Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 14:15 28 Mar 2024
- Man held over stabbing in front of train passengers
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Jet2 launches first flight from Liverpool airport
* Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1917)
Bideford, Westward Ho! and Appledore closed (link)

Train RunningCancelled
13:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
13:26 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
13:28 Weymouth to Gloucester
13:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
14:13 Par to Newquay
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
15:10 Newquay to Par
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
17:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
Short Run
11:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
11:29 Weymouth to Gloucester
11:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
11:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:07 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
14:05 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
15:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
15:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
15:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
Delayed
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
12:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
14:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 14:30:06 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[142] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[80] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[56] Return of the BRUTE?
[46] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[43] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[34] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: Marlborough Branch?  (Read 11709 times)
patch38
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 653


View Profile
« on: April 17, 2014, 11:25:33 »

On the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) News Wiltshire site:

A ^30m plan to re-establish a railway station at a Wiltshire town is to be presented to the government.

The proposal for Marlborough is backed by the town's Chamber of Commerce and Devizes MP (Member of Parliament) Claire Perry, and has been drafted by a community group.

Transition Marlborough said a rail link to the town should be restored as the nearest station is 14 miles away.

Passenger rail services to and from Marlborough were withdrawn in 1961 as part of the Beeching Act.

Transition Marlborough's Graham Francis said many people who have moved to the town in the last 30 years commute to London.

He said: "The opportunity to put that line back where it was in the sixties is something that should be seriously considered."

The proposed new branch line, off the main London to Westbury line at Savernake, would stretch for five miles and see a new station opposite the Marlborough Business Park.

MP Claire Perry said she supported the scheme and would be contacting Rail Minister Stephen Hammond to discuss the proposal.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-wiltshire-27062674
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: April 17, 2014, 11:35:06 »


Passenger rail services to and from Marlborough were withdrawn in 1961 as part of the Beeching Act.


If that BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) date is correct this is yet another incorrect attribution of a closure to Beeching.  He wrote his main report published in '63, and another in '65. 

PS Marlborough is not mentioned in the lists of stations in the first Beeching report, presumably because it had already closed...

I don't think it is ever normally referred to as the Beeching Act either...   Huh

Paul
Logged
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: April 17, 2014, 11:47:17 »

This has raised its head before: http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=4691.0

Personally I welcome ideas like this (I think it is rather stretching things to call it a 'plan') because they show how much pent-up demand there is for rail. And maybe it would be cheaper to buy every denizen of Marlborough a Land Rover and a tank full of fuel, but would it be better?
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: April 17, 2014, 12:11:18 »

My first question is to ask how many currently commute to their nearest railhead from Marlborough?....

Suspect the main users (in terms of numbers) would be schoolkids...
Logged
patch38
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 653


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: April 17, 2014, 12:20:39 »

A lot of Marlburians (or can you only call them that if they have been to the College?) drive to Bedwyn and park. This has caused a number of local issues and has cropped up in previous threads. I'd imagine a few use Swindon as well.
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: April 17, 2014, 16:24:26 »

Just build a parkway station on the B&H (Berks and Hants - railway line from Reading to Taunton via Westbury) and enhance the service.
Could also build a Deizves parkway.

The overall service on the B&H is a mess and needs sorting.
Trains to the SW should be non stop, but there should be a mix of semi fast and stopping services over the route.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #6 on: April 17, 2014, 16:48:49 »

Transition Marlborough said a rail link to the town should be restored as the nearest station is 14 miles away.

