Great Western Coffee Shop

All across the Great Western territory => Across the West => Topic started by: JayMac on July 25, 2010, 21:47:09



Title: 'Staycations' boost branch lines Beeching wanted to cut (Telegraph 25/07/2010)
Post by: JayMac on July 25, 2010, 21:47:09
From The Telegraph (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/road-and-rail-transport/7908251/Staycation-holidays-boost-branch-lines-Beeching-wanted-to-cut.html):

Quote
Britain's once-threatened branch lines are enjoying a boom thanks to 'staycation' holidays.

Figures compiled for The Sunday Telegraph show many routes earmarked for closure in the 1960s Beeching cuts are enjoying annual passenger growth well above the average across the railways, with rises of up to 55 per cent. The increases have been attributed to tourism traffic as recession-hit Britons opt for traditional seaside holidays instead of flying abroad. Seven of the 10 fastest-growing branch lines serve seaside resorts. Traffic on the scenic St Erth to St Ives line in Cornwall, recommended for closure by Dr Beeching, rose 15.5 per cent in 2009/10 compared to the previous year. The number of passenger journeys between Preston and Blackpool South rose by 13.8 per cent.

Alex Veitch, Integrated Transport Manager for the Association of Train Operating Companies (ATOC), said: "There is no doubt that the 'staycation' trend of holidaying at home has been a major factor. These branch line figures match existing research that shows summer traffic was significantly up at tourism 'destination' stations such Edinburgh and Oxford. With more holidays in Britain, many resorts are busier and it seems people have realised it is less hassle to get the train and the journey can be part of the holiday experience."

Official figures, due to be published on Thursday, are expected to show the number of rail passenger journeys in Britain in 2009/10 was similar to the previous year, ending almost 15 years of spectacular growth. But although the number of commuter journeys has dropped during the recession, branch lines have enjoyed remarkable growth, according to statistics supplied to The Sunday Telegraph by ATOC. Traffic between Par and Newquay in Cornwall grew 55 per cent after demand from stay-at-home holidaymakers prompted First Great Western to add direct daily trains from London.

Passenger journeys on the line between Oxenholme and Windermere in the Lake District, once slated for closure by Dr Beeching, rose 9.9 per cent.

Julian Crow, regional manager of First Great Western, said: "All the signs are that this summer is going to be even busier than last year when we saw significant increases. It is great news for everyone. In St Ives, which has narrow streets, the growth means more visitors than ever are arriving by rail rather than adding to road congestion."

The success has also been attributed to Community Rail Partnerships in which rail companies, local councils and volunteers join to promote passenger interest and investment in improvements.

On the Truro to Falmouth line, which had the third-highest growth, traffic rose 37.8 per cent after an extra platform was built to allow more trains.

"The fact is, many branch lines are providing their best ever service," said Richard Burningham, manager of the Devon & Cornwall Rail Partnership. "There is this notion of a golden age of steam trains but St Ives and Falmouth have never had a more frequent service in their history and people are starting to notice that and make use of their local train service, not just on holiday but throughout the year."



The 10 fastest-growing Community Rail Lines (2009/10 percentage increase over 2008/09)

Par ^ Newquay (First Great Western (FGW)) 54.80%

Derby ^ Matlock (East Midlands) 42%

Truro ^ Falmouth (FGW) 37.80%

Bristol Temple Meads ^ Severn Beach (FGW) 16.90%

St Erth ^ St Ives (FGW) 15.50%

Preston ^ Blackpool South (Northern) 13.80%

Liskeard ^ Looe (FGW) 13.10%

Exeter ^ Barnstaple (FGW) 11.60%

Oxenholme ^ Windermere (First TransPennine Express) 9.90%

Plymouth ^ Gunnislake (FGW) 9.10%


Title: Re: 'Staycations' boost branch lines Beeching wanted to cut (Telegraph 25/07/2010)
Post by: matt473 on July 26, 2010, 00:43:33
For those who need a reason to increase rolling stock in the Great Western region see the the stats. Imagine if there were more through services from other parts of the country to the regions that are having large growth through XC then we could be seeing a very profitable and useful summer service to many areas. Sadly a lost opportunity in the current day and age


Title: Re: 'Staycations' boost branch lines Beeching wanted to cut (Telegraph 25/07/2010)
Post by: 6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01 on July 26, 2010, 01:00:20
Not that they have the rolling stock but I wonder what would happen if fgw applied to run a service from the southwest to the north


