Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 22:35 28 Mar 2024
- Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
* Easter getaways hit by travel disruption
- Where Baltimore bridge investigation goes now
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Family anger at sentence on fatal crash driver, 19
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1988)
Formal end to carrying coffins by BR (link)

Train RunningCancelled
19:35 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
21:30 Shalford to Reading
22:25 Bedwyn to Newbury
22:30 Gatwick Airport to Reading
22:47 Newbury to Bedwyn
Short Run
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
22:10 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
23:04 Reading to Bedwyn
23:17 Bedwyn to Reading
Delayed
19:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:30 Gatwick Airport to Reading
21:45 Penzance to London Paddington
23:45 London Paddington to Penzance
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 22:37:41 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[104] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[103] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[78] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[56] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[41] Return of the BRUTE?
[25] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12 13 ... 78
  Print  
Author Topic: Intercity Express Programme (IEP) - ongoing discussion  (Read 743778 times)
The SprinterMeister
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 665


Trundling round the SW

Chris64ex4@hotmail.com
View Profile Email
« Reply #150 on: September 10, 2012, 14:02:29 »

Also, it's worth saying that most of these operating rules are based on a worst case scenario, i.e. during leaf-fall, and what seems perfectly possible in fine weather soon changes when conditions are different.
Quite. It has been known for 2+8 HST (High Speed Train)'s to get stuck on the Devon banks with both engines running / providing full traction power in extremely poor rail conditions. The operating rules governing running them on one engine over the Devon banks are there for sound reasons based on operational experience.
Logged

Trundling gently round the SW
Southern Stag
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 984


View Profile
« Reply #151 on: September 10, 2012, 14:04:31 »

Or do you go for say Meridians released by Midland main electrification or even more IEPs (Intercity Express Program / Project.).
More IEPs than specified by the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) is probably unlikely because of great cost of them compared to other options.
Logged
Louis94
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 446


View Profile
« Reply #152 on: September 12, 2012, 10:56:14 »

Quite. It has been known for 2+8 HST (High Speed Train)'s to get stuck on the Devon banks with both engines running / providing full traction power in extremely poor rail conditions. The operating rules governing running them on one engine over the Devon banks are there for sound reasons based on operational experience.

That is very true, I have been stuck on a service going up Rattery in this situation - sparks flying from the wheels, strangely enough a service going in the other direction was in the same situation going up Hemerdon at exactly the same time!

With regards to 2+9 HST sets, the diagram for a 2+9 set this summer involved a stop at Totnes going towards Plymouth on its next working - so can't see 2+9s being an issue providing both power cars are working, simple solution if it isn't would be to just not stop. How heavy is a TS compared to a TGS anyway?
Logged
The SprinterMeister
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 665


Trundling round the SW

Chris64ex4@hotmail.com
View Profile Email
« Reply #153 on: September 12, 2012, 14:00:04 »

How heavy is a TS compared to a TGS anyway?
TS is about 1/2 tonne lighter than TGS from memory.
Logged

Trundling gently round the SW
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #154 on: September 16, 2012, 18:50:15 »

The MTU (Motor Traction Unit) engines are indeed limited by the power input of the alternator / rectifier / traction motors they are attached to. The 16V4000R41 is in essence a 1800 rpm engine derated to produce the same BMEP at 1500 rpm to give the required power output. Furthermore below 40 mph the traction system is power limited even further in order to keep traction motor currents at a reasonable value, the more current you put through the motors the more heat is created in the motors themselves. You aren't putting anything like 1775 rail HP down until you hit 40 mph, the actual rail hp diminshes with speed below that speed value. It does on all diesel electric locomotives but it is more noticeable with HST (High Speed Train) due to the higher mechanical axle gearing needed to achieve 125mph running without running the motors at ridiculous rpm figures.

43167-170 were trial fitted with Mirrlees MB190 engines set to 2400 flywheel bhp at 1500 rpm, a major rectifier fire caused the power output to be reduced back to the usual 2250 at 1500 rpm.

There are two other reasons why you may not run the MTU at 1800 rpm, one being the mechanical properites of the alternators themselves and the other being the three phase AC ETS (Electric Train Supply) / Auxilary systems which will not accept current at 60 hz / 1800 rpm due to the mechanical /electrical properties of the various motors and devices fed from the supply on both the power cars and the trailers.

The engine speed would indeed have to be limited to about 1,500 RPM in order to produce 50 cycles AC for auxillary purposes.
I wonder however if the engine speed could be slightly increased up to 1,560 RPM , that would produce AC at 52 cycles which should be acceptable for 50 cycle equipment, remembering that some grid systems and many generators vary that much.
That would provide about 4% more HP, not that much, but it could make the difference between keeping time and not, with an extra coach.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Gordon the Blue Engine
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 752


View Profile
« Reply #155 on: September 17, 2012, 17:28:47 »

SprinterMeister says that the Mirrlees MB190 were de-rated from 2400 to 2250 HP because of a rectifier problem. So that is the issue that needs to be addressed - I think perhaps the idea of increasing crankshaft speed is not the key issue at the moment.

Incidentally, Eurostars and TGV (Train a Grande Vitesse)'s have a motor bogie on the car adjacent to the power car, so that the available power can be put down through more axles with more weight for adhesion.  As has been discussed before, installed power (ie the diesel engine) is only part of the problem in maximising drawbar pull.  AL6 electric locos (high powered, relatively light 4 axle locos with unsophisticated wheelslip protection that used to work on the WCML (West Coast Main Line)) were known to suddenly go into wheelslip at 70mph or more with poor rail conditions.

 
« Last Edit: September 17, 2012, 18:45:47 by Gordon the Blue Engine » Logged
woody
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 525


View Profile
« Reply #156 on: September 19, 2012, 22:15:08 »

MTU (Motor Traction Unit) is to supply diesel powerpacks for Intercity Express Programme.Having provided an engine for test bench trials at the Hitachi plant in Kasado, Japan, MTU has now finalised a novel design designated 12V 1600 R80L and rated at 700 kW.
  By way of comparison the Voyager fleet is powered by the Cummins QSK19 of 560 kW (750 hp)

http://www.railwaygazette.com/news/single-view/view/mtu-to-supply-diesel-powerpacks-for-intercity-express-programme.html
Logged
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #157 on: September 19, 2012, 23:15:37 »

MTU (Motor Traction Unit) is to supply diesel powerpacks for Intercity Express Programme.Having provided an engine for test bench trials at the Hitachi plant in Kasado, Japan, MTU has now finalised a novel design designated 12V 1600 R80L and rated at 700 kW.
  By way of comparison the Voyager fleet is powered by the Cummins QSK19 of 560 kW (750 hp)

http://www.railwaygazette.com/news/single-view/view/mtu-to-supply-diesel-powerpacks-for-intercity-express-programme.html

MTU's own press release gives more detail.
Quote
The pure electric trains are also set to be fitted with one Powerpack each for auxiliary power. Depending on their length, bi-mode vehicles will each have three (five-unit trains), four (eight-unit trains) or five (nine-unit trains) Powerpacks. Prior to today^s announcement, Hitachi has already started intensive tests at their own facilities in Japan using a Powerpack prototype specially prepared by MTU for the joint project. The test program focused on fuel consumption, noise and vibration, power and exhaust emissions.

I make that 3.5MW for a nine-car train.
Logged

Now, please!
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18894



View Profile
« Reply #158 on: September 19, 2012, 23:45:00 »

A good idea to fit one diesel 'Powerpack' to the electric units. As long as it'll generate enough oomph to haul a set when there are the inevitable OHLE failures....
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
Rhydgaled
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1500


View Profile WWW
« Reply #159 on: September 19, 2012, 23:55:21 »

MTU (Motor Traction Unit) is to supply diesel powerpacks for Intercity Express Programme.Having provided an engine for test bench trials at the Hitachi plant in Kasado, Japan, MTU has now finalised a novel design designated 12V 1600 R80L and rated at 700 kW.
  By way of comparison the Voyager fleet is powered by the Cummins QSK19 of 560 kW (750 hp)

http://www.railwaygazette.com/news/single-view/view/mtu-to-supply-diesel-powerpacks-for-intercity-express-programme.html

MTU's own press release gives more detail.
Quote
The pure electric trains are also set to be fitted with one Powerpack each for auxiliary power. Depending on their length, bi-mode vehicles will each have three (five-unit trains), four (eight-unit trains) or five (nine-unit trains) Powerpacks. Prior to today^s announcement, Hitachi has already started intensive tests at their own facilities in Japan using a Powerpack prototype specially prepared by MTU for the joint project. The test program focused on fuel consumption, noise and vibration, power and exhaust emissions.

I make that 3.5MW for a nine-car train.
Going purely on the figures posted above and the fact that a 22x has a diesel engine under each coaches
Class 221 (or 7-car bi-mode) - 5x diesel engines at 560 kW = 2,800 kW
IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) 5-car bi-mode - 3x diesel engines at 700 kW = 2,100 kW
IEP 9-car bi-mode - 5x diesel engines at 700 kW = 3,500 kW
Class 222 6-car (or 8-car bi-mode) - 6x diesel engines at 560 kW = 3,360 kW

Will there really only be 5 diesel engines under a 9-car bi-mode, would that have enough power to reach Aberdeen and Inverness?

