Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 16:55 28 Mar 2024
* Passengers pleaded with knifeman during attack
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Jet2 launches first flight from Liverpool airport
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1988)
Woman found murdered on Orpington to London train (*)

Train RunningCancelled
15:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
15:30 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
16:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
16:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:04 Bristol Temple Meads to Filton Abbey Wood
17:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
17:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:57 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
Short Run
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
13:28 Weymouth to Gloucester
13:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
14:49 Plymouth to Cardiff Central
15:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
15:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
15:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
16:00 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
16:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
17:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
Delayed
12:15 Penzance to London Paddington
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
13:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
14:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 17:04:07 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[133] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[132] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[53] Return of the BRUTE?
[44] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[41] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[32] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
  Home Help Search Calendar Login Register  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  All across the Great Western territory / Fare's Fair / Returning after midnight? - MIND THE APP on: December 13, 2021, 15:00:32
I stumbled into this whilst checking trains to London for New Year's Eve/Day
Using the GWR (Great Western Railway) App I selected an off-peak service for the outward journey.

For the return I searched for 31st December 23:30 and was offered an off-peak day return.
Scrolling forward up to 03:43 (for Maidenhead) I could still have an off-peak return. So far so good. I guess the cut-off point is 04:00 (special for New Year's Day?).

Retracing my steps, I entered 1st January 01:00 and was offered two off-peak singles - nearly twice as much for the same trains. Even if I scrolled backwards to 31st December I would still be charged for two singles.

You can understand the logic but you can't excuse the developers or their management who allowed this glitch to go live. It should never have got past the design stage.

I also tried the National Rail Enquiries app. It has an appalling user interface but as I'd selected an off-peak day return it simply wouldn't let me choose return services that needed two singles i.e. after 04:00.

2  Journey by Journey / Plymouth and Cornwall / Re: GWR bans surfboards from IET services on: May 28, 2019, 10:28:33
"What if the train had been scratched, and then withdrawn for a week to remove the scratch. Consider the legal costs in apportioning blame for the scratch."

Why should surfboards be treated any differently to bicycles? I would have thought that boards were less likely to cause damage than bikes.
3  All across the Great Western territory / Fare's Fair / Re: Cash only station? on: May 14, 2014, 10:44:42
You would think that FGW (First Great Western) would have one or two mobile credit card machines for use in emergencies. Not a hope!
4  Journey by Journey / London to Reading / Re: Person hit by train at West Ealing - 08 May 14 on: May 14, 2014, 10:34:09
What was really annoying was that the last train to Marlow left Maidenhead just 1 minute before the slightly delayed 2300 from Paddington arrived. The ATOC» (Association of Train Operating Companies See - here) help desk (when I found a help point that worked) was completely unable to grasp the situation and authorise a taxi for the stranded passengers.
5  All across the Great Western territory / Across the West / Re: Great Western Main Line electrification - ongoing discussion on: December 31, 2012, 20:52:22
On a lighter note - from First Great Western JourneyCheck:

Quote
15:16 Avonmouth to Bristol Temple Meads due 15:50
This train will be cancelled.
This is due to electrical supply problems.
Message Received: 31/12/2012 14:35

 Huh

This was at Reading P16 on 12th December. I was last there on the 14th but sans camera.


Edit note: Quote marks fixed. CfN.
6  All across the Great Western territory / Across the West / Re: Great Western Main Line electrification - ongoing discussion on: December 31, 2012, 15:14:57
@Paul7755: "I also thought that the underpass would have been the most obvious/logical place to have a short changeover section, and there have been a number of subsequent statements, (including by NR» (Network Rail - home page) in response to FGW (First Great Western) as recently as last October) that they intend to allow for AC and DC (Direct Current) in the underpass"

It would be preferable to make the changeover in a platform because then there are more options if it fails for any reason. You don't want to have a train stuck in the underpass or needing to reverse out, even though it is bidirectional.

7  All across the Great Western territory / Across the West / Re: Great Western Main Line electrification - ongoing discussion on: December 30, 2012, 00:09:29
Thank you, and yes, having thought about it a little 'Western Explorer's' hunch is probably closer to the mark, though the section that's been done is very much still part of the live railway - I remember hearing that electrification of the new platforms would start to take place by the end of the year, so this may be the first sign of that phase of the work.

I last went into Reading (from Maidenhead) about three weeks ago by which time track had been laid into P13-15 from the Southern underpass. P11 and 12 are blocked by the footbridge support. I didn't notice any masts at that time.