Title: Re: 'Staycations' boost branch lines Beeching wanted to cut (Telegraph 25/07/2010)
Post by: Btline on July 26, 2010, 15:17:00
Newquay to Newcastle could be a TPE route! ;D


Title: Re: 'Staycations' boost branch lines Beeching wanted to cut (Telegraph 25/07/2010)
Post by: 6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01 on July 26, 2010, 16:08:31
you know what... the cost of a couple of loco hauled sets could be shared along with the revenue if fgw and tpe worked together, it may even get approved seeing that xc doesnt seem that interested in getting any more people on its trains


Title: Re: 'Staycations' boost branch lines Beeching wanted to cut (Telegraph 25/07/2010)
Post by: matt473 on July 26, 2010, 17:19:34
you know what... the cost of a couple of loco hauled sets could be shared along with the revenue if fgw and tpe worked together, it may even get approved seeing that xc doesnt seem that interested in getting any more people on its trains

In theory yes, but of course the fragmented system requires completely sepearte accounts for both companies so can be a minefield to sort out. The only way it could work is if First created a subsidury for such services working in "parternship" with TPE and FGW that is accounted completely sepreately for from the franchises keeping the civil servants happy


Title: Re: 'Staycations' boost branch lines Beeching wanted to cut (Telegraph 25/07/2010)
Post by: 6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01 on July 26, 2010, 17:27:39
they already have.... but given the fun they had with the taunton to cardiff service that may not work lol


Title: Re: 'Staycations' boost branch lines Beeching wanted to cut (Telegraph 25/07/2010)
Post by: matt473 on July 26, 2010, 17:49:12
they already have.... but given the fun they had with the taunton to cardiff service that may not work lol

Actually they do not as of fairly recently as it was First sold GBRF hence the change of contract for the loco diagram to DBS as there is no more politics involved


Title: Re: 'Staycations' boost branch lines Beeching wanted to cut (Telegraph 25/07/2010)
Post by: 6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01 on July 26, 2010, 18:01:25
ahh sorry i idnt realise that it had been sold, i thought part of the swap over was the very poor performance of the 57's


Title: Re: 'Staycations' boost branch lines Beeching wanted to cut (Telegraph 25/07/2010)
Post by: devon_metro on July 26, 2010, 19:29:37
Hats off to FGW for those increases!


Title: Re: 'Staycations' boost branch lines Beeching wanted to cut (Telegraph 25/07/2010)
Post by: grahame on August 12, 2010, 12:18:13
Further report ... Rail News

http://rail-news.com/2010/08/12/4748/

Rather confirms "increase a rubbish service to one that's even half decent and they'll use it" ... highlights for Severn Beach and Newquay services.  It's clearly not just holiday / seaside stuff; I don't think there are many bucket and spaders at Severn Beach are there?


Title: Re: 'Staycations' boost branch lines Beeching wanted to cut (Telegraph 25/07/2010)
Post by: TheLastMinute on August 12, 2010, 12:54:16
How dare you cast such aspersions on the Beach!  :o

Oh, hang on a sec.... 

(http://s0.geograph.org.uk/photos/18/79/187956_2ebf4165.jpg)
^ Copyright Linda Bailey (http://www.geograph.org.uk/profile/4140) and 
licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/)


Ahhh, I see.  ;D


Title: Re: 'Staycations' boost branch lines Beeching wanted to cut (Telegraph 25/07/2010)
Post by: inspector_blakey on August 12, 2010, 14:56:15
A mildly amusing typo in that article (my emphasis, obviously!)

Quote
This surge, which was revealed in the research gathered by the Association of Train Operating Companies (ATOC), has been put down to recession-hit Brits opting for beach holidays over fights abroad as well as investment to increase the frequency and capacity of local services.


Title: Re: 'Staycations' boost branch lines Beeching wanted to cut (Telegraph 25/07/2010)
Post by: Tim on August 12, 2010, 17:17:02
I visited the beach with recently for "leisure".  The walk along the sea wall has the advantage of being pushchair friendly ad I was wanting to see if any evidence of the pump houses for the tunnel were evident having watched a BTF about the tunnel.  Could be a very nice spot without the M4, but "beach" is misleading.


Title: Re: 'Staycations' boost branch lines Beeching wanted to cut (Telegraph 25/07/2010)
Post by: 6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01 on August 13, 2010, 19:39:44
i have a ticket in my wallet for this branch however i stupidly bought the ticket (only ^1.50) before checking the times



This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net