Train Graphic
Great Western Passengers' Forum Great Western Coffee Shop - [home] and [about]
This site uses cookies - see [here] for details.
If you proceed, we will take that as your consent to accept cookies
Random Image
Current Train Running Road Report Acronyms/Abbreviations Station Comparator Rail News FGW co. site Site Style 1 2 3
May 25, 2013, 08:21:50 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
Author Topic: Cutting less used stops in the new franchise?  (Read 2128 times)
eightf48544
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2700


View Profile Email
« Reply #30 on: January 13, 2012, 01:29:29 PM »

Some excellent points and interesting analyses Grahame.

Taking point e nearby statons. This can often be played out as rivalry even if served by same TOC. Take Taplow and Bourne End they can be seen as rivals particularly by the branch as Taplow has a more frequent (halfhourly as opposed to hourly) shorter journey times, you're already on the Mainline no change at Maidenhead (off peak), cheaper fares. They are 6.2 miles apart by rail and 4.9 by road. We have lots of free parking admittedly on the road. The only disadvantage is we don't have Sunday service.

High Wycombe and Beconsfield are also rivals to Bourne End but that's good because it's competition FGW versus Chiltern see other posts on this board.

Re Coombe Halt one of the problems is that it is 10 chains or 220 yards beyond the junction so a train has to do an extra 1/4 mile to serve it. I wonder if there is case for experimenting with making it an automated request stop. i was thinking CCTV and a phone to Lisguard box (Thames Valley Control centre later) plus a light signal at the junction to indicate if the train is to stop.

Re service patterns I am wondering if in places like Cornwall there should be a DB type pattern of service IC Inter City, Regional Express RB Regional Bus (All stations) This would probably mean more trains overall but giving say larger stations like Truo at least 2 tph each direction, lesser stations Bomin Road 1 tph and smaller stations one train every two hours. ICs would be through to Padd, Some REs and RBs could start from say Falmouth or Newquay. The RE's would end at Bristol perhaps being overtaken at Truro, Plymouth, Newton Abbot, Exeter, Taunton and/or Weston super Mare.  RBs terminate at Plymouth or Exeter. The whole servcie intergrated with ICs and RBs starting from Paignton. Don't see much point in REs from Torquay as apart from Torre there aren't any stations to be left out. The RB could connect into the Cornwall Bristol RE at Newton Abbot. The trouble is most of the overtaking staions would require additional to to allow overtaking and possibly cross platform interchange.

Also think it could work for Melksham if Bradford North curve was reopened then the Bristol London RE would go via Bradford on Avon and Melksham, leaving the mainline clear for the ICs to miss Chippenham on some journeys.

It would as I say also require more trains perhaps slightly less intensively used than current stock at present . But that should improve reliability but will greately upset the "Bean Counters" who think stock should be turning a wheel 25 hours a day.

Tehre is a form of this service in teh thames Vally where off peak it is often possible to change at Slough or Reading from or to teh Fast Oxfors from or to an intermediate station. Thus i take the Fast Oxford to Slough and change for Taplow. You could also do this for Hayes Reading changing into the fast Oxford at Slough.

Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of First Great Western, for customers of First Great Western and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by a customer of First Great Western, and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.firstgreatwestern.co.uk for the official First Great Western website. Please contact the adminstrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants