Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 12:35 20 Apr 2024
- Three men killed in retail park car crash named
- Some Wales roads to revert to 30mph after backlash
- BBC presenter reports racist abuse on London train
- Three men killed in retail park car crash identified
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
20th Apr (1789)
Opening of Sapperton Canal Tunnel

Train RunningCancelled
07:55 Bristol Temple Meads to Penzance
13:07 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
18:52 London Paddington to Great Malvern
19:19 Carmarthen to Swansea
Short Run
10:03 London Paddington to Penzance
11:09 Gloucester to Weymouth
11:24 Reading to Gatwick Airport
11:42 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
12:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
14:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
Delayed
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:30 Weymouth to Gloucester
12:24 Plymouth to Gunnislake
13:14 Gunnislake to Plymouth
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 20, 2024, 12:41:23 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[279] Somerset and Dorset Devonshire Tunnel flood
[220] Rail to refuge / Travel to refuge
[109] On reservations, fees and supplements - Interrail
[37] Rail delay compensation payments hit £100 million
[33] Problems with the Night Riviera sleeper - December 2014 onward...
[16] Difficult to argue with e-bike/scooter rules?
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
  Print  
Author Topic: Changes to 0845/0870 Numbers  (Read 53180 times)
Ian01
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 24


View Profile
« Reply #30 on: December 26, 2013, 10:35:16 »

The Cabinet Office today (26 December 2013) published their HMG Guidance document Customer Service Lines recommending the use of 01, 02 and 03 numbers (and 080 numbers in specific circumstances) for all government departments and providers of public services.





Paragraph 2.3 of the guidance is of significant importance. It confirms that where a non-geographic number is required, "03 numbers" should henceforth be selected as the default choice.

Although the document is titled as "guidance", since it originates from the Cabinet Office, other departments will treat it as being "policy".

Departments using 084, 087 and 09 numbers are recommended to transfer to the matching 034 or 037 number or to a new 01, 02, 030, 033 or 080 number. The old number may be retained during a transition period as long as the new number is promoted as the primary number.


See earlier posts for Ofcom and BIS (Battery Isolating Switch) announcements: http://tinyurl.com/FGW13054c24
« Last Edit: January 09, 2014, 13:16:57 by Ian01 » Logged
Ian01
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 24


View Profile
« Reply #31 on: January 27, 2014, 17:50:04 »

DWP today (27 January 2014) published their long-awaited announcement that 0345 numbers will be adopted in place of the existing 0845 numbers used for their enquiry lines.


The document also confirms existing 0845 numbers will continue to be offered for the small number of callers that have a deal where 0845 calls are offered at a discounted rate (this is mostly people on "BT Weekend" who make calls on weekdays - most of whom would probably be better off with an "AnyTime call plan).

The document also confirms that existing 0800 numbers will continue to be available for new claims. DWP has a deal with six major mobile operators such that these are free calls from mobile phones. DWP pays massive fees for that.
Logged
SDS
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 772


Badgerline


View Profile
« Reply #32 on: February 03, 2014, 21:11:20 »

There is a small list of 'exempt' 0800 numbers on the O2 list (which all mention DWP Claims) which are free to call. Along with a biggish list of 0870 and 0845 numbers.
Logged

I do not work for FGW (First Great Western) and posts should not be assumed and do not imply they are statements, unless explicitly stated that they are, from any TOC (Train Operating Company) including First Great Western.
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12357


View Profile Email
« Reply #33 on: February 04, 2014, 12:01:37 »

DWP pays millions to keep those 0800  numbers free on mobile networks. Methinks this might be the driver to 03xx numbers - to reduce costs
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17876


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #34 on: February 04, 2014, 18:11:20 »

From the Western Daily Press:

Quote
Agency's crisis hotline given a cheaper tariff

A cheaper helpline for flooding victims has been opened for calls from the public after David Cameron overruled quango bosses who said it was "not appropriate" to publicise it during a flooding crisis.

The new Floodline number ^ 0345 9881188 ^ was released after complaints that callers were being charged up to 41p per minute to call the existing Environment Agency helpline on the premium rate number 0845 9881188, with the money going to a private firm.

The 0345 number had already been set up and was operational as part of a wider Whitehall move away from pricier 0845 numbers, but the EA said it was not promoting it "proactively" to avoid confusion.

But Downing Street said Mr Cameron wanted use of the premium number to be ended "as quickly as it possibly can be", and it was later revealed that the new helpline was open for calls.

The numbers will operate alongside each other for a period, providing identical information, to ensure that people with the old number are still able to get through.

A spokeswoman for the Environment Agency said: "The Environment Agency has never made any money by using an 0845 number. Most people pay nothing to call Floodline from a landline as 0845 numbers are free as part of their call packages. The cost of calls from mobiles is determined by the phone service provider.

"However we want to make sure the public do not pay over the odds to for information. An 0345 number is now running in parallel with the 0845 number as part of this transition, giving people an alternative.

