Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 10:15 28 Mar 2024
* Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
- Man suffers life-threatening injuries after train stabbing
* How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1988)
Formal end to carrying coffins by BR (link)

Train RunningCancelled
07:43 Swansea to London Paddington
08:18 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
08:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
09:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
09:12 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
09:29 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
09:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
09:46 Westbury to Swindon
10:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
10:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
10:41 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
11:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
11:05 Swindon to Westbury
11:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
11:23 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
11:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
11:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
12:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
12:17 Westbury to Swindon
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
05:40 Bristol Temple Meads to Penzance
06:00 London Paddington to Penzance
07:03 London Paddington to Paignton
07:33 Weymouth to Gloucester
08:38 London Paddington to Westbury
09:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
09:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
11:12 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
Delayed
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:23 London Paddington to Oxford
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 10:18:23 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[193] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[109] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[75] Return of the BRUTE?
[59] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[46] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[26] CrossCountry upgrade will see 25% more rail seats
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 [14] 15 16 ... 18
  Print  
Author Topic: Thames Valley signalling problems - big delays - July 2014  (Read 87471 times)
Worcester_Passenger
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1702


View Profile
« Reply #195 on: July 29, 2014, 19:17:41 »

Under these (rather unusual) circumstances, would the best strategy be to use the Underground to Richmond?
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7154


View Profile
« Reply #196 on: July 29, 2014, 19:24:45 »

Looking at how many trains did run, and ignoring the loss of the Dorking service (backed up via Victoria), why was the station so jammed with people? Did it reach the critical point (the equivalent of gridlock, whatever that's called) where trains set of half full and leaving passengers behind who couldn't reach them? In that case the crowd doesn't get reduced by running trains, and you might be better off going to Clapham, Wimbledon, Richmond etc. Usually this is not viable, as trains are full on arrival. And if too many people (which is not a huge number) do it crowding becomes a problem there.

Going back to Silver's comments earlier on, if you run one of these big stations (and that means NR» (Network Rail - home page), of course, not FGW (First Great Western) or SWT (South West Trains)) you need plans to cope with any level of service or none, and however many waiting passengers that leads to.

SWT had agreement from FGW to take their passengers for (I imagine) RDG(resolve), BSK (Brake Standard Corridor (carriage)), and points west. They continued to advertise this alternative all evening, with no mention of the lack of FGW trains. And they said their services were severely disrupted (without exceptions), not that WAT was too full of people. That may have seemed like an "equivalent lie", often done in the past, but I don't think it is advisable now. We can now check on what trains are running, so giving advice that is clearly based on wrong information will only lead to people ignoring the advice.
Logged
Worcester_Passenger
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1702


View Profile
« Reply #197 on: July 29, 2014, 19:51:57 »

There's a post on http://www.railforums.co.uk/showthread.php?t=103950 that says that the signalling equipment on HS1 (High Speed line 1 - St Pancras to Channel Tunnel) is well-defended against lightning strikes. Is this right?
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4355


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #198 on: July 29, 2014, 20:18:51 »

There's a post on http://www.railforums.co.uk/showthread.php?t=103950 that says that the signalling equipment on HS1 (High Speed line 1 - St Pancras to Channel Tunnel) is well-defended against lightning strikes. Is this right?

It is ETCS (European Train Control System) - in cab signalling, which uses a NRFD track mounted balise (or transponder) GPS and speed measurement to know where the it self is this is fed back to a control centre computer via GSMR (railway cell phone network) this then tells the train the max permitted speed.

If all this fails there fixed block markers which the drive can be talked through.

It is possible that lightening could take out signalling power supplies and junctions but HS1 doesn't have many of those, also the OLE (Overhead Line Equipment, more often "OHLE") could be struck taking out a substation but HS1 has a complex alternative feed system which providing the lightening hasn't taken out the SCADA (System Control And Data Acquisition,) that is  Grin
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7154


View Profile
« Reply #199 on: July 29, 2014, 20:47:23 »

Since people build and operate and operate railways and other infrastructure in places where big lightning bolts are commoner than here, it must be possible to build these to survive. I have come across several reasons why that would be so:

Keeping out lightning surges, like keeping out interference, is mostly in the details of earthing and the like. If it's wrong from the start, you can't add it in later. But despite the inherent susceptibility of modern electronics - small devices on chips can be destroyed by a tiny amount of energy - they can be protected. A lot of chips have some protection built in, then you can add more at board and module level, and most importantly at the cabinet entry point. Power supplies can now cross insulation breaks too, along with signals - a lot of domestic kit contains standard DC (Direct Current)-DC converters that can withstand several kV.

Axle counters and balises are fixed to the track, but insulated from it, so have a big advantage over track circuits (all of which will go). The Thales AzLM (NR» (Network Rail - home page)'s main favourite axle counter) can take a 6 kV surge on any interface, and they offer an extra protector for the cabinet entry.

The OHLE is electrically not so different from pole-mounted MV (11 kV and 33 kV) supplies, and they mostly survive lightning using standard methods. The lightning will still enter the ground down one or more stanchions, producing a big voltage difference between nearby earths - hence the importance of insulating cables from earth, using fibre, etc..

So new railways, and newly electrified and resignalled ones like most of the Western Route, ought to do be better than what we have now. But there are limits - most lightning round here has peak currents in the range 5-10 kA. If you get a really big one, like the 100-200 kA  seen in tall buildings and Alps, it may still fry things.
Logged
NickB
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 711


View Profile
« Reply #200 on: July 29, 2014, 21:38:38 »

Under these (rather unusual) circumstances, would the best strategy be to use the Underground to Richmond?

