Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 12:35 20 Apr 2024
- Three men killed in retail park car crash named
- Some Wales roads to revert to 30mph after backlash
- BBC presenter reports racist abuse on London train
- Three men killed in retail park car crash identified
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
20th Apr (1789)
Opening of Sapperton Canal Tunnel

Train RunningCancelled
07:55 Bristol Temple Meads to Penzance
13:07 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
18:52 London Paddington to Great Malvern
19:19 Carmarthen to Swansea
Short Run
10:03 London Paddington to Penzance
11:09 Gloucester to Weymouth
11:24 Reading to Gatwick Airport
11:42 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
12:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
14:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
Delayed
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:30 Weymouth to Gloucester
12:24 Plymouth to Gunnislake
13:14 Gunnislake to Plymouth
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 20, 2024, 12:51:53 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[279] Somerset and Dorset Devonshire Tunnel flood
[220] Rail to refuge / Travel to refuge
[109] On reservations, fees and supplements - Interrail
[37] Rail delay compensation payments hit £100 million
[33] Problems with the Night Riviera sleeper - December 2014 onward...
[16] Difficult to argue with e-bike/scooter rules?
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 51 52 [53] 54 55 ... 78
  Print  
Author Topic: Intercity Express Programme (IEP) - ongoing discussion  (Read 745405 times)
TrainSpy
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 17


View Profile
« Reply #780 on: August 03, 2016, 20:06:21 »

Why would they replace the 387s? they've only just ordered the new ones...

Logged
Rhydgaled
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1500


View Profile WWW
« Reply #781 on: August 03, 2016, 21:11:35 »

The electric class is now presumably dead in the water at GWR (Great Western Railway) as they are all now specified electro-diesel.

So only two classes with GWR - 801 & 802. (the 800 was the electric? I can't remember)

Logic does say they'll be 802s, otherwise they'd be added to the build at Newton Aycliffe, surely?

Why? The difference between 802 and (bi-mode) 800 is pretty trivial, much less than between 800 and (electric) 801. The choice of plant was based on capacity, surely.
I think the difference between all three classes (800, 801 and 802) is pretty trivial. The 801 is the 'electric' and if I've interpreted what has been written about them correctly they are just the same as the 800s but with fewer diesel-engine coaches. As far as manufacturing is concerned, the larger fuel tanks and different brake system of the class 802s might even be a bigger change than producing 800s versus 801s, but that's just a guess. Although GWR isn't getting 801s anymore, there are still quite a number on-order for the ECML (East Coast Main Line).
Logged

----------------------------
Don't DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
Adelante_CCT
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1314



View Profile
« Reply #782 on: August 03, 2016, 21:19:48 »

If they are to replace 387s then I would have thought they were for the Oxford services where 9 car would be needed. 
Why would they replace the 387s? they've only just ordered the new ones...


Technically some of the 387s are to replace the class 365s which are no longer heading to our region, these 7 new AT300s will cover for the 'cascaded' 387s
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5318


View Profile
« Reply #783 on: August 03, 2016, 22:41:11 »

Originally there were to be 58 4 car EMUs (Electric Multiple Unit), 21 x 365 and 37 x 387.  The recent uplift in 387 numbers was to 45 in total, so on the face of it 21 of them replace the 365s, with another 24 for services originally planned for 387s.

So the shortfall of 4 car EMUs is 13, or 6.5 x 8 car. We need to think what a broad equivalent is in terms of AT300/802, given that they are much longer vehicles. 7 x 9 car would be a really useful capacity increase, getting on for 50% longer trains...

Assuming 160m > 234m train lengths.

