Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 14:15 29 Mar 2024
- Delays at Dover as millions begin Easter getaway
- Attempted murder charge after man stabbed on train
- KFC Nigeria sorry after disabled diner refused service
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
13:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
14:12 Newbury to Bedwyn
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
14:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
15:50 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:15 Newbury to Bedwyn
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
16:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
12:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
13:46 Bristol Temple Meads to Warminster
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
09:10 Penzance to London Paddington
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:20 Penzance to London Paddington
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:15 Penzance to London Paddington
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
13:50 London Paddington to Great Malvern
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
14:15 Penzance to London Paddington
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
15:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
19:04 London Paddington to Penzance
etc
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 14:19:18 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[153] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[97] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[53] Travel for free on the m2 metrobus - Bristol - 4,5,6 April 202...
[41] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[38] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[37] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 16 17 [18] 19 20
  Print  
Author Topic: Warning - Pedant alert  (Read 119361 times)
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5191


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #255 on: September 22, 2014, 09:04:01 »

Just like London Southend Airport... Roll Eyes

Airports are like that... Lulsgate Bottom International is hundreds of yards from Lulsgate Bottom.
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 9810



View Profile
« Reply #256 on: September 22, 2014, 15:40:14 »

Don't start me on London Oxford airport.... it isn't even in Oxford, let alone London.
Logged
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #257 on: September 22, 2014, 16:11:33 »

Don't start me on London Oxford airport.... it isn't even in Oxford, let alone London.

Nor London Stansted, London Luton, nor to the delight of the true pedant London Heathrow!

Airports are like that... Lulsgate Bottom International is hundreds of yards from Lulsgate Bottom.

I thought Lulsgate Bottom what was you got from eating out-of-date airline meals. Another terrible disease is Boxcar Willie, caught on freight trains in the USA...
Logged

Now, please!
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17865


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #258 on: September 22, 2014, 20:23:52 »

Airports are like that... Lulsgate Bottom International is hundreds of yards from Lulsgate Bottom.

It's now Bristol Airport: we apparently dropped the International a few years ago: http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/Rebranded-Bristol-Airport-drops-International/story-11299139-detail/story.html  Wink
« Last Edit: November 27, 2014, 18:00:20 by Chris from Nailsea » Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #259 on: September 22, 2014, 22:19:42 »


It's now Bristol Airport: we apparently dropped the International a couple of years ago: http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/Rebranded-Bristol-Airport-drops-International/story-11299139-detail/story.html  Wink

It seems that once the foreign destinations served exceed a certain number, it is considered vulgar to retain the "International". That is left for the likes of Blackpool (4 non-seasonal overseas routes, or 5 if the Isle of Man counts), Leeds-Bradford (nearing the number for losing "International"), Exeter (2 non-seasonal overseas routes), and Norwich (also 2). Bournemouth non-International serves 8 permanent foreign destinations.

A similar principle can be seen in other contexts. Some schools of karate return to a white belt for the highest rank, usually held by one old man who can barely stand, but could still eviscerate an opponent with an eyelash. Doctors who achieve the exclusive height of membership or fellowship of the Royal College of Surgeons drop the title "Doctor" and become "Mister" (I'm not sure if this applies also to female fellows). In both cases, this is done to demonstrate to the lower orders that the master is no different to the pupil, merely vastly superior in ability, god-like stature, and salary.
Logged

Now, please!
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #260 on: September 22, 2014, 23:09:52 »

Don't start me on London Oxford airport.... it isn't even in Oxford, let alone London.

Nor London Stansted, London Luton, nor to the delight of the true pedant London Heathrow!

But think about it - why on Earth would you want a major airport inside a city?

Heathrow is too close in as it is. Since huge numbers of aircraft have to take off or land over London, over thirty years or more there is a significant probability that a big one will fall out of the sky onto a densely populated bit. Followed by politicians and others blaming each other ("who ever thought that was a good idea - not me!").

And anyway ... how much of "London" is really in "London"?

Logged
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #261 on: September 22, 2014, 23:52:43 »


But think about it - why on Earth would you want a major airport inside a city?

Heathrow is too close in as it is. Since huge numbers of aircraft have to take off or land over London, over thirty years or more there is a significant probability that a big one will fall out of the sky onto a densely populated bit. Followed by politicians and others blaming each other ("who ever thought that was a good idea - not me!").

And anyway ... how much of "London" is really in "London"?


Come now, stuving, this is the pedant alert thread! Even London City airport isn't within the strict limits of London's square mile.

Your point about proximity and the chances of one "going in" is well made, yet seemingly insoluble without huge sums being expended. The major problem is that Heathrow was established to the west of London, with firstly one then two east / west runways (OK, I know this is the pedant alert thred, and there were actually six at one point after the concept of runways arrived, rather than just a big field with aircraft needing only a few hundred metres take-off roll into the wind, but I am talking Modern Age, Comet / 707 onwards), the prevailing wind being westerly in the winter / spring / autumn months and easterly in summer. Aircraft take off and land into the wind, which was not a big issue when most of the aircraft so taking off would have 10 minutes of flight over farmland before getting anywhere close to the Metrolopse. By the time this was an issue, caused by the several forces of larger aircraft, urban sprawl, and increased passenger numbers, it was too late to do much about it, except try to mitigate the risks. Paris has two major airports, one north, one south of the city, neither any further from the centre than Heathrow, but neither having flight paths over the Champs Elysee or the Tour d'Eiffel. Heathrow 27R passes over Windsor Castle within 2 minutes of departure if the aircraft does not turn (they do unless in bad weather, but still pass close at almost TOGA power), and 09L gives passengers a birds eye view of Hampton court Palace at low level before skirting the Houses of Parliament and Canary Wharf.

