Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5
|
1
|
Journey by Journey / Plymouth and Cornwall / Keyham bomb removal - temporary suspension of rail traffic
|
on: February 23, 2024, 11:32:57
|
I've just read that the decision on the Keyham bomb is to move it out to sea, requiring a journey from its current location to the Torpoint ferry slipway near Devonport which will enforce a 300m cordon along the entirety of the route and suspension of rail services whilst it is being moved as the line runs through the cordon. No exact specifics but scheduled to take place between 1400 and 1700 today.
Fingers crossed all goes to plan!
|
|
|
4
|
Journey by Journey / Plymouth and Cornwall / Re: Saltash Station and Saltash Rail Users Group (merged topics)
|
on: April 19, 2023, 14:30:07
|
An update from the SRUG▸ today:
"Saltash Town Council have agreed a deal to open the café and waiting room at the station. This will mean that an accessible toilet and somewhere dry to wait for your train will be available soon"
Not to do a disservice to the two waiting shelters already in existence on the platforms but the environment of the station building is certainly far nicer than either of those.
Another great step forward in this brilliant project.
|
|
|
6
|
All across the Great Western territory / Across the West / Re: Problems with the Night Riviera sleeper - December 2014 onwards
|
on: March 10, 2023, 09:49:16
|
What will they do when HSTs▸ are no longer available to rescue the sleeper.
I wondered that ... Perhaps it is time for a next generation sleeper that does not need rescuing in any special way, and does not have the same high problem rating of the current trains which seem to be showing their age in a less than brilliant reliability. Given that this thread is not far coming up for 10 years I think it's definitely time! Would a class 67 or 68 be suitable for such duties, or are there issues with ETH/power incompatibilities?
|
|
|
7
|
Journey by Journey / Plymouth and Cornwall / Re: St Budeaux to stations to become 'major interchange' hub
|
on: September 15, 2021, 09:59:18
|
Thanks for sharing that, I wasn't aware of the project - the area certainly would benefit from redevelopment. I wonder if this forms part of the 'Plymouth Metro' vision? At the very least it should place St Budeaux in a better position to be part of it, should it ever come to fruition. St Budeaux square has always been busy in terms of bus passengers, it would be interesting to know how many of those journeys could be served by rail instead, as the bus network spreads out far and wide from there, especially to the North of the city (i.e. Derriford for the hospital & science parks), for which there is no rail provision. Is it the relative infrequency of services that has previously deterred those heading for the city centre from using the train? Overall though it's great to see investment in local transport initiatives
|
|
|
9
|
All across the Great Western territory / Across the West / Re: Problems with IET trains from April 2021
|
on: May 10, 2021, 16:40:05
|
The sleeper only conveys very limited seated coaches. And whilst every little helps, it might make make more sense to run the sleeper as normal but encourage use of the seated portion. Of course during the day, the sleepers are stabled, one at each end of the line, and it MIGHT be worth detaching the seated vehicles and the loco for a short local service. AFAIK▸ , this used to be done at the Cornish end, possibly summer only.
That's right, up until a couple of years ago they were used for a Class 57 hauled Summer Saturday service from St. Erth - Exeter and back, consisting of 3 or 4 coaches.
|
|
|
13
|
Journey by Journey / Plymouth and Cornwall / Re: Another bad day for evening Down Trains in Cornwall.
|
on: January 17, 2020, 08:54:27
|
January has not been a good month for punctuality in Cornwall, in particular evening down trains leaving Plymouth between 1630 and 1800. Repeated problems with signals at Par and this week, failure of track circuits and the new signals at Menheniot. Evening trains yesterday up to 90 minute late at Liskeard, and again today 20-30 minutes late. Yesterday no one seemed to have a clue what was going on, my reliable local contacts said that track circuit failures meant they didnt know where trains were! It does seem a pity after all the investment in extra signals that we now have a rather unreliable service.
In my simplistic view the use of track circuits as a means of detecting the presence/location of a train in this age of advanced telecomms/ GPRS▸ /RFID/Beacon technology, etc, does seem rather archaic and proven to be prone to failure. If each train was fitted with a device that transmits a unique RFID pulse and each signal (and/or other trackside objects) fitted with devices to receive these pulses, isn't that a more resilient and accurate way of tracking trains?
|
|
|
14
|
All across the Great Western territory / Across the West / Re: IETs into passenger service from 16 Oct 2017 and subsequent performance issues
|
on: June 17, 2019, 12:26:26
|
I had my first experience of an IET▸ this weekend, albeit rather short as it was a journey of just ten minutes. I boarded in coach 9 and then immediately the tannoy announced that for passengers wishing to alight at the next stop they could only do so from coaches 1 and 2. So I started what turned out to be a rather long journey through almost the entire train only to meet the trolley in coach 7, which was seemingly popular at this time. I pulled into a vacant seat just behind the attendant and waited for him to finish serving the current customer after which I tapped him on the shoulder and asked if I could please slip past, thinking that he would pull the trolley past where I was stood, I would step into the aisle and carry on up through the train and he would push the trolley back to it's original position. Instead, he said he would just serve the next customer on the table opposite and I'd be able to move then, so I waited as the passing scenery increasingly took on the form of that approaching my desired stop.....when the trolley then moved past the attendant explained that it can only move in one direction so if he had pulled past me he would not then be able to return to the waiting customer. At that moment I didn't have time to ponder/query this as I still had another 5 coaches and their respective obstacles (i.e. dogs with twisted leads, bags, elbows, etc) to negotiate as the looming form of the Royal Albert Bridge glided past the windows. I don't see any reason for the attendant to be bending the truth on this but purely from a safety perspective I find this rather hard to believe. In the case of an emergency this would create a serious obstacle if only able to move in one direction - can this really be the case? Also....the seats are hard
|
|
|
|