"The full switch over to 0345 9881188 will take place as soon as possible. However, we have been in a heightened incident since early December and took the decision not to start to promote the new number as we did not want confuse the public and jeopardise public safety.

"We will work with Natural Resources Wales and the Scottish Environmental Protection Agency, who also use Floodline, to start wide-scale promotion of the new number as soon as possible."

The Agency said free flood warning information was available on its website, Twitter feed and Facebook page, as well as through the Floodline Warning Direct service via phone, text message and email and a FloodAlerts application on Facebook.

Mr Cameron said in a message on Twitter: "Calls to flooding helplines shouldn't be premium rate ^ I'm pleased the EA has introduced a cheaper UK (United Kingdom)-wide number."
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Ian01
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 24


View Profile
« Reply #35 on: February 05, 2014, 09:13:05 »

DWP pays huge fees to make their 0800 numbers free from mobile phones. When all 080 numbers become free calls from all mobile phones on 26 June 2015, DWPs bill for this will substantially reduce. DWP are paying over the odds for their 0800 numbers at the moment.

At the 2 September 2013 Public Accounts Committee enquiry, DWP claimed the savings they will make from the running costs of their 0800 numbers will be enough to fund the running costs of the new 0345 numbers that will shortly replace the existing DWP 0845 numbers. DWP will have to pay about 1p/min for incoming calls to their new 0345 numbers.


The long list of 0500, 0800 and 0808 numbers published by O2 covers a number of charities, lines operated by DWP and phone numbers for organisations that are members of the Helplines Association. These numbers are free from mobiles and many of these do not appear on phone bills thereby hiding the fact they have been called.

Every mobile network publishes a similar list of 080 numbers that are free to call. While the core numbers are the same on every list there are some significant differences between networks.

The long list of 0845 and 0870 exemptions published by O2 are, I believe, numbers for various customer service lines belonging to O2, rather than lines for contacting other organisations. Please correct me if I am mistaken.


EA have had the new 0345 floodline number on test since November 2013. However, they did not want to publicise a change of telephone number in the middle of bad weather, just in case it confused anyone. The extended bad weather delayed their plans further.

Had they started advertising the new number during the bad weather, it would have saved callers a lot of money. However it is also likely that EA would have been criticised for "messing around with phone numbers rather than getting on with fixing the flooding". They couldn't win either way.

EA claim they "made no money" from their 0845 number but neglect to mention that callers pay a hidden Service Charge within the call price which their provider uses to cover costs incurred in running the number and routing the call to the final destination. Callers are therefore subsidising a service already funded through taxation. It is this issue that is driving the move to 03 numbers. The fact that mobile operators massively inflate the call price by adding an excessive mark-up is a side issue and one that will be addressed by Ofcom's "unbundled tariffs" system when it comes into force on 26 June 2015.

0845 numbers can pay out about half a penny per minute revenue share to high volume users. DWP declined to receive this payment so they could claim they didn't profit from the number. It is likely that EA did the same. Ofcom wants transparency here. By 26 June 2015, all users of 084, 087 and 09 numbers will be required to declare the Service Charge wherever their number is advertised, whether or not that leads to a revenue share payment.

If you have a BT line (or you are with a provider that copies BT call prices) with no inclusive calls in force at the time of day you want to make the call, or you are on Vodafone pay as you go, continue to call the 0845 number. Almost everyone else should call the new 0345 number.
« Last Edit: February 05, 2014, 09:46:13 by Ian01 » Logged
LiskeardRich
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3461

richardwarwicker@hotmail.co.uk
View Profile
« Reply #36 on: July 10, 2014, 21:46:12 »

It seems FGW (First Great Western) don't want passengers to know about their 0345 numbers. Their Twitter has confirmed they now have a compliant 0345 number. I believe the new rules about telephone numbers came in about a month ago.

In follow up to my ongoing complaint (see Frequent Poster Club for details), I visited the station in question this evening to look at what numbers they have available to customers.

I struggled to find the 0345 number but did eventually find it in small print on the local branch leaflets. I found plenty of mention of the 0845 number.

I looked at 5 publications available at the station, 4 of which only mention the 0345 number. I have copies of these leaflets, but my scan is too big to attach to the forum. The A1 posters at the station directs passengers to National rail enquiries' 0845 number.





Logged

All posts are my own personal believes, opinions and understandings!
thetrout
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2612



View Profile
« Reply #37 on: September 13, 2014, 20:09:01 »

Interestingly I have just been looking at my EE Monthly Phone Bill and spotted some things that are rather worrying and in one respect, very distasteful.