Paul
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12357


View Profile Email
« Reply #784 on: August 04, 2016, 10:16:16 »

Oxford & Cotswolds, yes, I reckon too
Logged
The Tall Controller
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 354


View Profile
« Reply #785 on: August 04, 2016, 12:09:12 »

The 7 new 9 car trains will 'cascade' 5 car AT300s to run Bedwyn services.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10116


View Profile
« Reply #786 on: August 04, 2016, 12:48:57 »

Are we sure they're 9-cars?  Other forums are quite confident they are 5-car units.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Ollie
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2302


View Profile
« Reply #787 on: August 04, 2016, 12:53:34 »

I've been told they will have 9.
Logged
Adelante_CCT
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1314



View Profile
« Reply #788 on: August 04, 2016, 12:58:57 »

Quote
Originally there were to be 58 4 car EMUs (Electric Multiple Unit), 21 x 365 and 37 x 387. 

Originally originally wasn't it just the 29 x 387 before the first of the 8 new ones.

So in the process of a year or two, we've gone from:
•57 IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) units
•29 not quite new class 387s (2-4 years old)
•21 class 365s (20-25 years old)

To:
•93 IEP units
•45 brand new class 387s.

Pretty pleased with that  Smiley
Logged
Adelante_CCT
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1314



View Profile
« Reply #789 on: August 04, 2016, 13:04:36 »

Quote
Are we sure they're 9-cars?  Other forums are quite confident they are 5-car units.

I don't speak Italian but this article states 9 coaches:

http://www.lanazione.it/pistoia/hitachi-treni-londra-1.2402438
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5408



View Profile
« Reply #790 on: August 04, 2016, 14:19:12 »

Are we sure they're 9-cars?  Other forums are quite confident they are 5-car units.

I would presume 5 car.
My natural cynicism says they will be 5 car. If a press release refers to "additional trains" without mentioning the length of said new trains then it is a reasonable assumption that they will be short ones.
If the additional trains ARE to be 9 car then I believe that the press release would have said "9 car ----"
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10116


View Profile
« Reply #791 on: August 04, 2016, 14:35:06 »

I would presume 5 car.

Certainly some confusion out there.  Ollie's been told 9-car, the article Adelante_CCT linked to says 9-car, ChrisB, TrainSpy and Rob T on here say 9-car.  However several posters on the wnxx forum are confident of 5-car including Mark Hopwood apparently confirming that to staff yesterday. 
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40786



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #792 on: August 04, 2016, 14:56:39 »

Certainly some confusion out there.  Ollie's been told 9-car, the article Adelante_CCT linked to says 9-car, ChrisB, TrainSpy and Rob T on here say 9-car.  However several posters on the wnxx forum are confident of 5-car including Mark Hopwood apparently confirming that to staff yesterday. 

There are usually very well placed and informed sources both saying "9" and saying "5".  I wouldn't like to bet either way at this stage.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5318


View Profile
« Reply #793 on: August 04, 2016, 19:13:59 »

Quote
Originally there were to be 58 4 car EMUs (Electric Multiple Unit), 21 x 365 and 37 x 387. 

Originally originally wasn't it just the 29 x 387 before the first of the 8 new ones.


The first concrete mention I saw was in the Direct Award franchise agreement's rolling stock tables, in about April 2015, and it definitely included (and still shows although obviously superseded) both the 29 that would have originally come from GTR, and a separate 8 new build.   Note that delivery of the extra 8 was originally due next January, before the last batches from GTR.

The original plan had the following, page 147, but now only if academic interest as both numbers and dates are overtaken by events:

Quote
Note i:
29 Class 387 units (116 vehicles) are delivered in four distinct phases:
- 6 units by end of March 2016;
- 4 units by end of April 2016;
- 8 units by end of February 2017; and
- 11 units by end of March 2017
Additional 8 Class 387 units:
Delivery is based on final acceptance, which is at a rate of 2 units every two weeks starting in the second week of January 2017.

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/486668/red-fgw-franchise-agreement.pdf

Paul
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5318


View Profile
« Reply #794 on: August 04, 2016, 19:18:33 »

Quote
Are we sure they're 9-cars?  Other forums are quite confident they are 5-car units.

I don't speak Italian but this article states 9 coaches:

http://www.lanazione.it/pistoia/hitachi-treni-londra-1.2402438

Isn't the price shown looking more like 63 vehicles than 35, at £139 million?
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 51 52 [53] 54 55 ... 78
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page