Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 06:55 29 Mar 2024
- Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
- Easter getaway begins with flood alerts in place
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
06:30 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
07:00 Bedwyn to Newbury
07:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
07:49 Bedwyn to Newbury
08:13 Newbury to Bedwyn
08:46 Bedwyn to Newbury
09:54 Bedwyn to Newbury
10:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:29 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
12:52 Bedwyn to Newbury
Short Run
04:54 Plymouth to London Paddington
05:23 Hereford to London Paddington
05:33 Plymouth to London Paddington
05:55 Plymouth to London Paddington
06:00 Bedwyn to London Paddington
06:37 Plymouth to London Paddington
06:48 Exeter St Davids to Exmouth
07:03 London Paddington to Paignton
07:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Penzance
07:40 Bristol Temple Meads to Westbury
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
Delayed
23:45 London Paddington to Penzance
05:03 Penzance to London Paddington
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 07:09:58 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[82] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[76] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[74] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[67] Return of the BRUTE?
[57] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[46] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: The 07:44 service from Henley to Paddington - worst for overcrowding?  (Read 19032 times)
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17865


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« on: April 20, 2012, 16:23:21 »

From the Henley Standard:

Quote
Video: Our trip on SE's busiest train

Commuters from Henley travel to work on the most overcrowded train in the South-East.

Nearly four in 10 passengers have to stand on the 7.44am service from Henley to Paddington, according to statistics from the Department for Transport.

This means the First Great Western service regularly operates at 166 per cent capacity.

A survey carried out on one day found the three-carriage train was carrying 373 passengers, 148 more than it was designed to hold.

Passengers from Henley, who pay nearly ^4,000 for an annual season ticket to London, say that more carriages should be introduced.

Mark Hanson, of Greys Road, Henley, described the service as ^abysmal^. ^It is far too busy,^ he said. ^It is far too cramped and there is no consideration for health and safety.^

Dennis Rocks, who works at Network Rail and travels to London every day, said he had seen a pregnant woman faint because the train was so overcrowded.  He said: ^The service before this one has five coaches and that gets quite full as well. It is when you get to Maidenhead that it gets very overcrowded. If you get on at Wargrave, Shiplake or Twyford, then you are pretty much guaranteed to get a seat. There should be an extra carriage ^ this is down to the operating company.^

Julian Thurston, 56, of Queen Street, Henley, who has commuted to London for 25 years, said: ^A lot of people at Henley get on that train and it is packed by Wargrave. Often there is not room for people at Twyford to get on ^ it^s only a three-car train ^ and by Maidenhead people are standing up and it is really bad. ^People become annoyed and they obviously feel uncomfortable. The Henley guys are actually not too bad because they get on the train first but it is really unpleasant because there are so many people packed around you. It has been like that for two or three years now. They have said they will make it longer but they haven^t yet. They need a six-car train and they have needed it for a long time.^

Kris Adams, 36, of Niagra Road, Henley, who often travels on the 7.44am, said: ^By the time you get to Twyford and then Maidenhead there are a few arguments now and again. I get pretty frustrated. I come with a bike so it is not good for me and it is not good for other commuters when it gets too packed to get a seat and it is a long journey. We are not talking 20 minutes, we are talking 40 minutes to an hour so standing up is frustrating.^

A passenger from Shiplake said: ^I pity the people who get on at Twyford. I think it needs to not stop at Maidenhead as it then becomes dreadful. It is already full by the time it gets there. It is supposed to be a Henley train and Maidenhead has a train stopping every 15 to 20 minutes so why do they need ours?^

A First Great Western spokesman said: ^The train is a very attractive alternative to the car, particularly for customers travelling to and from London on a regular basis, and demand continues to rise. Additionally, there is a shortage of rolling stock across the UK (United Kingdom) to allow many train operators to keep up with that demand. A great deal has already been done, including retiming and strengthening services with existing carriages where possible.

^However, we are in the process of introducing more than 4,500 additional seats in London and the Thames Valley before summer, which will have a further impact in the coming months.

^The 07.44 service from Henley to London Paddington will be strengthened from three cars to four cars when additional rolling stock becomes available September. Similarly, the 18.12 from Paddington to Henley will be strengthened from three cars to five.^
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
adc82140
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 183


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: April 20, 2012, 17:52:35 »

the problems got worse a few years back when the 0800 from Maidenhead was reduced from a 10 car Adelante to a 7 car HST (High Speed Train)- more people gave up on the 0800 and tried for the 0804 (0744 ex Henley) with predictable repercussions.
Logged
inspector_blakey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3574



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: April 20, 2012, 19:23:49 »

Slightly surprised to see a Network Rail employee prepared to go on the record and criticize a TOC (Train Operating Company) publicly in a press article that gives their full name  Undecided
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: April 20, 2012, 19:33:01 »

Surely, however, any reasonably knowledgeable NR» (Network Rail - home page) employee would realise that the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) remain responsible for rolling stock allocation policy - and under the current franchise regime the DfT insist on formal approval of every individual carriage move?

