Train Graphic
Great Western Passengers' Forum Great Western Coffee Shop - [home] and [about]
This site uses cookies - see [here] for details.
If you proceed, we will take that as your consent to accept cookies
Random Image
Current Train Running Road Report Acronyms/Abbreviations Station Comparator Rail News FGW co. site Site Style 1 2 3
May 25, 2013, 11:51:00 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Calls for Sunday trains at Taplow  (Read 1370 times)
Lee
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5349


View Profile WWW Email
« on: December 21, 2007, 05:07:32 PM »

Rail users in Taplow say they have seen little improvement with the new train timetable and are sick of the station being marginalised (link below.)
http://www.maidenhead-advertiser.co.uk/news_article.php?section=5&category=85&story=5192

Taplow Rail Users Group are making fresh calls for the return of a Sunday service after the publication of First Great Western's timetable earlier this month and are disappointed to see that weekday train services have been slashed.

Jon Willmore, chairman of Taplow Rail Users Group, said: "There is a crying need for Sunday services to be restored at Taplow."

"We are obviously also very disappointed at a net loss of two weekday services from Taplow, which involves three morning services to London being lost," he said.

But he added: "On the positive side, there is a glimmer of comfort in the provision of an extra mid-evening commuter train from London to Taplow and we are pleased that  the overall service pattern has been tweaked so that it provides a slightly more even service."

FGW :

"We have a very diverse customer base all with different needs and we have to balance that with a very complicated rail network. We are not the only users of it and we have to negotiate for access."

"It's very difficult to make everyone happy at the same time but we are trying."
Logged

chris from nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10834


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: April 12, 2012, 04:30:42 PM »

From the Maidenhead Advertiser:

Quote
Fresh calls for a Sunday service at Taplow railway station have been made as traffic chaos returns to the area with the start of the controversial car boot season.

Gridlock fears in Bath Road resurfaced following this year's first Giant Car Boot Sale on Sunday last week. Cars often queue for more than an hour between Maidenhead and Slough as they battle with bargain hunters at the weekly sale.

But organiser Jack Davenport believes opening up the station, located in nearby Approach Road, would help ease congestion. Trains do not stop at the station in Taplow on Sundays despite villagers' calls for a new service.

Jack said: "With Tesco opening at The Bishop Centre as well as Sainsbury's and our car boot sale, this would help the whole area and would be profitable for the train company too."

Taplow Rail Users Group has been asking First Great Western to consider a Sunday service since it formed in 2005. "We're often there doing the flower beds on Sundays and people turn up expecting to find trains but have to travel in alternative ways," said John Fowler, vice chairman of the group and Hag Hill Rise resident.

A First Great Western spokesman said weekend engineering works by Network Rail mean two tracks are often closed near Taplow while main lines are left open.

He added: "Unfortunately, Taplow doesn't have any suitable main line platforms, meaning it's impossible for the main line services to stop when these regular engineering works are taking place. If we could find a solution to this we would still need to ensure any Sunday services were sustainable, and look very closely at the business case."
Logged

'Level crossings on the railway network are safe - unless they are used in an unsafe manner.'   Discuss.

William Huskisson MP was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.
Electric train
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1553


The future is 25,000 Volts a.c.


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: April 12, 2012, 06:16:31 PM »

I doubt the car booters would travel by train (bit of a contradiction in terms)
Logged

I work for the largest employer in the Rail Industry.
Electrification is what I do

Swindon engineering - if 3/8th steel plate is enough use 7/16th just in case.

George Jackson Churchward a true Engineer
IndustryInsider
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3306


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: April 12, 2012, 06:26:50 PM »

    I wonder if Crossrail intends on heightening the through platforms so that trains can once again stop at them during engineering work?  Can't find any mention though - all that's mentioned on the Crossrail website is:

       
  • Canopies modified (cut back)
  • Footbridge parapets made imperforate
  • OLE gantries positioned for free running under bridge
  • Use of Selective Door Opening on all platforms

Logged

To view my 'before and after' video comparison of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, and a cab view of the new layout at Reading, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/1#
eightf48544
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2700


View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: April 12, 2012, 10:32:59 PM »

It's not the platforms that need raising it's the rails lowering which I would imagine they would have to do in anycase to get the wires under the footbridge.

The reinstatement of the mainline platorms really needs to be done now so that during electrification work on the Relief lines when trains cannot stop at Burnham they can stop at Taplow, with a bus to Burnham and Slough. It means that passengers from Burnham and Taplow to and from the West don't have to go via Slough and spend over an hour doing so.
Logged
eightf48544
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2700


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: April 13, 2012, 09:31:41 AM »

I should have added on the previous post about Crossrail as listed by Industry Insider.

I thought we were getting 10 coach platforms at least on the Reliefs, extended at the Maidenhead end. Surprised to see selective door opening can you have that with OMO?
Logged
paul7755
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2562


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: April 13, 2012, 10:52:30 AM »

...Surprised to see selective door opening can you have that with OMO?

I think SN can use individual coach SDO already on their 377s with DOO, indeed the opening part of the procedure is automatic even where there is a guard, it is controlled by a combination of GPS to give location and platform mounted balises to confirm direction and the distinct platform where they vary in length. (If you weren't aware, some SN services change from DOO to 'guard present' depending where they are on the route.)

LU use SDO (at individual door level) on the new S stock.  I'd suggest that as Crossrail stock will probably have walk through gangways, and far better passenger information displays than current, it will be manageable, especially if just the odd carriage at one end of the train.

Paul
Logged
eightf48544
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2700


View Profile Email
« Reply #7 on: April 13, 2012, 01:23:31 PM »

So  we aren't getting extended platforms then?
Logged
IndustryInsider
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3306


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: April 13, 2012, 01:56:53 PM »

Not judging from the Crossrail website, though of course that may change.  Taplow's platforms can't be too far off of accepting a 10 car 200 metre train?
Logged

To view my 'before and after' video comparison of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, and a cab view of the new layout at Reading, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/1#
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of First Great Western, for customers of First Great Western and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by a customer of First Great Western, and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.firstgreatwestern.co.uk for the official First Great Western website. Please contact the adminstrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants