Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 14:15 29 Mar 2024
- Delays at Dover as millions begin Easter getaway
- Attempted murder charge after man stabbed on train
- KFC Nigeria sorry after disabled diner refused service
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
13:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
14:12 Newbury to Bedwyn
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
14:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
15:50 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:15 Newbury to Bedwyn
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
16:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
12:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
13:46 Bristol Temple Meads to Warminster
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
09:10 Penzance to London Paddington
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:20 Penzance to London Paddington
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:15 Penzance to London Paddington
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
13:50 London Paddington to Great Malvern
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
14:15 Penzance to London Paddington
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
15:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
19:04 London Paddington to Penzance
etc
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 14:28:56 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[135] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[85] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[46] Travel for free on the m2 metrobus - Bristol - 4,5,6 April 202...
[36] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[34] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[33] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 62 63 [64] 65 66 ... 78
  Print  
Author Topic: Intercity Express Programme (IEP) - ongoing discussion  (Read 743856 times)
1st fan
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 402


View Profile
« Reply #945 on: April 27, 2017, 01:30:00 »

An interesting post from 'Clarence Yard' on railforums.co.uk, who has been closely involved in testing of the new trains, indicates that an unmuzzled IET (Intercity Express Train) running on diesel power is able to reach 120mph and pretty much match existing HST (High Speed Train) point-to-point timings - 105mph was reached with one engine isolated, which is still pretty impressive.  Muzzled and the performance was described as anaemic!  Let's hope the DfT authorise unmuzzled working at least until the Cardiff electrification is completed.  Talks are still ongoing apparently.
On my last trip I struck up a conversation with an off duty staff member and we talked about this subject. Talked about testing and doing fast runs to check performance, I bitched about the new 1st seats. They said that the company are desperate not to have the diesel engines running at less than full power. GWR (Great Western Railway) apparently get a bad enough press as it is and the media would roast them if the new trains ran slower than the HST. Now this may just be hokum but it sounded good.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10096


View Profile
« Reply #946 on: April 27, 2017, 09:15:53 »

Yes it would certainly be an easy win for the press who would no doubt jump on the story and it would indeed be GWR (Great Western Railway) that would suffer the most in terms of credibility.  This is despite it only being a temporary situation hopefully lasting just over a year until Didcot to Cardiff is wired and the real 'blame' lying with NR» (Network Rail - home page) and the DfT» (Department for Transport - about).
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #947 on: April 28, 2017, 14:31:42 »

Yes it would certainly be an easy win for the press who would no doubt jump on the story and it would indeed be GWR (Great Western Railway) that would suffer the most in terms of credibility.  This is despite it only being a temporary situation hopefully lasting just over a year until Didcot to Cardiff is wired and the real 'blame' lying with NR» (Network Rail - home page) and the DfT» (Department for Transport - about).

Thingley to Bristol will still be diesel.

Rumours have it that lawyers may become involved. More money down the drain.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10096


View Profile
« Reply #948 on: April 28, 2017, 14:55:24 »

Thingley to Bristol will still be diesel.

Though the nature of that and the other remaining un-electrified routes mean that the effects should be minimal once Cardiff is wired.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Oberon
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 186


View Profile
« Reply #949 on: April 29, 2017, 07:50:30 »

When the closure at Bath Spa for platform widening was in operation there was a lot of stuff on local TV about this. A Network Rail spokesperson was adamant, at the time of broadcast, that Thingley-Bristol would be wired by 2024. You never know just who to believe in these situations. It could simply have been a throwaway line designed to soft soap the public in the light of £ millions already having been spent on track lowering. I'm not a betting man but I'll certainly wager that Temple Meads-Parkway eventually gets wired.
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #950 on: April 29, 2017, 11:31:49 »

I forecast that the units will be allowed to run at full power "unmuzzled" and the real arguments will be over how much this will cost and whom is going to pay.
I presume that due to working the engines at a higher power than was originally intended, that some of the reliability risk will be transferred from Hitachi and to the TOC (Train Operating Company).

Since the speed when unmuzzled will be nearly as good as the old trains, I suspect that the same point to point times will be kept, perhaps by removing some of the "charter minutes" from the present timetable.

I expect a lot of hidden fare rises to pay for the extra costs on what were already hugely expensive trains.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #951 on: April 29, 2017, 12:09:29 »

I forecast that the units will be allowed to run at full power "unmuzzled" and the real arguments will be over how much this will cost and whom is going to pay.
I presume that due to working the engines at a higher power than was originally intended, that some of the reliability risk will be transferred from Hitachi and to the TOC (Train Operating Company).



Hopefully it can be settled without the lawyers!

Poor GWR (Great Western Railway) they are piggy in the middle.
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #952 on: May 01, 2017, 15:46:17 »

Don't feel too sorry for GWR (Great Western Railway).

They have routinely implied that THEY are funding the new trains, so no harm in them taking some reputational damage now that it is starting to go wrong.

