Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 15:15 18 Apr 2024
* Dubai airport re-opens after UAE sees heavy rain
- Rescuers deflate hedgehog with 'balloon' syndrome
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
18th Apr (2018)
SEWWEB leaflet launched and Aztec West (link)

Train RunningCancelled
14:12 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
14:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
15:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
15:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:12 Bristol Temple Meads to Avonmouth
16:58 London Paddington to Great Malvern
17:04 Didcot Parkway to Moreton-In-Marsh
17:05 Oxford to Didcot Parkway
17:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
18:43 Bristol Temple Meads to Westbury
18:51 Evesham to Oxford
19:13 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
19:14 Bristol Temple Meads to Avonmouth
19:46 Avonmouth to Bristol Temple Meads
20:50 Bristol Temple Meads to Weymouth
22:24 Bristol Temple Meads to Severn Beach
23:08 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
23:33 Reading to Gatwick Airport
19/04/24 04:45 Redhill to Gatwick Airport
19/04/24 05:11 Gatwick Airport to Reading
Short Run
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:49 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
14:39 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
15:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
Additional 15:20 Bristol Parkway to Weymouth
15:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
16:39 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
16:46 Avonmouth to Weston-Super-Mare
16:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
18:53 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
Delayed
13:23 Swansea to London Paddington
13:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
13:52 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
14:02 Westbury to Gloucester
14:48 London Paddington to Swansea
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 18, 2024, 15:28:24 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[109] Rail delay compensation payments hit £100 million
[60] Signage - not making it easy ...
[29] IETs at Melksham
[27] Ferry just cancelled - train tickets will be useless - advice?
[25] From Melksham to Tallinn (and back round The Baltic) by train
[23] New station at Ashley Down, Bristol
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
Author Topic: FGW Guards To Be Balloted By RMT For Action Over Managers Working Trains?  (Read 15072 times)
oooooo
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 288


View Profile
« Reply #30 on: December 21, 2007, 13:22:05 »

http://www.rmt.org.uk/Templates/Internal.asp?NodeID=101216
Logged
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #31 on: December 21, 2007, 17:14:28 »

Both the ASLEF» (Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen - about) and RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers) ballot results will be declared on Wednesday, January 10 (link below.)
http://oxfordmail.net/display.var.1922289.0.new_year_rail_strike_fears.php

ASLEF are saying that FGW (First Great Western) are "at least 100 drivers short."
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
Mookiemoo
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3117


View Profile Email
« Reply #32 on: December 21, 2007, 22:44:26 »

I apologise if I have offended anyone....

I work in an industry where my right to work as self employed is being undermined by union pressure to give all "temps" employment rights

I do not want employment rights - I'll trade off ^500-^800 per day for having no rights - I am not an employee.

However, the unions are trying to get all workers "rights" (where the definition of a worker is not just a temp).

But if that happens, the rates will fall as the clients have to cover the additional cost.

I am sure the ^15 per hour secretarial temp wants needs/protection

But unless it can be done without causing the likes of me to accept lower rates to pay for it (I pay an accountant and a solicitor to give me protection), no way.

It is the "protection" of UK (United Kingdom) workers that is one of the causes for bringing in overseas labour - they are employed by a non-UK company therefore not subject to UK labour laws but do work here by intercompany transfer.

P.S. I dont agree with the minimum wage either - people have free will to choose to work or not - if they are not willing to work for slave wages, employers will have to pay more. 

and P.P.S I will feel aggrieved as in current contract - if I cant get into the office on any day I have to be there - I lose ^650 + VAT (Value Added Tax).  Dont expect me to have any sympathy when the employees going on strike arent exactly losing out in the current arrangement (as it has been explained to me) but getting overtime etc etc - the only thing they are losing is freedom to choose when to take leave (if FGW (First Great Western) refuse to give you your contracted leave, sue them - thats what contracts are for).

Logged

Ditched former sig - now I need to think of something amusing - brain hurts -I'll steal from the master himself - Einstein:

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."

"Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love"
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #33 on: December 21, 2007, 23:21:18 »

Mookiemoo - I don't think you're going to get too much sympathy from other posters given your comment about how much you lose when not able to work. I don't think it's realistic to expect employed staff to sue their employer everytime they are leant on to accommodate their employer's needs. I have never belonged to a union (and never will), and for the majority of my working life have worked in non-unionised office environments. But even I can see that they serve a purpose in some industries in providing a collective voice and bargaining power against what would otherwise be very powerful employers.   
Logged
Shazz
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 534


View Profile
« Reply #34 on: December 21, 2007, 23:26:21 »

and P.P.S I will feel aggrieved as in current contract - if I cant get into the office on any day I have to be there - I lose ^650 + VAT (Value Added Tax).  Dont expect me to have any sympathy when the employees going on strike arent exactly losing out in the current arrangement (as it has been explained to me) but getting overtime etc etc - the only thing they are losing is freedom to choose when to take leave (if FGW (First Great Western) refuse to give you your contracted leave, sue them - thats what contracts are for).



