Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 19:15 28 Mar 2024
* Easter getaways hit by travel disruption
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Passengers pleaded with knifeman during attack
- Family anger at sentence on fatal crash driver, 19
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1988)
Woman found murdered on Orpington to London train (*)

Train RunningCancelled
17:48 Reading to Gatwick Airport
17:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:57 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:08 London Paddington to Frome
Additional 18:25 Shalford to Reading
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
18:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
19:23 Reading to Gatwick Airport
19:24 Newbury to Bedwyn
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
19:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
20:16 Frome to Westbury
20:49 Newbury to Bedwyn
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
21:16 Bedwyn to Newbury
21:53 Newbury to Bedwyn
22:25 Bedwyn to Newbury
22:47 Newbury to Bedwyn
Short Run
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
16:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:30 London Paddington to Taunton
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
17:50 Gloucester to Salisbury
17:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
18:18 Newbury to London Paddington
18:19 Reading to Gatwick Airport
18:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
18:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
18:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
19:06 London Paddington to Bedwyn
19:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
20:42 Bedwyn to London Paddington
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
13:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
14:15 Penzance to London Paddington
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
Additional 17:17 Exeter St Davids to Penzance
Additional 17:26 Castle Cary to Penzance
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 18:25 Shalford to Reading
19:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
etc
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 19:20:54 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[133] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[132] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[53] Return of the BRUTE?
[44] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[41] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[32] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 19 20 [21] 22 23 ... 78
  Print  
Author Topic: Intercity Express Programme (IEP) - ongoing discussion  (Read 743752 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #300 on: September 24, 2013, 13:06:56 »

Makes no difference really, it's still demand at Didcot ...

No, it does make a difference ... if it is demand from people who want to travel to Oxford, etc., then the choice between changing onto the Thames Valley train at Didcot, or onto a Bristol to Bedford service at Swindon is going to come down to a good journey profile.  But if the flow is to Didcot itself ...
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #301 on: September 24, 2013, 13:15:46 »

Errr....suggestion was to NOT stop at Swindon either...:-)
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #302 on: September 24, 2013, 16:27:47 »

Errr....suggestion was to NOT stop at Swindon either...:-)

Oh I know ... I'm musing wider on where we may be going in the future.   
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #303 on: September 29, 2013, 22:33:22 »

For those who are interested, this month's Modern Railways has the latest seating plans. A new measure, posterior/loo is introduced, which hints that leg room may become cross-legged room.

Also, no facility for a buffet car, just a trolley service. I wonder has any modelling been done as to how long it would take a trolley to get through 526 (standard) seats. (One problem with a trolley is that passengers feel they have to wait for the trolley to get to them, rather than going to the buffet when they feel like it.)

Given the problems last time FGW (First Great Western) tried to introduce trolleys, I wonder has this been thought through. Although I understand that EMT» (East Midlands Trains - about) has switched to trolleys, so maybe DfT» (Department for Transport - about) regard this as not a problem.

Another negative, from my perspective, is that the vast majority of the first class single seats become 'uni-directional" (aka airline). For solo business travellers wanting to spread paperwork, laptop etc, I suspect they'll migrate to the tabled double seats, leaving the single seats relatively unused.
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #304 on: September 30, 2013, 08:40:25 »

I have long held rather negative views regarding these new trains, and the recent magazine article has reinforced such views.

Well over half the seats in steerage are bus style, not facing across tables.
No catering beyond a trolley in steerage
Not enough toilets.
The wretched bus seats have even invaded first class.
A very low proportion of First class for long distance business travel.

Leg room remains to be seen, but experience with other new trains suggests that it will be worse than expected.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #305 on: September 30, 2013, 11:32:31 »

The stats on buffet vs trolley are interesting.

TOCs (Train Operating Company) report better sales from a trolley - probably because pax don't like leaving their seats and can make on-the-spot decisions as the trolley passes....I think we've possibly seen the end of buffets.