Had Norman MacMillan, in 1925, been forced down by mechanical problems at Cheshunt or Caterham, rather than Heathrow, we may have ended up with an alignment of runways / prevailing wind / capital on a par with Paris. But he wasn't, so we are stuck with it, and the perceived need for more capacity to boot. The first battle by locals against a third runway at Heathrow began before the second was finished. It is such a big issue that no government wants to tackle it, given there are only five years between elections. I think that as a country, we are getting better at super-massive infrastructure projects, but in the time it has taken to decide on a third reactor at Hinkley Point, for example, there have been three elections, and it could still be dumped by the next government if the Greens win. (Ladbrokes are offering generous odds). Heathrow's third runway has been an issue since 1946, and thus looks, possibly, to be the first major infrastructure to outlast three monarchs (four if you count the eponymous airline).
« Last Edit: September 23, 2014, 00:10:13 by Four Track, Now! » Logged

Now, please!
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18896



View Profile
« Reply #262 on: September 23, 2014, 00:55:27 »

As it's the pedant's thread I feel I should point out that plans for a third nuclear power station at Hinkley Point have been around for far longer than the last three elections. As early as 1981 the Central Electricity Generating Board were exploring options for a third site at Hinkley Point. In 1987 a planning application was submitted to Somerset County Council by the CEGB. A public inquiry was held in 1988. I remember the local news coverage well. And also debating the issues as part of my Personal & Social Development lessons at secondary school in Taunton. The CEGB obtained the planning permission in 1990 to build a Pressurised Water Reactor similar to that at Sizewell B. With Conservative plans to privatise the energy generation industries around the same time there was little firm commitment from central government to provide funds or underwrite the construction costs. Nobody wanted to buy the existing nuclear power stations when the Conservative government first attempted to sell them. The plan for Hinkley C was finally dropped following, at the second attempt, privatisation of the nuclear energy generation industry in the mid 1990s.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #263 on: September 24, 2014, 20:51:18 »

As it's the pedant's thread I feel I should point out that plans for a third nuclear power station at Hinkley Point have been around for far longer than the last three elections.

I stand corrected, and am grateful, bnm. It has, therefore, bubbled on through three administrations, seven general elections,  five Prime Ministers, and Nick Clegg. Hinkley C will be built in spite of government, not because of it.
« Last Edit: November 27, 2014, 17:48:51 by Four Track, Now! » Logged

Now, please!
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #264 on: November 27, 2014, 17:52:15 »

I saw this sign in Nelson Street, Bristol.



I may be verging on the lunatic frtinge of true pedantry, but am I the only one to think that this is possibly the daftest sign ever created? How can cyclists use the "mandatory" cycle lane if they cannot enter it? That it is sited outside a cycling caf^ and workshop makes it dafter, and the gentleman pictured is far from the only person to not comply.
Logged

Now, please!
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18896



View Profile
« Reply #265 on: November 28, 2014, 01:39:32 »

Didn't notice that sign today as I wandering around that area (Long story to do with buses being snarled up following a bus/pedestrian RTC outside Debenhams in Broadmead).

What I did notice though was that the New Bridewell Police Station, a 1960s building even I, a lover of modernism, didn't really like, has been obliterated. All that was left today was the main stairwell/liftshaft.

The BiB are now in across the road in a building called The Bridewell Police Station. I find it mildly amusing that the Old Bridewell Police Station is still standing, the New Bridewell is gone, and Avon & Somerset Constabulary are now in building called The Bridewell. I wonder why the latest cop shop wasn't called The New New Bridewell?  Tongue
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #266 on: November 28, 2014, 12:43:09 »

Logged

Now, please!
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18896



View Profile
« Reply #267 on: November 29, 2014, 01:52:05 »

The Old Bridewell (more formally, Central Police Station) in Nelson St, Bristol:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/58/Central_Police_Station_Bristol.jpg

What I love about that picture (not mine) is the parked cars featured. I'm assuming it's merely coincidence that it features four Ford Focus' (Foci? Focuses?). Not to forget one example of the Focus' predecessor - an Escort. Shame there's only one Escort. Plural for them is much easier.
« Last Edit: November 29, 2014, 01:57:09 by bignosemac » Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
Cynthia
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 298


View Profile Email
« Reply #268 on: December 14, 2014, 21:28:41 »

Informal plural of focus is Focuses I believe; Foci being the formal form.  And yes, there is only ONE Escort - the Mark 1, that is!  (not pictured, unfortunately, as only spotted at classic car rallies these days) Those were the days! (Sigh)

Logged

Trying to break ones addiction to car travel is much harder than giving up ciggies!
chrisr_75
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1019


View Profile
« Reply #269 on: December 19, 2014, 17:57:27 »

Informal plural of focus is Focuses I believe; Foci being the formal form.  And yes, there is only ONE Escort - the Mark 1, that is!  (not pictured, unfortunately, as only spotted at classic car rallies these days) Those were the days! (Sigh)

You might then be envious to know that there is a Mk1 Escort works rally car that lives in my neighbours garage, which I see from time to time, very nice (and expensive) it is too!
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 16 17 [18] 19 20
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page