Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 11:15 19 Apr 2024
* Children among nine dead in Russia strike on Ukraine
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
19th Apr (1938)
Foundation, Beatties of London (link)

Train RunningCancelled
08:48 London Paddington to Swansea
09:59 Cardiff Central to Taunton
11:23 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
12:04 Bristol Temple Meads to Filton Abbey Wood
12:54 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
Short Run
09:27 Carmarthen to London Paddington
11:10 Weston-Super-Mare to Severn Beach
16:31 Barnstaple to Axminster
Delayed
08:28 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
09:23 Swansea to London Paddington
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 19, 2024, 11:32:19 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[149] Rail to refuge / Travel to refuge
[137] Rail delay compensation payments hit £100 million
[56] Signage - not making it easy ...
[11] IETs at Melksham
[10] Ferry just cancelled - train tickets will be useless - advice?
[9] From Melksham to Tallinn (and back round The Baltic) by train
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 17 18 [19] 20 21 ... 306
  Print  
Author Topic: Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption elsewhere - ongoing, since Oct 2014  (Read 1255138 times)
NickB
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 712


View Profile
« Reply #270 on: November 04, 2014, 08:13:51 »

Where can I see that?
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7794



View Profile
« Reply #271 on: November 04, 2014, 08:41:20 »

Where can I see that?

Someone had taken a picture and put it on Twitter.
Logged
Jason
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 543


View Profile
« Reply #272 on: November 04, 2014, 09:05:32 »

Cancellations to services between Worcester Shrub Hill and Oxford

Due to poor rail conditions between Worcester Shrub Hill and Oxford all lines are blocked.

Train services running through these stations may be cancelled or delayed by up to 60 mins. An estimate for the resumption of normal services will be provided as soon as the problem has been fully assessed.

Last Updated 04/11/2014 09:00

Honeybourne would appear to be the problem spot.
Logged
Jason
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 543


View Profile
« Reply #273 on: November 04, 2014, 09:07:40 »

1749 to Worcester shrub hill was (1) announced on the train as delayed by a train problem

It must be bad luck but three times in the last few weeks I've planned to board this service at Paddington only for it to fail or leave late due to attendance of fitters.
Logged
BBM
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 634


View Profile
« Reply #274 on: November 04, 2014, 09:16:07 »

Cancellations to services between Worcester Shrub Hill and Oxford

Due to poor rail conditions between Worcester Shrub Hill and Oxford all lines are blocked.

Interesting note on RTT» (Real Time Trains - website) for the 0648 from PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains) to Great Malvern which appears to have only got as far as Moreton-in-Marsh:

http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/C40903/2014/11/04/advanced

Quote from: Real Time Trains
This service was cancelled between Moreton-in-Marsh and Great Malvern due to it being Autumn (TT).

 Grin
Logged
NickB
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 712


View Profile
« Reply #275 on: November 04, 2014, 09:24:13 »

18.18 to oxford is dangerously overcrowded.  Angry

I've seen the pictures of this service on arrival at Maidenhead (I think)- absolutely unbelievable, must be close to worst overcrowding ever on a single service?

Yes, the 18.18 came in on Platform 1 rather than Platform 3.  Lets face it, neither platform can adequately cope with the quantity of passengers on an overcrowded 18.18 but Platform 1 is definitely worst.
Overcrowding was such that passengers couldn't actually get off the train due to numbers on the platform.  There was much jostling and the chance of someone taking a slip down the gap was high - people were having to push themselves away from the train.  There was certainly no gap between crowds and train before the doors were shut and the train departed.  Being half-term (it seems) there were a number of small children in the crowd too.

No platform staff at all.



Logged
johoare
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2818


View Profile
« Reply #276 on: November 04, 2014, 10:24:06 »

I can't obviously see the picture on twitter.. Did they put it against @FGW (First Great Western)?
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7794



View Profile
« Reply #277 on: November 04, 2014, 12:49:11 »

I can't obviously see the picture on twitter.. Did they put it against @FGW (First Great Western)?

Yes just after 7pm last night......also read on Twitter that one very busy train went straight through Maidenhead without stopping last night due to driver error?
Logged
johoare
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2818


View Profile
« Reply #278 on: November 04, 2014, 17:11:49 »

Any chance of putting a link on here? Twitter is obviously being selective over what I am allowed to see and what I'm not :-)
Logged
johoare
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2818


View Profile
« Reply #279 on: November 04, 2014, 17:52:58 »

Found it now.. no thanks to twitter  Roll Eyes

And that is what happens when you try and get two busy trains worth of people onto one of those two trains.. That train was at Maidenhead for 3 minutes according to realtime trains.. 3 minutes worth of people getting off a train is quite a lot.. I'm really glad I didn't try and get on it in the first place, especially as I got back at the same time but in relative (if not slow and tortuous) comfort..

Which reminds me.. The train I was on had working air-con.. finally.. just in time for winter  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7794



View Profile
« Reply #280 on: November 04, 2014, 18:21:05 »

Found it now.. no thanks to twitter  Roll Eyes

And that is what happens when you try and get two busy trains worth of people onto one of those two trains.. That train was at Maidenhead for 3 minutes according to realtime trains.. 3 minutes worth of people getting off a train is quite a lot.. I'm really glad I didn't try and get on it in the first place, especially as I got back at the same time but in relative (if not slow and tortuous) comfort..

Which reminds me.. The train I was on had working air-con.. finally.. just in time for winter  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Absolutely shocking that there were no staff on the platform  - one of these days there will be a tragedy.....FGW (First Great Western) simply have to take responsibility for ensuring that trains are not crush loaded to dangerous proportions......and  yes OK maybe people should sometimes go for a pint and wait until things quieten down a bit rather than trying to cram on but at the moment with the service as flaky as it is on a daily basis that isn't practical - responsibility overall for safety sits fairly and squarely with FGW.
Logged
johoare
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2818


View Profile
« Reply #281 on: November 04, 2014, 18:27:32 »

Realtime trains showed it as swapping from platform 3 to 1 not long before it arrived so I expect the staff didn't know either until it was too late.. It's not easy to get up the stairs to platform 1 when hundreds of people are descending even had they tried once they were aware..

At least there is also a step free exit into the Shoppenhangers road car park from platform 1.. Although it looks like most people preferred to wait for the stairs
Logged
NickB
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 712


View Profile
« Reply #282 on: November 04, 2014, 18:32:55 »

Any chance of posting the pic, or a link to it?

Only a handful of people went to shoppenhangars (incl me) as the crowd was too big to pass on the platform.
To put things in context I walked the full length of the 5/6 car service which had been filled to bursting with people standing in between seats. If there were 50 on the whole train after maidenhead id be gobsmacked.
So who's good at maths and estimating the Maidenhead passengers on board?? Wink
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40784



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #283 on: November 04, 2014, 19:11:20 »

To put things in context I walked the full length of the 5/6 car service which had been filled to bursting with people standing in between seats. If there were 50 on the whole train after maidenhead id be gobsmacked.

Logically, that leads to some very interesting thoughts ... if there's empty seats beyond [name place] on the trip out from London, why not split the train and send the extra carriages back to strengthen another train - resulting in more seats out of London.    I know I'm going to get shot down on time taken to split and join trains, line capacity issues, ... but it's an interesting thought.  And perhaps something that will be borne in mind for whole trains rather than just parts of them come service recasts/
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6298


View Profile
« Reply #284 on: November 04, 2014, 19:27:20 »


The train I was on had working air-con.. finally.. just in time for winter  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Good for stopping the windows getting steamed up so you can see out of them  Wink...I'll get my coat.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 17 18 [19] 20 21 ... 306
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page