Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 03:15 24 Apr 2024
- Two airlifted to hospital after light aircraft crashes
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

No 'On This Day' events reported for 24th Apr

Train RunningNo cancellations or delays
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 24, 2024, 03:18:09 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[228] Lack of rolling stock due to attacks on shipping in the Red Se...
[101] You see all sorts on the bus.
[97] "Mayflower"
[91] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[61] Death of another bus station?
[36] Rail unions strike action 2022/2023/2024
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4
  Print  
Author Topic: Some thoughts on near and far future possibilities  (Read 28971 times)
6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2754



View Profile Email
« Reply #15 on: December 28, 2011, 14:28:52 »

Just to follow up on the sidmouth idea.... That covers such a small population it's pointless, however sidmouth-ottery st Mary-Fenton-Exeter central could be a plan
Logged
FlyingDutchman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 137


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: December 28, 2011, 19:06:53 »

Hi

I will just add the following link

http://www.avocetline.org.uk/rail-group-seeks-new-trains-and-more-stations/



http://www.tarkarail.org/page36.html

Guy
Logged
Chafford1
Full Member
***
Posts: 86


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: December 28, 2011, 19:29:40 »



An Adelante service from Barnstaple to Paddington via Honiton and Yeovil  Smiley
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10117


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: December 29, 2011, 14:20:29 »

And my favoruite which no-one has mentioned Bourne End High Wycombe (to be heavy rail to linked to East West via Aylesbury and Bicester,

I have to say I'd give this a less than 1% chance at best of ever re-opening.  So much of the old route has been obliterated by housing, roads or business parks that, in my eyes, it simply isn't practical for the level of benefits it would give.

That's why East-West Rail is such a good scheme - the route is protected in full (as far as Bedford at least), so aside from embankment and structure renewals, you have a much firmer footing to start with and don't have to either bulldoze housing estates or seek a new alignment somewhere in the Chiltern hills!  That's also why the line to Portishead should be given a huge push.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4362


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: December 29, 2011, 22:27:48 »

And my favoruite which no-one has mentioned Bourne End High Wycombe (to be heavy rail to linked to East West via Aylesbury and Bicester,

I have to say I'd give this a less than 1% chance at best of ever re-opening.  So much of the old route has been obliterated by housing, roads or business parks that, in my eyes, it simply isn't practical for the level of benefits it would give.

That's why East-West Rail is such a good scheme - the route is protected in full (as far as Bedford at least), so aside from embankment and structure renewals, you have a much firmer footing to start with and don't have to either bulldoze housing estates or seek a new alignment somewhere in the Chiltern hills!  That's also why the line to Portishead should be given a huge push.
I agree the Bourne End to High Wycombe has do chance of reopening, I do believe the East-West Rail on the western section has a very good chance of becoming a reality unless it get bogged down by any planning storm caused by HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) in the area.

Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #20 on: December 30, 2011, 08:34:52 »

Re Bourne End wycombe, of course, if we were really serious about railways we could revert to our Victorian ancestors way of dealing with obstacles and until recently the road lobby and just remove the buildings in the way.

What was it 14,000 house to build St Pancras and a whole road of houses in East London for a Motorway!
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4362


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: December 30, 2011, 10:11:37 »

Re Bourne End wycombe, of course, if we were really serious about railways we could revert to our Victorian ancestors way of dealing with obstacles and until recently the road lobby and just remove the buildings in the way.

What was it 14,000 house to build St Pancras and a whole road of houses in East London for a Motorway!
Yes and there are a lot of examples, for the rail route between Maidenhead and High Wycombe to be re-established there needs to be a greater desire for than there currently is to make the demolition of many houses and business palatable, to make the journey times viable there would need to be double track sections and not rely on passing loops, the other major hurdle to over come which was the thing that killed the line in 1970 the number of level crossings between Bourne End and High Wycombe 5 of them, yes 1970 was about manning cost / conversion todays argument would be about introducing something Network Rail is doing is best to get rid of
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
centralman
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 28


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: December 31, 2011, 00:17:18 »

I would like to see the winner of the new franchise pay half of the cost of reopening the Portishead railway line considering they will be running the service when it does reopen.
Logged
TerminalJunkie
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 919



View Profile
« Reply #23 on: December 31, 2011, 00:20:59 »

I would like to see the winner of the new franchise pay half of the cost of reopening the Portishead railway line considering they will be running the service when it does reopen.

Why? Don't you want it to reopen?
Logged

Daily Mail and Daily Express readers please click here.
centralman
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 28


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: December 31, 2011, 01:09:46 »

I would like to see the winner of the new franchise pay half of the cost of reopening the Portishead railway line considering they will be running the service when it does reopen.

Why? Don't you want it to reopen?

Of course I do. What I'm saying is that the winner of the franchise should try and help with the investment of reopening it.
Logged
TerminalJunkie
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 919



View Profile
« Reply #25 on: December 31, 2011, 01:44:51 »

What I'm saying is that the winner of the franchise should try and help with the investment of reopening it.

But all they will do is plug that cost into the bid they submit, plus a bit extra to screw more money out of the taxpayer keep their shareholders happy. In effect, it will just end up costing more.
Logged

Daily Mail and Daily Express readers please click here.
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: December 31, 2011, 12:42:06 »

But all they will do is plug that cost into the bid they submit, plus a bit extra to screw more money out of the taxpayer keep their shareholders happy. In effect, it will just end up costing more.

But it will then count as private finance not public and therefore, by some magic, good rather than bad.
Logged
centralman
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 28


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: December 31, 2011, 15:05:17 »

What I'm saying is that the winner of the franchise should try and help with the investment of reopening it.

But all they will do is plug that cost into the bid they submit, plus a bit extra to screw more money out of the taxpayer keep their shareholders happy. In effect, it will just end up costing more.

Yeah, but if they put money in themselves it means less money for the taxpayer (North Somerset Council) to fork up getting it running.
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #28 on: December 31, 2011, 16:02:56 »

Yeah, but if they put money in themselves it means less money for the taxpayer (North Somerset Council) to fork up getting it running.

I know its madness! But thats the private finance initiative for you. 
« Last Edit: December 31, 2011, 18:32:14 by ellendune » Logged
FlyingDutchman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 137


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: December 31, 2011, 18:13:29 »

It may be interesting see a Adelante service from Barnstaple to Paddington via Honiton and Yeovil

Guy
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page