Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 09:55 20 Apr 2024
* Three men killed in retail park car crash named
- Some Wales roads to revert to 30mph after backlash
- BBC presenter reports racist abuse on London train
* Three men killed in retail park car crash identified
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
20th Apr (1789)
Opening of Sapperton Canal Tunnel

Train RunningCancelled
06:38 Weymouth to Gloucester
07:55 Bristol Temple Meads to Penzance
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
08:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
10:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
18:52 London Paddington to Great Malvern
19:19 Carmarthen to Swansea
Short Run
06:12 Penzance to London Paddington
06:40 Penzance to Cardiff Central
07:22 Exeter St Davids to Penzance
08:30 Southampton Central to Bristol Temple Meads
08:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
10:09 Gloucester to Westbury
14:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
21:07 Gloucester to Bristol Temple Meads
Delayed
07:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
08:55 Paignton to London Paddington
09:09 Gloucester to Weymouth
09:30 Weymouth to Gloucester
09:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 20, 2024, 10:07:27 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[315] Somerset and Dorset Devonshire Tunnel flood
[250] Rail to refuge / Travel to refuge
[42] Rail delay compensation payments hit £100 million
[37] Problems with the Night Riviera sleeper - December 2014 onward...
[18] Difficult to argue with e-bike/scooter rules?
[17] Signage - not making it easy ...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
Author Topic: Oxford Parkway to Marylebone (and other Chiltern Routes) timetable consultation  (Read 40256 times)
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17876


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #30 on: June 22, 2015, 17:15:35 »

Many thanks for posting that update on this topic, IndustryInsider.  Wink

It may even help to calm member Btline down ... possibly?  Roll Eyes Tongue Grin
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12357


View Profile Email
« Reply #31 on: June 23, 2015, 09:49:14 »

Very pleased to see that some of the suggestions I (and doubtless many others too) made have been taken on board.  The main one is the addition of an early 06:05 train from Bicester to Oxford Parkway calling at Islip. 

An ECS (Empty Coaching Stock) working to form the 0630 ex-Oxford Parkway (anyone discovered the 3-letter acronym yet?) being turned into a service to enable Islip commuters to board (easement allowing this) to obtain an earlier MYB (London (Marylebone)) arrival by going via Parkway. I understand this easement will apply to several trains in both directions in order to improve the number of available services.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40784



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #32 on: June 23, 2015, 10:01:05 »

[Oxford Parkway (anyone discovered the 3-letter acronym yet?)

This may just be someone's guess / something for the rumour mill, but I found "OXP"

https://foursquare.com/v/oxford-parkway-railway-station-oxp--opens-2015/50c208cefe70202788da2a32
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Oxonhutch
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1248



View Profile
« Reply #33 on: June 23, 2015, 13:04:46 »

An ECS (Empty Coaching Stock) working to form the 0630 ex-Oxford Parkway (anyone discovered the 3-letter acronym yet?) being turned into a service to enable Islip commuters to board (easement allowing this) to obtain an earlier MYB (London (Marylebone)) arrival by going via Parkway. I understand this easement will apply to several trains in both directions in order to improve the number of available services.

From my submission to Chiltern on 15-9-2014 reported on Page 1:

Quote
May I please suggest that you consider staggering the stopping times at Islip in the up and down directions so that there is a more even arrivals and departures pattern throughout the day. By way of new Routing Guide Easements, Islip customers may be encouraged to back-track via either Oxford Parkway or Bicester Town to reach their intended destination, and at a time closer to the hour their choosing.  These backward connections should be positively engineered, and very importantly, advertised.

I am glad I was not a lone voice and that the provision of easements has been taken on board.  It is most important though that these back-tracking connections via Oxford Parkway (or Bicester Village) are overtly shown on the Public Timetable as a legitimate connection - and not just the subject of a footnote or worse still, just an easement hidden in the National Routeing Guide.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12357


View Profile Email
« Reply #34 on: June 23, 2015, 13:25:57 »

AIUI (as I understand it), it's not a overall easement, just on particular trains, mainly in or close to peaks. Only via Parkway too, so mainly usable by those going to/from London. The local User Group OBRAG, is well on top of want they need locally.
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #35 on: July 02, 2015, 21:19:50 »

Well well well, that Silver train in the morning peak will be very popular! Grin Grin
Almost all seats at tables, good views from all seats, seats actually comfortable...

With this timetable, I suspect there will be a notable drop in passengers at Hanborough and Oxford stations (and Charlbury? - only a 30 minute drive).

Glad that Islip has not seen too many extra services - the overall journey time is very important!

Bring it on - if passengers on FGW (First Great Western) fall, they only have themselves to blame...
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17876


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #36 on: July 02, 2015, 23:29:08 »

It may even help to calm member Btline down ... possibly?  Roll Eyes Tongue Grin

No ... apparently, it didn't.  Roll Eyes Shocked Grin
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Andrew1939 from West Oxon
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 535


View Profile Email
« Reply #37 on: July 04, 2015, 15:43:46 »

You will be lucky to get from Hanborough to Oxford Parkway in half an hour at peak time. OK out of peak hour but can be much longer at peak hour. On the odd occasion it has taken me 35 minutes just to do the 4 miles or so from Long Hanborough to Woodstock departing at 08.10 and arriving in Woodstock at 08.45. The A4095 is congested to Bladon roundabout from 07.00 as rat runners use it to avoid the A40 to Oxford and to get to the M40 near Bicester. Then there is peak hour congestion getting either through Kidlington or on the A44. Would be Oxford Parkway users from the Witney direction will have to reckon on a 2 or 3 mile queue into Long Hanborough as well at some peak times. At the best it is a slow crawl.
I agree there will be loss of business at Hanborough to FGW (First Great Western) but this will be more off-peak and the loss will be because the 30 minute service frequency. How FGW will fight back I do not know. Off-peak Advance fares now available are very attractive but the recent relaibility and punctuality record is appalling as any regular Cotswold Line user knows.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page