Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 21:15 28 Mar 2024
* Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
- Easter getaways hit by travel disruption
- Where Baltimore bridge investigation goes now
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Family anger at sentence on fatal crash driver, 19
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1992)
MOD Kineton tour, branch line society (*)

Train RunningCancelled
18:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
19:35 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
19:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
20:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
20:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
21:16 Bedwyn to Newbury
21:30 Shalford to Reading
21:53 Newbury to Bedwyn
22:25 Bedwyn to Newbury
22:30 Gatwick Airport to Reading
22:47 Newbury to Bedwyn
Short Run
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:30 London Paddington to Taunton
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
20:11 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
20:42 Bedwyn to London Paddington
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
23:04 Reading to Bedwyn
23:17 Bedwyn to Reading
Delayed
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
Additional 17:26 Castle Cary to Penzance
19:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:30 Gatwick Airport to Reading
23:45 London Paddington to Penzance
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 21:29:44 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[104] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[103] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[78] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[56] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[41] Return of the BRUTE?
[25] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 17 18 [19] 20 21 ... 27
  Print  
Author Topic: Class 180s return to the Cotswolds  (Read 194227 times)
Andy W
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 267



View Profile Email
« Reply #270 on: January 21, 2013, 17:47:31 »

Two diagrams covered today.  The two that aren't appear to have a 2-Car Class 165s allocated to them throughout the day.  Not acceptable FGW (First Great Western)!
The trouble is, II, that it is deemed acceptable by FGW. In the words of Tom Jones " It's not unusual"
Logged
johoare
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2818


View Profile
« Reply #271 on: January 21, 2013, 21:59:24 »

Two diagrams covered today.  The two that aren't appear to have a 2-Car Class 165s allocated to them throughout the day.  Not acceptable FGW (First Great Western)!
The trouble is, II, that it is deemed acceptable by FGW. In the words of Tom Jones " It's not unusual"

Does anyone here have a valid FGW reason for this happening?
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17865


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #272 on: January 21, 2013, 22:19:06 »

Erm ... cue Dan Panes, perhaps?  Roll Eyes
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Worcester_Passenger
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1703


View Profile
« Reply #273 on: January 21, 2013, 22:21:03 »

Two diagrams covered today.  The two that aren't appear to have a 2-Car Class 165s allocated to them throughout the day.  Not acceptable FGW (First Great Western)!
The trouble is, II, that it is deemed acceptable by FGW. In the words of Tom Jones " It's not unusual"

Does anyone here have a valid FGW reason for this happening?
Alas, probably not.

This evening the 17:22 to Hereford started from Didcot.

The 17:50 departure to Worcester was cancelled.

The 18:22 departure to Worcester and Hereford was cancelled.

The 19:22 departure to Worcester and Hereford left Paddington 43 minutes late.

DGIH I'm glad I was not travelling this evening.

Logged
inspector_blakey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3574



View Profile
« Reply #274 on: January 21, 2013, 22:32:10 »

In the spirit of this thread, this video in Youtube may be of train spotter-y interest to some:

(Network Rail - home page)=1&v=86oqnk--X_A" target="_blank">FGW (First Great Western) Class 180 Faults and Failures

Incidentally, the actor playing that driver seems to have been in more or less every railway training video made since the dawn of time, see for example here...
Logged
Southern Stag
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 984


View Profile
« Reply #275 on: January 22, 2013, 00:07:30 »

Two diagrams covered today.  The two that aren't appear to have a 2-Car Class 165s allocated to them throughout the day.  Not acceptable FGW (First Great Western)!
The problem from December with timetable and diagram changes is that 2 diagrams are now calling at stations with stations too short for a 3-car unit. It's been caused by moving the Shipton stop from the 1513 Hereford-London Paddington to the 1728 Worcester Foregate Street-London Paddington. So now if either the diagram with the evening halts train in, or the diagram with the 1728 Worcester-London in can't be covered with 180 trained staff they have to be a 2-car 165. I've seen the 1421 London Paddington-Worcester Foregate Street reported as a 2-car 165 a worrying number of times since December, presumably because of this issue. At least when the halts train was booked a 2-car 165 on its run up from London-Great Malvern it had a 3-car unit attached as far as Oxford. Now if a 2-car 165 is out vice 180 it seems that's normally all you get from London-Oxford.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #276 on: January 22, 2013, 05:41:12 »

That does indeed explain some of the rationale behind the decisions made, though one of the diagrams covered yesterday by a 2-car was OC504 which has no such impediment.  And there have been occasions where units have been stepped up later in the 'halts' diagram so that, at least up until that point, a 3-car has been used.  Those two reasons are what prompted my 'unacceptable FGW (First Great Western)!' statement.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
lordgoata
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 415



View Profile
« Reply #277 on: January 22, 2013, 09:22:29 »

DGIH I'm glad I was not travelling this evening.

Last night was a frigging joke. Stranded at Maidenhead for 78 minutes, while trains to Reading ran (albeit at bursting point), with all services to Oxford and Banbury cancelled up to 18:40, except for the 17:40, which arrived at 18:18. So you can imagine our enjoyment when the announcement that it was 2 coaches came over the PA (Public Address)....

Thankfully the vast majority got off at Maidenhead so all the passengers could actually get on, which I was very surprised about. The driver was excellent (had a chat while deciding if I should try and get on or wait), made a nice clear announcement over the PA for everyone to move well into the carriages and that they would all have plenty of time to get off at the stops, which I think helped, as usually no one wants to move more than 2 rows deep into the carriage!

