Train Graphic
Great Western Passengers' Forum Great Western Coffee Shop - [home] and [about]
This site uses cookies - see [here] for details.
If you proceed, we will take that as your consent to accept cookies
Random Image
Current Train Running Road Report Acronyms/Abbreviations Station Comparator Rail News FGW co. site Site Style 1 2 3
June 19, 2013, 11:04:38 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Franchise specification - Customer service quality  (Read 401 times)
ellendune
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 687


View Profile
« on: December 30, 2011, 01:30:39 PM »

The regulator in the Water Industry recently introduced a new customer service incentive into the regulatory system for water and sewerage services.  This brings in points for complaints at different levels from 1 for an unwanted phone call up to 1000 for a complaint to the Cunsumer Council for Water. 

In this case points do not, however, mean prizes.  Those with the least points might get a small percentage premium on their price increase and those with most points a small percentage decrease.  Small percentages of big numbers are however still big sums of money and this does appear to be transforming customer service in the water industry. 

Would it be desirable or practical to introduce this into the rail franchises?

Logged
matt473
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 374


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: December 30, 2011, 03:33:00 PM »

Practical I doubt due to the pass the blame for delay culture that exists on the railway. But maybe a system where each percentage point over benchmarks for satisfaction levels, cancellations, short turn arounds etc. allows more profit to be made by franchise holder. Carrot works better than the stick and maybe if the financial rewards are great enough, TOCs may invest in new rolling stock themselves to minimise cancellations to recieve more cash. Easier to rewards what TOCs can control as opposed to further increasing the pass the blame game TOCs play
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of First Great Western, for customers of First Great Western and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by a customer of First Great Western, and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.firstgreatwestern.co.uk for the official First Great Western website. Please contact the adminstrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants