Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 14:55 29 Mar 2024
* Delays at Dover as millions begin Easter getaway
- Attempted murder charge after man stabbed on train
* A view from inside ship that hit Baltimore bridge
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
13:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
14:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
15:50 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:15 Newbury to Bedwyn
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
16:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
17:29 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
19:02 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
12:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
15:28 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:29 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:20 Penzance to London Paddington
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:15 Penzance to London Paddington
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
13:50 London Paddington to Great Malvern
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
14:15 Penzance to London Paddington
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
15:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
19:04 London Paddington to Penzance
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 15:10:23 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[127] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[80] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[59] Who needs a travel agent these days?
[44] Travel for free on the m2 metrobus - Bristol - 4,5,6 April 202...
[34] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[32] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 36 37 [38] 39 40 ... 78
  Print  
Author Topic: Intercity Express Programme (IEP) - ongoing discussion  (Read 743860 times)
Rhydgaled
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1500


View Profile WWW
« Reply #555 on: March 26, 2015, 16:01:59 »

http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/Opinion-New-trains-jeopardise-electrification/story-26217290-detail/story.html?

A call for further electrification to(wards) the South West, and for the HSTs (High Speed Train) to be life extended to 2025 so there's no need to buy an expensive non-electrice fleet in the meantime.
Hear hear. I think though that 2025 is too early to expect enough electrification. The logical thing in my view would be to keep IC125s for now and work towards getting Swindon-Cheltenham, Newbury-Westbury and Bristol-Plymouth (inc. Weston-Super-Mare branch) wired. Then you can get new EMUs (Electric Multiple Unit) for PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains)-Cheltenham/Weston-Super-Mare/Westbury and cascade those bi-modes to the Penzance route (need to make them longer though). That might be possible 2030-2035 maybe, and maybe wires to Penzance in 2045 when the 27.5yr IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) contract ends...
Logged

----------------------------
Don't DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #556 on: March 26, 2015, 16:12:26 »

wires will never reach PNZ in our lifetime. However old you are now.
Logged
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #557 on: March 26, 2015, 19:40:11 »

wires will never reach PNZ in our lifetime. However old you are now.

Sadly, I'm inclined to agree. Although there must come a oint when it is cheaper to wire the last bit than keep running diesels.
Logged

Now, please!
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17865


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #558 on: March 26, 2015, 20:42:36 »

With advances in technology, they may be running battery powered units over 'the last bit' by then?  Undecided
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Surrey 455
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1229


View Profile
« Reply #559 on: March 26, 2015, 20:59:23 »

With advances in technology, they may be running battery powered units over 'the last bit' by then?  Undecided

Well I'd like to think that there will be no need for wires or third rail, the trains will be powered by solar panels on the roof with battery back up at night. Sadly I don't think that will happen in my lifetime.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40692



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #560 on: March 26, 2015, 21:19:14 »

With advances in technology, they may be running battery powered units over 'the last bit' by then?  Undecided

Well I'd like to think that there will be no need for wires or third rail, the trains will be powered by solar panels on the roof with battery back up at night. Sadly I don't think that will happen in my lifetime.

I'm noting in the tealeaves that the overhead wires + battery for the last bit approach is getting to be far more practical - "it works" and mileage on battery will go up as mileage on overhead goes down.  Not sure about solar panels - but how about swapping over batteries charge by solar, wind, wave power at station stops?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17865


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #561 on: March 27, 2015, 22:40:57 »

You ought to be able to recharge a fair few batteries using the wave power at Dawlish ...  Tongue Roll Eyes Grin
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #562 on: April 07, 2015, 11:42:19 »

More details on stock arrivals & Transfers from Railnews

Quote
NEW Bombardier Electrostars are included in the plans for the new First Great Western franchise, which will be a boost for jobs in Derby.

The main fleets for long-distance services will be Intercity Expresses and hybrid AT300s, both from Hitachi.

However, Thames Valley electrification will need large numbers of suburban electric multiple units, some of which will be 21 Class 365s cascaded from Great Northern.

Also heading west will be 29 Class 387 four-car sets, which are currently being delivered from Bombardier in Derby to Thameslink on a temporary basis.

In the longer term, all 29 sets will move to First Great Western for Thames Valley services, but a further eight sets have been ordered by Porterbrook specifically for FGW (First Great Western), Railnews has learned. Most will run as four or eight-car trains, but FGW said there was also potential for a 'very limited' number of 12-car sets.

The additional capacity offered by each four-car Class 387 rather than a three-car diesel Class 165 will help to fulfil First's pledge to offer an additional 8,000 seats in peak hours between Reading and London by 2018.

The plans for AT300s for services west of Bristol have not yet been confirmed, because they depend on a private financing deal and DfT» (Department for Transport - about) approval, which is due by June.

