Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 08:55 29 Mar 2024
- Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
- Easter getaway begins with flood alerts in place
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
08:46 Bedwyn to Newbury
09:00 Gatwick Airport to Reading
09:54 Bedwyn to Newbury
10:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:29 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
12:52 Bedwyn to Newbury
Short Run
05:33 Plymouth to London Paddington
06:37 Plymouth to London Paddington
07:03 London Paddington to Paignton
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
08:41 Westbury to Bristol Temple Meads
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
09:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
Delayed
05:03 Penzance to London Paddington
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 09:13:54 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[109] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[72] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[67] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[66] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[59] Return of the BRUTE?
[41] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
  Print  
Author Topic: Great Western Franchise Consultation  (Read 31541 times)
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18895



View Profile
« Reply #30 on: February 02, 2013, 09:49:45 »

A peppercorn rate would never be acceptable to the hareholders.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
TerminalJunkie
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 919



View Profile
« Reply #31 on: February 02, 2013, 10:39:05 »

hareholders

Got 'em by the long and fluffies?
Logged

Daily Mail and Daily Express readers please click here.
Network SouthEast
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 492



View Profile
« Reply #32 on: February 02, 2013, 10:42:20 »

A peppercorn rate would never be acceptable to the hareholders.
It would be more acceptable than DOR running the show.

They'll also gain another two years experience running the franchise, which should bode well for any future re-bid too.
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18895



View Profile
« Reply #33 on: February 02, 2013, 10:57:21 »

A peppercorn rate would never be acceptable to the shareholders.
It would be more acceptable than DOR running the show.

More acceptable to who? Certainly not the board of directors who would be breaking the law if they didn't maximise the return to shareholders (Section 172 Companies Act 2006).
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #34 on: February 02, 2013, 11:00:22 »

Yes but the law does allow them to take a slightly longer term view.  I would suppose we are talking about a cost plus management contract. In which case they would not actually be making a loss!
Logged
Trowres
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 750


View Profile
« Reply #35 on: February 02, 2013, 21:26:19 »

I thought it might be worthwhile quoting s172 of the Companies Act 2006:
Quote
172 Duty to promote the success of the company
(1)A director of a company must act in the way he considers, in good faith, would be most likely to promote the success of the company for the benefit of its members as a whole, and in doing so have regard (amongst other matters) to^
(a)the likely consequences of any decision in the long term,
(b)the interests of the company's employees,
(c)the need to foster the company's business relationships with suppliers, customers and others,
(d)the impact of the company's operations on the community and the environment,
(e)the desirability of the company maintaining a reputation for high standards of business conduct, and
(f)the need to act fairly as between members of the company.
I have omitted parts 2 and 3 as they are less relevant.
Logged
swrural
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 647


View Profile
« Reply #36 on: February 02, 2013, 22:04:07 »

'Ask the experts' time please.  Now I know what TUPE (The Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006.) means, could they not just make a deal with the most senior TUPE people in FGW (First Great Western) and ask them to form a company called "Now a New GW (Great Western)" or something, and give them a management contract?  I imagine such senior people all meet this 'safety case' thing, a term which does not sound logical English to me, so it must be American, I expect.

Just on another tack, I cannot believe that FGW will not apply for compensation for having been mucked about.
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17865


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #37 on: February 02, 2013, 22:13:13 »

... could they not just make a deal with the most senior TUPE (The Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006.) people in FGW (First Great Western) and ask them to form a company called "Now a New GW (Great Western)" or something, and give them a management contract?

Wouldn't that be merely offering an extension of the existing franchise to the existing management of First Great Western, in all but a new name?
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18895



View Profile
« Reply #38 on: February 02, 2013, 22:31:41 »

With First Group's share price having taking a hefty hit over the past few days following the release of the report into the franchising fiasco, I don't think the board are going to be suggesting to shareholders that they show some altruism and offer to run the franchise for two years for nothing. Shareholders and altruism are unlikely bedfellows.

First Group will be looking to get the maximum return from the management contract.

My real fear for the future is that the fiasco will have put off all the other original bidders for the various paused franchises and they won't bother re-bidding (in the cases of Greater Western and InterCity West Coast), or will withdraw their bids following the amended Invitations to Tender for the Thameslink, Southern & Great Northern (TSGN) and Essex Thameside franchises. Leaving the incumbents as the only show in town.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #39 on: February 02, 2013, 22:44:07 »

Well unless I am reading the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) press release incorrectly they haven't completely ruled out DOR yet:

Quote
I am mindful of my statutory duty to ensure the continuity of rail services and so, in parallel with my department entering into negotiations with the incumbent train operators, I will also be instructing Directly Operated Railways, a government owned company, to undertake the minimum preparatory measures necessary to operate train services in circumstances where I am unable to agree the terms of an interim agreement with the existing train operator
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #40 on: February 02, 2013, 22:51:56 »

I think that's to try and make sure that the incumbent operator doesn't have DaFT» (Department for Transport - critical sounding abbreviation I discourage - about) completely over a barrel in terms of negotiations of the management contract. Though whether it succeeds will depend on how the current operator judges the actual ability of the department to implement DOR control and at what cost.
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #41 on: February 02, 2013, 22:56:02 »

Unless they were thinking of pulling out of rail franchising all together, I do not think First Group would willingly part with their senior management team at FGW (First Great Western).  

If they cannot agree a management contract with DfT» (Department for Transport - about) then they will have to pay them to do very little until the next franchise bid comes up for preparation.

The longer they are not running a railway he less useful they will be.

So if they want to remain in the rail franchising business they will "need to foster the company's business relationships with suppliers, customers and others" namely DfT  and, given the extraordinary publicity campaign that Virgin ran over the WCML (West Coast Main Line) franchise, also FGW's customers and the public.

Don't forget DfT asked Directly Operated Railways to do the MINIMUM NECESSARY. 
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17865


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #42 on: February 02, 2013, 23:09:19 »

From the Telegraph:

Quote
Government faces 'challenge' to recruit vital rail experts

Attracting private sector rail experts to run government franchise teams in the wake of the West Coast Main Line fiasco will be a ^challenge^, the chairman of Eurostar told MPs (Member of Parliament).

Richard Brown, who last week published a report into the future of rail franchising, warned lower pay and the limitations of working in the civil service will make it difficult for the Government to recruit skilled staff from the private sector. Mr Brown told the Commons Transport Select Committee there were plenty of experts within the rail industry with experience of dealing with complex rail franchises. However, persuading those individuals to enter the civil service wouldn^t be easy, he suggested.

^I think there is a particular challenge for the department [of Transport], as there would be for any other government department, in getting those sorts of people to come and work within a civil service structure,^ Mr Brown said. ^They [the DfT» (Department for Transport - about)] will have to take some difficult decisions about terms and conditions and pay, and give reassurances they will be given the headroom to actually deliver what the government want.^
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
swrural
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 647


View Profile
« Reply #43 on: February 03, 2013, 13:53:57 »

... could they not just make a deal with the most senior TUPE (The Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006.) people in FGW (First Great Western) and ask them to form a company called "Now a New GW (Great Western)" or something, and give them a management contract?

Wouldn't that be merely offering an extension of the existing franchise to the existing management of First Great Western, in all but a new name?

I thought the difference between the TUPEs and the top brass (should emphasise I only have had helpful contact with the top brass of FGW and have great respect for them) is that the people who 'lose' their jobs when a franchise changes are the 'top brass' and the tupes go on running the show. 

It just occurred to me that a DOR operation is just the top brass (only without bonuses )so what really is the problem during the interregnum caused by the franchising fiasco?  One could even hire in those top brass to DOR if they feel like it?
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #44 on: February 03, 2013, 14:43:12 »

I thought the difference between the TUPEs (The Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006.) and the top brass (should emphasise I only have had helpful contact with the top brass of FGW (First Great Western) and have great respect for them) is that the people who 'lose' their jobs when a franchise changes are the 'top brass' and the tupes go on running the show. 

It just occurred to me that a DOR operation is just the top brass (only without bonuses )so what really is the problem during the interregnum caused by the franchising fiasco?  One could even hire in those top brass to DOR if they feel like it?

They don't loose their jobs if the main company (First Group in this instance) decide that they need them in order to put in a franchise bid for another line. If First Group wanted to keep them for a later franchise bid I am sure they could find them something to do and continue to pay them.  Directly Operated Railways could try and employ them, but the people concerned are entitled to make their own choice as to who they work for. 

Without such people First Group would not be in a position to make further franchise bids. 
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page