Incidentally, I was told that the underpass was going to be laid with long sleepers so that conductor rail could be added later if needed (and there would also be room for OLE (Overhead Line Equipment, more often "OHLE")). I didn't see whether this had actually been done.
8  Journey by Journey / London to Reading / Re: Four-year-old left on train after doors close - Burnham Station, 1 August 2012 on: December 29, 2012, 15:10:36
Maybe we'll have to add yet another train announcement - "we are now approaching [station] - if you are leaving the train here, please be ready to alight (or "get off", as more people know what that means) as soon as the train arrives as it may only stop for a short time".

Not forgetting to mind the gap and making sure you have all your personal belongings (including children) with you etc.

The nanny state.....

And not forgetting to take a moment to read the important safety information in the vestibule. Has any passenger (sorry, customer) ever been seen to get up and read the safety notices as a result of such an announcement? At least they now use "in the vestibule" instead of "which are located / adjacent to the / train doors" which took three passes to display on the old system.
9  All across the Great Western territory / Across the West / Re: Great Western Main Line electrification - ongoing discussion on: December 29, 2012, 14:34:02
I think it was always the plan to make passive provision for electrification during the Reading remodelling. It makes sense, in order to minimise disruption later, to do as much as possible in places that are currently away from the live railway. I suspect that now electrification beyond the extent of Crossrail is going ahead, it's worth putting up the masts before the new platforms open.
10  Journey by Journey / Thames Valley Branches / Re: Shiplake level crossing incidents - merged topics on: December 09, 2012, 21:06:12


The NR» (Network Rail - home page) links are now defunct.
11  All across the Great Western territory / Across the West / Re: Great Western Main Line electrification - ongoing discussion on: November 20, 2012, 21:31:00
I remember the 4DDs. There was one coach standing outside Chart Leacon for a long time. The forced ventillation didn't work very well and they were very stuffy when full. And it took an age for people to clamber down the steps from the upper compartments.
12  All across the Great Western territory / Across the West / Re: Great Western Main Line electrification - ongoing discussion on: November 20, 2012, 20:51:43
Picking up the double deck debate...
Low platforms on the continent mean you can  have a lower saloon with entrance doors between the bogies and gangways on the upper deck only. That's not really feasible with the UK (United Kingdom) platform height. Apart from that station dwell times would be significantly increased, which is not a good idea if you want to put 24tph through the central section.
13  All across the Great Western territory / Across the West / Re: The new franchise - what will happen to LTV services over the next 10 years? on: November 20, 2012, 20:28:08
I don't think there are any 2-car 25kV electric units, but as you say it would just about be possible to squeeze a 3-car unit into the down platform at Bourne End. One driver did make an attempt at extending the line a few years ago, and the result made the front of the local papers :-( I think it was after that that they installed the friction buffer stops.

There's no chance of any more third rail electrification outside existing areas, and NR» (Network Rail - home page) would like to convert the SE to overhead. However if the Southampton-Basingstoke section is converted to AC then some of the redundant equipment could be used for infill on less heavily used lines such as North Downs, Uckfield or Marsh Link. That would require dual voltage stock on the Soton/Weymouth services.
14  All across the Great Western territory / Across the West / Re: The new franchise - what will happen to LTV services over the next 10 years? on: November 20, 2012, 15:39:29
Hello! I've just come across this forum. We're wondering how the Marlow branch would be operated post-electrification. One possibility would be a stored energy solution between Bourne End and Marlow along with an all-day half-hourly service to Maidenhead. Some EMUs (Electric Multiple Unit) will of course be displaced from Liverpool Street services by Crossrail and it wouldn't be difficult to convert some 315s to 3 cars, but they will be pretty well life expired by that time.

Conversion to a tramway and extension to High Wycombe had been mooted, and that would have atractions for the local community. Also it might be easier to circumvent the places where the trackbed has been built over, in particular at Wooburn. Loudwater is not so easy because of the M40 but light industrial premeses would be easier to relocate. However reinstating the line for heavy rail would provide a diversionary route for the Chiltern line and open up the possibility of a HW to Heathrow service once Heathrow western access is complete. Also commuters on the line value their through services to/from London in the peaks.

The Greenford service from West Ealing could be extended over the GW (Great Western) line to South Ruislip and West Ruislip, where reversal would be easier, and transferred to the Chiltern franchise. This would require reinstatement of platforms at Greenford and Northolt. This would provide a useful connection between the Chiltern main line and Crossrail without requiring a short hop on the Central line. Should the HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) interchange at Old Oak Common be built then a full service could be restored from the Chiltern line to OOC (Old Oak Common (depot)). Currently there's just the Parliamentary into Paddington once a day and one wonders what will happen to that when Crossrail starts operating.
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page