Are they still advertising that the new trains will be faster ? bit optimistic if so ! unmuzzled they will struggle to keep present day HST (High Speed Train) timings, and muzzled will be significantly slower.
« Last Edit: May 01, 2017, 18:09:48 by broadgage » Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #953 on: May 01, 2017, 16:28:58 »

Which serves yet again to illustrate how short sighted the decision to not electrify the whole line to Bristol is.
Logged

Now, please!
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7750



View Profile
« Reply #954 on: May 01, 2017, 16:32:40 »

Don't feel too sorry for GWR (Great Western Railway).

They have routinely implied that THEY are funding the new trains, so no harm in them taking some reputational damage no that it is starting to go wrong.

Are they still advertising that the new trains will be faster ? bit optimistic if so ! unmuzzled they will struggle to keep present day HST (High Speed Train) timings, and muzzled will be significantly slower.

Really? And here was me with all my plans for the extra 6 minutes I'd be gaining on runs down to Plymouth!!!  Wink
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #955 on: May 01, 2017, 16:50:35 »

Which serves yet again to illustrate how short sighted the decision to not electrify the whole line to Bristol is.
Once the lines to Parkway and Thingley are electrified any performance issues on the remaining sections will be very marginal, even muzzled.  For me, the disappointment over the deferral (he says, optimistically) of wiring to Temple Meads is that none of the local services will be able to go electric.  Splitting the Cardiff - Taunton services at Bristol would be worth it to have 4 car electric services into Wales (and they could have been extended to Bath using the proposed turnback there, improving capacity on that route too).

I'm hopeful that once Bristol East is remodelled, the marginal cost of wiring from Parkway will be minimal. I'm sure both there (and in the work being done four-tracking) will be done very mindful of where the piles will need to go.  So it should be a relatively straightforward job, apart from Temple Meads itself.

 
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40692



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #956 on: May 01, 2017, 17:37:17 »

Really? And here was me with all my plans for the extra 6 minutes I'd be gaining on runs down to Plymouth!!!  Wink

I know that was written tongue in cheek .... but I look back at early HST (High Speed Train) timetables as while there were some fast runs, there were also big gaps.  For my own journeys, I typically need to be at [ Paddington / Plymouth / Swindon / Cambridge ] at a  particular time, and trains that's 10 minutes faster but dumps me there 10 minute earlier is no gain.

I would rather have a train every 30 minutes that takes an hour and 15 (so average is to leave my starting station 90 minutes before my required time) than a train every 60 minutes that takes an hour and 5 (so average is to leave my starting station 95 minutes before my required time).

Noting gaps from Chippenham as long as 2 hours in this timetable, and some skipping Swindon too. 

Othere benefit of more trains (even a bit slower) is that the previous train - if taken for an important appointment - isn't quite so previous!

Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18897



View Profile
« Reply #957 on: May 01, 2017, 17:58:23 »

At least these new trains are definitely entering service. Here's what the future at Swindon once looked like:


(Photo from a second-hand book I picked up at Minehead Station)

Imagine if the gas turbine concept was perfected and the cost came down.

Meanwhile, back in the real world...

Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40692



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #958 on: May 01, 2017, 18:10:40 »

At least these new trains are definitely entering service.

I am reminded never to count my chickens ... remembering the case of the IC4.  Scheduled to enter service from 2003, final unit did enter service in 2014 ... however ...

Quote
Concerns about reliability remain, however, especially after the failure of an IC4 trainset in the Great Belt tunnel on February 24, 2014 and the consequent evacuation of 191 passengers to another train set.

In September 2014 an investigation by the Danish department of transport was launched to find whether it was more economical to have the delivered trains scrapped or have them rebuilt for slower regional traffic. Scrapping the trains could lead to DSB filing for bankruptcy.

It was announced on 15 December 2016 that the troubled fleet would be phased out from 2024

I have no reason at all to think there will be IC4 size problems with 800 to 802 - just a reminder that you can never be sure.

On the brighter side,  a certain branch line was due to close in 2 weeks time during 1966 - but it's still with us some 51 years later!
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #959 on: May 01, 2017, 18:44:57 »

I have no reason at all to think there will be IC4 size problems with 800 to 802 - just a reminder that you can never be sure.

Maybe some trepidation is appropriate. The same AnsaldoBreda plant at Pistoia that made the IC4 will be building the 802s (and some other variants), having been bought by Hitachi in 2015. They also made the V250, that other nightmare train procurement exercise, for the Fyra high-speed services from Belgium to Amsterdam. And looking at Wikipedia, I find there have been others, such as a Gothenburg tram order.

I guess that this history will have made the place pretty cheap to buy. I have no idea what kind of deal was cut over liability and support for trains being built or already delivered, though that will have entered into the pricing.

Those problems relate to AnsaldoBreda's preformance in both design and build. For the 802s, the design is Hitachi's, and the build will depend on their ability to make heir Italian workforce build Hitachi's designs to Japanses standards of quality. Other Japanese Companies do seem to be able to do that, at least in greenfield sites - I'm thinking of the car-makers in Britain. But for a take-over ... we'll see, won't we?
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 62 63 [64] 65 66 ... 78
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page