Diesel class 165s displaced by Thames Valley electrification will stay with FGW for services between Cardiff, Bristol and the south coast. The 158s released from this will be used for local main line services in the far south west. They will be needed when local services between Plymouth and Penzance are increased to half-hourly.

Departing rolling stock will include the Class 142 and 144 Pacers currently in use in the Bristol and Exeter areas, while the Devon and Cornwall branch lines will mainly be worked by two-car Class 150s rather than the single-car Class 153s.

The new First Great Western franchise was announced yesterday, and will start in September.

First Great Western managing director, Mark Hopwood said:  ^For us, this franchise deal is about changing the way people think about rail. The Great Western network is already seeing the biggest investment since Brunel, and this deal has been designed to match that investment and ambition. It gives passengers newer trains, faster, more frequent services and importantly, given the growth this franchise has seen in recent years, more seats ^ three million extra seats a year by December 2018.

^We^ve worked with the Department for Transport to make sure passengers get every bit of benefit from the mainline electrification programme, while making sure no area misses out. I believe that the team at First Great Western will deliver for customers and the thriving communities and economies they serve, as well as the taxpayer.^


Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7750



View Profile
« Reply #563 on: April 07, 2015, 12:33:07 »

Just one question on this - to what extent will the extra 8,000 peak seats promised by 2018 between Reading and London be effectively wiped out by projected passenger numbers growth between now and then?
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #564 on: April 07, 2015, 12:44:23 »

Not sure of that prediction, but remember even more Crossrail capacitu comes online soon after that
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18897



View Profile
« Reply #565 on: April 07, 2015, 13:14:41 »

Quote
Departing rolling stock will include the Class 142 and 144 Pacers currently in use in the Bristol and Exeter areas

Split the difference/take the arithmetic mean and then you'd get the right class number. FGW (First Great Western) only has Class 143s.

Oh and no Pacer is in use in the Bristol area. They are exclusively to be found in Devon.

Pretty poor for a specialist rail news website. Roll Eyes
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #566 on: April 07, 2015, 13:28:20 »

They acknowledge the errors in the comment section at the base of that URL
Logged
Rhydgaled
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1500


View Profile WWW
« Reply #567 on: April 07, 2015, 13:50:13 »

Quote
Departing rolling stock will include the Class 142 and 144 Pacers currently in use in the Bristol and Exeter areas

Split the difference/take the arithmetic mean and then you'd get the right class number. FGW (First Great Western) only has Class 143s.

Oh and no Pacer is in use in the Bristol area. They are exclusively to be found in Devon.

Pretty poor for a specialist rail news website. Roll Eyes
They DID» (Didcot Parkway - next trains) have 142s not all that long ago though, and didn't they run Pacers in the Bristol area back then? Just an out-of-date quote except for the fact they put 144 instead of 143, which may have been a typing error.
Just one question on this - to what extent will the extra 8,000 peak seats promised by 2018 between Reading and London be effectively wiped out by projected passenger numbers growth between now and then?
Not sure of that prediction, but remember even more Crossrail capacitu comes online soon after that
Neither is any help west of Reading, and surely the patronage growth isn't confined to the Reading-London section. Yet the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) (and now it seems First too) seem happy to reduce capacity per train across much of the GW (Great Western) Intercity network while the vast majority of the frequency enhancements which will hopefully somewhat compensate for the shorter trains are limited to specific sections of the network.

Even if you think that I've got it wrong and current IC125s (except on Bristol services) don't often load to more than 300 passengers west of Reading then, assuming growth continues, the 5-car IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) trains will get full pretty quickly and lengthening them will be impossible without creating redundant driving vehicles.
Logged

----------------------------
Don't DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18897



View Profile
« Reply #568 on: April 07, 2015, 14:00:58 »

They acknowledge the errors in the comment section at the base of that URL

Ah, didn't scroll down to look for clarifications and corrections.  Smiley

They DID» (Didcot Parkway - next trains) have 142s not all that long ago though, and didn't they run Pacers in the Bristol area back then?

4^ years ago the 142s went. 3 years since a 143 has been in the Bristol area. So a fair time ago.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40692



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #569 on: April 07, 2015, 14:22:01 »

Just one question on this - to what extent will the extra 8,000 peak seats promised by 2018 between Reading and London be effectively wiped out by projected passenger numbers growth between now and then?

Looking at Paddington passenger numbers as a whole - they rose from 32200316 to 35093628 in the last 3 years (ORR» (Office of Rail and Road formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about) Station use figures).   Divide those by 363 days (no trains on Christmas day or Boxing day) ...

>>> (35093628 - 32200316) / 363
7970
>>>

So there will be 30 seats of the 8,000 left over if current growth trends continue.


Statistically, my logic leaks like a sieve!
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 36 37 [38] 39 40 ... 78
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page