Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 22:15 18 Apr 2024
* Arrest over alleged Russia plot to kill Zelensky
- Dubai airport delays persist after UAE storm
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
18th Apr (2018)
SEWWEB leaflet launched and Aztec West (link)

Train RunningCancelled
22:24 Bristol Temple Meads to Severn Beach
23:08 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
23:09 Bristol Temple Meads to Westbury
23:33 Reading to Gatwick Airport
19/04/24 04:45 Redhill to Gatwick Airport
19/04/24 05:11 Gatwick Airport to Reading
Short Run
20:24 Exmouth to Cardiff Central
20:30 Carmarthen to Bristol Parkway
20:50 Bristol Temple Meads to Weymouth
21:00 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Shrub Hill
21:15 Great Malvern to Bristol Temple Meads
22:36 Worcester Shrub Hill to Bristol Temple Meads
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 18, 2024, 22:28:43 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[176] Rail delay compensation payments hit £100 million
[71] Signage - not making it easy ...
[15] IETs at Melksham
[13] Ferry just cancelled - train tickets will be useless - advice?
[12] From Melksham to Tallinn (and back round The Baltic) by train
[12] New station at Ashley Down, Bristol
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Dilton Marsh (26/11/2007)  (Read 3670 times)
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« on: November 27, 2007, 17:14:22 »

I travelled on the 1310 service from Salisbury - Westbury , which was about 75% loaded (admittedly in part due to the cancellation of the preceding Portsmouth - Cardiff service.) 5 people got off at Dilton Marsh , including me. One asked what was happening from December , to which the guard replied "you are losing a couple of trains per day."

I spent some time looking around Dilton Marsh , and the combination of existing and new - build housing is spread over a surprisingly wide area. In fact , DM is increasingly looking like a suburb of Westbury , and the continuing growth probably justifies the claims of local campaigners that a better service would be appropriate.

However , my return on the 1415 towards Southampton provided a taste of what's to come. Because it follows a Cardiff - Portsmouth train out of Westbury , it is virtually empty. At the moment though , trains at least tend to run through to Southampton. Unfortunately , journey opportunities will be reduced from December , with some trains terminating at Warminster.
« Last Edit: November 27, 2007, 17:31:58 by Lee Fletcher » Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
Ptolemy
Full Member
***
Posts: 30


ptolemyphil@hotmail.com ptolemyphil
View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1 on: January 21, 2008, 09:57:06 »

I travelled from Swindon to Melksham last Friday evening, the last leg of a journey back from London, and was "entertained" by an angry exchange between a Dilton Marsh passenger and the FGW (First Great Western) guard (who, I have to say up front, handled the situation extremely well, I thought - far more professional and diplomatic than I would have been faced with a similar situation!)

The issue in a nutshell was that the passenger had a Westbury-Swindon return ticket, issued at Westbury, but wanted to travel on to Dilton Marsh. The passenger's argument, rather forcibly put, was that the ticket price is exactly the same from Westbury - Swindon as it is from Dilton Marsh - Swindon, so what's the problem?

(I hardly need state the guard's position on this since it's patently obvious, plus I rather suspect the person concerned had already evaded paying from Dilton - Westbury when they bought their ticket at Westbury that morning!)

Nevertheless it does raise the question whether anything's going to be done about pricing anomalies such as this (there's a similar situation up on the Kemble - Stroud route I believe), not only to make it easier for passengers to understand but also to protect train staff - and other passengers - as well. The situation I saw could very easily have got out of hand.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40783



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #2 on: January 21, 2008, 14:07:35 »

The issue in a nutshell was that the passenger had a Westbury-Swindon return ticket, issued at Westbury, but wanted to travel on to Dilton Marsh. The passenger's argument, rather forcibly put, was that the ticket price is exactly the same from Westbury - Swindon as it is from Dilton Marsh - Swindon, so what's the problem?

Surprisingly, the passenger is correct in saying that the fares are the same:
11.20 cheap day return
14.20 standard day return
17.00 saver return (WHAT does it save on?)
21.00 business saver

What he should do (or was it a she?) is to ask in the morning for a DILTON MARSH to Swindon return ticket if there's any chance of he / she happening to be on a train that calls at Dilton Marsh in the evening.   

Customer Happy. Conductor Happy. Fare system even more in disrepute!
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
swlines
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1178


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: January 21, 2008, 16:02:42 »

The Saver Return saves on the Standard Open Return fare by having more restrictions but despite being valid for a month return. Wink

Of course, the SOR isn't available on that journey...

The guard could technically have just zero excessed their fare to Dilton Marsh...
Logged
vacman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2530


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: January 21, 2008, 16:15:44 »

The Saver Return saves on the Standard Open Return fare by having more restrictions but despite being valid for a month return. Wink

Of course, the SOR isn't available on that journey...

The guard could technically have just zero excessed their fare to Dilton Marsh...
I know i'm playing devils advocate BUT a penalty fare could be charged in that situation IF the customer had travelled beyond the validity of the ticket regardless of whether there is a difference, probably hard for FGW (First Great Western) to defend if it went to court but...
Logged
swlines
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1178


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: January 21, 2008, 16:20:06 »

I got the impression he was on the return portion of his ticket, and as it was between Swindon and Westbury he was perfectly entitled to ask for a zero excess...
Logged
Ptolemy
Full Member
***
Posts: 30


ptolemyphil@hotmail.com ptolemyphil
View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #6 on: January 21, 2008, 16:25:31 »


What he should do (or was it a she?) is to ask in the morning for a DILTON MARSH to Swindon return ticket if there's any chance of he / she happening to be on a train that calls at Dilton Marsh in the evening.   

Customer Happy. Conductor Happy. Fare system even more in disrepute!

Thanks Graham - this was my understanding of it as well, and to be fair was exactly what the guard was trying to explain to the person concerned (I'd rather not mention if it was a he or a she so as to protect anonymity).

In the end she (whoops!) got so agitated that the guard calmly pointed out, as Vacman says, that he was perfectly entitled to charge a penalty fare in that situation if the customer had travelled beyond the validity of the ticket (ie beyond Westbury)
Logged
vacman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2530


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: January 21, 2008, 16:31:52 »

I got the impression he was on the return portion of his ticket, and as it was between Swindon and Westbury he was perfectly entitled to ask for a zero excess...
Yes, but if you read my post properly, if the person HAD travelled beyond the validity of their ticket!
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page