Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 12:15 29 Mar 2024
* Delays at Dover as millions begin Easter getaway
* Attempted murder charge after man stabbed on train
- KFC Nigeria sorry after disabled diner refused service
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
09:30 Weymouth to Gloucester
11:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
12:17 Westbury to Swindon
12:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
12:52 Bedwyn to Newbury
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
13:21 Newbury to Bedwyn
13:48 Bedwyn to Newbury
14:12 Newbury to Bedwyn
14:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
14:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
15:50 Bedwyn to Newbury
16:15 Newbury to Bedwyn
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
16:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
12:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
09:10 Penzance to London Paddington
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:20 Penzance to London Paddington
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:15 Penzance to London Paddington
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
etc
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 12:21:28 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[124] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[53] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[49] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[48] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[43] Return of the BRUTE?
[30] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 78
  Print  
Author Topic: Intercity Express Programme (IEP) - ongoing discussion  (Read 743842 times)
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17865


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #75 on: August 26, 2012, 21:57:43 »

Surely it is now widely agreed that there needs to be a decent sized van for luggage and bikes!

Says who?  And where are they widely agreeing it?  Roll Eyes
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #76 on: August 26, 2012, 22:05:58 »

Surely it is now widely agreed that there needs to be a decent sized van for luggage and bikes!

Says who?  And where are they widely agreeing it?  Roll Eyes

If cyclists want larger trains to carry their bikes are they prepared to pay for the additional cost, or are they expecting the rest of us to do so?
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #77 on: August 26, 2012, 23:52:50 »

Or the gov pays to encourage cycle travel to improve the environ and cure congestion! Wink

Guard's vans are heavily used where they still exist (holiday trains, Uni term start/end dates).
Having them also means you can cram more seats in the saloons.
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #78 on: August 27, 2012, 10:22:30 »

I can't See any point of a 5 car set, I would of thought they learnt the lessons when they bought the Adelante.

Guy

Agree entirely, we arguably have enough short trains, it is proper full length inter city trains that are needed.
There will of course be some services for which a short train will suffice, but refurbished voyagers and adelantes will be around for many years yet.
Whilst of course short trains can be coupled together, this is often less satisfactory than a full length train.
2 trains each of 5 cars will probably cost more than a single 10 car one.
2 trains each of 5 cars will either have fewer seats or be longer than a single 10 car one.

There is more chance of proper catering being viable on a 10 car train rather than on 2 short ones.
Less staff will normaly be needed for a proper 10 car train than for 2 short ones.
« Last Edit: September 02, 2012, 17:36:03 by broadgage » Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #79 on: August 27, 2012, 16:12:44 »

Where will surfboards be held in the summer on Newquay services?

Agree that the 5 car should be axed. If a train is empty offer lower fares (advance/super off peak) for the section that is quieter.

Look at the roads, whilst we have congestion, there is NO excuse for short or empty trains.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #80 on: August 27, 2012, 16:27:41 »

Where will surfboards be held in the summer on Newquay services?

Irrelevant in the near future.  As discussed many times previously, IEPs (Intercity Express Program / Project.) are not going to be used on the Devon and Cornwall services.

Paul
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10096


View Profile
« Reply #81 on: August 28, 2012, 10:08:15 »

Purely coincidental, but possibly a little worrying for Cotswold Line growth:

Total number of proposed standard class seats on a 5-car IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.)270
Total number of seats on a Class 165 Turbo: 270

Though of course most Cotswold Line services are/will be in the hands of Class 180s (226 standard class seats + 16 tip-ups) or Class 166s (243 standard class seats).  The First Class provision is better with the proposed IEP layout giving 45 first class seats, compared with 42 on a Class 180, 32 on a Class 166 and 16 on a Class 165.

Given that running two IEP's on the Cotswold Line will be impossible, there's not really a huge increase in seating to cover a whole generation of growth, though it could be partially offset by running more trains with further re-doubling.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #82 on: August 28, 2012, 11:44:50 »

True, i forgot about D+C. But there is still no where near enough luggage space. I am actually shocked, as I would have thought the penny would have dropped by now...

Regarding the Cotswold line - this indeed is worrying. At peak times, I can't see any more trains, so the only extra ones will be during the day, when the trains are less full.

Of course, the Thames Turbos can be wedged at weekends and on shoulder peak services, hence the use of HSTs (High Speed Train).

Having trains splitting at Oxford will increase journey times and decrease reliability. Plus how often will a unit get poached for another route, leaving a 5 car all the way to London? Why not use 8 car units, SDO (Selective Door Opening) and cheaper tickets to sell the seats?