Marlborough to Bedwyn is 6 or 7 miles.  They don't help their case with such errors as people will wonder what else is stretching the truth.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Andrew1939 from West Oxon
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 535


View Profile Email
« Reply #7 on: April 17, 2014, 19:57:12 »

Another "pie in the sky" reopening to add to the many other proposed reopenings made without mention of finance to pay for the reopening and, probably more importantly, the finance to pay for the continuing running expenses.
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4355


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: April 18, 2014, 07:58:44 »

Will it pass the GRIP (Guide to Railway Investment Projects) 1 phase for railway investment, even tougher at GRIP 2.  Look how long it took Eastwest Rail to build their case, bigger project I know it is scalable
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #9 on: April 20, 2018, 05:41:35 »

An update to this story from The Gazette and Herald

Quote
Station plan is derailed by red tape

CAMPAIGNERS believe ‘ridiculous’ barriers are being put in the way of a railway proposal for Marlborough by Wiltshire Council.

Dreams of creating a railway in Marlborough were dealt a blow after the town heard it was at the bottom of a council list of towns likely to have a station built in Wiltshire.

Article continues

The easiest stations to (re-)open, all other things being equal, are going to be those which are on an existing passenger railway and a suitable train is going through the site that could call.  Second are going to be stations on existing passenger lines where there's a question mark over which trains could actually be persuaded to stop there.   Third comes re-openings on lines where there's existing freight traffic but the line's not up to daily passenger standards.   Fourth come lines that have been mothballed, fifth come lines that have been ripped up, sixth come lines that have been ripped up, land disposed of, bridges removed, embankments pulled down and cuttingsfilled in. Bottom of the list - grade seven - are lines where there have never been lines before.

Wiltshire has managed to complete two openings in the last 100 years - Dilton Marsh in 1937, grade 1, and Melksham in 1985, grade 2.    Regrettably, Marlborough, Calne, Amesbury, Malmesbury and Devizes (town rather than Parkway) and all in grade 5 or 6. Not so much "bottom of the council list" I fear, but rather on a different list. The cost of a grade 5 or 6 re-opening would be several orders of magnitude greater than the cost of a grade 1 or grade 2 - and we struggle hard enough, good heavens, for each of those. 

The good news for the Marlboroughites is that pound for pound, they'll probably have to fight less hard than we do for stations on existing lines.  The bad news is that they'll need a hundred times more pounds than would be needed to open a station at - say - Hullavington (Malmesbury Road) and ten times more than would be needed for Ludgershall.

Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: April 20, 2018, 09:26:17 »

The good news for the Marlboroughites is that pound for pound, they'll probably have to fight less hard than we do for stations on existing lines.  The bad news is that they'll need a hundred times more pounds than would be needed to open a station at - say - Hullavington (Malmesbury Road) and ten times more than would be needed for Ludgershall.
I've always reckoned Hullavington would be a good site for a station; there's Hullavington village itself and Stanton St Quintin, the RAF (Royal Air Force) base and of course it would be "Malmesbury Parkway".


This has raised its head before: http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=4691.0

Personally I welcome ideas like this (I think it is rather stretching things to call it a 'plan') because they show how much pent-up demand there is for rail. And maybe it would be cheaper to buy every denizen of Marlborough a Land Rover and a tank full of fuel, but would it be better?
Of course it would not. No one in Marlborough would drive anything less than a Range Rover.  Cheesy
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
patch38
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 653


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: April 20, 2018, 13:58:39 »

and of course it would be "Malmesbury Parkway".

Or "Dyson Parkway"...
Logged
rogerw
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1336



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: April 20, 2018, 15:17:04 »

As information for those not in the know or local to Wiltshire. Dyson are building a new R & D facility on Hullavington airfield. Hence Dyson Parkway
Logged

I like to travel.  It lets me feel I'm getting somewhere.
ray951
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 461


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: April 20, 2018, 15:26:25 »

As information for those not in the know or local to Wiltshire. Dyson are building a new R & D facility on Hullavington airfield. Hence Dyson Parkway
They trains that stop at Malmesbury Parkway presumably wouldn't hoover up all the passengers, but could leave a vacuum and GWR (Great Western Railway) could take them to the cleaners.  Smiley Smiley Smiley
Logged
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: April 20, 2018, 15:29:57 »

The station buildings would have to be built to withstand extreme weather, such as cyclones.  Cheesy
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page