Women *like* bus seats in general, coz they hate playing footsie under tables. Come & watch pax on Chiltern....but 1st class is meant for business and thus each seat ought to have a proper table.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #306 on: September 30, 2013, 12:20:13 »

but 1st class is meant for business and thus each seat ought to have a proper table.

At certain times of the day, yes.  But with the advent of cheaper 1st class advances, it is becoming more and more for the 'masses' who just want a more comfortable journey.  For example, the number of elderly passengers who use a senior railcard in combination with an advance 1st class ticket has rocketed in the last ten years, with my own parents joining that particular club whenever they can.  I can tell you right now that their own personal preference is for two airline seats with a nice view out of the window.  So, providing some airline style seats is no bad thing in my mind, though the ratio of tabled seats should be much higher in first class than airline - say a 75/25% split or thereabouts?  Not sure what the rstio is with the latest specification?
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #307 on: September 30, 2013, 12:32:06 »

I suspect that when the new trains come into use, that we will see far fewer heavily discounted first class tickets being sold.
Surely the purpose of the present heavily discounted advance first tickets is to fill first class seats that would otherwise be unused.
The new trains have a much smaller percentage of first class, therefore much less need for discounting to fill them.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Rhydgaled
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1500


View Profile WWW
« Reply #308 on: September 30, 2013, 14:38:12 »

I have long held rather negative views regarding these new trains, and the recent magazine article has reinforced such views.

Well over half the seats in steerage are bus style, not facing across tables.
No catering beyond a trolley in steerage
Not enough toilets.
The wretched bus seats have even invaded first class.
A very low proportion of First class for long distance business travel.

Leg room remains to be seen, but experience with other new trains suggests that it will be worse than expected.
The main problems with 'bus seats' in my opinion are lack of legroom and fact half of them will normally align with a window pillar, because the size of windows does not really permitt a seating layout that ensures all seats have an unobstructed view, unless all seats are at table bays. The only stock I've used which provides plenty of legroom in 'bus-style' seating is class 175s, but they have an array of other aspects which are rather less attractive.

As for catering, I think the old spec of an 8-car IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) DID» (Didcot Parkway - next trains) have a buffet in standard class. I wonder who (DfT» (Department for Transport - about), Hitachi, East Coast or FirstGW) made the decision to restrict buffet/kitchen facilities to first class?

The stats on buffet vs trolley are interesting.

TOCs (Train Operating Company) report better sales from a trolley - probably because pax don't like leaving their seats and can make on-the-spot decisions as the trolley passes....I think we've possibly seen the end of buffets.

Women *like* bus seats in general, coz they hate playing footsie under tables. Come & watch pax on Chiltern....but 1st class is meant for business and thus each seat ought to have a proper table.
I suppose I don't often have somebody sit opposite me at a table, but when I do it rarely seems to cause footsie. Footsie seems to be more likely when the the seat opposite is facing the same way as the seat behind it (as opposed to the seats being back-to-back).

I understand passengers not wanting to leave their seats. However, a trolley does not provide a sufficently wide range of options. Most importantly, they do not provide proper meals, only snacks. If making a long road journey, one has a chance of finding motorway services en-route able to serve you a full evening meal. On a long rail journey that doesn't involve an INTERCITY service (and even they rarely have a cooked meal service and when they do the menu doesn't normally appeal to me) you might reach your destination and find the pubs are shut or only serve drinks. You are left with a peice of flapjack from the trolley for dinner. Not at all satisfying. We need more trains with buffets, not less, in my opinion.

What really gets me with IEP is there is still a kitchen, but only in the 1st class driving vehicle. British Rail had it right with the IC225 and IC125, there is only one buffet car but it is suitated between 1st and standard, meaning either can make use of it.
Logged

----------------------------
Don't DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18894



View Profile
« Reply #309 on: September 30, 2013, 14:47:59 »

I suspect that when the new trains come into use, that we will see far fewer heavily discounted first class tickets being sold.
Surely the purpose of the present heavily discounted advance first tickets is to fill first class seats that would otherwise be unused.
The new trains have a much smaller percentage of first class, therefore much less need for discounting to fill them.