District Line was bust too.
Not kidding.
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7743



View Profile
« Reply #201 on: July 30, 2014, 06:34:51 »



Going back to Silver's comments earlier on, if you run one of these big stations (and that means NR» (Network Rail - home page), of course, not FGW (First Great Western) or SWT (South West Trains)) you need plans to cope with any level of service or none, and however many waiting passengers that leads to.



............and that sums it up in a nutshell - "you need plans" - even if in extremis that means closing the station until such time it is safe and practicable to operate a service which allows the numbers leaving the station to reduce the numbers waiting, even if in extremis it means calling in the Met Police to help with crowd control if FGW/NR/BTP (British Transport Police) are not capable of doing so (as they patently were not last week), even if in extremis it means being honest enough to tell people that there is no point waiting as there will be no trains for the foreseeable future, even if in extremis advising customers to seek their own alternatives which will be refunded.......................basically it means exercising a duty of care to customers/the public.
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7154


View Profile
« Reply #202 on: July 30, 2014, 08:59:11 »

...if you run one of these big stations (and that means NR» (Network Rail - home page), of course, not FGW (First Great Western) or SWT (South West Trains))...

Is that an issue in itself?

If Network Rail manages the station, but most of the staff who work there work for a TOC (Train Operating Company) (or for BTP (British Transport Police)) which is not a subcontractor to NR, whose responsibility is safety and crowd control? If it's been written into contracts, that usually has good points (ensures the subject has been thought about and responsibility allocated somewhere) and bad (if it wasn't thought about, or incompletely, everyone may duck it; management is made far more complex, and cooperation with a third party can't realistically be required in a contract).
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #203 on: July 30, 2014, 10:22:37 »

I think it is.

IT doesn't sound as if any agreement other than standard station working has been entered into by Network Rail and the TOCs (Train Operating Company) using their major stations - so when it comes to Meltdown, the TYOCs are trying to organise their crews & stock, while NR» (Network Rail - home page) alone are left to man their station. And fail, because they need a connect (and probably a better, more detailed one that under standard conditions) with the TOC.

This latter connect to me is mainly missing....
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7743



View Profile
« Reply #204 on: July 30, 2014, 11:15:57 »

I went through Reading station this morning at about 0745 and bearing in mind the woeful level of staffing in evidence on Friday during the meltdown I thought I would have a quick scout around to see what was in evidence this morning.

On each of the main London bound platforms there were 3 train dispatch staff in hi vis, there were at least one or two on all the other operational platforms, together with a load of Ribena in the gateline/concourse areas as well as the gateline staff, additionally there were one or two on the footbridge.

My question therefore would be.............why was it in the height of Friday's chaos that there only appeared to be a handful of staff anywhere attempting to help customers (and believe me I looked for them) - few if any on platforms, no Ribena, and only 2 on the footbridge who by the looks of it would have earned a VC by close of play.

Were they hiding in crew rooms? Or is there another explanation?

Leaving aside the Customer Service implications...........what about Health and Safety? Station evacuation with the area much busier than usual? How would that be manafged? How would disabled customers be assisted?

Logged
NickB
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 711


View Profile
« Reply #205 on: July 30, 2014, 12:31:38 »

At Maidenhead on Friday it amused me greatly that the only two staff present on the platforms had located themselves on Platform 1, which for anyone unfamiliar with Maidenhead is the only platform that passengers weren't on as it is only used for about two trains per day.

Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #206 on: July 30, 2014, 12:36:51 »

Hiding out of the way on a quiet platform, or was a HST (High Speed Train) due soon for despatch, or were they doing one of these security checks that happens at the larger stations?
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
NickB
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 711


View Profile
« Reply #207 on: July 30, 2014, 13:03:59 »

They were on Platform 1 for the best part of an hour whilst I was on Platform 2/3 with a couple of hundred other passengers.
HST (High Speed Train)'s were coming in to Platform 1 and being held at signal in the platform for about 10mins a time before going onwards towards Twyford.  The doors remained locked throughout and there was no chance of a disembark on Platform 1.
Logged
BBM
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 633


View Profile
« Reply #208 on: July 30, 2014, 13:17:37 »

They were on Platform 1 for the best part of an hour whilst I was on Platform 2/3 with a couple of hundred other passengers.
HST (High Speed Train)'s were coming in to Platform 1 and being held at signal in the platform for about 10mins a time before going onwards towards Twyford.  The doors remained locked throughout and there was no chance of a disembark on Platform 1.

One of the friends with whom I shared the taxi on Friday says that one of her colleagues is adamant that a train picked her up at Maidenhead "sometime after 17.30" and she was able to alight at Twyford. According to RTT» (Real Time Trains - website) there appears to have been no Down stoppers from MAI (Maidenhead station) between 1644 and 2106. Did by any chance one of those HSTs open its doors there and at TWY (Twyford station) I wonder?

Logged
NickB
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 711


View Profile
« Reply #209 on: July 30, 2014, 13:55:59 »

Well I was on platform 2 staring at platform 1 from 16.00 until 17.30.  I'm not going to call anyone a liar, but to the best of my knowledge no one got on or off those HST (High Speed Train)'s.  The unlock/lock would have been audible to me.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 [14] 15 16 ... 18
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page