Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 05:35 29 Mar 2024
- Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
* Easter getaway begins with flood alerts in place
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
07:00 Bedwyn to Newbury
07:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
08:13 Newbury to Bedwyn
08:46 Bedwyn to Newbury
09:54 Bedwyn to Newbury
10:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:29 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
12:52 Bedwyn to Newbury
Short Run
04:54 Plymouth to London Paddington
05:12 Reading to Bedwyn
05:33 Plymouth to London Paddington
05:55 Plymouth to London Paddington
06:00 Bedwyn to London Paddington
06:37 Plymouth to London Paddington
07:03 London Paddington to Paignton
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
Delayed
23:45 London Paddington to Penzance
05:03 Penzance to London Paddington
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 05:37:49 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[92] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[86] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[76] Return of the BRUTE?
[65] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[53] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[47] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 3
  Print  
Author Topic: Call for Regular Service to Bodmin General  (Read 31832 times)
Andy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 544



View Profile
« on: June 22, 2013, 10:09:07 »

Apparently, this week questions were raised in Parliament regarding the possibility of establishing regular services to Bodmin General and Okehampton in order to improve access to the rail network from North Cornwall, an area which was particularly hard-hit by the closures of the 60s.

http://www.thisiscornwall.co.uk/regular-passenger-service-run-Bodmin-General/story-19342069-detail/story.html#axzz2WvvnbMW2

I'm assuming the idea is to have some kind of shuttle between Bodmin General & Bodmin Road to serve commuters, running before & after the heritage service, as I imagine the cost/benefit ratio of altering the track layout at the east end of Bodmin Road to enable some sort of all-stations service direct from Bodmin General to Plymouth would make it unfeasible. 
Logged
LiskeardRich
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3457

richardwarwicker@hotmail.co.uk
View Profile
« Reply #1 on: June 22, 2013, 10:38:42 »

The idiot of an MP (Member of Parliament) wants to run main line services from London through Bodmin General. I could only wonder where the infrastructure for this is coming from!
Logged

All posts are my own personal believes, opinions and understandings!
Andy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 544



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: June 22, 2013, 11:07:52 »

The idiot of an MP (Member of Parliament) wants to run main line services from London through Bodmin General. I could only wonder where the infrastructure for this is coming from!

Oh dear, so it's a cuckoo on a cloud eating pie in the sky!
Logged
LiskeardRich
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3457

richardwarwicker@hotmail.co.uk
View Profile
« Reply #3 on: June 22, 2013, 12:15:31 »

Indeed, his pitch to local media was so ridiculous it was funny. The thing was none of them queried the lack of infrastructure.
He also wanted a new station "Okehampton Parkway" next to the A30 to serve the Bude area.
Logged

All posts are my own personal believes, opinions and understandings!
chrisoates
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 286


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: June 25, 2013, 03:02:43 »

Indeed, his pitch to local media was so ridiculous it was funny. The thing was none of them queried the lack of infrastructure.
He also wanted a new station "Okehampton Parkway" next to the A30 to serve the Bude area.
If I remember correctly.
Approach BOD and cross over to the up - change ends and reverse in platform 2 - change ends and reverse across the ground frame  to the engine shed - change ends - set two manual points - reverse onto platform 3 - change ends, set manual points and continue to Bodmin General.
I don't think anything but a 153 or 150 will fit in the platform 3 engine shed spur.
Logged
chrisoates
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 286


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: June 25, 2013, 22:59:39 »

Had a look today - the cross over is at Lostwithiel and you would only get a 153 across the ground frame into Parkway platform 3.

Looked at platform 3 which could be connected to the main line except for a few problems.

You would need two sets of points one of which would be on the road bridge - this would need a trap to protect the main line and whatever was derailed would end up in the river at the bottom of a steep embankment.
 
Logged
rower40
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
******
Posts: 292

Turning signalling into a video game since 1988.


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: July 20, 2013, 04:49:38 »

I'm assuming the idea is to have some kind of shuttle between Bodmin General & Bodmin Road to serve commuters, running before & after the heritage service, as I imagine the cost/benefit ratio of altering the track layout at the east end of Bodmin Road to enable some sort of all-stations service direct from Bodmin General to Plymouth would make it unfeasible. 
The exchange siding between Network Rail and Bodmin&Wenford infrastructure is long enough for a 2car unit; at the end of 2012, FGW (First Great Western) lent the B&W a class 150 for a day. As already stated, there's no crossover at Bodmin Parkway between the Down and Up lines, so trains using the exchange siding have to have come from Lostwithiel to get on to the B&W, and then go towards Liskeard when they get back onto NR» (Network Rail - home page) metals.