On the major flow (London<->Bristol) that these trains will be running on, there is expected to be a doubling of frequency. Doesn't that mean extra seats in both Standard and First?

Other flows, such as London<->Cheltenham, London<->Westbury/Exeter and London<->Worcester/Hereford are also expected to see an increased frequency.

Now both the interior specification and the final timetables are neither set in stone yet, so it remains to be seen; what the catering will be, how many toilets there are, how many airline seats/tables there are, what the proportion of Advance Purchase fares will be.

Regarding buffets specifically, I'll also mourn their passing, but if anyone can find a way to make the space pay, versus using it for seating, then it'd be wrong to not have them. Truth is, they rarely cover their costs.

New trains, faster journey times, increased frequency. It's all doom and gloom isn't it?  Roll Eyes
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #310 on: September 30, 2013, 14:55:25 »

I suspect that when the new trains come into use, that we will see far fewer heavily discounted first class tickets being sold.
Surely the purpose of the present heavily discounted advance first tickets is to fill first class seats that would otherwise be unused.
The new trains have a much smaller percentage of first class, therefore much less need for discounting to fill them.

And to add to bignosemac's comments, my parents usually use CrossCountry which, despite it's terrible crowding and single first class carriage on the routes they travel on, still manages to provide some very reasonable first class advance prices.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #311 on: September 30, 2013, 15:22:05 »


"As for catering, I think the old spec of an 8-car IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) DID» (Didcot Parkway - next trains) have a buffet in standard class. I wonder who (DfT» (Department for Transport - about), Hitachi, East Coast or FirstGW) made the decision to restrict buffet/kitchen facilities to first class?"

This is known as progress ! Still time for more progress.
I suspect that when the trains arrive, that "capacity will have been improved" that is at least one more row of seats, 92 per vehicle instead of 88, and one or two fewer toilets.

Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #312 on: September 30, 2013, 16:07:21 »

Can anyone save me the bother of looking it up, by telling me how the cattle class seat pitch differs between the current IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) proposal and the HST (High Speed Train)? If they have reduced it by more than about a millimetre, then that'll be the end of long-distance rail travel for me.
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #313 on: September 30, 2013, 16:20:25 »


"As for catering, I think the old spec of an 8-car IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) DID» (Didcot Parkway - next trains) have a buffet in standard class. I wonder who (DfT» (Department for Transport - about), Hitachi, East Coast or FirstGW) made the decision to restrict buffet/kitchen facilities to first class?"

This is known as progress ! Still time for more progress.
I suspect that when the trains arrive, that "capacity will have been improved" that is at least one more row of seats, 92 per vehicle instead of 88, and one or two fewer toilets.

No surprise to see you decline to comment on bignosemac and my responses to your rather swingeing statement about availability of advance first class fares come the advent of IEP's, and instead choose to repeat the same old opinions and phrases.   Undecided

At the end of the day we'll just have to wait and see when we first get to see one in its final specification in real life.  Not too long now.  Should it be an absolute disaster in every respect like you predict then I will happily hold up my hands and say so (as well as being bloody annoyed with the DfT!).

Can anyone save me the bother of looking it up, by telling me how the cattle class seat pitch differs between the current IEP proposal and the HST (High Speed Train)? If they have reduced it by more than about a millimetre, then that'll be the end of long-distance rail travel for me.

I think it increases, but I'll let someone save me the bother of looking it up too.   Wink
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
anthony215
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1260


View Profile Email
« Reply #314 on: September 30, 2013, 18:05:34 »

Yes the IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) class 800/801 units have more seats in each carriage compared to a hst although not by much.

Anyway we should have a better understanding of how these new units will be like when the mock up is completed.

I do hope that they wont be but I can see us having some problems with these new trains although I do hope they will not be really problematic
« Last Edit: September 30, 2013, 18:49:34 by anthony215 » Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 19 20 [21] 22 23 ... 78
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page