Paul
Logged
TerminalJunkie
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 919



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: April 20, 2012, 19:38:17 »

Slightly surprised to see a Network Rail employee prepared to go on the record and criticize a TOC (Train Operating Company) publicly in a press article that gives their full name  Undecided

It might be a made-up name, of course. And the fact that there is an 'Information Management Delivery Manager' with the same name at Network Rail could be entirely coincidental...
Logged

Daily Mail and Daily Express readers please click here.
TerminalJunkie
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 919



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: April 20, 2012, 19:41:04 »

There are times I love Google...

http://www.logica.co.uk/we-work-in/transport-and-logistics/related-media/videos/2011/keeping-the-supply-chain-on-track-for-network-rail/
Logged

Daily Mail and Daily Express readers please click here.
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10096


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: April 20, 2012, 20:43:34 »

Well, it looks like he's going to get his wish of an extra carriage come late summer.  I'm not sure it will make too much difference though as a 33% increase in seats on a train that's already full to maximum will mean any extra space will soon be swallowed up by Maidenhead commuters.  As was previously discussed adding any more than one carriage would present operational problems given the length of the bay platform at Twyford.  Still, every carriage extra is good news I suppose.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
johoare
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2818


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: April 20, 2012, 20:44:55 »

the problems got worse a few years back when the 0800 from Maidenhead was reduced from a 10 car Adelante to a 7 car HST (High Speed Train)- more people gave up on the 0800 and tried for the 0804 (0744 ex Henley) with predictable repercussions.

As has been mentioned (by me) on another recent thread re this train.. Hardly anyone that I've seen gets on it at Maidenhead now as it's usually overfull before it arrives.. To be honest the only reason they stop it there is so they (FGW (First Great Western)/NR» (Network Rail - home page)) can boast about the amount of non-stop Services Maidenhead have.. Even if hardly anyone can get on it, it still counts in their "number of trains" statistics... I do hope FGW will realise the extent of the overcrowding on all our lines soon.. I won't hold my breath though.. Roll Eyes
Logged
autotank
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
******
Posts: 241


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: July 23, 2012, 08:39:52 »

Good to see the 0744 formed of 4 coaches this monring - I assume this is thanks to the 180's?
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10096


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: July 23, 2012, 09:55:40 »

Yes, there's three 180 diagrams starting today, so extra Turbo coaches will have been released.  I'd imagine a North Downs service has been strengthened from 2 to 3 cars and the spare 2 car is now allocated to that Henley service.  That also means, as well as that service, and the early morning Henley shuttle service, the 08:38 PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains)-TWY (Twyford station), 10:48 RDG(resolve)-PAD, and 11:57 PAD-OXF» (Oxford - next trains) are all also benefiting from an extra carriage.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
BerkshireBugsy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1640


Berkshire Bugsy Jr


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: July 23, 2012, 11:56:05 »

I'd imagine a North Downs service has been strengthened from 2 to 3 cars and the spare 2 car is now allocated to that Henley service. 

I may be wrong but thought the Reading to Gatwick diagrams on the North Downs line were normally 3 cars and the slower Reading-Redhill diagrams were normally 2 cars.

Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10096


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: July 23, 2012, 12:11:16 »

Yes, and more of those 2-car stopping services will be 3-car services using the displaced Turbos with the 2-cars strengthening services such as the 07:44ex Henley.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
BBM
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 634


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: July 23, 2012, 15:54:53 »

The 06:53 from Twyford (06:20 from Didcot Parkway) to PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains) was 6 cars instead of 5 this morning so at last everyone at Maidenhead could get a seat!
Logged
Southern Stag
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 984


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: July 23, 2012, 20:03:42 »

I'd imagine a North Downs service has been strengthened from 2 to 3 cars and the spare 2 car is now allocated to that Henley service. 

I may be wrong but thought the Reading to Gatwick diagrams on the North Downs line were normally 3 cars and the slower Reading-Redhill diagrams were normally 2 cars.


Weekdays it was usually only one of the three diagrams on Reading-Redhill services that was a 2-car, and that has now presumably been replaced by a 3-car.
Logged
johoare
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2818


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: July 23, 2012, 22:29:21 »

Good to see the 0744 formed of 4 coaches this monring - I assume this is thanks to the 180's?

Yes I noticed this whilst waiting for the delayed 8am departure from Maidenhead.. (and I think more people from my train would have got it had they known) as it looked much less overcrowded than normal..

What a difference an extra carriage makes. Was this advertised? FGW (First Great Western) are waiting to get back to me on where the extra carriages will be used currently when they find out themselves ;-)  Roll Eyes
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page