All i have to say to that is:

Oh no, you're loosing what some people get paid per month for a days work, boo hoo...

As john said, he doubts you're going to get any sympthy for it on this forum, and he was very very right.
« Last Edit: December 22, 2007, 00:52:19 by Shazz » Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40783



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #35 on: December 22, 2007, 09:00:37 »

"The Grass is always greener on the other side"  ... have you heard that one?

Firstly, this thread has wandered far from the topic of managers stepping in for operational staff, the safety issues thereof and union ballots to say "enough is enough".  It has moved much more onto people's personal things away from their rail use, which isn't something that's encouraged - indeed it is discouraged save for the fact that if it's someone talking about their own situation then who are we, (the moderators) to discourage it.  So we have been letting this thread run .... but keeping a watching eye.   Now is, I think, a time to say "enough is enough" and ask posters to to move back on topic, or let the thread quietly fade.

John and Shazz predict that Mookiemoo will get no sympathy on this forum.  Ho, Hum, J and S - perhaps I'm going to surprise you.  I can identify with much of what I have read on that "side" and in some aspects I have been there too.   

But I've also been in roles where strong union support could potentially have helped to ensure that wrongs had not been committed, and from a purely practical viewpoint I think it is very important at larger employers for the employees to have a practical co-operation.   In a one / two / three person company there may be little need for the coordination, but I can't imagine how each and every conductor could negotiate his own terms and conditions with First who (by virtue of being a profit generated company) are more or less bound to look to maximise income and minimise [staff] expenditure.   It's much more efficient for them, too, to set things up with a single body such as a Union and I suspect they would confirm this if asked.  And that single body really does need to be independent of the employer; otherwise conflicts of interest occur.

OK - so how can I identify with the trials and travails of our first class traveller who's stated daily fees make some of the other contributors react jealously?  Been there / am there!  But I'm sure that may parts of my situation are different - so I'll open the door a little and give you some ideas with no direct comparison to a case I don't know and with a person I've never emailed or met.

For my work, I present training courses.  The cost for a course that I present is very clear from the web site about them and is far in excess of the pay rate of the majority of salaried 40 hour per week (or so) employees of companies. But that's only a tiny part of the story. I finished training last Thursday, and I don't have any more course bookings until 7th January, and there's no cushion of income for that time.   When I need training in the specialist subjects that I'm concerned with, it's not simply a question of no income - it's negative income as I have to pay to travel to wherever it is, and pay what's probably an even higher rate to gain that knowledge that I need in turn.

But I've only just started to scratch the surface there.  If I start a course on a Monday morning, having finished one the previous Friday evening, how on earth is everything ready and in place?  It's because there's a whole team of staff behind the scenes.  Our delegates typically arrive on Sunday evening (which is why I celebrate the return of an evening train from Swindon to Melksham on Sundays even though it hasn't actually run from Swindon once yet due to engineering!) and need to be checked in to the hotel that forms part of our package. Breakfast needs to be prepared on Monday and subsequent mornings. You've got sales, marketing, invoicing, preparing manuals, booking systems, chambermaids, supplies specialists, food hygiene, adminstration, government rules and tax ... all on top of this. There's a huge difference - and order of magnitude - between what's charged for my time of being in front of someone, and what I get out of it when all the extra costs which are "wholely, necessarily and exclusively" taken out of it are taken into account.

In my own line I have - on a few rare occasions - travelled over and above standard class in order to ensure that I'm fresher and able to work at destination. And having paid what is usually a significant premium to ensure I can do a good job then, yes, I too am pretty unhappy if that extra investment is voided out. Take the other week - when a first class train ticket that should ensure me arriving fresh as a daisy in 15 minutes turned (last minute) into a ride in a replacement bus with people crammed in and standing, tiny seats, and a 50 minute journey with an uncomfortable knee full of luggage.


« Last Edit: December 22, 2007, 10:40:52 by grahame » Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
gaf71
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 305


View Profile
« Reply #36 on: December 22, 2007, 11:24:49 »

I agree that we should move back on to topic, so to let you know, I have recieved notification in the post this morning that we will be ballotted for 'strike action' and 'industrial action short of a strike'. Ballot papers will be posted on 27/12/07 and the RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers) strongly urges its members to vote yes to both questions.

Merry Xmas.
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6298


View Profile
« Reply #37 on: December 22, 2007, 17:25:05 »

I agree that we should move back on to topic, so to let you know, I have recieved notification in the post this morning that we will be ballotted for 'strike action' and 'industrial action short of a strike'. Ballot papers will be posted on 27/12/07 and the RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers) strongly urges its members to vote yes to both questions.

Merry Xmas.
Poor FGW (First Great Western) and its longsuffering passengers. Tis only going to get worse in the new year now Bob Crow has found something to beat a part of the privatised rail network over the head with.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page