 12 is now de-energised, you hit the obstruction at 110 in an uncontrolled slide rather than 75 with all the WSPs behind you doing their job. Scenario 3 - You suffer an onboard fire whilst on the move. For the Fire Supression system in a powercar to function, the MC has to be in the OFF position. Granted, the Inergen will not discharge until the set speed falls below 6mph, but upon hearing the firebells, the Driver may instinctivley operate the EMG plunger and shut the desk down. Weeeeeeeeeeeee off we go into a slide.... Just a little bit of a design flaw!!! Vain.... The Westinghouse WSP system is a lot better than what went before, both in terms of operation and fault finding, and any random bizarre sequences of rare events you can dream up are probably outweighed by the systems more day to day usefulness. It's not as a if a train with no working WSP is not actually braking now is it? And what about the old WSP units that required the train air brake pipe to have pressure in it to turn on? What happened if the driver put the brake into emergency or the brake pipe split? Oh yes..... Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: The SprinterMeister on July 18, 2010, 22:19:22 And what about the old WSP units that required the train air brake pipe to have pressure in it to turn on? What happened if the driver put the brake into emergency or the brake pipe split? Oh yes..... Wasn't that some mod BR did as a result of the Colwich Jn job where it was said WSP activity on the Mk3's extended the ground run of the SPADing Manchester train into the path of the oncoming Liverpool - Euston train?Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: dmutony on July 21, 2010, 13:08:05 43043 is currently in the wheel lathe at spm for tyre turning there is a possibility it will be moved to brush by rail as it costs a fortune to move it by road!!!
Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: The SprinterMeister on July 24, 2010, 04:16:14 43043 is currently in the wheel lathe at spm for tyre turning there is a possibility it will be moved to brush by rail as it costs a fortune to move it by road!!! That would be 43041 the involved power car then? I understand that the spare cab has been located and arrangements for it's repair in hand.Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: TheLastMinute on August 12, 2010, 18:54:09 The RAIB have announced that they are going to investigate the Lavington incident...
Quote from: RAIB http://www.raib.gov.uk/publications/current_investigations_register/100710_lavington.cfm Investigation into the collision of a passenger train with a fallen tree at Lavington, Wiltshire, on 10 July 2010 The RAIB is carrying out an investigation into the collision of a passenger train with a fallen tree at Lavington, on the line between Reading and Westbury, on 10 July 2010. The train involved, 1C84, the 13:06 hrs service from London Paddington to Penzance, was travelling at about 90 mph (145 km/h) when it struck the tree. The service was operated by First Great Western and was formed by a High Speed Train (HST) set that was conveying around 200 passengers and 4 train crew. The collision occurred at about 14:09 hrs. The driver had little warning of the obstruction on the line and could take no action to avert the collision. The train was not derailed but extensive damage was caused to the front cab due to a large branch entering its interior at the level of the windscreen. Despite the damage, the driver sustained only minor injuries but was shocked by the event. None of the other crew members or passengers were injured. Train 1C84 was assisted forward to Westbury by a freight locomotive and arrived there at 19:03 hrs where the passengers were detrained. To date, there is no evidence that the condition of the railway infrastructure, signalling, rolling stock or driving of the train contributed to the collision. The RAIB^s investigation is independent of any investigations by the safety authority. The RAIB will publish a report, including any recommendations to improve safety, at the conclusion of its investigation. This report will be available on the RAIB website. Cheers, TLM Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: JayMac on August 12, 2010, 19:19:32 Was it really 6 hours between the incident and the passengers being de-trained at Westbury? :o
Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: gwr2006 on August 12, 2010, 19:28:24 Was it really 6 hours between the incident and the passengers being de-trained at Westbury? :o No, it was just under 5 hours before the hauled set made it into Westbury (i.e. between 1409 when the incident occurred and 1903). I guess this was due to the extensive damage to WSP and braking system and no doubt its 5mph top speed! Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: JayMac on August 12, 2010, 19:40:28 Opps, bad maths on my part. :-[ Still a long time though.
EDIT: Oops, and bad typing! Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: The SprinterMeister on October 31, 2010, 23:48:10 Just to update this thread a bit, I spoke to the involved Plymouth driver last week. He has now returned to work and is currently refreshing his route knowledge prior to returning to normal driving duties.
Power car still at Brush apparently. Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: JayMac on November 01, 2010, 00:07:40 Ta for the update, TSM. Glad to hear the driver is back in the saddle.
Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: 158747 on February 20, 2011, 01:07:40 Saw 43041 at Bristol T.M. yesterday, now back in service with new cab.
Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: JayMac on February 20, 2011, 01:16:27 Ta for the update, 158747. Glad to hear the power car is back on track. ;) :D ;D
Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: TheLastMinute on April 07, 2011, 12:34:56 The RAIB report into the Lavington incident has been released and is available at http://www.raib.gov.uk/publications/investigation_reports/reports_2011/report082011.cfm.
Cheers, TLM Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: grahame on December 27, 2023, 18:13:23 43129 has hit a tree on a run between Perth and Aberdeen today. Looks a bit of a mess - by a miracle, the driver escaped serious injury I believe.
Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: Chris from Nailsea on March 11, 2024, 16:22:42 The train driver in that Lavington incident escaped with no more than a sprained wrist - that's really quite remarkable, looking at the extent of the damage caused by the tree v the cab :o
Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: UstiImmigrunt on August 31, 2024, 19:50:44 And I was the very lucky driver sent to Westbury to bring the HST back to BTM. I had a fitter with me who I had to help with the brake continuity test. I then ran at a top speed of ten MPH from Westbury with a requirement for 5 MPH over point work at fittings due to the wheelset damage. I ran non stop and it took over 3 1/2 hours to complete the journey. I was doing the required 5 MPH from the trailing crossing at St Anne's the rest of the way into BTM. I parked the set in the up through unintentionally leaving the damaged power car opposite what is now the main gateline.
I made sure of a couple of pints from the (un)kind controller who volunteered me for this task. It was more difficult holding ten MPH than 125! Title: Re: HST hits tree at Lavington today - 10 July 2010 Post by: Chris from Nailsea on August 31, 2024, 19:57:56 I made sure of a couple of pints from the (un)kind controller who volunteered me for this task. Absolutely right! ;D This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net |