Stop, look, listen, live.
This was a basic principal that was taught to me by my parents as well as in school - If they had followed this, they would still be alive.
The parents/idiots are just using NR» as a scapegoat and are completely ignoring that fact that their children were dippy enough to ignore the warnings and run infront of a train.
What about the harm done to the driver who watched them disappear under his unit, or the poor bystanders on the platform who had to endure being covered in the girls 'red mist'....
Schools are probably too busy teaching kids about Global warming and human rights to bother about things like basic road/railway safety and 'not talking to strangers'.
I cant agree with that. As it said in the report the most likely explanation for their behaviour is that they assumed that the reason for the barrier being across the road was for the stationary train in the platform. By pleading guilty Network Rail has accepted that the crossing had inherent design flaws which had been recognised years earlier and which they had not acted on.
It would seem to be obvious to me that a person could make such an assumption and that any gate should be of the locking type.
The girls were not reckless but made an understandable mistake which sadly cost them their lives.