Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 15:15 29 Mar 2024
* Delays at Dover as millions begin Easter getaway
- Attempted murder charge after man stabbed on train
* A view from inside ship that hit Baltimore bridge
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
13:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
14:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
15:50 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:15 Newbury to Bedwyn
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
16:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
17:24 Newbury to Bedwyn
17:29 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
18:04 Bedwyn to Newbury
18:26 Newbury to Bedwyn
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
18:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
19:02 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
19:24 Newbury to Bedwyn
19:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
20:49 Newbury to Bedwyn
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
21:16 Bedwyn to Newbury
21:53 Newbury to Bedwyn
22:25 Bedwyn to Newbury
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
15:28 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:29 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:20 Penzance to London Paddington
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:15 Penzance to London Paddington
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
13:50 London Paddington to Great Malvern
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
14:15 Penzance to London Paddington
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
15:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
etc
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 15:25:02 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[165] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[71] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[52] Who needs a travel agent these days?
[38] Travel for free on the m2 metrobus - Bristol - 4,5,6 April 202...
[30] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[28] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 67
  Print  
Author Topic: Weather disruption caused in 2014, and how to prevent it happening again - ongoing discussion  (Read 413713 times)
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #45 on: February 05, 2014, 10:35:57 »

Regarding Dawlish, what came first?  I read a local newspaper report yesterday that said something like 'the railway was built along the town's sea wall'.

Is it not more accurate to say that following the building of the railway along the foot of the cliffs the town of Dawlish developed (or at least expanded) behind it at that point?

So it's all very well 'considering the inland route' but the coastal protection would still have to be maintained by someone, and the Act allowing it to be built probably requires that to be done by the railway 'in perpetuity'...

Paul

 
Logged
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #46 on: February 05, 2014, 10:55:50 »

someone needs to maintain the sea wall for sure.  But I suppose that if the railway was shifted off the top of it there might be more options to use some of the space to build up the wall.

We do need an inland route.  We can't simply disconnect such a large area from the rail network when the weather gets bad.  Abandoning the route completely would mean some significant towns would loose their stations which would be bad.

How about a compromise of a new high speed inland route and the existing route retained for stopping services.  You could perhaps single the existing route which would give a little more space between the trains and the sea and some more space for building up the defences
Logged
BBM
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 634


View Profile
« Reply #47 on: February 05, 2014, 11:06:40 »

I'm attaching another photo of the damage, it's just been posted to the WNXX (Stored Unserviceable, Mainline Locos HQ All Classes) forum.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #48 on: February 05, 2014, 11:18:12 »

The answer I guess is for this to be repaired & another (external) sea wall to be constructed (which will obviously take up the beach area (if any).
Logged
chuffed
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1499


View Profile
« Reply #49 on: February 05, 2014, 11:23:14 »

Some reports suggest that there has been so much erosion that the beach at Dawlish may well have dropped some 10 or 12 feet, leaving more bedrock exposed. I suppose that could be used to anchor whatever is deemned necessary to protect the existing sea wall.
Logged
chopper1944
Full Member
***
Posts: 49


View Profile
« Reply #50 on: February 05, 2014, 11:41:09 »

With problems between Castle Cary and Taunton, Exeter and Newton Abbot/Totnes as well as branch lines in Devon and Cornwall, no mention of Cowley Bridge so far, and various maintenance enhancements between Taunton and Tiverton Parkway various serious consideration needs to be given to doubling the line completely between Castle Cary and Yeovil Junction, Yeovil Junction  and Exeter to provide a more robust alternative to Paddington to Exeter via Castle Cary. With regard to Dawlish I believe the Environment Agency has drawn up a 10 point plan to protect the line through Dawlish but the recent ongoing events would appear to be considerably worse than what happened in the 1960's. Perhaps consideration should be given to reinstating the line between Exeter and Plymouth via Okehampton or digging out the GWR (Great Western Railway) plans from the archives of Devon County Council for a faster inland route between Exeter and Newton Abbot. In this day and age it is a poor reflection of how the South West peninsula is perceived in Whitehall from a railway point of view. I know there will be a cost whatever is eventually decided, but the fact that at the present time a City as large as Plymouth is effectively not connected to the rest of the rail network is a disgrace, well done Beeching and the old regional rivalries which still persist to this day which decimated the routes in the South West!!
Logged
marky7890
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 149


