Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 23:35 19 Apr 2024
- Some Wales roads to revert to 30mph after backlash
- BBC presenter reports racist abuse on London train
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
19th Apr (1938)
Foundation, Beatties of London (link)

Train RunningDelayed
22:00 Hereford to London Paddington
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 19, 2024, 23:35:46 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[282] Rail to refuge / Travel to refuge
[233] Somerset and Dorset Devonshire Tunnel flood
[48] Rail delay compensation payments hit £100 million
[42] Problems with the Night Riviera sleeper - December 2014 onward...
[20] Difficult to argue with e-bike/scooter rules?
[19] Signage - not making it easy ...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 60 61 [62] 63 64 ... 306
  Print  
Author Topic: Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption elsewhere - ongoing, since Oct 2014  (Read 1255387 times)
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12357


View Profile Email
« Reply #915 on: September 12, 2015, 12:29:44 »

Indeed, NR» (Network Rail - home page) pit their name to apology notices when their side goes seriously tits-up
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5408



View Profile
« Reply #916 on: September 19, 2015, 15:31:06 »

Not looking good for this evenings rush hour. Signal failure between Paddington and Slough resulting in numerous cancellations or trains serving only part of the route.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
johoare
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2818


View Profile
« Reply #917 on: September 20, 2015, 16:32:52 »

There was also a signal failure at Hanwell yesterday morning.. I got the 12.17 from Maidenhead to Paddington which left half an hour or more late.. By the time we left Slough we were full up so the remaining stops were interesting to say the least. We left lots of people behind.

I was on the 19.57 home. There appeared to be some good planning that had gone on. The 19.42 was advertised first.. Once the hordes had sprinted off (most of them literally) to platform 13 the 19.57 was announced and left Paddington virtually empty (I was with my children and we had a carriage to ourselves). The 19.42 had already gone but we were allowed to pass it. The 19.57 was advertised as first stop Hayes and Harlington but was also (it appears) scheduled to pick up only at Ealing Broadway. This meant the people there had more than enough room (just) to get on the train and that the 19.42 which was already full didn't leave people at Ealing Broadway behind..

Hopefully the issues are all sorted out now before tomorrow's commute.
Logged
Jason
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 543


View Profile
« Reply #918 on: September 21, 2015, 08:16:55 »

Train failure outside Paddington. I've already lost 22 minutes since leaving Reading on a direct service.
Logged
lordgoata
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 415



View Profile
« Reply #919 on: September 21, 2015, 11:21:07 »

And the 07:38 from Goring was 17 minutes late due to waiting for a freight train at Didcot Parkway, according to the driver announcement. Time for a Didcot Viaduct ?  Grin
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40784



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #920 on: September 21, 2015, 11:28:36 »

Time for a Didcot Viaduct ?  Grin

Many a true word spoke in jest.  Next pinch point Didcot, then Royal Wootton Bassett ...
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Adelante_CCT
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1314



View Profile
« Reply #921 on: September 21, 2015, 12:50:12 »

And the 07:38 from Goring was 17 minutes late due to waiting for a freight train at Didcot Parkway, according to the driver announcement. Time for a Didcot Viaduct ?  Grin

It appears there was a problem with the freight loco between Oxford and Didcot so a Didcot flyover wouldn't have helped. Though 4 tracking the section might  Wink
Logged
lordgoata
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 415



View Profile
« Reply #922 on: September 21, 2015, 15:35:05 »

And the 07:38 from Goring was 17 minutes late due to waiting for a freight train at Didcot Parkway, according to the driver announcement. Time for a Didcot Viaduct ?  Grin

It appears there was a problem with the freight loco between Oxford and Didcot so a Didcot flyover wouldn't have helped. Though 4 tracking the section might  Wink

I'd prefer banning freight at peak times, but maybe that's just me  Cheesy
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #923 on: September 21, 2015, 23:59:25 »

I remember hearing a Junior Transport Minister saying, at the time of privatisation, that if a freight company was prepared to pay for a path from Willesden to Tillbury, which involves crossing all 4 of the GE lines around Stratford, during the rush hour then that was OK. This was to be the new competitive railway 
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40784



