Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 04:35 29 Mar 2024
- Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
* Easter getaway begins with flood alerts in place
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
07:00 Bedwyn to Newbury
07:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
08:13 Newbury to Bedwyn
08:46 Bedwyn to Newbury
09:54 Bedwyn to Newbury
10:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:29 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
12:52 Bedwyn to Newbury
Short Run
04:54 Plymouth to London Paddington
05:12 Reading to Bedwyn
05:33 Plymouth to London Paddington
05:55 Plymouth to London Paddington
06:00 Bedwyn to London Paddington
06:37 Plymouth to London Paddington
07:03 London Paddington to Paignton
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
Delayed
21:45 Penzance to London Paddington
23:45 London Paddington to Penzance
05:03 Penzance to London Paddington
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 04:35:11 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[98] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[97] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[86] Return of the BRUTE?
[74] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[53] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[23] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: Folkestone Harbour Station to Close  (Read 10146 times)
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« on: November 21, 2013, 11:57:42 »

Network Rail propose to close the station & branch line
http://www.networkrail.co.uk/news/2013/nov/Consultation-on-proposals-to-close-the-Folkestone-Harbour-branch-line/

However, the line's Preservation Society think otherwise

From Railnews
http://www.railnews.co.uk/news/2013/11/20-end-of-the-line-for.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

And local press
http://www.kentonline.co.uk/folkestone_express/news/is-this-the-end-of-9128

There's too much to quote here. Mods feel free to amend if you think it necessary.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1 on: November 21, 2013, 12:24:05 »

Thanks for posting this, Chris ... very important topic in case precedents may get set.

There are differing views in the rail / campaign / enthusiast camp as to whether or not a line or service or station should even be closed.  My view is that in some cases it can make sense - Abercynon North and South closed to make way for a single combined station, for example.   However, I worry (perhaps because I don't know the area!) about places like Norton Bridge which seem like they may be closure by stealth, with a consultation such as the this one then simply confirming a status quo.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #2 on: December 23, 2013, 16:29:01 »

A link forwarded by Passenger Focus to their mailing list, seeking consultation inputs and providing the official data to accompany it.

https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/folkestone-harbour-closure-of-branch-line-and-station?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #3 on: February 21, 2015, 04:42:14 »

From Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/groups/rtreversingbeeching/permalink/668186579994177/

Quote
Just to let you know that we've hit 3000 signatures on our petition to save Fokestone Harbour Station and by implication the Harbour Railway!

...and the total is still growing. Folkestone Harbour Company have publicly stated that the station is beyond repair. That is a ludicrous statement- currently the heritage railway movement is building steam locomotives from scratch and long demolished station buildings have been totally rebuilt to the original specification. Folkestone Harbour Station could easily be restored-and the Remembrance Line Association are poised to take on the task. Folkestone Harbour Company also reaffirms that the Harbour Railway is closed. So what- railways all over country which have been closed for 50years or more are being revived from what has been returned to green fields.

In Folkestone's case, a railway with the essential features of its infrastructure still in position is under threat because the plans of the seafront developer deem it necessary to sweep it away. However this appears to be a threat without substance as clearly the developer has totally failed to attract UK (United Kingdom) investors and is now hawking its aspirations on the international market. Obviously the UK investors have dismissed the seafront development as not viable and Folkestone Harbour Company appears to believe that the international investors are less wily. I think not. I might add that government schemes like the one the harbour company is using is notoriously lumbering and could add years to the commencement of seafront building if any.

Furthermore when Folkestone Harbour Company present their Harbour Revision Order to the Maritime Management Organisation they will say 'look this harbour is useless- it has no rail link- I wonder how that happened?' If you haven't signed and shared-please take the opportunity!

The petition text

Quote
HALT THE DESTRUCTION OF FOLKESTONE HARBOUR RAILWAY STATION.
TO: FOLKESTONE HARBOUR COMPANY AND NETWORK RAIL

Retain and restore, this unique, iconic, heritage structure, of national importance.

Why is this important?

In 1843, the first sea/rail service in the world, was implemented between Folkestone and Boulogne.  This is what makes it an iconic location.

The existing station represents over 100 years of this type of operation.  The Harbour Railway and Station was singularly instrumental in making Folkestone a vibrant successful town.  It's cross channel ferry service rivalled that of Dover in intrinsic value, if not in volume.

During The Great War, Folkestone Harbour Station was the departure/arrival  point for eight million troop movements and five million tons of supplies, munitions and regular mail, to and from the Western Front.  Ships and trains were also used to whisk men from the front, back to blighty, in just a few hours, the wounded brought to hospitals in Folkestone and other points.  This makes it the most important World War One heritage site in Britain, particularly in this year, marking the centenary of the start of hostilities.

The Golden Arrow, one of the best known trains in our time, was regularly seen here.

Mata Hari was arrested here.

In 1855 The first Great Train Robbery occurred  here. Just one of many colourful historical events that took place  here.

Folkestone Harbour Company tells us  they have "saved the harbour station". This is not accurate.  In fact, they have only saved the harbour arm canopy, which is not in the recognised station area. In reality, the track has been torn up in the "saved" area.

Back in the summer of 2014, the Folkestone Harbour Branch Railway was closed by Network Rail and the DfT» (Department for Transport - about). This was very short sighted, as this railway and its harbour station are still potentially  valuable assets to the town, boosting local district and county commerce, tourism and employment. There is also scope for expediting the traditional role as a feeder for a possible cross channel passenger ferry operation connecting with Boulogne. Dover is not currently encouraging this type of service and it is believed that Folkestone could corner this market.