View Profile Email
« Reply #51 on: February 05, 2014, 12:05:02 »

Network rail just posted this photo on twitter. The bit that has been washed away appears to be where the walkway along side drops down, and so the sea wall is much thinner. The walkway seems to have stopped the rest of the track being washed away.

Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #52 on: February 05, 2014, 12:15:06 »

This looks a lot more than 30 feet....

Logged
stebbo
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 445


View Profile
« Reply #53 on: February 05, 2014, 14:19:09 »

Been predicted for a few years now. How easy would it be to dust off the old inland route from Exeter to Newton Abbot, though I'm not sure if that would be susceptible to high speed running? Going via Okehampton would require two train reversals for Penzance - Paddington. But both of these would make electrification easier.

How about diverting some of the HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) cash to preserve an existing line to an important part of the countryside?
Logged
PhilWakely
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2007



View Profile
« Reply #54 on: February 05, 2014, 14:27:57 »

Been predicted for a few years now. How easy would it be to dust off the old inland route from Exeter to Newton Abbot, though I'm not sure if that would be susceptible to high speed running? Going via Okehampton would require two train reversals for Penzance - Paddington. But both of these would make electrification easier.

How about diverting some of the HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) cash to preserve an existing line to an important part of the countryside?

Far easier to reinstate the Okehampton to Bere Alston link and make it usable at reasonably high speeds. The old Teign Valley route has been virtually obliterated and was only single track suitable for 14xx with Auto coaches.
Logged
thetrout
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2612



View Profile
« Reply #55 on: February 05, 2014, 14:32:45 »

I decided to return on 1C87 the 1448 ex PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains), and not bother waiting for the 1703 (and missed meeting thetrout - sorry).

No worries Wink I have a habit of appearing on a train in the very near future Grin

BTW (by the way), 1C87 not booked to stop at Westbury, but ran through the station rather than the avoiding line - points failure again?? (see my earlier topic about Totnes - is it me?!)

The 17:03 also ran via Westbury Station, Platform 1 but did not call there.

There is a large lake near the avoid line so could have been flooding (Mere speculation) What is more likely IMO (in my opinion) is setting the points in the same position for the Up/Down trains that do call at Westbury. With the poor weather it may have been overcautious working to prevent the points failing. I believe this is done when there is snow around... Even if it is the wrong type of snow... Roll Eyes Grin Cheesy


Logged

Grin Grin Grin Grin
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #56 on: February 05, 2014, 14:39:17 »

Large lake <> 'mere' speculation! 

Nice connection there...   Grin

Paul
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #57 on: February 05, 2014, 14:42:02 »

Have we seen this one?

Logged
chopper1944
Full Member
***
Posts: 49


View Profile
« Reply #58 on: February 05, 2014, 14:43:35 »

Pages 142 and 156 of the GWR (Great Western Railway) in the 20th Century by O S Nock (Paperback) make interesting reading about the proposed Exeter to Newton Abbot route. One has only to look at a map of the network post the proposed electrification to see the great blank space that is the SouthWest peninsula. A new vision for the rail network in the far South West needs to be looked at as the present one of make do and mend is obviously not going to be fit for purpose in future especially with all the climate change that is being likely to happen. Some of the HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) money would be better spent reinforcing the rail network in the south west but this is unlikely to happen unless the government stops being so London centred.
The latest estimate for the line to be working again is 4-6 weeks, weather permitting!! Some thinking outside the box is required other than just repairing until the next time.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #59 on: February 05, 2014, 14:46:18 »

There's some video of the missing 30' or so here

http://www.mobypicture.com/user/BigWoollyBum/view/16542525
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 67
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page