Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 08:35 28 Mar 2024
* Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
- What contributed to the Baltimore Bridge collapse?
- Man suffers life-threatening injuries after train stabbing
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1988)
Woman found murdered on Orpington to London train (*)

Train RunningCancelled
06:28 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
06:57 Swansea to London Paddington
07:28 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
07:43 Swansea to London Paddington
08:18 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
08:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
09:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
09:12 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
09:29 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
09:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
10:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
10:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
10:41 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
11:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
11:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
11:23 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
11:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
11:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
12:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
Short Run
04:54 Plymouth to London Paddington
05:40 Bristol Temple Meads to Penzance
06:48 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
06:54 Taunton to London Paddington
07:12 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
07:25 Okehampton to Exeter Central
08:25 Okehampton to Exeter Central
08:34 Exeter Central to Okehampton
09:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
10:50 Penzance to Cardiff Central
Delayed
05:03 Penzance to London Paddington
05:23 London Paddington to Swansea
05:33 Plymouth to London Paddington
05:55 Plymouth to London Paddington
06:00 London Paddington to Penzance
06:38 Weymouth to Gloucester
06:50 Westbury to Weymouth
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:30 Liskeard to Looe
09:05 Looe to Liskeard
09:35 Exeter Central to Okehampton
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:23 London Paddington to Oxford
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 08:42:50 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[155] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[124] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[85] Return of the BRUTE?
[67] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[53] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[29] CrossCountry upgrade will see 25% more rail seats
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Andover to Ludgershall  (Read 20724 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40687



View Profile WWW Email
« on: September 19, 2013, 20:01:12 »


Quote
PLANS to develop a heritage railway line linking Andover with Ludgershall have been working up a head of steam over the past week, Ludgershall town councillors heard.

Council chairman Owen White told the council that the idea had now received the enthusiastic backing of both local MPs (Member of Parliament) Sir George Young and Claire Perry.

It has also been given a likely name ^ Mid Wessex Railway Preservation Society ^ and discussions have opened with South West Trains and Network Rail about the need to maintain access to Andover railway station

... article continues at http://www.thisishampshire.net/news/10671503._/?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
trainer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1035


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: September 19, 2013, 20:18:08 »

I ask the following in a spirit of genuine enquiry and for the purposes of debate, not out of any position on this specific scheme.

Is there a point at which the number heritage railways reaches saturation point in terms of finding sufficient materiel (not to be confused with material) to run a successful operation?  Similarly, at what point are we likely to find that the number of poorly run operations outweigh the high quality ones to the point that Joe Public is no longer impressed?  (There is no intended implication that this could be anything other than a well run railway.)

Clearly I have no special knowledge of this proposal (and therefore this post may need to be shunted to another siding), but its very mention makes these questions arise as I reflect on it.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40687



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #2 on: September 19, 2013, 20:26:47 »

http://www.wellho.net/mouth/1757_Preserved-railways-struggling-to-the-future-.html

I would suggest also that a preserved railway takes equipment that's already near the end of its useful life and tries to extend it further ... and there is a limit.    There may be a case for new build leisure lines though ...
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18894



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: September 19, 2013, 20:40:20 »

Dean Forest Railway is a classic case in point. It's a lovely little line, but they appear to have taken on far too much materiel. Seeing the vast amount of rusting rolling stock at the lineside rather detracts from the beauty of the line. There's little evidence of preservation work going on for much of this stock.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40687



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #4 on: September 19, 2013, 20:56:17 »

Of course we've not seen the latest plans for Ludgershall ... I know the newspaper article says "head of steam" which implies steam engines, and it says "heritage" too, but there have been other proposals for the same route at the opposite end of the 'amount of stock' spectrum:

http://www.lctltd.co.uk/Newsletter%20May%2011.pdf

http://sinfin.net/railways/ultra.html
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: September 19, 2013, 21:56:25 »

There seems to be a view that heritage railways are inherently good for the tourist economy, so they tend to get the support of Local Authorites (though not always - see http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=583.15). Plainly some are - the Bluebell, Severn Valley and West Somerset are all examples of well-run tourist attractions, and of course there are many more. But there is another league of heritage line which seems to be run for enthusiasts by enthusiasts - which might be fine if they were not exactly the same people. Essentially it can look like 12" to the foot railway modelling, and you can get the feeling that some of the volunteers see visitors as a necessary nuisance at best. You can't help thinking that such operations will need to change their ideas if they are to survive beyond the medium term, but then a few apparently hopeless ventures have come good with the right leadership.