I haven't read the links, but do they say what the results of the fuel consumption and emissions tests are, how do they stack up against Voyagers and Meridians on the greenhouse-effect scale?

A good idea to fit one diesel 'Powerpack' to the electric units. As long as it'll generate enough oomph to haul a set when there are the inevitable OHLE failures....
I disagree. One hopes the OHLE on the GWML (Great Western Main Line) will be a reliable design, and they don't increase day-to-day electricity consumption by fitting emergency generators to electric trains in mainline Europe do they?

Now on the ECML (East Coast Main Line), where the OHLE seems rather more prone to falling down than one would expect, fitting a diesel powerpack might not be a bad idea but I still think a smaller, much lighter, engine (enough to keep passengers cool/warm but not shift the train) might make more sense as it would add less to the electricity consumption than one capable of moving the train, which would likely be stuck behind a non-diesel-fitted train anyway.
Logged

----------------------------
Don't DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
woody
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 525


View Profile
« Reply #160 on: September 20, 2012, 00:25:15 »

The International Railway Journal also states "The first train for Great Western will be completed in June 2014, and test operation on the British network is due to begin in May 2015. The trains will enter service on the Great Western Main Line from April 2017, and on the East Coast Main Line from June 2018."

http://www.railjournal.com/index.php/rolling-stock/hitachi-selects-mtu-for-iep-engine-contract.html?channel=542#.UFpS7VG5f0Q
Logged
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #161 on: September 20, 2012, 09:58:12 »

Will there really only be 5 diesel engines under a 9-car bi-mode, would that have enough power to reach Aberdeen and Inverness?

One assumes that someone, somewhere has done the maths on this. Speed does not seem to be of the essence after Edinburgh. 2 hours 20 mins to cover 126 miles is hardly supersonic is it?

The thought occurs to me that if, after 2019, electrification continues, then the bi-mode trains could have some of their diesel power packs removed, to lighten them and improve efficiency. That seems to be the only difference between bi-mode and "pure" electric - the fuel tank and control systems will be largely similar whether there are 5 engines, or just the one. Looks as though MTU (Motor Traction Unit) will still get the contract to maintain them for the full 27.5 years though.
Logged

Now, please!
The SprinterMeister
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 665


Trundling round the SW

Chris64ex4@hotmail.com
View Profile Email
« Reply #162 on: September 20, 2012, 10:41:08 »

The thought occurs to me that if, after 2019, electrification continues, then the bi-mode trains could have some of their diesel power packs removed, to lighten them and improve efficiency.
I don't think you can randomly remove 5 - 6 tonnes of engine-alternator set, fuel tank, radiator and control system from under a passenger coach without seriously upsetting the suspension / ride characteristics, Centre of Gravity / Roll axis etc. Some sort of balance weight will be required to compensate if that is the case.

I'm still very intrigued as to how you fit a large 90 degree V12 diesel engine-alternator set under a passenger coach without raising the internal saloon floor heights a fair bit. This affects things like stepping height from platform and departure angles of wheelchair ramps etc. I am also intrigued to know how you maintain access to the valve rockers, fuel injectors, 'Top Hamper' etc with the engine in situ under the coach without providing access hatches in the floor. It should be remembered that these hatches are not fitted to modern DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit)'s as they were found to be very ineffective in preventing fires from traction equipment on the older type DMMU's from spreading into the interior of the coach. Which is why every DMU from the 14x / 15x onwards have floors with no hatches in them. Insulating the saloon floors from radiated noise and heat could be interesting too.

It will be remembered that the Bombardier 22x were also going to use an earlier variant of MTU (Motor Traction Unit) V12 as the power source but the factors mentioned above caused them to fit the Cummins QSK19-R as it eliminated the problems noted above.
Logged

Trundling gently round the SW
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #163 on: September 20, 2012, 11:39:28 »

A good idea to fit one diesel 'Powerpack' to the electric units. As long as it'll generate enough oomph to haul a set when there are the inevitable OHLE failures....

Agree, I have misgivings about the whole project, but the fitting of a single diesel engine to a nominaly electric train seems an excellent idea.
Not only will the OHLE fail, but the limited diesel power would presumably allow short term/low speed operation on non-electrified diversion routes.

Some miles restricted to say 30MPH is probably less overall delay than attaching a diesel locomotive, or transfering passengers to buses.

I presume that movements at low speed within depots would also be under diesel power, thereby saving the costs and hazards of electrification in depots.

Regular use of the diesel for movement within depots would ensure that the machinery is kept in good working order and does not fall into disuse.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #164 on: September 20, 2012, 11:45:40 »

The International Railway Journal also states "The first train for Great Western will be completed in June 2014, and test operation on the British network is due to begin in May 2015.

Crickey, not long then!
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12 13 ... 78
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page