  • EE have charged me 12.5p for a 6 minute call to 101 (The Police UK (United Kingdom) Wide Non Emergency Number)
  • Their website offered me the option in the control panel to select addons by calling customer services on an 0843 number.
  • Certain Debt Collection Agencies are still encouraging people to contact them using 0844 and 0845 numbers
  • Eclipse Internet have 0845 Numbers but have always listed their 01392 numbers on their website for the last few years at least
  • Virgin Media Business are still using 0800 numbers which cost a fortune from mobiles
  • Job Centre Plus have migrated to 0345 Numbers but several documents still have 0845 numbers
  • Barclays have been using 03 numbers for a while including one in the Barclays Banking App that connects you straight through to a human and does all the authentication from the app to their systems in the background of the call
  • EE have admitted that their My EE Part of their website is suffering serious technical issues and 99% of the time is not working correctly in some way or another for customers

So I contact 101 to supply evidence after police appealed for witnesses to an incident I witnessed and it's cost me 0.125p Excluding VAT (Value Added Tax). All personal thoughts and feelings aside. The bottom line is I am out of pocket for providing information to police to assist them with their investigations into a criminal case.

When I contacted Lowlifes Lowell on behalf of a "young person" one of the questions I asked was why they were stating to phone an 0844 number when 01 numbers were freely available in the public domain. The conversation was already going negative and I was told:

"It's people like you who" <I Interrupt> "Choose to use more than one brain cell and make a stance against companies using deceitful practices to gain finance in any way they can"

With EE I was told they were having serious problems with their My EE accounts system. The irony being that the girl I spoke to answered the call with the following: "Thanks for calling EE, the UKs best network..."

Such an arrogant slogan and, from my experience, a very untruthful one... Roll Eyes

** Editted typo where 12.5p was written as 0.125p - Apologies - tt Lips sealed Embarrassed **
« Last Edit: September 13, 2014, 22:16:04 by thetrout » Logged

Grin Grin Grin Grin
LiskeardRich
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3461

richardwarwicker@hotmail.co.uk
View Profile
« Reply #38 on: September 13, 2014, 20:17:06 »

Interesting you mention Barclays, as Barclays are not covered by the changes. Banks and financial institutions were permitted to keep 08 numbers.

FGW (First Great Western) sent me a cheque of ^20 to cover my additional phone costs when I raised concerns about being given the 0845 number.
The legislation states that companies can keep an 08 number as long as they pay the customer any additional call costs compared to ringing an 01,02 or 03 number.
Logged

All posts are my own personal believes, opinions and understandings!
thetrout
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2612



View Profile
« Reply #39 on: September 13, 2014, 20:23:06 »

Well I had to phone Fujitsu recently because of a DOA (Dead on Arrival) piece of equipment. That's cost ^7 in 0870 numbers. I'll send them an email requesting reimbursement based on the principle and let you all know how I get on Smiley
Logged

Grin Grin Grin Grin
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #40 on: September 13, 2014, 20:37:00 »

It seems FGW (First Great Western) don't want passengers to know about their 0345 numbers. Their Twitter has confirmed they now have a compliant 0345 number. I believe the new rules about telephone numbers came in about a month ago


I had to pick up a new season ticket wallet on Friday, as my previous one had suddenly disintegrated. Guess what - the number shown to contact FGW is still 08457 000 125.
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #41 on: September 13, 2014, 20:40:13 »

Interestingly I have just been looking at my EE Monthly Phone Bill and spotted some things that are rather worrying and in one respect, very distasteful.

  • EE have charged me 0.125p for a 6 minute call to 101 (The Police UK (United Kingdom) Wide Non Emergency Number)

So I contact 101 to supply evidence after police appealed for witnesses to an incident I witnessed and it's cost me 0.125p Excluding VAT (Value Added Tax). All personal thoughts and feelings aside. The bottom line is I am out of pocket for providing information to police to assist them with their investigations into a criminal case.


So you're complaining about being charged one eighth of a penny to make a phone call?
Logged
LiskeardRich
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3461

richardwarwicker@hotmail.co.uk
View Profile
« Reply #42 on: September 13, 2014, 20:43:42 »

Interestingly I have just been looking at my EE Monthly Phone Bill and spotted some things that are rather worrying and in one respect, very distasteful.

  • EE have charged me 0.125p for a 6 minute call to 101 (The Police UK (United Kingdom) Wide Non Emergency Number)

So I contact 101 to supply evidence after police appealed for witnesses to an incident I witnessed and it's cost me 0.125p Excluding VAT (Value Added Tax). All personal thoughts and feelings aside. The bottom line is I am out of pocket for providing information to police to assist them with their investigations into a criminal case.


So you're complaining about being charged one eighth of a penny to make a phone call?

I think he may have been charged 12.5p as that was what I was charged recently for calling 101 from EE
Logged

All posts are my own personal believes, opinions and understandings!
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #43 on: September 13, 2014, 21:29:02 »

But that would be ^0.125.  Trout wrote 0.125p, which is most definitely one eighth of a penny, and I know the attention to detail and accuracy that he expects from others means he wouldn't make such a mistake himself.  Wink
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12357


View Profile Email
« Reply #44 on: September 13, 2014, 21:49:44 »

Must have been an old wallet....the new ones are grey & have a Greater West theme
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page