There are currently plans to demolish Folkestone Harbour Station to make way for a luxury seafront housing scheme. Common sense tells us all, that the station and the railway it serves would easily co-exist with, enhance and complement the proposed development.
 

This is the last chance we have of saving this iconic edifice, let it be a lasting monument to our local heritage and a tribute to our past endeavours. Please sign this petition.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #4 on: February 21, 2015, 04:57:30 »

further background

- Summary of DfT» (Department for Transport - about) responses to consultation
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/307590/summary-responses-comments.pdf
undated, but map is April 2014. Found via search engine - does anyone have a parent link?

- Remembrance Line Association
http://www.theremembranceline.org.uk/index.htm
And their next meeting is next week - Thursday 26th February




Edit note: Some of grahame's trademark typos corrected. CfN.  Roll Eyes Grin
« Last Edit: February 22, 2015, 13:43:55 by Chris from Nailsea » Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: February 21, 2015, 14:31:58 »

You mean 26th?
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #6 on: February 21, 2015, 15:32:31 »

You mean 26th?

Yes, I do
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: February 21, 2015, 16:14:46 »

I thought the railway and station had already closed according to the DfT» (Department for Transport - about).

Locking the stable door?

Paul
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #8 on: February 21, 2015, 16:55:09 »

I thought the railway and station had already closed according to the DfT» (Department for Transport - about).

Locking the stable door?

Paul

The DfT outcome report is

Quote
As a result of responses to this consultation we modified the proposal so that the area affected is limited to the Network Rail lease area. We referred the proposal to the Office of Rail Regulation (ORR» (Office of Rail and Road formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about)) for ratification in May 2014, as required under legislation.

The ORR has now completed the ratification process and is content for the closure of the railway branch line of Folkestone Harbour and associated station to go ahead. The ratification notice (PDF, 120 KB), dated 31 July 2014, is available to view on the ORR website.

The closure will not take effect until 4 weeks after the date of ratification. There are no passenger services affected by this closure.

Ratification notice at http://orr.gov.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/14345/closure-ratification-notice-folkestone-harbour-branchline-and-station.pdf

It may well be too late - but not necessarily because of the closure;  "every" line that's opened as a heritage railway has had to be closed first (I say "every" in quotes, because I can now think of one line that was transferred).   The real battles at Folkestone would seem to be the ones with the developers, the local council and the practicalities of making an economic case on what's not going to be a cheap infrastructure.   At best a long shot - but then I remember being told that we were too late and didn't have any real chance in Wiltshire.

Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #9 on: January 23, 2019, 09:12:33 »

Network Rail Press Release on track clearance and removal - https://www.networkrailmediacentre.co.uk/news/disused-kent-railway-line-set-for-new-lease-of-life

Interesting spin that they "have deliberately opted to leave some of the old track in place to allow this to be a feature of any future scheme" but "Railway equipment at the rail-road and the footpath crossings at Folly Road will also be removed and the crossings converted to a public highway and public footpath" making reuse as a railway very difficult...
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #10 on: January 23, 2019, 10:42:12 »

Quote
From the beginning of February to April 2019, most of the old track, sleepers and lineside equipment will be removed and overgrown vegetation and litter cleared along the the route.  Railway equipment at the rail-road and the footpath crossings at Folly Road will also be removed and the crossings converted to a public highway and public footpath. 

Discussions with local stakeholders on potential new community uses are now underway with a decision to be made in the summer of 2019. Enquiries about about the old line and potential future uses can be directed to CRSouthEast@networkrail.co.uk
.

I know that there were several aspirations to run a rail based heritage service; I have no idea of the practicality or currency of them.  It does strike me that removing equipment and converting in the spring, then announcing a decision in the summer, seems the wrong way round and renders certain aspirations as impractical. Perhaps that is the intent?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
old original
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 877


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: January 23, 2019, 13:46:19 »

It seems a lot of work has already been done to turn it into a pedestrian area and walk-through to the "Folkestone Harbour Arm"

https://www.folkestoneseafront.com/folkestone/the-station/

http://folkestoneharbourarm.co.uk





Logged

8 Billion people on a wet rock - of course we're not happy
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #12 on: January 24, 2019, 08:31:28 »

Kent Live article - https://www.kentlive.news/news/kent-news/network-rail-clear-disused-folkestone-2458911
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
Umberleigh
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 456


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: January 26, 2019, 21:06:07 »

I well remember catching a boat train from London to Folkestone Harbour Station one sunny August Saturday in 1983, and then onwards by ferry to Calais and the awaiting Motorail train to the South of France.

But we have to be realistic and concentrate heritage preservation efforts on projects which will prove sustainable in the future. Not every closed branch, siding, spur and diesel depot can be saved. We now have a tunnel and the Motorail train is no more. This revamped harbour scheme is proving a real boon to the town and I don’t see how an industrial diesel shutter and brake van trundling between the old station and a point near the mainline for a princely sum is going do much for the area or the soul
Logged
Chris125
Full Member
***
Posts: 48


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: January 27, 2019, 15:34:16 »

I know that there were several aspirations to run a rail based heritage service; I have no idea of the practicality or currency of them.  It does strike me that removing equipment and converting in the spring, then announcing a decision in the summer, seems the wrong way round and renders certain aspirations as impractical. Perhaps that is the intent?

Realistically any possibility of it reopening as a railway died years ago, and never seemed particularly workable anyway. What's now been done with the viaduct and station is wonderful, as can be seen below:


The harbour bridge by Saturdaywalker, on Flickr


Looking landward along the platforms by Saturdaywalker, on Flickr
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page