The B&W signalling allows a train to be 'locked in' to the line between Bodmin General and Bodmin Parkway; so after the heritage operation has finished (normally about 1630 each day), a DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) could be shunted into the platform at Bodmin General and locked in.  It could then shuttle between General and Parkway as often as demand required, needing only a driver and a guard - i.e. Bodmin General signalbox would not necessarily need to be manned.  But this would prevent the B&W from running their occasional evening Dining and Murder Mystery trains.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #7 on: July 20, 2013, 08:36:26 »

The exchange siding between Network Rail and Bodmin&Wenford infrastructure is long enough for a 2car unit; at the end of 2012, FGW (First Great Western) lent the B&W a class 150 for a day ...

Welcome to the forum, Rower40 - and many thanks for filling us in on the infrastructure at Bodmin Parkway and the line through to Bodmin General.

As someone who doesn't know much anything about the specifics of Bodmin, I have to wonder at the practicality of transferring a 2 car dmu on and off the line on a regular basis under current infrastructure, in order to provide a morning / evening commuter service (to Plymouth?) and longer distance connections.  Of course, that's not to say that  the infrastructure couldn't be changed if the business case were there, or different operating arrangements made such as a more permanent residence (a la Stourbridge Town, Lymington, Cardiff Bay, etc)
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
rower40
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
******
Posts: 292

Turning signalling into a video game since 1988.


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: July 24, 2013, 11:53:05 »

I was assuming that it would be the Bodmin & Wenford's (heritage) DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) that would be used for the shuttle service.  In that way, the only shunting that needs to be done is at Bodmin General.

In order to unlock the points between the Exchange Siding and Bodmin Parkway platform 3, the shunter must have the Bodmin General to Bodmin Parkway train staff.  This is issued by the Bodmin General signalman (not signaller!).  Under present arrangements, this has to be taken to Bodmin General by road if the B&W is to take delivery of stock from the main line, or if a loco is to be brought up from the Parkway shed.

However, there's a plan for the B&W to build a signalbox at Bodmin Parkway; then a token could be taken out at either end (but only one at a time) for a movement to the other end, and any shunting at Parkway could be performed under control of a signalman there.  That signalman would liaise with the NR» (Network Rail - home page) signaller at Lostwithiel for movements to/from the Exchange siding.

(I'm one of the volunteer signalmen at Bodmin General.  However, I live and work in Derby, and my association with the B&W is an accident of history!)
Logged
trainer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1035


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: July 24, 2013, 12:30:46 »

Good to have you on the forum, rower40.

Can you tell me if the B&W job titles remain gender specific because of the heritage nature of the operation, because there coincidentally happen to be no women in that specific department or because jobs are allocated as per some point in history?
Logged
rower40
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
******
Posts: 292

Turning signalling into a video game since 1988.


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: July 24, 2013, 17:10:20 »

Can you tell me if the B&W job titles remain gender specific because of the heritage nature of the operation, because there coincidentally happen to be no women in that specific department or because jobs are allocated as per some point in history?
The last of your three options.  In any event, the 'man' in Signalman, Fireman etc refers to their membership of the human race, not just the Y-chromosome-carrying half.  This means the job can't be re-assigned to a computer.
Logged
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: July 24, 2013, 17:47:29 »


In any event, the 'man' in Signalman, Fireman etc refers to their membership of the human race, not just the Y-chromosome-carrying half


Well, no. NR» (Network Rail - home page) employs signallers (human ones), not signalmen, because language is important. It is not good enough to say 'women shouldn't take offence' - some will, and some will feel excluded by the suffix -man. Are you happy to offend and exclude?

On a heritage railway I would expect signage to reflect the mores and norms of the period - but I would not expect its social attitudes and organisation to do so.
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
LiskeardRich
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3457

richardwarwicker@hotmail.co.uk
View Profile
« Reply #12 on: July 24, 2013, 18:41:00 »


In any event, the 'man' in Signalman, Fireman etc refers to their membership of the human race, not just the Y-chromosome-carrying half


Well, no. NR» (Network Rail - home page) employs signallers (human ones), not signalmen, because language is important. It is not good enough to say 'women shouldn't take offence' - some will, and some will feel excluded by the suffix -man. Are you happy to offend and exclude?


This is ridiculous. Postman, Fireman, policeman, boatman, are all long term traditional job titles.
Logged

All posts are my own personal believes, opinions and understandings!
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: July 24, 2013, 19:24:41 »


This is ridiculous. Postman, Fireman, policeman, boatman, are all long term traditional job titles.


...that have been replaced by postal officer, firefighter, police officer etc.

No, I agree, it's rediculous, they'll be giving them the vote next!  Shocked
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
Zoe
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 746


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: July 24, 2013, 19:55:55 »

Network Rail do still (or at least did until very recently) use the term "Pilotman" though.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2 3
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page