Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 12:15 28 Mar 2024
* Man held over stabbing in front of train passengers
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1988)
Formal end to carrying coffins by BR (link)

Train RunningCancelled
10:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
10:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
10:41 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
11:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
11:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
11:23 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
11:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
11:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
Additional 12:07 Bristol Temple Meads to Gloucester
12:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
12:17 Westbury to Swindon
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
13:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
06:00 London Paddington to Penzance
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
09:30 Weymouth to Gloucester
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
11:12 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
11:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
11:41 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:12 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:07 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
Delayed
08:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
09:51 Warminster to Gloucester
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 12:18:58 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[161] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[91] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[62] Return of the BRUTE?
[53] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[49] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[38] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Class 180 Adelantes future confirmed  (Read 10624 times)
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« on: October 07, 2014, 12:48:33 »

Grand Central have gone public with their anticipated change to wholly 180 operation.   They are taking on FGW (First Great Western)'s 5 units from 2017, and it is implied they're  ditching their 3 short HSTs (High Speed Train).

Quote
Grand Central Rail has signed a lease with Angel Trains for a further five Class 180 trains which, along with the company^s existing five Class 180 services will be seen on the rails from 2017. Having two additional trains in the fleet ^ a 25% increase on current arrangements - will allow Grand Central Rail to be more robust and flexible in terms of train maintenance and capacity. Following a refurbishment of the fleet, Grand Central will work with Network Rail with the aim of increasing the number of seats available on its busiest services.

http://www.grandcentralrail.com/about-us/news-press/^78m-investments-are-just-the-ticket/

Paul

Logged
a-driver
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 965


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: October 11, 2014, 20:19:52 »

Grand Central have gone public with their anticipated change to wholly 180 operation.   They are taking on FGW (First Great Western)'s 5 units from 2017, and it is implied they're  ditching their 3 short HSTs (High Speed Train).

Quote
Grand Central Rail has signed a lease with Angel Trains for a further five Class 180 trains which, along with the company^s existing five Class 180 services will be seen on the rails from 2017. Having two additional trains in the fleet ^ a 25% increase on current arrangements - will allow Grand Central Rail to be more robust and flexible in terms of train maintenance and capacity. Following a refurbishment of the fleet, Grand Central will work with Network Rail with the aim of increasing the number of seats available on its busiest services.


http://www.grandcentralrail.com/about-us/news-press/^78m-investments-are-just-the-ticket/

Paul


By which time FGW *should* have the IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.) trains in service which will take over from the 180's on the Cotswolds. 
The current 180s cost FGW a fortune just to keep serviceable. 
Logged
Oberon
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 186


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: October 14, 2014, 15:40:29 »

The latest issue of RAIL magazine reports five Adelantes are to leave Great Western and go to Grand Central in 2017. Presumably these are units currently utilised on the Cotswold Line services. After they've gone does anybody have any idea what will take their place on Worcester/Hereford services from Paddington?
Logged
Network SouthEast
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 492



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: October 14, 2014, 16:07:19 »

IEPs (Intercity Express Program / Project.) will take over Cotswold line services.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: October 14, 2014, 18:43:52 »

Specifically bi-modes
Logged
Rhydgaled
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1500


View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: October 14, 2014, 19:26:37 »

Specifically bi-modes
Which (for Great Western) are currently all planned to be just 5-car, and will be replacing the IC125s on the Cotswolds not just the 180s.
Logged

----------------------------
Don't DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7155


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: October 14, 2014, 19:47:36 »

Specifically bi-modes
Which (for Great Western) are currently all planned to be just 5-car, and will be replacing the IC125s on the Cotswolds not just the 180s.

On page 240 of the Western Route Study Draft f October 2014 or Consultation, in Appendix B
Rolling stock assumptions
it lists the bimodes as:
NameClassDescriptionAssumed capacityLocation/service assumed to
operate in 2019 ITSS
10-car bi-mode IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project.)SET (Super Express Train (now IET))Super Express Train - two Electric Multiple Units
with five carriages fitted with diesel engines to
operate on routes without electrification coupled
together to form a train with ten carriages
Seats: 630 Seats
+ standing: 756
Hereford via Oxford to London Paddington,
Cheltenham via Kemble to London Paddington

AFAIK (as far as I know), that's always been the party line - 10-car trains that can run half-length out of the peak if you are sure they won't get to full.