Is there room for new heritage operations? The answer must be 'yes', but they need a USP. I travelled on the Ludgershall line many years ago (would it have been GWR150?) and I can't say I found it particularly scenic, so I'm not sure where its attraction might lie. As to the question of materiel, or heritage assets: for the tourist market, steam sells. Unless the route is particularly scenic, steam traction is a must. There are a number of new-build, or all-but new build steam loco projects underway as the heritage rail industry adapts to keeping a reliable fleet of kettles running well beyond their sensible scrap dates, but you have to think that the trend must be for the fleet to slowly reduce in size. Where is a family more likely to go for a day out: Ludgershall to ride in a Mk3 carriage behind an industrial 0-4-0, or Alresford..?
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
trainer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1035


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: September 21, 2013, 18:58:16 »

A very coherent and germane posting, RS. 

Where is a family more likely to go for a day out: Ludgershall to ride in a Mk3 carriage behind an industrial 0-4-0, or Alresford..?

You neatly summarise my present thoughts.
Logged
1014
Newbie
*
Posts: 1


View Profile Email
« Reply #7 on: October 03, 2013, 16:20:43 »

Hello there,
This is my first post so I had better introduce myself.
I am not a regular user of FGW (First Great Western) but I love to travel by rail and I live near Andover. I volunteer at Didcot on 1014 (hence the name) and look forward to seeing her on the ex. GWR (Great Western Railway)!
With reference to the Ludgershall to andover line (ex MSW Cheltenham to Southampton) rumour has it that together with shrinkage of army camps big movements are in hand for the repatriation of troops and vehicles from Afghanistan.
I believe that together with Ashchurch Ludgershall is closing and all the vehicles are going to Lyneham. The real estate is to be used for married quarters for the new super garrison at Tidworth. This means that the line will no longer be needed and indeed will get in the way of any development. So on the one hand the line will become obsolete and on the other the population will expand by 2-3000 so the line could become even more useful as a commuter line into Andover. This means of course that the bus company will not want competition. Food for thought!
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18894



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: October 03, 2013, 16:30:06 »

Thank-you for that first post and introduction, 1014. Food for though indeed.

Welcome to Great Western Passengers' Forum!  Smiley
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #9 on: October 06, 2013, 15:21:05 »

I confidently expect a further renewal of the just-won franchise, probably for another 23 months with the resultant little effect in improvement of services. Isn't it 2017 for electric services? Thus the turbos won't be available until then....and a new Government might have other ideas for them by then?
Logged
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: October 06, 2013, 22:10:12 »

Pots and kettles to point this out, I know, but methinks this has strayed a little from the Tiddly Dyke...

Edit: Hadn't quite clocked the fact that the Swindon & Cricklade is also part of the old Tiddly Dyke. I don't mean them.
« Last Edit: October 06, 2013, 22:17:30 by Red Squirrel » Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40687



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #11 on: July 14, 2016, 16:29:06 »

A meeting with some local politicians today who represent Ludgershall or part thereof lead me to look up / see what's online.

A rail tour that uses the line later this summer:
http://www.ukrailtours.com/product/the-andover-fist/

Old plans:
http://www.go-op.coop/plans/
http://www.parrypeoplemovers.com/ppm-uk-map-south-of-england.htm

Discussions I have heard recently include one or two of the peak Salisbury to London services running from Ludgershall instead, as the London peak trains are much busier further in and the spare Andover - Salisbury capacity could be used to Ludgershall.  Also an idea floated about a Ludgershall to Basingstoke shuttle.  Links / reference would be appreciated if anyone has any.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page