Is No 3 on the BR^▸ (British Rail(ways)) test track?

Based on the shambles being reported at the Covid enquiry I am not al all surprised by the lack of joined up thinking.

Is 3 Weymouth, loading for D Day.

Legally that could be January 2025!

Crichel Down only applies to compulsory purchase.  It will not apply to an agreed purchase even if that had the threat of being compulsory if there was no agreement

Edit.
Following the comment from Stuving below I realise I was wrong.  Thank you for correcting me.

Bring N Somerset back and call it CUBA^▸ (Counties that Used to Be Avon) (Councils that Used to Be Avon) or just Avon.

(CUBA is already used in local government for some inter authority work)

I had never heard of the Bristol Lodekka but deduced it was a bus from the poll questions and the earlier comments.

I do not see a need for any boards beyond the existing ones.  We already have boards for current busses and rail history and the occasional historic bus can be fitted in them.  The Imber busses currently live in the diary.

I have seen a comment that the system is designed that if there is a significant data input problem then it will fail safe by reverting to manual.

In this case fail safe prevented a lot of flights.

That makes a lot of sense, I always thought that the old name was a bit of a mouthful.

And I remember in the 70s working where senior people were known by their initials, which were also on their office door.  This was fine until Wally Clarke (no middle initial) arrived.

I always thought that 'great' referred to magnitude and not magnificence in this context.

There are comments elsewhere that Crossrail was code red until it opened.  The perceived problem appears to be a lack of clear government direction.

This: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/jul/18/labour-mayors-legal-action-train-ticket-office-closures-england
is from the Guardian.

I agree