Of course you may still suspect there won't be enough 10-car trains. And you may also wonder how well they will serve short platforms.
Logged
IanL
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 348


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: October 14, 2014, 19:55:50 »

Could this be added to the thread already started a few days ago in the Cotswold lines section?
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: October 14, 2014, 20:05:42 »

Which (for Great Western) are currently all planned to be just 5-car, and will be replacing the IC125s on the Cotswolds not just the 180s.

Is this strictly relevant to the simple matter of the 180s leaving the franchise?   Or do you have to go on about IEPs (Intercity Express Program / Project.) not being long enough in every possible rolling stock thread?

Why will a 5 car IEP be any worse than a 5 car 180?

Paul
Logged
jdw.wor
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
******
Posts: 108


View Profile Email
« Reply #9 on: October 14, 2014, 20:16:19 »

The problem is when a 5 car replaces a HST (High Speed Train) in the rush hours
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: October 14, 2014, 20:47:58 »

The problem is when a 5 car replaces a HST (High Speed Train) in the rush hours

But that isn't a problem that will necessarily increase due to the transfer of the 180s elsewhere is it?

Paul
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #11 on: October 14, 2014, 20:50:26 »

It won't - see above from the Western Route Study...2 x5cars in the peaks.

Mods - can we shorten Western Route Study to WRS (Western Route Study - Network Rail's successor to the RUS)?
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17865


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #12 on: October 14, 2014, 22:25:50 »

Could this be added to the thread already started a few days ago in the Cotswold lines section?

Yes: now done.  Wink

Mods - can we shorten Western Route Study to WRS (Western Route Study - Network Rail's successor to the RUS)?

Yes - I'll add it to our 'acronyms and abbreviations' page.  Smiley
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #13 on: October 15, 2014, 10:23:04 »

Back in the 60s when I was on the Southern it was easy we ran 1 Unit 4 car trains  off peak and 2 units 8 car ( 3 units 10 car on the South Eastern) in the peak. However, it did lead to lots of coupling and uncoupling and lots of units standing idle during the day.

Now we seem to have to thrash every unit all day every day so there are no spares for peak strengthening. This  leads to another dilemma how long do you make your base unit. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 maybe 6?

Do you have long units 8,9,10,11 possibly 12, For heavy peaks?

There is also the reluctance to have corridors between units so that when 2 or more are copuled togther you have in effect two or more trains for revenue collection etc.
 
In many cases, not allowing for growth, a single car 153 is enough on some lines Off Peak, whereas say on Cross Country even a 5 car Voyager can be packed in the so called off peak.

There seems to me no solution unless DfT» (Department for Transport - about) can be convinced that it better to have some (more)  spares for strengthening, covering failures, specials etc, plus meaning the rest of the fleet has to be less intensively used.

Plus any unit should be able to couple and work in multiple with any other unit and have corridor connections.

Too expensive? Not in the long term. unit reliability increases with less intensive use, more people get seats in the peak and hopefully continue using the train, passenger growth can be catered for, units will have universal coverage so you won't have the problem of 165s movng to Britol and being incoompatible with 15Xs
Logged
Rhydgaled
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1500


View Profile WWW
« Reply #14 on: October 16, 2014, 13:19:27 »

Which (for Great Western) are currently all planned to be just 5-car, and will be replacing the IC125s on the Cotswolds not just the 180s.

Is this strictly relevant to the simple matter of the 180s leaving the franchise?   Or do you have to go on about IEPs (Intercity Express Program / Project.) not being long enough in every possible rolling stock thread?

Why will a 5 car IEP be any worse than a 5 car 180?

Paul
Is it strictly relevant? No, I suppose not, fair point. A 5-car IEP probably has more pluses than a 180, but the Cotswolds line is not soley worked by 180s. To keep myself from wandering further off-topic, I have added some detail and replied to some of the IEP-related comments here.
Logged

----------------------------
Don't DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page