Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 18:35 28 Mar 2024
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Passengers pleaded with knifeman during attack
- Family anger at sentence on fatal crash driver, 19
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1988)
Woman found murdered on Orpington to London train (*)

Train RunningCancelled
16:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:48 Reading to Gatwick Airport
17:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:57 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:08 London Paddington to Frome
Additional 18:25 Shalford to Reading
18:26 Newbury to Bedwyn
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
18:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
18:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
19:23 Reading to Gatwick Airport
19:24 Newbury to Bedwyn
19:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
19:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
20:16 Frome to Westbury
20:49 Newbury to Bedwyn
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
21:16 Bedwyn to Newbury
Short Run
15:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
15:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
16:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:20 Reading to Gatwick Airport
17:30 London Paddington to Taunton
17:30 Warminster to Bristol Temple Meads
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
17:50 Gloucester to Salisbury
17:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
18:18 Newbury to London Paddington
18:19 Reading to Gatwick Airport
18:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
19:06 London Paddington to Bedwyn
20:42 Bedwyn to London Paddington
Delayed
13:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
14:15 Penzance to London Paddington
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
Additional 17:17 Exeter St Davids to Penzance
Additional 17:26 Castle Cary to Penzance
17:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 18:25 Shalford to Reading
18:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
19:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
etc
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 18:41:27 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[133] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[132] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[53] Return of the BRUTE?
[44] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[41] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[32] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 20 21 [22] 23 24 ... 78
  Print  
Author Topic: Intercity Express Programme (IEP) - ongoing discussion  (Read 743748 times)
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18894



View Profile
« Reply #315 on: September 30, 2013, 18:32:26 »

Yes the IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.)'s have more seats in each carriage compared to a hst although not by much.

Understandable seeing as the IEP carriages are 3m longer than a Mk3.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #316 on: September 30, 2013, 18:33:32 »

Yes the IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.)'s have more seats in each carriage compared to a hst although not by much.

Anyway we should have a better understanding of how the IEP's will be like when the mock up is completed.

I do hope that they wont be but I can see us having some problems with the IEP's

Typical FGW (First Great Western) operated HST (High Speed Train) coach that everyone thinks is wonderful, has 84 mostly airline seats in 23m.   IEP at 88 has 4 more seats in its extra 3m.  I have a theory that seating density won't be the issue for normal passengers, just for those hoping for a 1980s HST layout, which will never appear in new stock again.

By the way, antony215, you appear to have three grocer's apostrophes in your post...

Paul  
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17865


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #317 on: September 30, 2013, 20:40:08 »

By the way, antony215, you appear to have three grocer's apostrophes in your post...

Paul  

I rather think you'll find he's anthony215, Paul.  Wink
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Rhydgaled
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1500


View Profile WWW
« Reply #318 on: September 30, 2013, 21:50:21 »

On the major flow (London<->Bristol) that these trains will be running on, there is expected to be a doubling of frequency. Doesn't that mean extra seats in both Standard and First?
Nope, because over half of the new fleet are currently planned to be 5 carriage formations (compared to today's 2+8 IC125s).

New trains, faster journey times, increased frequency. It's all doom and gloom isn't it?  Roll Eyes
Given that over half the fleet will be overcrowded 5-car diesel-guzzling trains that are likely to lock Weston-Super-Mare and Cheltenham services (which might otherwise be logical progressions of electrfication in CP6 (Control Period 6 - The five year period between 2019 and 2024)) into diesel traction for another 15 years, yes. It is (almost) all doom and gloom. Ditch the 5-car idea (replacing them with 9-car sets) and change the ratio of bi-modes to electrics to allow extension of GWML (Great Western Main Line) wiring in CP6 and things might start looking up. Oh, and leave the IC225s alone on the ECML (East Coast Main Line) (the 270 IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) vehicles ordered to replace them can be used to get avoid 5-car IEPs), rather than scrapping locos with 10 years life left in them.
Logged

----------------------------
Don't DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #319 on: September 30, 2013, 22:12:45 »

By the way, antony215, you appear to have three grocer's apostrophes in your post...

Paul  

I rather think you'll find he's anthony215, Paul.  Wink

...and they aren't Grocer's Apostrophes either - it's only recently that style guides have started to frown upon using apostrophes when pluralising initialisms (see Grammar Girl's piece), and the OED (Oxford English Dictionary) merely says that you don't need to use an apostrophe for this - it doesn't say you shouldn't.

Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18894



View Profile
« Reply #320 on: September 30, 2013, 23:35:59 »

Nope, because over half of the new fleet are currently planned to be 5 carriage formations (compared to today's 2+8 IC125s).

Working to the current IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) information (draft weekday timetable, draft seating capacity) in the public domain, Bristol TM(resolve)-Paddington may have:

6x double 5 car services: 3780 seats
14x 5 car services: 4410 seats
40x 9 car services: 25080 seats
Total: 33270 seats

Looking at current Bristol TM-Paddington HST (High Speed Train) provision there are a maximum of 34 weekday services and if we assume they are all operated by 2+8 high density sets with micro buffets, then there are 34x 560 seats.
Total: 19040 seats

Even if those figures aren't wholly accurate come the final shakedown, I think it does highlight that there is likely to be a very large increase in capacity between Bristol and London.

In addition, Weston-Super-Mare get's an hourly off peak 5 car service to London on top of existing and future peak services. Cheltenham gets an hourly 5 car service throughout the day, as does Worcester. Hereford gets a bi-hourly 5 car service. Westbury/Taunton/Exeter get an hourly off peak 5 car service in addition to existing HST services. Some of these additional 5 car services are doubled up in the peaks for all or part of their journey.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #321 on: October 01, 2013, 02:23:37 »

Crikey, well done for sitting down and working those figures out, sir!

Assuming your base figures are correct, I've done the first class seating in the same style.  Is another false assumption put to rest?   Wink

6x double 5 car services: 540 seats
14x 5 car services: 630 seats
40x 9 car services: 4040 seats
Total: 4210

Looking at current Bristol TM(resolve)-Paddington HST (High Speed Train) provision there are a maximum of 34 weekday services and if we assume they are all operated by 2+8 high density sets with micro buffets, then there are 34x 95 seats.
Total: 3230 seats*

* If we're generous and assume that all those current services are operated by 2+8 low density sets with normal sized buffets then 3230 increases to 3774 seats.  Still well short of 4210 though!
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18894



View Profile
« Reply #322 on: October 01, 2013, 16:41:10 »

Just to clarify, my figures were total seating capacity, First and Standard Class.

Deduct II's First Class figures from mine and you have Standard Class capacities.

And just to reiterate, these figures are based on the IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) layouts as published by the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) in August 2012 and the draft Greater Western IEP timetable spreadsheet as posted in this thread at post #220. This timetable was developed by the DfT for establishing diagrams and rolling stock requirements and is not to be regarded as a public timetable aspiration or proposal. We should have the Service Level Commitment for IEP when the Greater Western franchise is re-tendered in 2016.
« Last Edit: October 01, 2013, 16:54:27 by bignosemac » Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #323 on: October 01, 2013, 17:24:19 »

Whilst in theory, a more frequent service should make up for many of the new trains being only 5 car, practice may suggest otherwise.

When (then) Virgin cross country introduced new shorter trains, I remember being re-assured that the new shorter trains would be fine due to the increased frequency.
Some years have now passed, and the cross country services are now run by someone else, but I regulary have to stand on one of the new "fun sized" trains when I probably would have got a seat on an HST (High Speed Train) or loco hauled train.

I fear a repeat.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #324 on: October 01, 2013, 18:04:00 »


I fear a repeat.

And so do I. I consider, though, that passenger numbers on FGW (First Great Western)'s patch are more constant than Cross Country's ex Bristol. I may be wrong, but that's my impression. It follows that armed with reasonably accurate figures, the rolling stock for the line should be easy to plan for.

Which is why I fear a repeat. Anyone know if there are options for further trains in the contract with Agility / Hitachi?
Logged

Now, please!
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18894



View Profile
« Reply #325 on: October 02, 2013, 01:44:39 »

When (then) Virgin cross country introduced new shorter trains, I remember being re-assured that the new shorter trains would be fine due to the increased frequency.
Some years have now passed, and the cross country services are now run by someone else, but I regulary have to stand on one of the new "fun sized" trains when I probably would have got a seat on an HST (High Speed Train) or loco hauled train.

Ignoring CrossCountry's Cardiff-Nottingham and Birmingham-Stansted services...

At the time of the introduction of the Voyager fleet to Virgin CrossCountry, I don't think anyone predicted the huge rise in passenger numbers that would take to the CrossCountry network following the increase in frequency. With the core XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) routes having a half hourly clockface service since the introduction of Operation Princess, the number of seats per hour actually slightly increased over the previous hourly (and randomly timed) core services.

The old  Virgin XC 2+7 HSTs had around 420 seats and the loco hauled 7 coach mk2 sets had around 310 seats. With an even split between services operated by either HST or loco that would give an average of 365 seats per hour.

Now with a half hourly Voyager service you have at worst 400 seats per hour (2x Class 220) and at best 524 (2x Class 221). The actual figure would be somewhere in between, around 440 seats per hour. I'm saying 440 rather than a median between the capacity of a 220 versus a 221 to take account of CrossCountry having 34 Class 220s and only 23 Class 221s. The few XC HSTs runs per day would probably bump that 440 seats per hour up a bit.

So, more seats on the core XC network since Operation Princess was rolled out, but not enough to cope with current demand. There's a few other things wrong with Voyagers as well.

Who knows what the future holds for the CrossCountry network. There's going to be more than a handful of HST sets available from 2017 onward. Plus with further electrification there may be scope for CrossCountry Class 800s and 801s (IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.)). It would certainly make sense to have a similar fleet to other InterCity operators.

Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
Network SouthEast
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 492



View Profile
« Reply #326 on: October 02, 2013, 08:55:55 »

Who knows what the future holds for the CrossCountry network. There's going to be more than a handful of HST (High Speed Train) sets available from 2017 onward. Plus with further electrification there may be scope for CrossCountry Class 800s and 801s (IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.)). It would certainly make sense to have a similar fleet to other InterCity operators.


Interesting times ahead for XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)). Class 222s will be released by the MML» (Midland Main Line. - about) electrification, and routes like Bournemouth to Manchester can be all electric. I dare say we'll see more double headed Voyager/Meridians instead of cascaded HSTs on XC routes.
Logged
didcotdean
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1424


View Profile
« Reply #327 on: October 02, 2013, 11:45:35 »

At the time of the introduction of the Voyager fleet to Virgin CrossCountry, I don't think anyone predicted the huge rise in passenger numbers that would take to the CrossCountry network following the increase in frequency. With the core XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)) routes having a half hourly clockface service since the introduction of Operation Princess, the number of seats per hour actually slightly increased over the previous hourly (and randomly timed) core services.
Although this is broadly the case there are some significant exceptions. For example the frequency of services to Coventry and Birmingham International from Reading are still hourly as the extra services take the other route.

I recall that Virgin sent a survey to me concerning the services post Operation Princess. Since this had abolished the Cross Country stops at Didcot that had been in place for many years  there was little improvement for me personally in either convenience or journey times. Even now a proportion of trains need to be pathed through the station without stopping.
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #328 on: October 02, 2013, 14:23:51 »

Interesting times ahead for XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)). Class 222s will be released by the MML» (Midland Main Line. - about) electrification, and routes like Bournemouth to Manchester can be all electric. I dare say we'll see more double headed Voyager/Meridians instead of cascaded HSTs (High Speed Train) on XC routes.

Agree interesting times ahead. Re double Voyagers/Meridians can they work in multiple? Or do they fall victim to non standard coupling and control systems?




Edit note: Quote marks amended, for clarity. CfN.
« Last Edit: October 05, 2013, 00:18:33 by chris from nailsea » Logged
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #329 on: October 02, 2013, 14:59:29 »

Interesting times ahead for XC (Cross Country Trains (franchise)). Class 222s will be released by the MML» (Midland Main Line. - about) electrification, and routes like Bournemouth to Manchester can be all electric. I dare say we'll see more double headed Voyager/Meridians instead of cascaded HSTs (High Speed Train) on XC routes.

Agree interesting times ahead. Re double Voyagers/Meridians can they work in multiple? Or do they fall victim to non standard coupling and control systems?

AIUI (as I understand it) the coupling is compatible but the control systems are not (although that presumably could be fixed if there was an economic case for doing so. )




Edit note: Quote marks amended, for clarity. CfN.
« Last Edit: October 05, 2013, 00:19:30 by chris from nailsea » Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 20 21 [22] 23 24 ... 78
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page