No announcements to Oxford bound passengers were made in the whole 78 minutes, despite frequent announcements for the London bound passengers.

And then, yet again, this morning the 180 was replaced with 2 car turbo, which at least was slightly less crowded than yesterday. But not by much.

Just what the hell is the problem at Hayes & Harlington ? Is there really any signal kit left to replace, it seems to be faulting almost weekly if not even more frequently than that!
Logged
Richard Fairhurst
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1204


View Profile Email
« Reply #278 on: January 22, 2013, 10:38:03 »

I know it shouldn't happen, but I have on very rare occasions been on a 3-car Turbo that's stopped at Finstock and Combe. Don't tell HSE (Health and Safety Executive). Wink

More pragmatically, AIUI (as I understand it) it's accepted practice that when 15xs stop at stations with very short platforms, passengers are asked to use (under supervision) the door in the rear cab. (Info from a uk.railway posting by a Central Trains conductor back in 2003.) Given the tiny number of passengers at the Oxfordshire halts, would it be possible to do that on a 3-car 16x, or are the rules different from 15xs?
Logged
IndustryInsider
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #279 on: January 22, 2013, 10:57:22 »

More pragmatically, AIUI (as I understand it) it's accepted practice that when 15xs stop at stations with very short platforms, passengers are asked to use (under supervision) the door in the rear cab.

The layout is different.  The Class 150 cab door is separate to the actual cab, whereas on a Turbo passengers would have to clamber all over the drivers seat to get out!  I've said before though, that I don't see why the operating instructions can't be altered so that the Guard exits the rear cab and locally operates one of the doors at the rear of the train using one of the outer butterfly handles.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Steve Bray
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 207


View Profile
« Reply #280 on: January 22, 2013, 12:50:19 »

To be honest, it does seem daft that a 2 car turbo has to operate due to the Shipton situation. Is a record kept of passengers alighting/boarding this train? I am sure the numbers will be miniscule, and therefore the majority of passengers are suffering overcrowding for the benefit of very few Shiptonians. Ascott down the line has a shiny new underused platform.
Logged
CLPGMS
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 155


View Profile
« Reply #281 on: January 22, 2013, 15:25:35 »

Quote
I know it shouldn't happen, but I have on very rare occasions been on a 3-car Turbo that's stopped at Finstock and Combe.

Here is a photo of one occasion when it did happen at Finstock.



This was on Saturday 11th June 1994, when the Cotswold Line Promotion Group organised a ramble which ended at Finstock.  Unfortunately, the booked Class 150 never ran from Tyseley to Oxford to form the evening stopper service, so a special stop was arranged in the following 3-car Turbo to collect the rambling party.  The method outlined by II was used to allow passengers to board.

Unfortunately, train operators seem to regard this procedure as "unsafe" as all the train doors may inadvertently be opened by mistake.
Logged
Andy W
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 267



View Profile Email
« Reply #282 on: January 22, 2013, 15:30:56 »

In the spirit of this thread, this video in Youtube may be of train spotter-y interest to some:

(Network Rail - home page)=1&v=86oqnk--X_A" target="_blank">FGW (First Great Western) Class 180 Faults and Failures

Incidentally, the actor playing that driver seems to have been in more or less every railway training video made since the dawn of time, see for example here...

Thanks for posting this - very interesting not least because the video is 10 years old. You would have hoped that lessons would have been learned in the intervening years but alas not it would appear.

To be honest, it does seem daft that a 2 car turbo has to operate due to the Shipton situation. Is a record kept of passengers alighting/boarding this train? I am sure the numbers will be miniscule, and therefore the majority of passengers are suffering overcrowding for the benefit of very few Shiptonians. Ascott down the line has a shiny new underused platform.

You would have thought that if a solution to opening the doors could not be implemented (I'm sure II has identified a solution) then a mini bus could be put on for those wishing to travel to / from Shipston.
Logged
Southern Stag
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 984


View Profile
« Reply #283 on: January 22, 2013, 16:07:11 »

More pragmatically, AIUI (as I understand it) it's accepted practice that when 15xs stop at stations with very short platforms, passengers are asked to use (under supervision) the door in the rear cab.

The layout is different.  The Class 150 cab door is separate to the actual cab, whereas on a Turbo passengers would have to clamber all over the drivers seat to get out!  I've said before though, that I don't see why the operating instructions can't be altered so that the Guard exits the rear cab and locally operates one of the doors at the rear of the train using one of the outer butterfly handles.
That's usually what's done on the 150/1s with the slam cab door, at least it was before they had intermediate door controls fitted.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #284 on: January 22, 2013, 16:44:12 »

Is a record kept of passengers alighting/boarding this train? [at Shipton]

Shipton's annual figures are shown in http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/smr/SIP.html (you have to be logged in to see them).  Remember to divide by 2 for the number of arrivals and the number of departures (I don't suppose there's a significant difference), then divide by around 300 to give a number for a typical day, then see how you think they would split between the various trains.

The local council map also have specific survey figures, and they may provide extra data like the journeys being made by the people who get on and off; we've found such data highly enlightening on the TransWilts (and not what we expected) and the council will give you their data (FOI (Freedom of Information)) whereas the TOC (Train Operating Company) probably won't (Commercial data)
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 17 18 [19] 20 21 ... 27
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page