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #924 on: September 22, 2015, 08:43:08 »

I remember hearing a Junior Transport Minister saying, at the time of privatisation, that if a freight company was prepared to pay for a path from Willesden to Tillbury, which involves crossing all 4 of the GE lines around Stratford, during the rush hour then that was OK. This was to be the new competitive railway 

Side question (I may split into a separate thread) ... how are "runs as required" freight paths priced / charged?   I probably need to ask in general to avoid getting a "commercial in confidence" answer, but looking at a Monday to Friday "Q" path which in practise runs less than 10 times a year ... is it paid for 10 times, or 250 times?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Worcester_Passenger
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1720


View Profile
« Reply #925 on: September 22, 2015, 10:26:09 »

And the 07:38 from Goring was 17 minutes late due to waiting for a freight train at Didcot Parkway, according to the driver announcement. Time for a Didcot Viaduct ?  Grin

It appears there was a problem with the freight loco between Oxford and Didcot so a Didcot flyover wouldn't have helped. Though 4 tracking the section might  Wink

I'd prefer banning freight at peak times, but maybe that's just me  Cheesy

Didn't the Southern Railway have a policy of running freight at night?
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #926 on: September 22, 2015, 16:09:16 »

In the mid 60 s the Central Division used to work their 33s hard.
Newspapers to Brighton early morning
Pass to Victoria or London Bridge via Uckfield.
ECS (Empty Coaching Stock) to New Cross Gate or Stewarts Lane
Light Norwood Yard
Freight to Willsden or OOC (Old Oak Common (depot)) via West London Line or Ferme Park via Widenened lines.
Return freight to Norwood
Light to New Cross Gate or Stewarts Lane
ECS Victoria or London Bridge
Pass Brighton via Uckfiled
Vans to London and start cycle again.
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7163


View Profile
« Reply #927 on: September 22, 2015, 22:38:55 »

I'd prefer banning freight at peak times, but maybe that's just me  Cheesy

If you read the Route Studies, there are a lot of statements implying that a few freight paths present in the off-peak timetable are displaced by extra passenger services in the peak. That sounds like common sense, but I can't see anything in the Western RS, or elsewhere, that states this is what happens, and how it is managed. For example, for each path per hour off-peak, how many are available per day? How much of a freight path is over a part of the line that has a peak?

There are also several lines where extra loops are proposed as a way of coping with a mix of traffic including relatively slow freight trains. And, however much freight paths are reduced in the peaks now, one thing is clear from the study - there will need to be more of it in the future.

To see the other side of this - and everything has another side - see DB» (Deutsche Bahn - German State Railway - about) Schenker's consulation submission after the draft WRS (Western Route Study - Network Rail's successor to the RUS). Its tone is rather plaintive - "why is everyone ignoring us" - but it does explain the limits of some of these measures. Like most of the "working group and board" submissions, it appears to restate their inputs to the study that were not taken into account in the draft. I can't see that they are in the final version either.
Logged
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6438


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #928 on: September 26, 2015, 23:19:19 »


It appears there was a problem with the freight loco between Oxford and Didcot so a Didcot flyover wouldn't have helped. Though 4 tracking the section might  Wink

Mission creep, maybe, but I'm up for that...
Logged

Now, please!
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4362


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #929 on: September 27, 2015, 08:58:42 »

And the 07:38 from Goring was 17 minutes late due to waiting for a freight train at Didcot Parkway, according to the driver announcement. Time for a Didcot Viaduct ?  Grin

It appears there was a problem with the freight loco between Oxford and Didcot so a Didcot flyover wouldn't have helped. Though 4 tracking the section might  Wink

I'd prefer banning freight at peak times, but maybe that's just me  Cheesy

The railways were built as freight movers ............... people moving was and after thought.

There is space for both, the UK (United Kingdom) railways have managed for almost two centauries mixing freight and passenger trains on a congested network
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 60 61 [62] 63 64 ... 306
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page