Can we keep the HSTs please?
Logged
CLPGMS
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 155


View Profile
« Reply #83 on: August 28, 2012, 12:09:12 »

In addition to the question of short platforms on the Cotswold Line and the need for full HST (High Speed Train) type diesel trains during peak times, has anyone addressed the question of platform clearance at stations which are on a curve - e.g. Worcester Foregate Street?  The extra 3 metres coach length could cause problems, especially with the gap between the train and the platform.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #84 on: August 28, 2012, 14:04:01 »

... has anyone addressed the question of platform clearance at stations which are on a curve - e.g. Worcester Foregate Street?  The extra 3 metres coach length could cause problems, especially with the gap between the train and the platform.

Quote
Gauge clearance for IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) on the following GWML (Great Western Main Line) sections and other associated routes:
Core routes:
o London to Cardiff/Swansea;
o London to Bristol/Weston Super Mare/Taunton;
o London to Gloucester/Cheltenham;
o London to Oxford/Worcester/Hereford; and
o London to Newbury/Westbury/Exeter;
Diversionary routes
o Westbury to Bath Spa;
o Gloucester to Severn Tunnel Junction;
o Cardiff to Bridgend via Barry;
o Castle Cary to Exeter via Yeovil; and
o Reading to Waterloo. Shocked

...is a CP4 (Control Period 4 - the five year period between 2009 and 2014) enhancement project, with design activities ongoing, and work on the ground starting Dec 13.  So yes, it has been addressed.

Paul
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #85 on: August 28, 2012, 14:34:01 »

Great, so they'll have to shave off some of the platform at WOF. So how big will that make the gap? At the moment it's around 2 feet wide and 2 feet up on platform one.

Why not just keep the HSTs (High Speed Train) and 180s?
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #86 on: August 28, 2012, 16:17:39 »

Great, so they'll have to shave off some of the platform at WOF. So how big will that make the gap? At the moment it's around 2 feet wide and 2 feet up on platform one.

Why not just keep the HSTs (High Speed Train) and 180s?

I would presume that any excesive difference in height between platform and train will be eliminated as part of the works.
Not much can be done though about the horizontal gap which will indeed be worse with longer vehicles.

Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
stebbo
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 445


View Profile
« Reply #87 on: September 01, 2012, 21:26:28 »

I think the HSTs (High Speed Train) will be life expired ere too long, although I think they were/have been brilliant. But there's no reason decent size guard's vans (or equivalent) couldn't be built in. Trouble is nobody cares about cyclists and there's no mail/parcels to carry any more because it mostly goes by road/air. Mad......
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #88 on: September 02, 2012, 09:11:28 »

I think the HSTs (High Speed Train) will be life expired ere too long, although I think they were/have been brilliant. But there's no reason decent size guard's vans (or equivalent) couldn't be built in. Trouble is nobody cares about cyclists and there's no mail/parcels to carry any more because it mostly goes by road/air. Mad......

I do not see why the HSTs should soon become life expired, the power cars have recently be re-engined, and the coaches are said to be in good condition, not just comesticly, but structurally.

I agree entirely that it is a mistake to build the new trains without decent sized gaurds vans.
Cycling is increasing as road fuel costs rise, congestion worsens, and the health benifits of cycling become known.
On commuter routes it is perhaps reasonable to suggest that commuters should keep a cycle at the station, or perhaps one at each end, or make use of a hired cycle.
On longer distance routes used by holidaymakers this is not feasible and more cyclists will wish to travell with their machines.
Providing space does cost money, and I dont see why cyclists should not pay for taking a cycle on a train.
Similar arguments apply to surfboards and other bulky articles.
IMHO (in my humble opinion) it is reasonable to charge for conveyance of such, but to effectively prohibit it is unreasonable.

Also due to rising road fuel costs, and enviromental concerns, it is probable that mail, light freight and parcells will return to the rails, during the life of the new trains.

This is also an argument for full length trains.
Providing a proper van on a 10 car train seems reasonable.
Providing 2 such on two 5 car units coupled together, not only wastes space but could result in time wasting confusion as to in which van articles have been/should be stowed.
« Last Edit: September 02, 2012, 17:35:24 by broadgage » Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
dog box
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 653


View Profile
« Reply #89 on: September 02, 2012, 10:54:43 »

As i read on another forum......The Future is Plastic and not very Fantastic
Logged

All postings reflect my own personal views and opinions and are not intended to be, nor should be taken as official statements of first great western or first group policy
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 78
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page