Great Western Coffee Shop

All across the Great Western territory => The Wider Picture - related rail and other transport issues => Topic started by: Brucey on October 21, 2011, 08:53:09



Title: "Long-term safety fears over Yorkshire's Pacer trains" BBC News 21/10/2011
Post by: Brucey on October 21, 2011, 08:53:09
A story also relevant to our region
Quote
Pacer trains are some of the most unpopular on the network.

Built in the 1980s, they are essentially a bus body mounted on a freight wagon chassis with a diesel engine slung underneath.

When passengers complain of cattle truck conditions, they are sometimes closer to the truth than they realise.

Pacer trains were built as a stop-gap with an expected life of no more than 20 years. But they are now 25-years-old and there are no plans to replace them.
'Notable incidents'

Now the rail regulator is placing a question mark over the long term safety of Pacers, saying: "There is particular concern over the ongoing use of Pacers beyond their intended design life."

It says there have been some "notable incidents", including the failure of drive shafts that transmit power from the engine to the wheels.

Northern Rail operates about 100 Pacer trains all over the north of England.

In Yorkshire, it operates commuter services around Leeds, Sheffield, Huddersfield, Wakefield and York over routes such as the Huddersfield-Sheffield and Huddersfield-Wakefield lines, between York, Harrogate and Leeds, and on the coast line from Scarborough to Hull.

There is no suggestion that the trains are unsafe today.

But the rail regulator says its investigations are continuing and it wants to see an action plan from the rail industry that demonstrates how the trains will be kept safe as they get older.

They already have an extensive daily safety check, and Northern Rail insists they would not be allowed out on the tracks if there were any doubts about their safety.
Higher fares

But the company does accept that the trains are old and need replacing. The problem is how to afford it.

A new train would cost about six times as much as a Pacer in leasing charges, so each train would have to carry six times the number of passengers or the subsidy paid to keep loss-making lines running would have to go up by the same factor.

Neither action is likely. Instead, it looks as though if commuters want new trains they will have to be prepared to pay for them through higher fares.

That would be politically unpopular as well as bringing howls of outrage from daily travellers. But it is a fact that rail fares in Yorkshire are low compared with other parts of the country.

Northern says its average fare is just ^2.90, less than the cappuccino that many commuters buy to drink on the train.

Car parking is also free at most local stations, and that is likely to come under scrutiny. Commuters in the South East are accustomed to paying to park at their local station.

Yorkshire commuters are not, and that may have to change if they are ever to afford the cost of the shiny new trains which rail travellers would love to see.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-15390172

I couldn't help but giggle at the opening sentence!


Title: Re: "Long-term safety fears over Yorkshire's Pacer trains" BBC News 21/10/2011
Post by: brompton rail on October 21, 2011, 10:57:40
Does a similar aged 150 cost six times the hire charge of a 144?

Car Parks are mostly free in Northern's Yorkshire area ( and full from 7.30) because the PTEs adopted that policy decades ago. Machines and enforcement staff would be required as most of the stations are unstaffed. Probably CCTV would need extending too. While they were at it the PTEs could install TVMs too, since very few unstaffed stations have them and rely on tickets issued on trains by conductors - difficult when the said trains are packed. Tickets are sold before te barriers at Leeds, but not Sheffield which doesn't have barriers.



This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net